Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_______________________
A Thesis
Presented to the Faculty of the
Senior High School
SAINT MARY ACADEMY OF GUINDULMAN, BOHOL, INC.
Tabajan, Guindulman, Bohol
_______________________
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the
Senior High School Academic Track
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
_______________________
REYES, CHARO
TIMBAL, MAYET
TIU, KIERLELEAZAR
May 2023
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Researchers
2
DEDICATION
who made this journey possible with their unwavering support and
forming the significant conclusions that this study was built on.
To our mentors, our research subject teacher Ms. Mae Charlette R. Bulias
and our thesis adviser, Ms. Maria Catrena Llemit. Throughout our study journey,
work were put into the successful completion of this study, which enhanced its
Above all, we are truly grateful to Almighty God and Blessed Mary for her
intercession. Her grace and guidance gave us courage and insight, motivating us
The Researcher
3
ABSTRACT
today’s society. It can often times leave students unable to escape their abilities
and leave them feeling alone and helpless. In our research, having a better
whether they are the one being bullied or doing the bullying. This case is
officer has a responsibility to act as an instrument for students who have been
the victims of cyberbullying. This study aims to evaluate and critically analyze the
Inc. The method used by the researchers in this study is the descriptive-survey
Word to collect the data. The questionnaire was distributed through a room-to-
room survey to the respondents to this study. The percentage, weighted mean,
and Square Contingency Test are the formulas utilized statistically to evaluate
the data acquired. The result of this study identified that there is no significant
relationship between school officers and cyber bullyuing cases among the grade
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgement …………………………………………. ii
Abstract …………………………………………. iv
Chapter 1 :
Rationale ………………. 1
THE PROBLEM
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Design ………………. 16
Environment ………………. 16
Participants ………………. 17
Instrument ………………. 17
5
Procedures ………………. 18
CHAPTER 2 :
CHAPTER 3 :
Conclusion ……………….
Recommendation ……………….
References ……………….
APPENDICES
LIST OF TABLES
6
LIST OF FIGURES
7
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Rationale
target another person. Online threats and mean, aggressive, or rude texts,
also includes photos, messages, or pages that don’t get taken down, even after
the person has been asked to do so. In other words, it’s anything that gets
posted online and it’s meant to hurt, harass, or upset someone else. (1:2022)
France, Greece, Hungary Italy, Poland, and Spain), it was shown that being both
a victim and a bully is more prevalent there than in Spain. Boys are more likely
than girls to engage in actions that are considered cyberbullying in all the nations
that were analyzed. More often than not, the scope of the acts classified as cyber
et al., 2019), the scale of the activities characterized as cyber bullying experience
to emphasize at the very beginning that the scale of the phenomenon changes
8
due to different methodological assumptions 9construction of questions,
anticipation strategies are also important factors that differentiate the scale
shaped and is continuing to shape the world today. Today’s students use these
platforms extensively, which has unluckily increased the intensity and prevalence
the aim of this problem is to examine the Efficiency of the school officers or
school leaders Facility towards the cyber bullying cases in school. (3:2020)
LITERATURE BACKGROUND
today’s society. It can often times leave students unable to escape their abilities
and leave them feeling alone and helpless. Faucher, Jackson, and
Cassidy( 2014) performed a study had been the victims of cyberbullying over the
last twelve months. These shocking numbers show that nearly one in every four
people have been the victims of this phenomenon. This statistics is interesting
however because when compared to studies that were done amongst younger
age students you see that the numbers are drastically different. Wegge,
Vandebosch, and Eggermont (2014) found that among 1458 people, 13-14 year
9
old students that considerably less students reported being cyberbullied.
(4:2014)
in students as they get older. Wegge et al. (2014) also noted that 30.8 percent
had been victims of traditional bullying. This is true across multiple studies.
Weggeet al. (2014) also concluded that people who were bullied in traditional
Faucher et al. (2014) also found similar results claiming that male and female
students decided to bully people online because they were bullied first. Research
has also been done that looks at how the bullies find their victims.
found that 27 percent were in the same grade, 14.2 percent were in different
grades and a staggering 48.6 percent were not schoolmates of the bullies. This
evidence somewhat and at home because it shows that nearly half of the bullies
prefer to bully people they don’t go to school with and possibly do not know at all.
