Bulk Current Injection For Automotive Product Tests

EMC TEST & TRAINING CENTER (OPC) LTD
Bulk Current Injection (BCI) – Substitution

Method and Closed-Loop Method with Power
Limitation
The conducted immunity test known as a Bulk Current Injection (BCI) test, according to ISO
11452-4 specification [1]. This immunity test is carried out by inducing disturbance signals
into the wiring harness by means of a current injection probe, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: BCI test setup and the injection probe

The injection probe is a current transformer through which the wiring harness (which forms
the secondary winding) of the device under test (DUT) is passed. Immunity tests are carried
out by varying the test severity level and frequency (1 MHz – 400 MHz) of the induced
disturbance. The disturbance is an amplitude modulated (AM), narrowband, continuous wave
(CW) carrier signal.
The ISO11452-4 standard specifies two BCI test methods: the substitution (open-loop), and
current monitoring (closed-loop) probe methods. Both test methods consist of two phases:
o Calibration (using a calibration fixture)

o Testing (using the DUT).
Calibration Fixture and Equipment
The calibration fixture, used in both methods, is shown in Figure 2.
A Technical Institution for Future Communication

www.emcttc.org ; info@emcttc.org
Figure 2: Calibration fixture

During the calibration procedure (same for both methods), the injection probe is mounted
inside the calibration fixture. The calibration fixture is terminated by a 50 Ω load at one
terminal and connected to the spectrum analyzer through an attenuator (to protect the
measuring equipment) at the other terminal, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Calibration fixture connections

The 50 Ω load and a 20 dB attenuator are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: 50 Ω load and an attenuator

The calibration procedure (and the BCI test) is performed in a shielded enclosure, using
several additional pieces of equipment shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: Shielded enclosure and BCI test equipment

The block diagram of the test equipment configuration (outside the shielding enclosure) is
shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6: Test equipment configuration

During the calibration procedure we need to measure forward power supplied to the injection
probe (mounted in the calibration fixture) and the power reflected from it (reverse power).
This is accomplished with the help of a directional coupler shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Directional coupler and its connections

The coupler is rated for specific power handling, frequency range, and attenuation. Ports J3
and J4 sample the power and attenuate it before the power sensors can read it. The coupler
shown is rated for 100 W, 0.1 – 1000 MHz, 40 dB.
Calibration Procedure
The calibration procedure (same for both methods) is performed with an unmodulated
sinusoidal RF signal. During the calibration procedure net power (forward power minus
reverse power) is injected into the current probe creating the required current level in the
calibration fixture over the required frequency range (1 – 400 MHz). The level of forward
power used during the calibration is later used during the actual testing. BCI test severity
levels (required current levels) are specified in Table 1.
Table 1: BCI test severity levels

These limits are displayed in Figure 8.

Figure 8: Current level test limits

Maximum frequency step sizes during the calibration should be not greater than the
maximum frequency step sizes used in testing, and shown in Table 2.
Frequency band (MHz) 1 < f ≤ 10 10 < f ≤ 200 200 < f ≤ 400
Linear step (MHz) 1 5 10
Table 2: Maximum frequency step sizes
AM Modulated Signal
During the testing (in both methods) the AM modulated signal is used with the carrier
frequency, fC, varied from 1 to 400 MHz. Let’s briefly discuss the modulation process. The
unmodulated signal is a sinusoid shown in Figure 9a.
The modulating signal, shown in Figure 9b, is also a sinusoid of an angular frequency θ,
corresponding to the linear (cyclic) frequency of 1 kHz. The amplitude of this sinusoid is
controlled by the modulation index, m, where,
(1)
The resulting AM-modulated signal is shown in Figure 9c. The peak amplitude of this signal
is larger than the amplitude of the original unmodulated signal (since we are adding two
sinusoids).

