11 MOGOTE Chapter 4

CHAPTER 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presents, analyzes and interprets gathered
data of the study.
Status of Children in Conflict with the Law (CICL) in

Barangay Dayap, Calauan, Laguna
Specific problem number one focused on the status of
children in conflict with the law in Barangay Dayap,
Calauan, Laguna.
Figure 3 presents the statistics on the crimes
committed by the CICL in Barangay Dayap, Calauan, Laguna.
Figure 3. Crimes Committed by Children in Conflict with the

Law in Barangay Dayap, Calauan, Laguna.
Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation 34
As presented in figure 3, it shows that there were only
three major crimes committed by CICL of Barangay Dayap,
Calauan, Laguna, such as curfew, robbery, and theft.
The said barangay recorded twenty-six (26) cases of
curfew, twenty-six (26) cases of theft, and only eleven (11)
cases of robbery. In total, they were sixty-three (63) cases
committed by the CICL. Generally, there is an increasing
number of crimes and/or infraction of law committed by the
CICL.
Level of Perception on the Risk Factors of Children in

Conflict with the Law and Its Effect in terms of Individual,
Family and Community
Specific problem number two focused on the level of
perception on the risk factors of children in conflict with
the law and its effect in terms of individual, family and
community in Brgy. Dayap Calauan Laguna as perceived by the
two groups of respondents.
Table 2 reveals the level of perception on the risk
factors of children in conflict with the law and its effect
in terms of family as perceived by the barangay officials.

Table 2
Level of Perception on The Risk Factors of Children in

Conflict with The Law and Its Effect in Terms of Family as
Perceived by The Barangay Officials
A. Patrol Guidelines (Duhat)
STATEMENT Brgy. Officials Tanod Residents
MEAN SD VERBAL MEAN SD VERBAL MEAN SD VERBAL

INTERPRETATION INTERPRETATION INTERPRETATION
1. Patrol members observe precautionary 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.00 0.89 Agree
measures and personal safety while
on patrol.
2. Patrol members observe defensive 6.80 0.40 Strongly Agree 6.40 0.49 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.98 Strongly Agree
driving and follow traffic rules and
regulations.
3. Patrol members select routes which 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.40 Strongly Agree 5.80 0.40 Agree
provide best visibility.
4. Patrol members must be always on the 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.40 Strongly Agree 6.00 0.63 Agree
look-out for indications of vices
and other illegal activities on
their beat
5. Patrol members must be knowledgeable 6.80 0..40 Strongly Agree 5.60 0.49 Agree 6.40 0.80 Strongly Agree
of conditions, events and details of
places on their beat
6. Patrol members must be observant of 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 5.60 0.49 Agree 6.20 0.75 Strongly Agree
people, places, situations or
conditions and develop a suspicious
attitude especially if the subject
appears to be slightly out of the
ordinary.
7. Patrol members keep under close 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.75 Strongly Agree 6.00 0.63 Agree
observation action of
juvenile/trouble makers/ agitators
and the mentally ill/ retarted
person.
8. Patrol member must be familiar, as 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.98 Strongly Agree 5.40 0.49 Agree
much as possible, with known
criminals/ex-convicts residing in or
frequenting the patrol beat
9. Patrol members must be familiar as 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.98 Strongly Agree 5.40 1.02 Agree
much as possible with known
criminals/ ex-convict residing in or
frequenting the patrol beat
10. Patrol members must be on the alert 7.00 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.75 Strongly Agree 6.00 0.89 Agree
for loiters
11. Patrol members must Keep watch on 6.80 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.00 0.63 Agree 5.20 0.98 Moderately
uninhabited homes Agree
12. Patrol members observe the practice 6.80 0.00 Strongly Agree 5.60 0.80 Agree 5.60 0.80 Agree
of “shaking doors” of unguarded
business establishments during night
patrol. Check for signs of intrusion
13. Patrol members establish good 6.80 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.40 0.49 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.75 Strongly Agree
rapport with the people on your beat
14. Patrol members develop contacts by 6.80 0.00 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.40 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.75 Strongly Agree
getting to know as many people as
possible who can give factual
information about crime condition in
the patrol beat
15. Patrol members use tact and 6.60 0.49 Strongly Agree 6.60 0.49 Strongly Agree 6.00 0.89 Agree
persuasiveness when conducting spot
inquiry or questioning individuals
for information
16. When requiring identification from a 6.80 0.40 Strongly Agree 6.20 0.75 Strongly Agree 5.40 0.80 Agree
suspicious person or any individual,
patrol members avoid taking the
wallet or bag in which the
cards/documents are placed. Let the
individual remove and hand them to
you
17. When checking suspicious persons, 6.80 0.40 Strongly Agree 5.60 1.20 Agree 6.40 0.49 Strongly Agree
places, buildings/ establishments
and vehicles especially during night
time, patrol member is prepared to
use non-lethal equipment like
nightstick. Flash light should be
held tightly away from the body to
avoid making the patrol member a
possible target
18. Patrol member should avoid loitering 6.60 0.49 Strongly Agree 5.80 0.75 Agree 5.60 0.49 Agree
in theaters, restaurants and other
recreational places
Overall 6.87 0.13 Strongly Agree 6.12 0.22 Agree 5.89 0.40 Agree
Table 2 displays the level of implementation of the
barangay patrol operations by the barangay tanod in selected
barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat, as
perceived by the three (3) groups of respondents in terms of
Patrol Guidelines. The table revealed that, statement 1, 3,
4, 6, 7, 8,9 and 10 (Patrol members observe precautionary
measures and personal safety while on patrol; Patrol
members select routes which provide best visibility; Patrol
members must be always on the look-out for indications of
vices and other illegal activities on their beat) got the
highest mean as perceived by the first group of respondents
with a mean value of 7.00 (SD=0.00) interpreted as Strongly
Agree. Meanwhile, statement 1 (Patrol members observe
precautionary measures and personal safety while on patrol)
got the highest mean as perceived by the second group of
respondents with a mean value of 7.00 (SD= 0.00) interpreted
as Strongly Agree. And statement 5 and (Patrol members must
be knowledgeable of conditions, events and details of
places on their beat; When checking suspicious persons,
places, buildings/ establishments and vehicles especially
during night time, patrol member is prepared to use non-
lethal equipment like nightstick. Flash light should be
held tightly away from the body to avoid making the patrol
member a possible target) got the highest mean value of 6.40