This continues to build and add to the idea of cyberbullying in that it allows bullies
to create their own personas and images in order to try and intimidate and
Effects of Cyberbullying
While the platforms used are different the lasting effects that the bullying
has on the victims are very similar, faucher et al. (2014) concluded that one of
the main effects that cyberbullies had on university students was that they were
unable to accomplish some of their school assignments. While many people think
10
of effects of bullying to be simply depression or low esteem, this study brought
Forms of Cyberbullying
extensive research done on cell phones and the role they play oni the act of
cyber bullying. Abele et al. (2013) studied various aspects of mobile phone
bullying and found that the most prevalent type was gossiping via text message.
Abele et al. (2013) also found that girls were more often than not the perpetrators
of gossiping while boys made slightly more threats via cell phones. This numbers
tend lean towards the stereotype of females being more of gossipers and males
generally being more aggressive and physical. This is also interesting because
this shows that society’s stereotypes appear to remain true even in a cyberworld.
(7:2013)
Forms of cyberbullying.
11
various aspects of mobile phone bullying
and found that the most prevalent type
was gossiping
via text message, followed by gossiping
over the phone, and concluded with
threatening
others over text message. Abeele et al.
(2013) also found that girls were more
often than not
the perpetrators of gossiping while boys
made slightly more threats via cell phone.
This
numbers tend lean towards the stereotype
of females being more of gossipers and
males
generally being more aggressive and
physical. This is also interesting because
shows that that
society’s stereotypes appear to remain
true even in a cyberworld.
12
Forms of cyberbullying.
13
numbers tend lean towards the stereotype
of females being more of gossipers and
males
generally being more aggressive and
physical. This is also interesting because
shows that that
society’s stereotypes appear to remain
true even in a cyberworld.
Faucher, C., Jackson, M., & Cassidy,
W. (2014). Cyberbullying among
University
Students: Gendered Experiences, Impacts,
and Perspectives. Education Research
International, 1. doi:10.1155/2014/69854
14
hostile manner (Stopbullying.gov, 2014). Information and communication
technology includes the use of email, text message via mobile and social
surveyed 10,008 teenagers and young people aged 13–22 years old. They found
the sample that used Facebook, 54% had experienced cyberbullying. Survey
participants originated from the UK, USA, Australia and other countries. Madden,
Lenhart, Duggan, Coresi and Gassar (2014) research into technology and
teenagers, discovered that of 802 teenagers aged 12–17 years old surveyed,
95% had access to the Internet, 78% had a mobile phone, 47% owned a
outcome of the internet’s extensive reach: the growing rate of harmful offences
against children and teens. Cyber bullying victimization has recently received a
unanswered concerning the impact of cyber bullying. This study gathers literature
15
from 18 studies pieces together only the factors that kick-start cyber-bullying
perpetration and victimization but also the effects of bullying on the victims as
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
painful, and thus victims of any form of bullying are more likely to have the same
publically reveals the inadequacies of a weaker victim, who feels the treatment is
dealing with the pain caused by their experiences. However, as noted earlier, in
Ultimately, such a victim will look for individuals that he or she can bully as a way
of revenging. Therefore, bullying becomes a cycle, and its negative effects are
replicated across different school populations. This aspect may explain why
world.
16
Future research should examine whether to becoming success of anti-
organization.(10:2016)
states that there have been being conducted to analyze the effectiveness
(2020) and Polanin et al.’s (2021) meta-analysis studies showed very small effect
2020 and g = −0.18 in Polanin et al., 2021) and victimization (SMD = −0.13 in Ng
et al., 2020 and g = −0.13 in Polanin et al., 2021). On the contrary, Mishna et al.
(2011) reviewed three intervention studies on online safety, and found that their
17
effectiveness of reviewed interventions, the findings showed opposite
trends. Cantone et al. (2015) found that studies conducted between 2000 and
2013 did not show positive effects on reducing cyberbullying in the long term. On
the other hand, Ng et al.’s (2020) meta-analysis revealed significant but small
effectiveness. Due to the small number of studies that provided data on long-
18
The Theory of This House Bill entitled
Humiliation holds that an Act of Defining and
being humiliated is Penalizing the Crime of
painful, and thus victims Cyber-bullying otherwise
of any form of bullying known as Anti-Bullying
are more likely to have Act of 2015 aims to
the same behavior as a encourage people to
way of revenging become a responsible
netizen about their cyber-
actions
Previous Reviews on the
Anti-Cyberbullying
Programs The Education and the
There have been Legal System: Inter-
systematic reviewsbeing Systemic Collaborations
\ conducted to analyze the identified by Australian
effectiveness of Schools to more
cyberbullyinginterventions effectively reduce
and preventions, but the cyberbullying
findings are not consistent.