Figure 9: AM modulation process

For peak test level conservation, the peak amplitudes of the unmodulated and AM-modulated
signals are made equal. That is, the peak amplitude, AC, of the unmodulated signal is reduced
to a new level of A′C, so when the modulating signal, m(t), is added to the reduced-amplitude
unmodulated signal, the resulting AM-modulating signal has the same peak amplitude as the
original unmodulated signal. This is shown in Figure 10.
Figure 10: Peak conservation

The peak conservation is achieved with m = 0.8. This AM modulation used in conducted
immunity testing is often referred as AM 1 kHz, 80%.
The reduction in the peak amplitude of the original unmodulated signal can be also described
in terms of the mean power. Let’s denote the mean power of the original unmodulated signal
as PCW, and the mean power of the amplitude-reduced unmodulated signal as P′C. Then [1],

(2)
For the above relation becomes
(3)
or
(4)
Thus, to adjust the amplitude of the carrier wave prior to modulation, the power is decreased
by 5.1 dB and then AM modulating signal is added.
Test Procedure and Setup – Substitution Method
The test configuration for the substitution method is shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12,
respectively.
Figure 11: Test configuration – substitution method – top view

Figure 12: Test configuration – substitution method – side view

Note that the injection probe is placed at three different locations: 150, 450, and 750 mm
from the DUT. For a DUT remotely grounded (vehicle power return line longer than 200
mm) two Line Impedance Stabilization Networks (LISNs) are used, (see [2] for LISN
description and operation).
The test is conducted by injecting the forward power (recorded during the calibration
procedure) into the current probe clamped over the harness connected to the DUT. The
forward power is incrementally increased until the level used in calibration (that produced the
required current) is reached. Note that the calibrated level of the forward power corresponded
to the load of 50 Ω. The load impedance during the testing varies and could be smaller or
larger than 50Ω. Thus, the forward power used during the testing may induce larger or
smaller currents in the harness than the forward power induced during the calibration.
Test Procedure and Setup – Closed-Loop Method with Power Limitation
The test configuration for the closed-loop method with power limitation is shown in
Figure 13 and Figure 14, respectively.

Figure 13: Test configuration – closed-loop method with power limitation – top
view
Figure 14: Test configuration – closed-loop method with power limitation –

side view
Note that this method uses two current probes one for injection (same as in the substitution
method) and the other for current measurements (see [3] for current probe measurements).
Such a probe is shown in Figure 15. The injection probe is placed 900 mm from the DUT
while the measurement probe is placed 50 mm from the DUT.

Figure 15: Current measurement probe used in closed -loop method with power
limitation
During testing power level recorded during the calibration is applied to the injection probe.
The forward power is incrementally increased until the level used in calibration (that
produced the required current in the 50Ω fixture) is reached. Current level in the wiring
harness is measured using the measurement probe. If this measured current is below the level
specified in Table 1, the power to the injection probe is increased until the specified current
level is achieved or the power limit is reached. The power limit is specified by
(5)
where k is a factor equal to 4 unless otherwise specified in the test plan.
Conducted Immunity Test Results
Figure 16 shows the passing test result for a DUT which was tested to the severity level IV,
using the substitution method.

Figure 16: Measurement result – substitution method – passing case

The current curve riding on the Level IV curve shows that there were no anomalies when the
current reached the severity level IV. To be more precise, there were no anomalies when the
forward power applied during testing reached the level used during the calibration. The actual
current in the harness during the testing is not known (unless an optional current measuring
probe is used).
Figure 17 shows the test result with anomalies for a DUT which was tested to the severity
level IV, using the substitution method.
Figure 17: Measurement result – substitution method – anomalies occurred