(SD=0.49) as perceived by the third group of respondents
interpreted as Strongly Agree. On the other hand, statement
15 and 18 (Patrol members use tact and persuasiveness when
conducting spot inquiry or questioning individuals for
information; Patrol member should avoid loitering in
theaters, restaurants and other recreational places ) got
the lowest mean value of 6.60 (SD= 0.49) as perceived by the
first groups of respondents interpreted as Strongly Agree.
However, statement 5, 6, 12 and 17 (Patrol members must be
knowledgeable of conditions, events and details of places
on their beat; Patrol members must be observant of people,
places, situations or conditions and develop a suspicious
attitude especially if the subject appears to be slightly
out of the ordinary) got the lowest mean value of 5.60 (SD=
0.49) interpreted as Agree as perceived by the second group.
While statement 11 (Patrol members must Keep watch on
uninhabited homes) got the lowest mean value of 5.20 (SD=
0.98) interpreted as Moderately Agree as perceived by the
third group. Overall, the threes group of respondents has
different level of perception on the level of implementation
of the barangay patrol operations by the barangay tanod in
selected barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay
Duhat, as perceived by the three (3) groups of respondents
in terms of Patrol Guidelines, wherein the first group

stated that they are Strongly Agree while the second and
third group stated that they are Agree.
The implication drawn from Table 1 highlights
differences in the perception of the level of implementation
of barangay patrol operations by barangay tanods in selected
barangays in Sta. Cruz, Laguna, specifically Barangay Duhat,
as perceived by three groups of respondents in terms of
patrol guidelines. While the first group strongly agrees
with the implementation, the second and third groups show
slightly lower levels of agreement, though still indicating
general agreement. These discrepancies suggest potential
variations in understanding or expectations regarding patrol
guidelines among different groups of respondents. Addressing
these differences and ensuring alignment in perceptions can
contribute to more effective and cohesive patrol operations,
enhancing community safety and security in Barangay Duhat
and similar areas.
RRL
B. Technique in Traffic Direction and Control (Duhat)

STATEMENT Brgy. Officials Tanod Residents
ME SD VERBAL ME SD VERBAL ME SD VERBAL

AN INTERPR AN INTERPR AN INTERPR
ETATION ETATION ETATION
1. Police member keep 6. 0. Strongl 6. 0. Strongl 6. 0. Strongl
intersection always 80 40 y Agree 60 80 y Agree 20 98 y Agree

open.
2. Police member never 0. Strongl 0. Strongl 5. 1. Agree
allow the motorists to 40 y Agree 89 y Agree 60 36
cross when they don’t 6. 6.
have any exit. 80 00
3. Stop motorist at 6. 0. Strongl 6. 0. Strongl 5. 0. Agree
their designated 80 40 y Agree 20 40 y Agree 60 80
stopping lane. However,
police member do not
stop motorist near you,
provide motorist
sufficient distance to
stop gradually
4. Patrol member prefer 0. Strongl 0. Agree 5. 1.
to stop fast moving 6. 40 y Agree 6. 63 60 36
vehicles. 80 00 Agree
5. When two or more 6. 0. Strongl 6. 0. Agree 1. Moderat
vehicles are about to 60 49 y Agree 00 63 62 ely
obstruct their Agree
intersection, the police
member should stop the 4.
motorist affecting it. 60
6. If two or more 6. 0. Strongl 5. 0. Agree 4. 1. Neither
personnel are conducting 60 49 y Agree 80 40 20 33 Agree
traffic direction and nor
control, the first Disagre
command must be given by e
the team leader followed
by the member.
Overall 6. 0. Strongl 6. 0. Agree 5. 0. Agree
73 27 y Agree 10 27 30 19
Table 3 displays level of implementation of the

Technique in Traffic Direction and Control. The table
revealed that, statement 1,2, 3 and 4 (Police member keep
intersection always open; Police member never allow the
motorists to cross when they don’t have any exit; Stop
motorist at their designated stopping lane. However, police
member do not stop motorist near you, provide motorist
sufficient distance to stop gradually; Patrol member prefer
to stop fast moving vehicles.) got the highest mean as
perceived by the first group of respondents with a mean
value of 6.80 (SD=0.40) interpreted as Strongly Agree.
Meanwhile, statement 1 (Police member keep intersection
always open.) got the highest mean as perceived by the
second group of respondents with a mean value of 6.60 (SD=

0.80) interpreted as Strongly Agree. And statement 1
(Police member keep intersection always open.) got the
highest mean value of 6.20 (SD=0.98) as perceived by the
third group of respondents interpreted as Strongly Agree,
while statement 1 (Association with peers or gangs engaged
in deviant and/or criminal behaviors and/or involvement in
illegal drugs) got the highest mean value of 6.32 (SD= 1.29)
as perceived by the fourth group of respondents interpreted
as Strongly Agree. On the other hand, statement 5 and 6
(When two or more vehicles are about to obstruct their
intersection, the police member should stop the motorist
affecting it; If two or more personnel are conducting
traffic direction and control, the first command must be
given by the team leader followed by the member.) got the
lowest mean value of 6.60 (SD= 0.49) as perceived by the
While statement 6 (If two or more personnel are conducting
given by the team leader followed by the member) got the
lowest mean of 5.80 (SD=0.80) as perceived by second group
interpreted as Agree as. Also, statement 6 (If two or more
personnel are conducting traffic direction and control, the
first command must be given by the team leader followed by
the member) got the lowest mean value of 4.40 (SD= 2.80)
interpreted as Neither Agree or Disagree as perceived by the
third group. Overall, the three group of respondents has
different perception on the level of implementation of the
Technique in Traffic Direction and Control, wherein the
first group stated that they are Strongly Agree while the
second and third group stated that they are Agree.
The implication drawn from Table 2 highlights varying

perceptions among three groups of respondents regarding the
level of implementation of barangay patrol operations by
barangay tanods in selected barangays in Sta. Cruz Laguna,
specifically Barangay Duhat, in terms of techniques in
traffic direction and control. While the first group
strongly agrees with the implementation, indicating a high
level of satisfaction, the second and third groups show

general agreement. These differences suggest potential
variations in understanding or expectations regarding
traffic direction and control techniques among different
groups of respondents. Addressing these differences and
ensuring alignment in perceptions can contribute to more
effective and cohesive patrol operations, enhancing traffic
management and safety in Barangay Duhat and similar areas.
SUMMARY
Variable Brgy. Officials Tanod Residents

s Mea Verbal Mea Verbal Mea Verbal
n Interpretati n Interpretati n Interpretati
on on on
Patrol Strongly 6.1 Agree 5.8 Agree
Guidelin 6.8 Agree 2 9
es 7
Techniqu Strongly 6.1 Agree 5.3 Agree
e in Agree 0 0
Traffic
Directio
n and 6.7
Control 3
OVERALL 6.8 Strongly 6.1 Agree 5.6 Agree
Agree 1 0
Table 4 summarizes the findings of perception on the

level of implementation of the barangay patrol operations by
the barangay tanod in selected barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna
specifically Barangay Duhat, as perceived by the three (3)
groups of respondents in terms of Patrol Guideline and
Technique in Traffic Direction and Control. The data
revealed that the four groups pf respondent has different
level of perception on implementation of the barangay patrol
operations by the barangay tanod in selected barangays in
Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat, based on the
overall mean value. wherein the first group stated that they
are Strongly Agree while the second and third group stated
that they are Agree.
The implication derived from Table 4 underscores