It is an expectation of
Australian schools to
address student
cyberbullying.
LEGAL BASIS
This House Bill entitled an Act of Defining and Penalizing the Crime
This law will help to enlightened everyone’s mind when it comes to their actions
via social media or internet that they have to use it properly without putting
someone’s life into danger. We need a law that will focus on one thing so that
the kind of life they have and thinks that they don’t deserve to live. And most of
all, so that the case of cyber-bullying will end. It’s also a good thing that under
this law is a punishment that will definitely make the people who keeps on cyber-
bullying think twice whether they continue or they will stop. The law states that,
those who will be found guilty of cyber- bullying shall be fined penalty of P50,000
but not more than P100,000 and imprisonment of not less than six months but
20
bullying, which can cause harm to students. This bill would help the students of
Saint Mary Academy who may be struggling with their mental health as a result
of bullying.
societal systems are not aligned and supportive. Within this ecological framing,
this qualitative study used interview and focus group methods to gather
secondary school stakeholder perspectives about the role the legal system plays
analysis uncovered three themes with implications for improving school capacity
with the help of society’s legal system: What schools can and cannot do to
management; and the need for education and legal inter-systemic collaborations
between schools and the legal system in effectively addressing cyber bullying.
cyber bullying cases should consider the impact of legal support and the role of
21
these dynamics can inform strategies for school leaders to navigate and leverage
The output
acknowledges the
efficiency of school
officers in handling
cyberbullying cases
varies. While some
schools have
implemented
proactive measures
and comprehensive
policies to address
cyberbullying, others
may face challenges
in identifying and
addressing such
cases promptly.
Factors such as
training, awareness
programs, and
collaboration with
law enforcement can
significantly impact
the effectiveness of
school officers in
dealing with
cyberbullying
incidents.
22
•Gathering and Analyzing
Data gathered from of the data. It involves the
the responses of the systematic collection,
respondents: examination, and
interpretation of
• Demographic profile information for the
of the respondents: purpose of gaining
insights.
a. Name;
b. Age •Presentation of the data.
c. Grade and It involves conveying and
section interpreting the results of
the data analysis in a
•The Efficiency of the clear and concise
school officers manner.
towards cyberbullying
cases •Analysis and findings.
The analysis and findings
of the research provide
valuable insights and
information that can
greatly contribute to the
existing body of
knowledge in the
respective field.
•Formulation of the
questionnaires. The first
step is to clearly define
the research objectives
and the specific
information that needs to
be collected. Decide on
the appropriate question
types and formats that
will best elicit the desired
information.
THE PROBLEM
23
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
services. Gaming platforms and mobile devices are all potential venues. It is a
pattern of behavior meant to frighten, infuriate, or embarrass those who are the
This study aims to determine the basis for assessing the efficiency of
Mary Academy of Guindulman, Bohol, Inc. It also seeks to answer the following
questions:
1.1 age;
1.3 section?
2. What actions were done by the school officers to facilitate cyber bullying cases
in school?
3. How efficient are the school officers in facilitating towards the problem of
24
3.2 Developing and implementing a social awareness program in school?
5. Based on the findings, what intervention plan of the school officers must be
implemented?
