Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- eBook PDF
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/download/circuit-theory-and-transmission-lines-ebook-pdf/
Circuit Theory
and
Transmission Lines
Second Edition
About the Author
Ravish R Singh is presently Academic Advisor at Thakur Educational Trust, Mumbai.
He obtained a BE degree from University of Mumbai in 1991, an MTech degree from
IIT Bombay in 2001, and a PhD degree from Faculty of Technology, University of
Mumbai, in 2013. He has published several books with McGraw Hill Education (India)
on varied subjects like Engineering Mathematics (I and II), Applied Mathematics,
Electrical Engineering, Electrical and Electronics Engineering, etc., for all-India
curricula as well as regional curricula of some universities like Gujarat Technological
University, Mumbai University, Pune University, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological
University, Anna University, Uttarakhand Technical University, and Dr A P J Abdul
Kalam Technical University. Dr Singh is a member of IEEE, ISTE, and IETE, and has published research
papers in national and international journals. His fields of interest include Circuits, Signals and Systems, and
Engineering Mathematics.
Circuit Theory
and
Transmission Lines
Second Edition
Ravish R Singh
Academic Advisor
Thakur Educational Trust
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Information contained in this work has been obtained by McGraw Hill Education (India), from
sources believed to be reliable. However, neither McGraw Hill Education (India) nor its authors guarantee the
accuracy or completeness of any information published herein, and neither McGraw Hill Education (India) nor its
authors shall be responsible for any errors, omissions, or damages arising out of use of this information. This work is
published with the understanding that McGraw Hill Education (India) and its authors are supplying information but
are not attempting to render engineering or other professional services. If such services are required, the assistance
of an appropriate professional should be sought.
Typeset at Text-o-Graphics, B-1/56, Aravali Apartment, Sector-34, Noida 201 301, and printed at
Cover Printer:
My Father
and
My Mother
5. RESONANCE 5.1
5.1 Introduction 5.1
5.2 Series Resonance 5.1
5.3 Parallel Resonance 5.18
5.4 Comparison of Series and Parallel Resonant Circuits 5.21
Exercises 5.38
Objective-Type Questions 5.39
Answers to Objective-Type Questions 5.40
Salient Features
� Up-to-date and full coverage of the latest revised syllabus of University of Mumbai
� Covers both analysis and synthesis of networks
� Uses problem-solving approach to explain topics
� Lucid coverage of network theorems, transient analysis, two-port networks, network synthesis
� Separate chapter on transmission lines
� Extensively supported by illustrations
� Solution of 2015 and 2016 University of Mumbai question papers is provided at the end of the
book.
� Examination-oriented excellent pedagogy:
� Illustrations: 1500+
� Solved Examples within chapters 570
� Unsolved Problems: 185
� Objective Type Questions: 135
Chapter Organisation
This text is organised into 12 chapters. Chapter 1 covers basic circuit elements and basic laws comprising
of networks. Further, dc network theorems are elucidated in Chapters 2 and 3. Chapters 4 and 5 discuss
coupled circuits and resonance, respectively. Chapters 6 and 7 discuss transient analysis in time domain and
frequency domain, respectively. Chapters 8 and 9 cover network functions and network synthesis. Chapter
10 elucidates two-port networks. Chapter 11 describes filters and attenuators. Lastly, transmission lines and
radio frequency is covered in Chapter 12.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to the reviewers mentioned below for taking out time to review certain chapters of the book and
sharing their valuable suggestions:
Amit Bagade Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra
Gajraj Singh Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra
Reena Sonkusare Sardar Patel Institute of Technology, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Ravish R Singh
Publisher’s Note
Remember to write to us. We look forward to receiving your feedback, comments, and ideas to enhance the
quality of this book. You can reach us at info.india@mheducation.com. Please mention the title and authors’
name as the subject. In case you spot piracy of this book, please do let us know.
Roadmap to the Syllabus
(As per latest revised syllabus of University of Mumbai)
This text is useful for Electronics Engineering
Circuit Theory—EXC304
Module 1: Analysis of Electrical Circuits
1.1 Analysis of DC Circuits: Analysis of circuits with and without controlled sources using generalized
loop, node matrix, superposition, Thevenin, Norton, Millman theorems
1.2 Analysis of Coupled Circuits: Self and mutual inductances, coefficient of coupling, dot convention,
equivalent circuit, solution using loop analysis
1.3 Series and Parallel Resonance Circuits: Selectivity, bandwidth, quality factor
GO TO:
CHAPTER 1. BASIC NETWORK CONCEPTS
GO TO:
GO TO:
CHAPTER 9. NETWORK SYNTHESIS
GO TO:
CHAPTER 10. TWO-PORT NETWORKS
GO TO:
CHAPTER 11. FILTERS AND ATTENUATORS
GO TO:
CHAPTER 12. TRANSMISSION LINES
������������������������xvii
GO TO:
GO TO:
GO TO:
GO TO:
GO TO:
1.1 IntroductIon
We know that like charges repel each other whereas unlike charges attract each other. To overcome this force
of attraction, a certain amount of work or energy is required. When the charges are separated, it is said that a
potential difference exists and the work or energy per unit charge utilised in this process is known as voltage
or potential difference.
