EDRS 6004: Applied Research in Education

Poster  Presentation  Scoring  Rubric  

 
Examiner’s  Name:     Score  Key:    
Presenter’s  Name:   0  =  No  Attempt  
Poster  Title:       ________________________________________   1  =  Developing  
Poster  Research  Category:    Scholarly/  Theoretical  Study   2  =  Competent  
3  =  Exemplary  
         
Please  rate  the  poster/presenter  from  0  to  3  on  each  of  the  following  (circle  one):  

1.      Statement  of  Research  Problem/Rationale:          

a)      Clearly  stated  questions/  objectives  being  addressed   0   1   2   3  
b)      Well-­‐explained  rationale/justification  for  the  study   0   1   2   3  
c)      Study  purpose  is  clearly   outlined   0   1   2   3  
2.      Literature  Review/Background  Theory:          
a)      Relevant  previous  work  reviewed   0   1   2   3  
b)      Appropriate  theoretical  /conceptual  framework  presented   0   1   2   3  
c)       Explanation  is  succinct  and  comprehensive   0   1   2   3  
3.  Discussion:          
a) Clearly  presents  main  arguments   0   1   2   3  
b.
b) Addresses   study’s  
c)      Discussion   problem/purposes  
placed    
into  broader  framework   0   1   2   3  
c)  Supported  by  critical  analysis   0   1   2   3  
4.      Conclusion/s                
a) Clearly  stated   0   1   2   3  
b)
b) Relate/s  
Re   to  questions/  objectives  being  addressed   0   1   2   3  
c) Importance/  implications  of  study  is  addressed   0   1   2   3  
c) Re  
 
5.  
     Presentation  Overall:  
       
a)  
     Effective  overall  aesthetic/organization  of  poster   0   1   2   3  
b)  
     Flow  of  information  is  logical  and  facilitates  understanding   0   1   2   3  
c)        Tables  /figures  are  appropriate  and  used  effectively   0   1   2   3  
d.        c.References  
  are  cited  appropriately  (APA  6th  Edition)   0   1   2   3  
e)      d.   of  poster  summary  (by  presenter)  was  appropriate  
Length   0   1   2   3  
6.      ORAL  DISCOURSE  (Explanation/Appropriateness):  
   
a)      Clear  understanding  of  relevant  context  literature                                                                                     0   1   2   3  
b)      Presenter  answered  questions  well   0   1   2   3  
c)      Gap/s  in  knowledge/exploration  identified   0   1   2   3  
d)      Analytic  discourse  is  presented  clearly  and  accurately   0   1   2   3  
e)      Presenter  summarized  study  clearly   0   1   2   3  
         
 
Total     /  66  

Comments: