Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by
Anita Kumari
(19MC201006)
Under the supervision and guidance of
(Moumita Dey)
School of Management & Commerce
Submitted to the
I Anita Kumari (19MC201006 ) hereby declare that the project report entitled “STUDY OF
PERFORMANCE REVIEW SYSTEM” at “Halcyon Technologies Private Limited”
submitted to SRM School of Management & Commerce in partial fulfilment of
the requirement for the award of the Degree of BBA, is a record of the original
research work done under the supervision and guidance of Moumita Dey, School
of Management & Commerce, SRM University, Sikkim and that it has not
formed the basis for the award of any degree / associateship / fellowship of other
similar title to any candidate of any university.
Date :01.04.2022
Place : Rangpo, East Sikkim
Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the work reported herein
does not form part of any other project report or dissertation on the basis of
which a degree or award was conferred on an earlier occasion on this or any
other candid ate.
INTERNAL GUIDE
DEAN (ACADEMIC)
Declaration 02
Bonafide Certificate 03
Acknowledgement 06
Abstract 07
I INTRODUCTION 8-21
1.1 Introduction 9
2.1 Introduction 15
2.3Data Collection 17
4.3 Recommendations 31
V CONCLUSION 32-36
Appendix 32
Bibliography 33
Questionnaire 34-36
A Good start leads to a Fine end. The ideal way to begin documenting this
project work would be to extend my earnest gratitude to everyone who has
encouraged, motivated, and guided me to make a fine effort for successful
completion of this project.
I acknowledge with pleasure and owe my special thanks to Mr. Abhishak Singh,
HR Manager, and Halcyon Technologies for his continuous guidance and
support throughout the project.
A final word of thanks goes to my Parents, Friends, and everyone else who made
this project possible. Your contributions have been most appreciated.
(SIGNATURE)
A customized and relevant Review System was prepared which would fulfill
both the needs of Management and Employees. The Self Review Form and Peer
Feedback form was designed and then sessions were conducted to make the
employees understand the Process and importance of Performance Review. Then
as scheduled the one-one meeting between the employee and their respective
Team Leader was conducted and the final report was given to HR Manager.
Performance appraisals, also known as employee appraisal, are essential for the
effective management and evaluation of staff. Appraisals help develop
individuals, improve organizational performance, and feed into business
planning. Each staff member is appraised by their line manager. Directors are
appraised by the CEO, who is appraised by the chairman or company owners,
depending on the size and structure of the organization. Performance appraisal is
a part of career development and regular review of employee performance
within organizations.
Annual performance appraisals enable management and monitoring of
standards, agreeing expectations and objectives, and delegation of
responsibilities and tasks. Staff performance appraisals also establish individual
training needs and enable organizational training needs analysis and planning.
Performance appraisals are important for staff motivation, aligning individual
and organizational aims, and fostering positive relationships between
management and staff.
Appraisals must address 'whole person' development - not just job skills or the
skills required for the next promotion. Appraisals must not discriminate against
anyone on the grounds of age, gender, sexual orientation, race, religion,
disability, etc.
Performance appraisals should be positive experiences. The appraisals process
provides the platform for development and motivation, so organizations should
foster a feeling that performance appraisals are positive opportunities, in order to
get the best out of the people and the process.
Requirements for effective performance management system:
Let the employees know where they stand in so far as their performance
is concerned and to assist them with constructive criticism and
guidance for the purpose of their development.
Benefits:
1. Ranking
In this, the superior ranks his/her subordinates in order of their merit, from best to
worst.
- It is done in a competitive group.
- It is done by placing the appraisee on numerical scales I.e. 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc. in
the total group.
2. Person-to-Person/Paired Comparison
Under this method the appraiser compares each employee with every other
employee, one at a time.
- Certain key performance areas/traits are developed. E.g.: Leadership, Creativity,
Initiative etc.
3. Grading
- Certain categories of traits/performance criteria, which are worth of appraising,
are established. E.g. cooperativeness, self-expression, dependability, job
knowledge etc.
- Any grade that is selected should be well defined.
4. Graphic Scales
- A printed form, one for each person to be rated is used.
- The factors included in the form are Employee characteristics such as leadership,
cooperativeness, enthusiasm, loyalty etc.
5. Checklist
- A series of questions are presented concerning an appraisee’s behavior.
- The appraiser has to reply to the questions in either negative or positive tone-
(Yes/No).
- The value of each question may be weighted I.e. one can have predetermined
scale and scoring to those questions.
6. Essay
- A blank form is given to the appraiser.
- The form contains main heading such as employees’ characteristics, attitudes,
job knowledge, potential etc.
- The appraiser is asked to put in words his impressions about the employee..
- It gives specific information about the employee.
7. Confidential Reporting
- It is the most traditional way of appraising employee’s performance. The basic
assumption here is that since the superior .
- The superior writes a paragraph or so about his subordinate’s strengths,
weaknesses, intelligence, attitude to work, attendance, conduct and character,
work efficiency, etc.
8. Critical Incident Method
- Initially a set of noteworthy (good or bad) on-the-job behaviours is prepared.
This is usually in the form of incidents.
- These incidents are given to a group of experts who assign scale values
depending upon the degree of desirability for the job.
9. Forced Choice Technique
- In forced choice system the appraiser is forced to choose 4 statements that best
fits the individual being rated and one which least fits him.
Company Profile
SRM University, Sikkim BBA 2021-22 Page 15
HALCYON Technologies is an Application Development and Business Process
Outsourcing solutions provider. HALCYON Technologies offers a range of
services from outsourced application development and managed services to
professional services. All Their services are enabled by experienced, knowledge,
proven methodologies, global talent and innovation. Their portfolio includes
Application Development, consulting, maintenance & support, Business Process
Outsourcing, and Testing services. HALCYON provides services to clients from
their network of offices across US, UK and state-of-the-art Global Solutions
Development center in Hyderabad, India.
With HALCYON Technologies, the clients can rest assured of transport fair
working partnership and quality work processes. HALCYON Technologies offers
cutting-edge technologies that help the client business improve, and more well
ahead of their competitors in the market.
Products
As per the requirement of the management to design a new policy for performance
Review system, I basically analyzed the questionnaire given to employees to
know their perception regarding the Review System and collected information on
websites regarding the various methods of appraisals, the process of Performance
Appraisals etc. and referred to books to get the idea of the concepts. The practical
approach was by –
Understanding the perspective of Management.
Studying the kind of Appraisal suitable for Halcyon environment.
The time period required for the Review to be completed.
Then the appraiser gives his own rating to the employee after the one – one
discussion and then the report is submitted to the reviewer and a final discussion
takes place with the HR Manager to proceed with the next course of action like
setting of goals, hike in salaries, performance linked incentives, etc.
3) Angelo DeNisi & Caitlin E. Smith (2014) Researched the design and
implementation of performance assessment and management systems to improve
efficiency. The study focuses on a model that demonstrates how enhanced
performance requires solid HR practices, fair assessment systems, effective
performance management, and a clear understanding of an organization's overall
strategic goals.
My self-assessment result
contributes
to my final appraisal result
10
20 Strong
Neutra
Strong
70
10
Strongly Ag
Neutral
30
60 Strongly Dis
30
40 Str
Ne
Str
30
30 35 Strongly Ag
Neutral
Strongly Dis
35
20
40 To
To
No
40
10
15 Salary
Respons
Team Str
75
Other Findings:
4. The process did not take place in the exact time frame as planned and
scheduled.
5. A good improvement was seen in the inter-personal relationship
between the team leader and subordinates.
6. Many employees could not justify the ratings given by them in the Self
Review Form.
7. It helped the employees in understanding their past performance and
setting up of targets and goals for future.
8. They got to understand the organizational needs and it helped in
developing a sense of belongingness towards the company.
9. It helped the management in identifying the Caliber of employees and
encourage the same.
10. The employer and employees got a platform to understand each other
in a better manner.
11. The management was too much dependent on team leaders for
conducting
Recommendations
CONCLUSION
Websites:
www.citehr.com
www.google.com
www.custominsight.com
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly disagree
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly Disagree
3. I know all the aspects and standards that are used to evaluate my
performance.
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly Disagree
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly Disagree
a) To an Extent
b) Totally
c) Not at all
a. To an Extent
b. Totally
c. Not at all
a. To an Extent
b. Totally
c. Not at all
a. Salary
b. Responsibility
c. Team Structure
a. Not Important
b. Some What Important
c. Most Important
a.To an Extent
b .Totally
c.Not at all