NULL HYPOTHESIS
officers and cyberbullying cases of the Grade 7 students of Saint Mary Academy
us identify children who needs help – whether they are the one being bullied or
doing the bullying. Our intervention can make a tremendous difference, and even
change a young person’s life. Vital results of this research could be highly
School Administration, Faculty, and Staff. This study can give the
school administration knowledge about bullying and its effects, they can take
25
also give the faculty and staff more opinions about the efficiency of the school
Parents. This study will help the parents understand how these identifies
factors affect their children’s mental and emotional well-being. And would help
Students. The findings of this study will be beneficial and will serve as a
social development to the students who can learn to recognize it, speak up about
it, and work together to prevent it. This can create a safer and more positive
learning environment for all students, leading to better academic outcomes and
Future Researchers. This study will serve as a reference and basis that
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
DESIGN
26
This document is primarily based on quantitative research. This
the main objective of quantitative research. Therefore, the purpose of this study
is to ascertain how well Saint Mary Academy of Guindulman Bohol, Inc. school
sampling. Each participant will fill out a questionnaire that will be used to gather
ENVIRONMENT
Bohol, Inc. is most likely where this study will take place. Saint Mary Academy of
Guindulman, Bohol, Inc. is the only standing and operating private Catholic
away from Guindulman Municipal Hall and 40 meters away from Guindulman
Public Market. Participants in the study will complete our questionnaire, which
PARTICIPANTS
27
This study collected the necessary data from the respondents, who were
to provide authentic data. Thus, those chosen Grade 7 students for the School
Year 2023-2024 using the Face-to-Face Learning Modality are included in the
inclusion criteria. Most likely, forty-two (42) people will take part and the selection
St. Michael 24 33 14
St. Gabriel 24 33 14
St. Raphael 25 34 14
TOTAL 73 100 42
Guindulman Bohol, Inc. The primary focus of this study is to assess the efficiency
school officers for tackling cyberbullying incidents. The limitation of this study will
or control the opinions of the participants, and their views will be respected and
28
INSTRUMENT
preferences. A fair amount of time will be given to participants to fill out the
study. The questionnaires might consider using open-ended questions that will
PROCEDURE
research surveys for data collection, affirming their relevance and effectiveness
and data collection strategies will be chosen. Once the research instrument has
DATA ANALYSIS
29
The gathered data were analyzed and interpreted through projection and
frequency of responses to each item was divided by the total number of cases
Where:
P = percentage
F= frequency of responses
Statistical Treatment
30
To determine the degree of correlation in the responses of the
∑(ƒo−ƒe)
x 2=
ƒe
Where:
2
x = Chi-square factor
ƒo = observed frequency
ƒe = expected frequency
P = F/N x100
Where:
P = Percentage
F = Frequency
N = Number of Respondents
31
n
∑ ( xi∗wi )
W = i =1 n
∑ (Wi )
i =1
Where:
W = weighted average
DEFINITION OF TERMS
32
The following are operationally defined to enhance the understanding of
student. This is a type of evidence and storytelling that a student gives and
towards the students, including those from diverse backgrounds and cultures.
leaders or in an organization.
CHAPTER II
33
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
the age, sex, and section profiles of the respondents. Additionally, it assesses
34
the efficiency of school officers in addressing cyberbullying cases, enhancing
Table 1.1
N = 42
the respondents belong to age of 12 years old. Followed by 9 (21.4%) whose age
is13 years old, 0 (0%) whose age is14 years old, and 1 (2.4%) whose age is 15
years old. This will help us to determine the age group of the Grade 7 St.
Table 1.2
35
Profile of the Respondents in terms of Sex
N = 42
WEIGHTED MEAN 21 50
respondents, 15 (35.7%) of them are males, and 27 (64.3%) who are females.
The classification will help us to determine the sex group of the Grade 7 St.
Table 1.3
N = 42
Number of
Section Percentage (%)
Respondents
St. Michael 14 33.3
St. Gabriel 14 33.3
St. Raphael 14 33.3
TOTAL 42 100
36
It can be seen in the table that there are 42 respondents. Out of 42
respondents, 14 (33.3%) of them are from St. Michael, 14 (33.3%) of them are
from St. Gabriel, and 14 (33.3%) who are from St. Raphael. The classification will
help us to determine the section group of the Grade 7 students of Saint Mary
ON CYBERBULLYING CASES
Table 2.1
N = 42
Total
Indicators SD % D % A % SA %
(%)
37
policies and
guidelines to
students.
2. The school
officers
proactively
monitor and
address
4 9.5 3 7.1 25 59.5 10 23.8 100
cyberbullying
incidents
reported by
students,
parents, or staff.
3. School
officers didn’t
provide
adequate
resources and
5 11.9 17 40.5 17 40.5 3 7.1 100
support to
students and
parents dealing
with
cyberbullying.
4. School
officers didn’t
take proactive
steps to educate
and raise
awareness
among students 11 26.2 16 38.1 12 28.6 3 7.1 100
about
responsible
online behavior
and the
consequences
of cyberbullying.