The phenomenon of transfer of charge from one point to another is termed current. Current (I) is defined as
the rate of flow of electrons in a conductor. It is measured by the number of electrons that flow in unit time.
Energy is the total work done in the electric circuit. The rate at which the work is done in an electric circuit
is called electric power. Energy is measured in joules (J) and power in watts (W).
1.2 resIstance
Resistance is the property of a material due to which it opposes the flow of electric current through it.
Certain materials offer very little opposition to the flow of electric current and are called conductors, e.g.,
metals, acids and salt solutions. Certain materials offer very high resistance to the flow of electric current and
are called insulators, e.g., mica, glass, rubber, Bakelite, etc.
The practical unit of resistance is ohm and is represented by the symbol W. A conductor is said to have
resistance of one ohm if a potential difference of one volt across its terminals causes a current of one ampere
to flow through it.
The resistance of a conductor depends on the following factors.
(i) It is directly proportional to its length.
(ii) It is inversely proportional to the area of cross section of the conductor.
(iii) It depends on the nature of the material.
(iv) It also depends on the temperature of the conductor.
Hence,
l
R∝
A
l
R=ρ
A
where l is length of the conductor, A is the cross-sectional area and r is a constant known as specific resistance
or resistivity of the material.
1.2 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
1. Power Dissipated in a Resistor We know that v = R i
When current flows through any resistor, power is absorbed by the resistor which is given by
p=vi
The power dissipated in the resistor is converted to heat which is given by
t t
E = ∫ v i dt = ∫ R i i dt = i 2 Rt
0 0
1.3 Inductance
Inductance is the property of a coil that opposes any change in the amount of current flowing through it. If
the current in the coil is increasing, the self-induced emf is set up in such a direction so as to oppose the rise
of current. Similarly, if the current in the coil is decreasing, the self-induced emf will be in the same direction
as the applied voltage.
Inductance is defined as the ratio of flux linkage to the current flowing through the coil. The practical unit
of inductance is henry and is represented by the symbol H. A coil is said to have an inductance of one henry
if a current of one ampere when flowing through it produces flux linkages of one weber-turn in it.
The inductance of an inductor depends on the following factors.
(i) It is directly proportional to the square of the number of turns.
(ii) It is directly proportional to the area of cross section.
(iii) It is inversely proportional to the length.
(iv) It depends on the absolute permeability of the magnetic material.
Hence,
N 2A
L∝
l
N 2A
L=µ
l
where l is the mean length, A is the cross-sectional area and m is the absolute permeability of the magnetic
material.
1. Current–Voltage Relationships in an Inductor We know that
di
v=L
dt
Expressing inductor current as a function of voltage,
1
di = v dt
L
Integrating both the sides,
i(t ) t
l
∫ di =
L ∫0
v dt
i(0)
t
1
L ∫0
i(t ) = v dt + i(0)
1.4 Capacitance 1.3
The quantity i(0) denotes the initial current through the inductor. When there is no initial current
through the inductor,
t
1
L ∫0
i( t ) = v dt
2. Energy Stored in an Inductor Consider a coil of inductance L carrying a changing current I. When
the current is changed from zero to a maximum value I, every change is opposed by the self-induced emf
produced. To overcome this opposition, some energy is needed and this energy is stored in the magnetic
field. The voltage v is given by
di
v=L
dt
Energy supplied to the inductor during interval dt is given by
di
dE = v i dt = L i dt = L i dt
dt
Hence, total energy supplied to the inductor when current is increased from 0 to I amperes is
I I
1 2
E = ∫ dE = ∫ L i di = LI
0 0
2
1.4 capacItance
Capacitance is the property of a capacitor to store an electric charge when its plates are at different potentials.
If Q coulombs of charge is given to one of the plates of a capacitor and if a potential difference of V volts is
applied between the two plates then its capacitance is given by
Q
C=
V
The practical unit of capacitance is farad and is represented by the symbol F. A capacitor is said to have
capacitance of one farad if a charge of one coulomb is required to establish a potential difference of one volt
between its plates.
The capacitance of a capacitor depends on the following factors.
(i) It is directly proportional to the area of the plates.
(ii) It is inversely proportional to the distance between two plates.
(iii) It depends on the absolute permittivity of the medium between the plates.
Hence,
A
C∝
d
A
C=ε
d
where d is the distance between two plates, A is the cross-sectional area of the plates and e is absolute
permittivity of the medium between the plates.
1.4 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
1. Current–Voltage Relationships in a Capacitor The charge on a capacitor is given by
q = Cv
where q denotes the charge and v is the potential difference across the plates at any instant.
We know that
dq d dv
i= = Cv = C
dt dt dt
Expressing capacitor voltage as a function of current,
1
dv = i dt
C
Integrating both the sides,
v(t ) t
1
∫ dv =
C ∫0
i dt
v(0)
t
1
C ∫0
v(t ) = i dt + v(0)
The quantity v (0) denotes the initial voltage across the capacitor. When there is no initial voltage on
the capacitor,
t
1
C ∫0
v(t ) = i dt
2. Energy Stored in a Capacitor Let a capacitor of capacitance C farads be charged from a source of
V volts. Then current i is given by
dv
i=C
dt
Energy supplied to the capacitor during interval dt is given by
dv
dE = v i dt = v C dt
dt
Hence, total energy supplied to the capacitor when potential difference is increased from 0 to V volts is
V V
1
E = ∫ dE = ∫ C v dv = CV 2
0 0
2
1.5 sources
Source is a basic network element which supplies energy to the networks. There are two classes of sources,
namely,
1. Independent sources
2. Dependent sources
1.5 Sources 1.5
A non-linear circuit element is one in which the current does not change linearly with the change
in applied voltage. A semiconductor diode operating in
the curved region of characteristics as shown in Fig. 1.8 I
is common example of non-linear element.
Other examples of non-linear elements are voltage-
dependent resistor (VDR), voltage-dependent capacitor
(varactor), temperature-dependent resistor (thermistor), light- t
en t
dependent resistor (LDR), etc. Linear elements obey Ohm’s m en
E le m
ar le
law whereas non-linear elements do not obey Ohm’s law. ne rE
a
Lii ne
3. Active and Passive Elements An element -L
N on
which is a source of electrical signal or which is capable
of increasing the level of signal energy is termed as 0 V
active element. Batteries, BJTs, FETs or OP-AMPs are
treated as active elements because these can be used
Fig. 1.8 V-I characteristics of linear and
for the amplification or generation of signals. All other
non-linear elements
circuit elements, such as resistors, capacitors, inductors,
VDR, LDR, thermistors, etc., are termed passive elements. The behaviour of active elements cannot be
described by Ohm’s law.
4. Unilateral and Bilateral Elements If the magnitude of current flowing through a circuit element
is affected when the polarity of the applied voltage is changed, the element is termed unilateral element.
Consider the example of a semiconductor diode. Current flows through the diode only in one direction.
Hence, it is called an unilateral element. Next, consider the example of a resistor. When the voltage is
applied, current starts to flow. If we change the polarity of the applied voltage, the direction of the current
is changed but its magnitude is not affected. Such an element is called a bilateral element.
5. Lumped and Distributed Elements A lumped element is the element which is separated physically,
like resistors, inductors and capacitors. Distributed elements are those which are not separable for analysis
purposes. Examples of distributed elements are transmission lines in which the resistance, inductance and
capacitance are distributed along its length.
6. Active and Passive Networks A network which contains at least one active element such as an
independent voltage or current source is an active network. A network which does not contain any active
element is a passive network.
7. Time-invariant and Time-variant Networks A network is said to be time-invariant or fixed if its
input–output relationship does not change with time. In other words, a network is said to time-invariant,
if for any time shift in input, an identical time-shift occurs for output. In time-variant networks, the
input–output relationship changes with time.
V = V1 + V2 + V3
RT I = R1 I + R2 I + R3 I
RT = R1 + R2 + R3
Hence, when a number of resistors are connected in series, the equivalent resistance is the sum of all the
individual resistance.
Total power PT = P1 + P2 + P3
= I12 R1 + I 22 R2 + I 32 R3
V2 V2 V3
= + +
R1 R2 R3
R1 R2
Note: For two branch circuits, RT =
R1 + R2
V = RT I = R1 I1 = R2 I 2
V R I R2
I1 = = T = I
R1 R1 R1 + R2
V R I R1
I2 = = T = I
R2 R2 R1 + R2
1 1 1 1
LT ∫ v dt = L1 ∫ v dt + L2 ∫ v dt + L3 ∫ v dt v
L1 L2 L3
LT =
L1 L2 + L2 L3 + L3 L1
Hence, when a number of inductors are connected in parallel, the reciprocal of the equivalent inductance
is equal to the sum of reciprocals of individual inductances.
1.10 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
Q CT V C1 C3 i3 C3
V2 = = = V
C2 C2 C1C2 + C2C3 + C3C1
Q CT V C1 C2
V3 = = = V
C3 C3 C1C2 + C2C3 + C3C1
v
Figure 1.14 shows three capacitors connected in parallel across
an ac voltage source v. Let i1 , i2 and i3 be the current through each Fig. 1.14 Parallel combination
capacitance C1 , C2 and C3 respectively. of capacitors
In parallel combination, the voltage across each capacitor is same but current through each capacitor is
different.
i = i1 + i2 + i3
dv dv dv dv
CT = C1 + C2 + C3
dt dt dt dt
CT = C1 + C2 + C3
Hence, when a number of capacitors are connected in parallel, the equivalent capacitance is the sum of all
the individual capacitance.
1 1
R1
RC RB
R2 R3
2 3 2 3
RA
(a) (b)
These two networks will be electrically equivalent if the resistance as measured between any pair of
terminals is the same in both the arrangements.
RC ( RA + RB )
R1 + R2 = ...(1.1)
RA + RB + RC
RA ( RB + RC )
Similarly, R2 + R3 = ...(1.2)
RA + RB + RC
RB ( RA + RC )
and R3 + R1 = ...(1.3)
RA + RB + RC
Thus, star resistor connected to a terminal is equal to the product of the two delta resistors connected to
the same terminal divided by the sum of the delta resistors.
1.12 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
1.10.2 Star to delta Transformation
Multiplying the above equations,
RA RB RC2
R1 R2 = ...(1.5)
( RA + RB + RC ) 2
RA2 RB RC
R2 R3 = ...(1.6)
( RA + RB + RC ) 2
RA RB2 RC
R3 R1 = ...(1.7)
( RA + RB + RC ) 2
Adding Eqs (1.5), (1.6) and (1.7),
RA RB RC ( RA + RB + RC ) RA RB RC
R1 R2 + R2 R3 + R3 R1 = =
( RA + RB + RC ) 2 RA + RB + RC
= RA R1 = RB R2 = RC R3
Hence,
R1 R2 + R2 R3 + R3 R1 RR
RA = = R2 + R3 + 2 3
R1 R1
R1 R2 + R2 R3 + R3 R1 RR
RB = = R1 + R3 + 3 1
R2 R2
R1 R2 + R2 R3 + R3 R1 RR
RC = = R1 + R2 + 1 2
R3 R3
Thus, delta resistor connected between the two terminals is the sum of two star resistors connected to the
same terminals plus the product of the two resistors divided by the remaining third star resistor.
Note: (1) When three equal resistors are connected in delta (Fig. 1.16), the equivalent star resistance is given by
R∆ R∆ R
RY = = ∆
R∆ + R∆ + R∆ 3
R∆ = 3RY
A
A
RY
R∆ R∆
RY RY
B C B C
R∆
Fig. 1.16 Equivalent star resistance for three equal delta resistors
(2) Star-delta transformation can also be applied to network containing inductors and capacitors.
1.11 Source Transformation 1.13
R
V
⇔I= R
V R
(a) (b)
example 1.1 Replace the given network of Fig. 1.18 with a single current source and a resistor.
A
10 A 6Ω
5Ω
20 V
Fig. 1.18 A A
60 V
Solution Since the resistor of 5 W is connected in parallel with the voltage 80 V
source of 20 V it becomes redundant. Converting parallel combination 6Ω
of current source and resistor into equivalent voltage source and resistor 6Ω
(Fig. 1.19),
20 V
By source transformation (Fig. 1.20),
B B
A
Fig. 1.19
13.33 A 6Ω
Fig. 1.20
example 1.2 Reduce the network shown in Fig. 1.21 into a single source and a single resistor be-
tween terminals A and B.
1.14 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
A
1A 2Ω 2Ω
4V
3Ω 1Ω
6V 3V
B
Fig. 1.21
Solution Converting all voltage sources into equivalent current sources (Fig. 1.22),
A
1A 2Ω 2Ω 2A
2A 3Ω 1Ω 3A
Fig. 1.22
Adding the current sources and simplifying the network (Fig. 1.23),
A
1Ω 3A
0.75 Ω 1A
Fig. 1.23
Converting the current sources into equivalent voltage sources (Fig. 1.24),
A A
3V
3.75 V
1Ω
1.75 Ω
0.75 Ω
0.75 V B B
Fig. 1.24
example 1.3 Replace the circuit between A and B in Fig. 1.25 with a voltage source in series with
a single resistor.
1.11 Source Transformation 1.15
5Ω 6Ω
3A
30 Ω 50 Ω
20 V
Fig. 1.25
Solution Converting the series combination of voltage source of 20 V and a resistor of 5 W into equivalent
parallel combination of current source and resistor (Fig. 1.26),
A
3A 30 Ω 50 Ω 4A 5Ω 6Ω
Fig. 1.26
Adding the two current sources and simplifying the circuit (Fig. 1.27),
A
7A 30 || 50 || 5 || 6 = 2.38 Ω
Fig. 1.27
By source transformation (Fig. 1.28),
2.38 Ω
A
16.67 V
Fig. 1.28
example 1.4 Find the power delivered by the 50 V source in the network of Fig. 1.29.
3Ω
5Ω
2Ω
50 V 10 A 10 V
Fig. 1.29
1.16 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
Solution Converting the series combination of voltage source of 10 V and resistor of 3 W into equivalent
current source and resistor (Fig. 1.30),
5Ω
10 A 2Ω 3.33 A 3Ω
50 V
Fig. 1.30
Adding the two current sources and simplifying the network (Fig. 1.31),
5Ω
13.33 A 1.2 Ω
50 V
Fig. 1.31
By source transformation (Fig. 1.32),
5Ω 1.2 Ω
I
50 V 16 V
Fig. 1.32
50 − 16
I= = 5.48 A
5 + 1.2
example 1.5 Find the current in the 4 W resistor shown in network of Fig. 1.33.
6V
5A 2Ω 2A 4Ω
Fig. 1.33
Solution Converting the parallel combination of the current source of 5 A and the resistor of 2 W into an
equivalent series combination of voltage source and resistor (Fig. 1.34),
1.11 Source Transformation 1.17
2Ω 6V
10 V
2A 4Ω
Fig. 1.34
Adding two voltage sources (Fig. 1.35),
2Ω
4V
2A 4Ω
Fig. 1.35
Again by source transformation (Fig. 1.36),
2A 2Ω 2A 4Ω
Fig. 1.36
Adding two current sources (Fig. 1.37),
4A 2Ω 4Ω
Fig. 1.37
By current-division rule,
2
I4 W = 4 × = 1.33 A
2+4
example 1.6 Find the voltage across the 4 W resistor shown in network of Fig. 1.38.
3Ω 2Ω 1Ω
6V 6Ω 3A 4Ω
Fig. 1.38
1.18 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
Solution Converting the series combination of the voltage source of 6 V and the resistor of 3 W into
equivalent current source and resistor (Fig. 1.39),
2Ω 1Ω
2A 3Ω 6Ω 3A 4Ω
Fig. 1.39
2Ω 1Ω
2A 2Ω 3A 4Ω
Fig. 1.40
By source transformation (Fig. 1.41),
2Ω 1Ω 1Ω
2Ω 4Ω
4Ω 4Ω
3A 3A
4V 4V
(a) (b)
1Ω 1Ω 4Ω 1Ω
I
1A 4Ω 3A 4Ω 4A 4Ω 4 Ω 16 V 4Ω
Fig. 1.41
16
I= = 1.78 A
4 +1+ 4
example 1.7 Find the voltage at Node 2 of the network shown in Fig. 1.42.
1 50 Ω 2
I
100 Ω
15 V 100 Ω
+ 10 I
−
Fig. 1.42
Solution We cannot change the network between nodes 1 and 2 since the controlling current I, for the
controlled source, is in the resistor between these nodes. Applying source transformation to series combination
of controlled source and the 100 W resistor (Fig. 1.43),
1 I 50 Ω 2 1 I 50 Ω 2
1 I 50 Ω 2 50 Ω
+
15 V 5I
−
Fig. 1.43
15 − 50 I − 50 I − 5 I = 0
15
I= = 0.143 A
105
example 1.8 Calculate the voltage across the 6 W resistor in the network of Fig. 1.44 using source-
shifting technique.
3Ω
2
4Ω 3 1Ω
1 4
+
2Ω 6Ω Va
18 V
−
Fig. 1.44
Solution Adding a voltage source of 18 V to the network and connecting to Node 2 (Fig. 1.45), we have
2 3Ω
4Ω 3 1Ω
1 4
18 V
+
2Ω 6Ω Va
18 V −
Fig. 1.45
Since nodes 1 and 2 are maintained at the same voltage by the sources, the connection between nodes 1
and 2 is removed. Now the two voltage sources have resistors in series and source transformation can be
applied (Fig. 1.46).
18 V 3Ω
18 V 4Ω 1Ω
2Ω 6Ω Va
−
Fig. 1.46
Exercises 1.21
4.5 A
4.5 A 1Ω
1Ω
1.33 Ω
4Ω +
2Ω 6Ω Va
−
6Ω
− +
Va
` (a) (b)
18 V 3Ω Va
5.985 V 3Ω 2.33 Ω
1.33 Ω 1Ω 6Ω
18 V 5.985 V
6Ω
− +
Va
(c) (d)
Fig. 1.47
Applying KCL at the node,
Va − 18 Va − 5.985 Va
+ + =0
3 2.33 6
Va = 9.23 V
Exercises
1.1 Use source transformation to simplify the 1.2 Determine the voltage Vx in the network of
network until two elements remain to the left Fig. 1.49 by source-shifting technique.
of terminals A and B.