The dip in the current curve indicates an anomaly. When anomaly occurs at a given
frequency, the power level is incrementally reduced until the anomaly is no longer present.
Then the power level is incrementally increased until the anomaly occurs. At that time the
anomaly is marked on the plot (orange dots in Figure 17). Subsequently the frequency is

stepped up to the next value and the power is incrementally increased until the required
power level is reached or another anomaly is observed.
Figure 18 shows the test result when a DUT was tested using the closed-loop method with
power limitation (note: the test limits in this plot do not correspond to the ISO 11452-4
specification).
Figure 18: Measurement result – closed-loop method with power limitation

Notice that up to a frequency of 10 MHz the induced current did not reach the required level,
even though the maximum power (equal to 4 times the calibration power was applied).
Functional Status Classification
Anomalies are categorized as belonging to one of several classes. ISO 11452-1, [4], defines
theses classes as follows.
o Class A – all functions of a DUT perform as designed during and after exposure to a
disturbance.
o Class B – all function of a DUT perform as designed during exposure; however, one
or more of them can go beyond a specified tolerance.
o All functions return automatically to within normal limits after exposure is removed
(memory functions belong Class A).
o Class C – one or more functions of a DUT do not perform as designed during
exposure but return automatically to normal operation after exposure is removed.
o Class D – one or more functions of a DUT do not perform as designed during
exposure and do not return to the normal operation until exposure is removed and the
DUT is reset by a simple operator action.
o Class E – one or more functions of a DUT do not perform as designed during and
after exposure and cannot be returned to proper operation without repairing or
replacing the DUT.

Based on the DUT intended function, with respect to the conducted immunity, the DUT is
usually also classified (by the manufacturer) as belonging to one of the test groups. These test
groups reflect the severity of the DUT malfunction on the safety or functionality of other
systems.
During the immunity testing, each test group must meet a set of minimum requirements
defined by the functional status classification above.
References
1. ISO 11452-4:2011(E) – “Road vehicles – Component test methods for electrical

disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic
energy – Part 4: Harness excitation methods”.
2. Adamczyk, B., Teune, J., “Topology and Characterization of a DC Line Impedance
Stabilization Network”, In Compliance magazine, July 2017.
3. Adamczyk, B. “Current Probe Measurements in EMC Testing”, In
Compliance magazine, September 2017.
4. ISO 11452-1:2005/Amd.1:2008(E) – “Road vehicles – Component test methods for
electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy – Part 1:
General principles and terminology”.


Bulk Current Injection For Automotive Product Tests

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bulk Current Injection For Automotive Product Tests

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EMC TEST & TRAINING CENTER (OPC) LTD

Bulk Current Injection (BCI) – Substitution

Figure 1: BCI test setup and the injection probe

o Calibration (using a calibration fixture)

Calibration Fixture and Equipment

The calibration fixture, used in both methods, is shown in Figure 2.

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 2: Calibration fixture

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 3: Calibration fixture connections

Figure 4: 50 Ω load and an attenuator

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 5: Shielded enclosure and BCI test equipment

Figure 6: Test equipment configuration

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 7: Directional coupler and its connections

Table 1: BCI test severity levels

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 8: Current level test limits

Frequency band (MHz) 1 < f ≤ 10 10 < f ≤ 200 200 < f ≤ 400

Linear step (MHz) 1 5 10

Table 2: Maximum frequency step sizes

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 9: AM modulation process

Figure 10: Peak conservation

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

For the above relation becomes

Test Procedure and Setup – Substitution Method

Figure 11: Test configuration – substitution method – top view

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 12: Test configuration – substitution method – side view

Test Procedure and Setup – Closed-Loop Method with Power Limitation

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 14: Test configuration – closed-loop method with power limitation –

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

where k is a factor equal to 4 unless otherwise specified in the test plan.

Conducted Immunity Test Results

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 16: Measurement result – substitution method – passing case

Figure 17: Measurement result – substitution method – anomalies occurred

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

Figure 18: Measurement result – closed-loop method with power limitation

Functional Status Classification

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

1. ISO 11452-4:2011(E) – “Road vehicles – Component test methods for electrical

A Technical Institution for Future Communication

You might also like