WEIGHTED 14.88 22.63 14.25
MEAN 6.25 % 9.5 % 20.3 48.23% 6 % 100
Table 2.1 shows the assessment of the actions taken by the school
38
There are5 respondents who answered Strongly Disagree (SD); there are 2
answered Agree (A); and there are 8 respondents who answered Strongly Agree
who answered Disagree (D); there are 25 respondents who answered Agree (A);
and there are 10 respondents who answered Strongly Agree (SA). Number 3,
“School officers didn’t provide adequate resources and support to students and
Strongly Disagree (SD); there are 17 respondents who answered Disagree (D);
there are 17 respondents who answered Agree (A); and there 3 respondents who
answered Strongly Agree (SA). Lastly, number 4, “School officers didn’t take
who answered Disagree (D); there are 12 respondents who answered Agree (A);
and there are 3 respondents who answered Strongly Agree (SA). In total, there
Table 3.2
N=42
39
Total
Indicators SD % D % A % SA %
(%)
The
1. The school
feedback
officers
and
promptly
concerns
addressed 5 11.9 8 19.0 25 59.5 4 9.5 100
of
my concerns
students,
related to
parents,
cyberbullying.
and staff
2. The school
officers
effectively
communicate
the actions
taken to 3 7.1 5 11.9 26 61.9 8 19.0 100
resolve
cyberbullying
cases to all
parties
involved.
3. The school
officers
actively seek
feedback
from
4 9.5 5 11.9 24 57.1 9 21.4 100
students,
parents, and
staff about
cyberbullying
issues.
4. I am not
satisfied with
the school
officers' 5 11.9 23 54.8 12 28.6 2 4.8 100
responses to
cyberbullying
reports.
5. I don't feel 5 11.9 17 40.5 17 40.5 3 7.1 100
comfortable
reporting
cyberbullying
incidents to
the school
40
officers.
6. The school
officers
Developi
effectively
ng and
involve
impleme
students,
nting a
parents, and
social 3 7.1 5 11.9 21 50.0 13 31.0 100
staff in
awarene
promoting
ss
social
program
awareness
in school
about
cyberbullying.
7. The school
officers
collaborate
with external
organizations
to enhance
2 4.8 5 11.9 27 64.3 8 19.0 100
social
awareness
about
cyberbullying
in the
community.
8. The school
officers did
not
successfully
implement
8 19.0 21 50.0 12 28.6 1 2.4 100
programs to
raise
awareness
about
cyberbullying.
9. The 1 2.4 19 45.2 18 42.9 4 9.5 100
initiatives
taken by the
school
officers didn't
improve
students'
understandin
g of the
consequence
s of
41
cyberbullying.
10. The
school
officers did
not engage in
campaigns to 13 31.0 18 42.9 8 19.0 3 7.1 100
prevent
cyberbullying
within the
school.
WEIGHTED 4.9 11.7 12.6 30.0 19 45.2 5.5 13.1 100
MEAN % % % %
feedback and concerns of students, parents and staff. Number 1, “The school
who answered Disagree (D); there are 25 respondents who answered Agree (A);
and there are 4 respondents who answered Strongly Agree (SA). Number 2,
Disagree (D); there are 26 respondents who answered Agree (A); and there are
officers actively seek feedback from students, parents, and staff about
(SD); there are 5 respondents who answered Disagree (D); there are 24
respondents who answered Agree (A); and there 9 respondents who answered
Strongly Agree (SA). Number 4, “I am not satisfied with the school officers'
42
responses to cyberbullying reports”. There are 5 respondents who answered
Strongly Disagree (SD); there are 23 respondents who answered Disagree (D);
there are 12 respondents who answered Agree (A); and there are 2 respondents
who answered Strongly Agree (SA). Number 5, “I don't feel comfortable reporting
Disagree (D); there are 17 respondents who answered Agree (A); and there are
Strongly Disagree (SD); there are 5 respondents who answered Disagree (D);
there are 21 respondents who answered Agree (A); and there are 8 respondents
who answered Strongly Agree (SA). Number 7, “The school officers collaborate
the community”. There are 2 respondents who answered Strongly Disagree (SD);
there are 5 respondents who answered Disagree (D); there are 27 respondents
who answered Agree (A); and there are 8 respondents who answered Strongly
Disagree (D); there are 12 respondents who answered Agree (A); and there is 1
respondent who answered Strongly Agree (SA). Number 9, “The initiatives taken
43
consequences of cyberbullying”. There is 1 respondent who answered Strongly
Disagree (SD); there are 19 respondents who answered Disagree (D); there are
18 respondents who answered Agree (A); and there are 4 respondents who
answered Strongly Agree (SA). Lastly number 10, “The school officers did not
who answered Disagree (D); there are 8 respondents who answered Agree (A);
and there are 3 respondents who answered Strongly Agree (SA).In total, there
Table 4.0
44
9 18 19.36 -1.36 1.8496
Degree of Freedom: df = n – 1
df = 14 – 1
df = 13
Level of Significance = 0.05
= 22.36
271
∑ ƒo=
14
∑ ƒo=19.36
2
∑ ( ƒo−ƒe ) =553.2144
SOLUTION:
553.2144
x
2
= 19.36
√ x 2 = √ 28 .57512397
x = 5.3455705
ANHI AG GRAPH
45
Chapter III
This chapter includes the study’s outline, general findings based on the
demographic profile of the respondents in terms of age, sex, and section? What
actions were done by the school officers to facilitate cyber bullying cases in
school, in the Feedback and concerns of students, parents and staff; and
46
Developing and implementing a social awareness in school? How efficient are
significant degree of relationship between the profile of the respondents and the
school officers and cyberbullying cases among Grade 7 students at Saint Mary
variables.