3Ω
6 kΩ 3.5 kΩ
A
2Ω 1Ω
Vx
2 kΩ 3 kΩ 20 mA 12 kΩ
2V 2Ω 5Ω
B
Fig. 1.48
Fig. 1.49
[88.42 V, 7.92 k W]
[1.129 V]
1.22 Circuit Theory and Transmission Lines
Objective-Type Questions
1.1 A network contains linear resistors and ideal R
voltage sources. If values of all the resistors (a) nR (b)
n
are doubled then the voltage across each
R
resistor is (c) n2R (d)
n2
(a) halved
(b) doubled 1.6 All the resistances in Fig. 1.51 are 1 W each.
(c) increased by four times The value of I will be
(d) not changed
1.2 Four resistances 80 W, 50 W, 25 W, and R are I
connected in parallel. Current through 25 W
resistor is 4 A. Total current of the supply is
10 A. The value of R will be 1V
(a) 66.66 W (b) 40.25 W
(c) 36.36 W (d) 76.56 W
1.3 Viewed from the terminal AB, the network
Fig. 1.51
of Fig. 1.50 can be reduced to an equivalent
network of a single voltage source in series with
a single resistor with the following parameters 1 2
(a) A (b) A
A 15 15
10 V 5V 4 8
(c) A (d) A
15 15
10 Ω 4Ω 1.7 The current waveform in a pure resistor at 10
W is shown in Fig. 1.52. Power dissipated in
B the resistor is
Fig. 1.50 i
2.1 IntroductIon
In Chapter 1, we have studied basic network concepts. In network analysis, we have to find currents and
voltages in various parts of networks. In this chapter, we will study elementary network theorems like
Kirchhoff’s laws, mesh analysis and node analysis. These methods are applicable to all types of networks.
The first step in analyzing networks is to apply Ohm’s law and Kirchhoff’s laws. The second step is the
solving of these equations by mathematical tools.
3. Determination of Sign A rise in potential can be assumed to be positive while a fall in potential can
be considered negative. The reverse is also possible and both conventions will give the same result.
(i) If we go from the positive terminal of the battery or source to the negative terminal, there is a fall in
potential and so the emf should be assigned a negative sign (Fig. 2.2a). If we go from the negative
terminal of the battery or source to the positive terminal, there is a rise in potential and so the emf
should be given a positive sign (Fig. 2.2b).
(ii) When current flows through a resistor, there is a voltage drop across it. If we go through the resistor
in the same direction as the current, there is a fall in the potential and so the sign of this voltage
drop is negative (Fig. 2.3a). If we go opposite to the direction of the current flow, there is a rise in
potential and hence, this voltage drop should be given a positive sign (Fig. 2.3b).
I + − − + I
In general,
R11 R12 R13 I1 V1
R21 R22 R23 I 2 = V2
R31 R32 R33 I 3 V3
where, R11 = Self-resistance or sum of all the resistance of mesh 1
R12 = R21 = Mutual resistance or sum of all the resistances common to meshes 1 and 2
R13 = R31 = Mutual resistance or sum of all the resistances common to meshes 1 and 3
R22 = Self-resistance or sum of all the resistance of mesh 2
R23 = R32 = Mutual resistance or sum of all the resistances common to meshes 2 and 3
R33 = Self-resistance or sum of all the resistance of mesh 3
If the directions of the currents passing through the common resistance are the same, the mutual resistance
will have a positive sign, and if the direction of the currents passing through common resistance are opposite
then the mutual resistance will have a negative sign. If each mesh current is assumed to flow in the clockwise
direction then all self-resistances will always be positive and all mutual resistances will always be negative.
The voltages V1, V2 and V3 represent the algebraic sum of all the voltages in meshes 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
While going along the current, if we go from negative terminal of the battery to the positive terminal then its
emf is taken as positive. Otherwise, it is taken as negative.
Example 2.1 Find the current through the 5 W resistor is shown in Fig. 2.5.
1Ω 2Ω
3Ω 5Ω
10 V
5V 4Ω
6Ω
20 V
Fig. 2.5
Solution Assigning clockwise currents in three meshes as shown in Fig. 2.6.
Applying KVL to Mesh 1,
10 − 1I1 − 3 ( I1 − I 2 ) − 6 ( I1 − I 3 ) = 0
10 I1 − 3 I 2 − 6 I 3 = 10 …(i)
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The object of these pages is to present to the reader the thoughts
on Egypt, as it was and as it is, which arose in the author’s mind
during a tour he made last winter through the country. Among these
thoughts, as I intimated at the beginning of this chapter, a prominent
place is occupied by chronological questions, for the dates of early
Egyptian history do not accord with those of the popularly-received
system. It therefore becomes necessary to revert to the grounds of
that system, as well as to examine and ascertain the particulars of
the chronology of Egypt.
