Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E
vapoa
r
t nspa
ir io
t n
E
vapoa
r io
t n Tr
a nspr
iao
t
in
O
penwae
t r S
oli V
egsu
. a
f
r ces P
a
lns
t
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
• 2.3.1 DEFINITIONS
Kc
Ks
FACTORS THAT AFFECT
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
Weather parameters, Crop Characteristics,
Management and Environmental aspects are
factors affecting ET
• Crop Height
Management and Environmental
Factors
Factors such as
• soil salinity,
• Poor land fertility,
• Limited application of fertilizers,
• Absence of control of diseases and
• Pests and poor soil management
may limit the crop development and reduce soil
evapotranspiration.
• Other factors that affect ET are ground cover, plant density and
soil water content. The effect of soil water content on ET is
conditioned primarily by the magnitude of the water deficit and
the type of soil. Too much water will result in waterlogging
which might damage the root and limit root water uptake by
inhibiting respiration.
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
CONCEPTS
• (a) Reference Crop Evapotranspiration (ETo):
Used by FAO.
• This is ET rate from a reference plant e.g. grass or alfalfa, not
short of water and is denoted as ETo. The ET of other crops
can be related to the ET of the reference plant.
• ETo is a climatic parameter as it is only affected by climatic
factors.
• The FAO Penman-Monteith method is recommended as the
sole method for determining ETo. The method has been
selected because it closely approximates grass ETo at the
location evaluated, is physically based, and explicitly
incorporates both physiological and aerodynamic parameters.
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
▪ Lysimeters
ET Computed from
Meteorological Data:
• ET is commonly computed from weather data. A large number
of empirical equations have been developed for assessing crop
or reference crop evapotranspiration from weather data. Some
of these methods include the Blaney-Criddle, Penman,
Thornthwaite, Radiation, Hargreaves, Turc and many others.
Most of these methods have been found to only work in specific
locations.
• Following an Expert Consultation by Food and Agriculture
Organization in May 1990, the FAO Penman-Monteith method
is now recommended as the standard method for the definition
and computation of the reference evapotranspiration. The FAO
Penman-Monteith equation is described in the Notes.
ET Estimated from Evaporation
Pans:
• Evaporation from an open water surface provides an
index of integrated effect of radiation, air
temperature, air humidity and wind on
evapotranspiration. However, differences in the
water and cropped surface produce significant
differences in the water loss from an open surface
and the crop. The pan is used to estimate reference
ETo by observing the evaporation loss from a water
surface (Epan) and applying empirical coefficients
(Kpan)to relate pan evaporation to Eto thus:
• ETo = Kp x Epan
EVAPORATION
Pan-Evaporation Approach
E = W – (V2 – V1)
Types of Evaporation Pans
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
where
55 .17 .21 .26 .32 .36 .39 .38 .33 .28 .23 .18 .16
50 .19 .23 .27 .31 .34 .36 .35 .32 .28 .24 .20 .18
45 .20 .23 .27 .30 .34 .35 .34 .32 .28 .24 .21 .20
40 .22 .24 .27 .30 .32 .34 .33 .31 .28 .25 .22 .21
35 .23 .25 .27 .29 .31 .32 .32 .30 .28 .25 .23 .22
30 .24 .25 .27 .29 .31 .32 .31 .30 .28 .26 .24 .23
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
To calculate ET:
ET = p (0.46 T mean + 8)
ET × Kc = ET crop
Barley/Oats/Wh 120 15 25 50 30
eat
150 15 30 65 40
Bean/green 75 15 25 25 10
90 20 30 30 10
Bean/dry 95 15 25 35 20
110 20 30 40 20
Cabbage 120 20 25 60 15
140 25 30 65 20
Carrot 100 20 30 30 20
150 25 35 70 20
Cotton/Flax 180 30 50 55 45
195 30 50 65 50
Cucumber 105 20 30 40 15
130 25 35 50 20
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
Per crop, four crop factors (Kc) have to be determined: one
crop factor for each of the four growth stages.