collection. The findings were presented based on the data obtained from this
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
This study aims to evaluate and critically analyze the efficiency of the
students in Saint Mary Academy of Guindulman, Bohol, Inc. This likely involves
evaluating the school officers’ actions on cyberbullying cases, and asses the
47
Profile of the respondents:
Age. It shows that the majority of respondents (76.2%) were 12 years old,
Sex. It shows that a clear gender distribution was evident, with 35.7% of
respondents being male and 64.3% female, emphasizing the higher enrollment of
Section. It shows that Sections St. Michael, St. Gabriel, and St. Raphael
48
responses, with 57.1% agreeing. Overall, these findings highlight both strengths
and comfort in reporting incidents (81%). However, concerns arise regarding the
CONCLUSION
Drawing insights from the collected data and its analysis, the following
49
2. Regarding the assessment of school officers' actions on cyberbullying
raised about the adequacy of resources and support and the proactive
RECOMMENDATION
As part of our study goals, we, the researchers, aim to provide practical
helpful to students, parents, teachers, and school administrators in the future are
listed below.
50
In addressing cyberbullying cases, the researchers came up with
seminars.
the researchers suggest that they should be cautious about the information they
share online. Encourage students to think before they post or share anything
Remind them to avoid sharing personal information, such as their full name,
review their privacy settings on social media platforms and limit their audience to
trusted friends and family. By being mindful of what they share and who they
share it with, students can reduce the risk of becoming targets for cyberbullying.
cases, the researchers suggest that the teachers and school administrators
51
action. It is also important for schools to have protocols in place for investigating
cyberbullying. It's also important for teachers to stay informed about the latest
trends and platforms used by students for online communication, as this will
students to speak up against cyberbullying, report incidents, and seek help when
needed. It's crucial for teachers to maintain open lines of communication with
and effectively.
should engage in regular conversations with their children about online safety
and responsible digital behavior. Encourage your child to share their online
experiences with you, and create a safe space where they feel comfortable
communication, parents can stay informed about their child's online activities and
52
Also, for the parents, in mitigating or lessening the cyberbullying cases,
the researchers suggest that the parents should maintain open and honest
communication with their children about their online experiences, including social
online interactions, parents can better understand their child's digital environment
and any potential signs of cyberbullying. It's important for parents to educate
themselves about the various social media platforms and online communities that
their child is a part of, allowing them to offer guidance and support when needed.
Parents should also set clear boundaries and rules for internet use, such as time
limits and privacy settings, to help protect their children from potential
cyberbullying incidents.