In this indispensable department of primæval history it is possible
that we may have been misled by a very natural misapprehension as
to the character of the earlier portions of the Hebrew Scriptures. We
read them as if they were addressed to ourselves, and as if their
object was historical. These are, both of them, erroneous and
misleading ideas. It is evident, on the face of the documents, that
their writers had in view no readers excepting those for whose
immediate behoof they were composed, and no objects excepting
religion and patriotism. Their aim was to form the Israelites into a
people by the instrumentality of a Code, sanctioned and enforced by
religion. The writings, therefore, necessarily lay a foundation for the
religion, give an exposition of it, and set forth the motives for its
observance. The Code is the point of view from which the religion,
and the formation of the people that from which the Code, is to be
regarded. History is no more their object than science. They do, of
course, contain a part, and that a most important part, of the history
of mankind; for, in carrying out their aim, they give much of the
history of a people that was destined to have a great, and
permanent, and ever-growing effect on the world. But it is important
to observe that even this they contain only incidentally. To us both
their religious aims, and their incidental history, give them a value
which cannot be over-estimated. We shall, however, only fall into
mistakes if we lose sight of their primary, limited, Hebrew, religious
purpose, and regard them as universal history.
This is a question of broad as well as of minute criticism—of the
interpretation of the whole as well as of particulars. Are these
Scriptures to be regarded as containing the religion and the history,
limited to the point of view of the religion, of one of the smallest of all
people, or as containing the whole primæval history of man, in such
a sense that nothing but what appears to be in harmony with what
has come to be their popular interpretation, can be taken into
consideration? It was for many ages an unavoidable mistake to
entertain respecting them the latter assumption. (That some of the
elements of Hebrew religious thought were subsequently taken up
into the religious thought of a very considerable portion of mankind
does not affect the question immediately before us.) It maybe,
precisely, the attempt to maintain this misconception of their nature
which is now causing so much confusion of thought and ill-feeling. If
regarded in their true light, no documents of the old world are more
precious to us historically (I am not speaking of them in any other
sense now); for, to refer to that which is the chief concern of man, if
the great lesson of history is to teach us that it has itself no meaning,
purpose, or value, excepting so far as it is the story of the intellectual
and moral growth of the race, and that this double growth is the
paramount object of national and of individual life, then how precious
and how luminous a portion of history do these documents become!
But this value is very much lessened, and this light obscured, by
the determination to find in them, not a part, but the whole of
primæval history. The civilization of Egypt, which reaches back into
so remote a past that the Pyramids were monuments of hoar
antiquity when Abraham saw them, and the civilization—perhaps
contemporary with the date of the Pyramids—which existed on the
banks of the Euphrates, the Ganges, and the Yankse Kiang, must be
made harmoniously to find a place by the side of what is recorded in
the Hebrew Scriptures. So must the mythology, and the moral and
intellectual aptitudes of the Aryan race of man. So must also the
knowledge to which we have attained of the history of our globe
itself, and of the succession of life upon it. This process has already
been passed through with respect to the discoveries of astronomy.
Against them there was a long and fierce struggle. At last everybody
admitted both that what astronomers taught might be believed, and
that the Hebrew Scriptures did not teach astronomy. There is no
reason for confining to astronomy the rule that was established in its
favour. It must be extended so as to include our knowledge of the
greatness and the remoteness of Egyptian civilization, and every
other kind of knowledge. We need not, and we must not, so interpret
the Hebrew Scriptures as to reject on their authority, or even to feel
repugnance to accept, any clearly-established facts. To make this
use of them is to wrest them to a purpose for which it is clear they
were never intended.
Their historical value to ourselves is only an incident and accident
of their designed purpose: that was to teach to the Israelites their
code, and to give them motives for observing it (which has come to
be to us a part of history), and not to teach history to us. The idea of
history, taking the word in the meaning it has for us, did not exist
then. It could not, indeed, have existed then, for everything has its
own place and time, and the time for history had not come then.
First, the seed is deposited in the ground, then comes the tender
shoot, next the stem and blades, after that the plant flowers; last of
all comes the full corn in the ripe ear. Those early days were the time
when the materials were in many places being collected, out of
which we have to construct human history. It is fortunate for us that
in those first times men did not forestall the idea of history: that
would have prevented their attending singly to what they were
themselves doing, and to the thoughts that were at work in their own
minds.
CHAPTER XI.
GOING UP TO THE TOP OF THE GREAT
PYRAMID.
How fearful
And dizzy ’tis to cast one’s eyes so low:
The crows and choughs that wing the midway air
Show scarce so gross as beetles.—Shakspeare.