Crop Initial Crop dev. Mid-season Late season
stage stage stage stage
Barley/Oats/W 0.35 0.75 1.15 0.45
heat
Bean, green 0.35 0.70 1.10 0.90
Bean, dry 0.35 0.70 1.10 0.30
Cabbage/Carro 0.45 0.75 1.05 0.90
t
Cotton/Flax 0.45 0.75 1.15 0.75
Cucumber/Squ 0.45 0.70 0.90 0.75
ash
Eggplant/Tomat 0.45 0.75 1.15 0.80
o
Grain/small 0.35 0.75 1.10 0.65
Lentil/Pulses 0.45 0.75 1.10 0.50
Lettuce/Spinac 0.45 0.60 1.00 0.90
h
Maize, sweet 0.40 0.80 1.15 1.00
Maize, grain 0.40 0.80 1.15 0.70
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
QUESTION:
GIVEN:
It can be seen from the table above that the months and growth stages do not
correspond. As a consequence the ETo and the Kc values do not correspond.
Yet the ET crop (= ET × Kc) has to be determined on a monthly basis. It is thus
necessary to determine the Kc on a monthly basis, which is done as follows:
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
where
ETo is the Penman-Monteith reference or potential evapotranspiration,
is slope of the vapor pressure curve,
Rn is net radiation,
G is soil heat flux density,
is psychrometric constant,
T is mean daily air temperature at 2-m height,
u2 is wind speed at 2-m height,
es is the saturated vapor pressure and
ea is the actual vapor pressure.
NET IRRIGATION
REQUIREMENT (Nir)
• This is the moisture that must be supplied by irrigation to satisfy
evapotranspiration plus that needed for leaching and not
supplied by off-season storage, and the effects of precipitation
and groundwater storage.
• Nir = ET + Wl - Ws - Re
It is equivalent to:
120 /1000 mm x 10,000 m2 =
1200 m 3 per hectare.
2.8.2 Irrigation Interval (II):
• This is the time between successive
irrigations.
• Irrigation interval is equal to:
• Readily Available Moisture or Net Irrigation divided by
Evapotranspiration, ET
• The shortest irrigation interval is normally use in
design. The irrigation interval varies with ET.
• It is equivalent to Readily Available Water divided by the
Peak ET
Example 2
• For the Last Example. the Peak ET is
7.5 mm/day, Determine the Shortest
Irrigation Interval.
1 2 4 5 7 9 10
3 6 8
Qc = A. d
F. H . Ea
Where:
•Qc is the Desired Design Capacity;
•d is the Net Irrigation Depth = Readily Available Moisture;
•F is the number of Days to complete the Irrigation (Irrigation Period);
•H is the number of Hours the System is perated (hrs/day) and
• Ea is the Irrigation Efficiency
Example 3
• A 12-hectare field is to be irrigated with a sprinkler
system. The root zone depth is 0.9 m and the field
capacity of the soil is 28% while the permanent
wilting point is 17% by weight. The soil bulk density
is 1.36 g/cm and the water application efficiency is
70%. The soil is to be irrigated when 50% of the
available water has depleted. The peak
evapotranspiration is 5.0 mm/day and the system is
to be run for 10 hours in a day.
• Determine: (i) The net irrigation depth
• (ii) Gross irrigation ie. the depth of water to be pumped
• (iii) Irrigation period
• (iv) Area to be irrigated per day and (v)
• the system capacity.
Solution to Example 3
• Solution: Field Capacity = 28%; Permanent
Wilting Point = 17%
• ie. Available Moisture = 28 - 17 = 11% , which is
Pm
• Root zone depth = 0.9 m;
• Bulk density = 1.36 g/cm3
• Depth of Available Moisture, = Pm . Db. D
• = 0.11 x 1.36 x 900 = 135 mm
• Allowing for 50 % depletion of Available Moisture
before Irrigation, Depth of Readily Available Moisture
= 0.5 x 135 mm = 67.5 mm
Solution of Example 3 Contd.
• i) Net irrigation depth = Depth of the Readily Available
Moisture = 67.5 mm
Farm
Wd
Water lost by evap
And seepage Ws
Stream
Application Efficiency
Water in root zone after irrigation
Ea =
Total volume of water applied
• = 96,000/144,000 = 66.7%.
Example 5
• 45 m3 of water was pumped into a farm distribution
system. 38 m3 of water is delivered to a turn out (at
head ditch) which is 2 km from the well. Compute the
Conveyance Efficiency.
Solution:
Water delivered to the Farm (Wd )
Ec =
Water of water diverted from a stream, reservoir or well (Ws )
= 38/45 = 84%
Water Storage Efficiency (Es)
Volume of water in the root zone after irrigation
Es =
Volume of water needed in root zone to avoid total water moisture depletion
Water Use Efficiency
• Y – yield
IRRIGATION SCHEDULING