53
REFERENCES
1. Phao, R. (2022). Exploring the Relationship Between Social Media Usage and
https://bit.ly/3StMwyy
2. Athanasiou, K., Melegkovits, E., Andrie, E. K., Magoulas, C., Tzavara, C. K.,
https://bit.ly/45Zgpd4
3. Waters, S., Russell, W. B., & Hensley, M. (2020). Cyber bullying, social media,
and character education: why it matters for middle school social studies. The
54
Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(4),
195-204.
https://bit.ly/40ruZJl
https://bit.ly/3QsifNI
5. Wegge, D., Vandebosch, H., & Eggermont, S. (2014). Who bullies whom
https://bit.ly/3MtzpcT
https://bit.ly/3QsifNI
among adolescents: The role of gender and peer group status. Communications-
https://bit.ly/49k5kpV
55
8. Alim, S. (2016). Cyberbullying in the world of teenagers and social media: A
https://bit.ly/49ytmO6
9. Talpur, M. A. R., Touseef, T., Jilanee, S. D. A., Shabu, M. M., & Khan, A.
https://bit.ly/40pBRGY
https://bit.ly/3sjR8MO
11. Lan, M., Law, N., & Pan, Q. (2022). Effectiveness of anti-cyberbullying
https://bit.ly/40m1KYh
https://bit.ly/3QoLq4u
13. Pennell, D., Campbell, M., & Tangen, D. (2022). The education and the legal
56
effectively reduce cyberbullying. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education
https://bit.ly/45ZvpaM
Appendix A
(letter of proposal)
57
Appendix B
58
Appendix C
59
Appendix D
RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Participants,
We, the Grade 12 STEM students from Our Lady of Consolation, would
like to conduct an interview to partially complete the requirements for the Senior
High School Academic Track. "Assessing the Efficiency of School Officers in
Addressing Cyberbullying Cases to Grade 7 Students of Saint Mary Academy of
Guindulman, Bohol, Inc." is the title that the researchers are now working on. In
light of this, we are kindly asking for your time to be part of this study. Please
answer the questions honestly and to the best of your ability. Your responses are
entirely anonymous, and we firmly respect your right to privacy.
60
Instructions: Kindly check (/) the box that corresponds to your answer.
Age: 12 13 14 15
Sex: Male Female
Section: St. Michael St. Gabriel St. Raphael
Agree (A) = 3
Disagree (D) = 2
SD D A SA
1. School officers effectively
communicate the school's anti-
cyberbullying policies and guidelines to
students.
2. The school officers proactively monitor
and address cyberbullying incidents
reported by students, parents, or staff.
3. School officers didn’t provide
adequate resources and support to
students and parents dealing with
cyberbullying.
61
4. School officers didn’t take proactive
steps to educate and raise awareness
among students about responsible online
behavior and the consequences of
cyberbullying.
Agree (A) = 3
Disagree (D) = 2
Indicators SD D A SA
The
feedback
1. The school officers
and
promptly addressed my
concerns of
concerns related to
students,
cyberbullying.
parents , and
staff
2. The school officers
effectively communicate the
actions taken to resolve
cyberbullying cases to all
parties involved.
62
3. The school officers
actively seek feedback from
students, parents, and staff
about cyberbullying issues.
4. I am not satisfied with the
school officers' responses to
cyberbullying reports.
5. I don't feel comfortable
reporting cyberbullying
incidents to the school
officers.
Developing
and 6. The school officers
implementing effectively involve students,
a social parents, and staff in
awareness promoting social awareness
program in about cyberbullying.
school
7. The school officers
collaborate with external
organizations to enhance
social awareness about
cyberbullying in the
community.
8. The school officers did not
successfully implement
programs to raise
awareness about
cyberbullying.
9. The initiatives taken by
the school officers didn't
improve students'
understanding of the
consequences of
cyberbullying.
10. The school officers did
not engage in campaigns to
prevent cyberbullying within
the school.
63
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 18
Sex : Female
Citizenship : Filipino
64
: Ms. Maria MelaneCabillo
E-mail : karyllcabillo388@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 17
Sex : Female
Citizenship : Filipino
65
Parents : Mr. Henry B. Inojales
E-mail : inojalesjosher095@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Tambongan, Candijay,Bohol
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 17
Sex : Female
Citizenship : Filipino
66
: Mrs. Beatriz Lloren
E-mail : katrinalloren4@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 18
Sex : Female
Citizenship : Filipino
67
: Mrs. Kyrene G. Pizaña
E-mail : maryangagaa@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Negros Oriental
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 17
Sex : Male
Citizenship : Filipino
68
: Mrs. Mary Ann B. Bernales
E-mail : karljohnrywenrevadinera@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 16
Sex : Female
Citizenship : Filipino
69
E-mail : reyescharo2007@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 18
Sex : Female
Citizenship : Filipino
70
E-mail : mayettimbal01@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age : 18
Sex : Male
Citizenship : Filipino
71
E-mail : kierltzy102905@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
72