On our first visit to the Pyramids we had our luncheon in the large
granite tomb a little below, and to the south-east of the Sphinx. One
feels that there is an incongruity, a kind almost of profanation, in
using a tomb, particularly such a tomb, for such a purpose. Its
massiveness, at all events, makes you conscious of a kind of
degeneracy in the present day. A sense of unworthiness and
littleness comes over you. What business have we, who send our
dead to heaven, and have done with them, to disturb the repose of
those on whose sepulchres a fortune was spent, if not by their
relatives, at all events by themselves? But on this occasion there
was little choice. Outside the sun was scorching, and the wind was
high, and the only alternative was the hotel. But that was impossible:
to be shut up in a hideous, plastered, naked room of yesterday,
within a few yards of the Great Pyramid. One would rather go without
one’s luncheon for six months together than have to bear the stings
of conscience for having so outraged the memory of Cheops and
Chephren. And so we took our luncheon that day in the tomb of one
of the great officers of the court of those old times.
It was formed entirely of enormous blocks and monolithic piers of
polished granite. I do not know of how many chambers it consisted,
for being considerably below the level of the surrounding sand-drift,
and the roof having been entirely removed, a few hours’ wind must
always completely fill and obliterate it. The Arabs then have to clear
it out again. When we were there four chambers were open. These
are all long narrow apartments. The one by which we entered runs
from west to east. At right angles to this are two other apartments,
their axes being from north to south. The fourth we saw was at right
angles to the north end of these two parallel chambers. It was in the
southern extremity of the westernmost of the two parallel chambers
that our party took their places. The comestibles were laid on a cloth
spread on the sand, with which the floor, to the depth of some
inches, was covered; the party reclined on the sand around, or sat
on blocks of granite arranged for seats. The hungry Arabs perched
themselves on the brink of the tomb, waiting for the fragments of the
feast, like vultures. The pert popping of the champagne corks again
disturbed ones sense of the fitness of things.
How was it possible to be there, and not feel the genius loci? The
whole of this edge of the desert, from Gizeh to the Faioum, is one
vast Necropolis. The old primæval monarchy lies buried here; at
Gizeh, Sakkara, Dashour, Abusseir, and throughout all the spaces
between and beyond, to the Faioum. No other empire has been so
buried.
In this wide field of the dead how much of early thought and
feeling, and life is storied. How much contemporary history in wood
and stone, in earthenware, and glass, and paint. Contemporary
history—not history composed, heaven save the mark! centuries
after the events, often by authors (sometimes truly the authors of all
they tell) who did not understand their own time, often merely for
bread and cheese;—not composed twentieth-hand from writings
which, even at their original source and fountain-head, were the work
of men who were not agents in what they endeavoured to record,
and who, not knowing truly the events, their causes, or their
consequences, were but ill qualified to write the record;—not
composed when the feelings and ways of thinking of the time were
no longer living things, but had died out, and other thoughts and
feelings come in their place, and when what the writer had to
construct had become obscure by party prejudice in politics and
religion, and by social misunderstandings. Nothing of this kind is
here. What is here is contemporary history, presented in such a form
that it is the actual pressure and embodiment of the heart and mind
of each individual. Here are the occupations he delighted in, the
sentiments that stirred him, the business that was the business of his
life, the clothes he wore, the furniture he used, the forms religious
thought had assumed in his mind, the forms social arrangements
had assumed around him. No people have ever so written their
history. Here is a biography of each man as he knew himself. Here
every man is a Boswell to himself. It is a nation’s life individually
photographed in granite.
We sat after luncheon taking our kêf, apparently absorbed in the
contemplation of the little fantastic wreaths of cloud formed by our
cigars. But the few remarks that were made showed that the
thoughts of most of us were occupied in resuscitating the past, and
repeopling the sacred terrain around with the grand impressive
ceremonies and funeral processions of five thousand years back.
What a scene must this have been then. The mountains—for that is
the meaning of the Pyramids—not rugged and dilapidated as now,
but cased with polished stone, each with its temple in front of it. The
many smaller Pyramids that have now disappeared, or are only seen
as mounds of rubbish, then acting as foils to their giant brethren.
Great Pyramids reaching all along the foot of the hills as far as the
eye could see towards the south: some of these still figure in the
landscape. The Sphinx was standing clear of sand with a temple
between his paws. Everything was orderly, bright, and splendid. The
dark red granite portals of the thousand houses of those, who slept
in the city of the dead, were standing out conspicuous upon the
sober limestone area, unchequered by a plant, unstained by a
lichen. The black basalt causeways traversed the green plain from
the silver river to the Pyramid plateau. The whole scene was alive
with those, who were visiting, and honouring, the dead, and
preparing their own last, earthly resting-places. Above all was spread
out the azure field of the Egyptian sky.
Opera basilica.—Bacon.