significant differences in the perception of the level of
implementation of barangay patrol operations by barangay
tanods in selected barangays in Sta. Cruz Laguna,
specifically Barangay Duhat, among the three groups of
respondents. While the first group expressed strong
agreement with the implementation, indicating a high level
of satisfaction, the second and third groups showed slightly
lower levels of agreement, though still indicating general
agreement. These variations suggest potential differences in
understanding or expectations regarding both patrol
guidelines and techniques in traffic direction and control
among different groups of respondents. Addressing these
differences and ensuring alignment in perceptions can
enhancing community safety and security in Barangay Duhat
and similar areas.
Significant difference on the level of implementation of

the barangay patrol operations by the barangay tanod in
selected barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna specifically
Barangay Duhat, as perceived by the three (3) groups of
respondents in terms of Patrol Guideline and Technique in
Traffic Direction and Control."
Responden F Df Decisi
Df p
ts Variable Valu 2 on on Analysis
1 value
e Ho
Brgy. Patrol 13.9 2 12 0.000 Reject Significa
Officials Guidelin 2 7 Ho nt
Tanod es
Residents
Brgy. Techniqu 17.9 2 12 0.000 Reject Significa
Officials e in 7 2 Ho nt
Tanod Traffic
Residents Directio
n and
Control
Table 5 shows the results of a statistical analysis on

the level of implementation of the barangay patrol
Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat, as perceived by
the three (3) groups of respondents in terms of Patrol
Guideline and Technique in Traffic Direction and Control.

The f-value and p-value were presented for each comparison.
The p-value represents the probability that the observed
difference occurred by chance, and a p-value less than 0.05
is considered statistically significant.
The table shows the summary of results in differences

in the level of implementation of the barangay patrol
Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat. The analysis
of variance showed that there is significant difference on
the level of perception of the groups of respondents on
Patrol Guideline F (2,12) = 13.92, p = .0007 likewise with
Technique in Traffic Direction and Control F (2,12) = 17.97,
p = .0002. The null hypothesis is said to be rejected based
on the significance level that is less than .05.
The implication of the analysis indicates significant

differences in the perception of the level of implementation
of barangay patrol operations by barangay tanods in selected
barangays in Sta. Cruz Laguna, specifically Barangay Duhat,
among the groups of respondents. The rejection of the null
hypothesis suggests that these differences are statistically
significant for both patrol guidelines and techniques in
traffic direction and control. Such findings underscore the
importance of recognizing and addressing variations in
perception among different groups of stakeholders involved
in barangay patrol operations. Understanding these
differences can inform targeted interventions and strategies
to improve coordination, communication, and implementation,
ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of barangay patrol
operations and contributing to the safety and security of
the community in Barangay Duhat and similar areas.
A. Patrol Guidelines (Santo Angel)

STATEMENT Brgy. Tanod Residents
Officials

AN INTERP AN INTERP AN INTERP
RETATI RETATI RETATI
ON ON ON
1. Patrol members 6. 0. Strong 7. 0. Strong 7. 0. Strong
observe 60 49 ly 00 00 ly 00 00 ly
precautionary Agree Agree Agree
measures and
personal safety
while on
patrol.
2. Patrol members 0. Strong 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong
observe 49 ly 49 ly 80 40 ly
defensive Agree Agree Agree
driving and
follow traffic
rules and 6. 6.
regulations. 40 60
3. Patrol members 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 0. Strong
select routes 20 40 ly 60 49 ly 00 ly
which provide Agree Agree Agree
best 7.
visibility. 00
4. Patrol members 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Strong
must be always 40 ly 49 ly 49 ly
on the look-out Agree Agree Agree
for indications
of vices and
other illegal
activities on 6. 6. 6.
their beat 20 40 40
5. Patrol members 5. 0. Agree 6. 0. Strong 0. Strong
must be 60 49 40 49 ly 40 ly
knowledgeable Agree Agree
of conditions,
events and
details of
places on their 6.
beat 80
must be 40 80 ly 20 40 ly 80 40 ly
observant of Agree Agree Agree
people, places,
situations or
conditions and
develop a
suspicious
attitude
especially if
the subject
appears to be
slightly out of
the ordinary.
7. Patrol members 6. 0. Strong 0. Strong 7. 0. Strong
keep under 60 80 ly 80 ly 00 00 ly
close Agree Agree Agree
observation
action of
juvenile/troubl
e makers/
agitators and
the mentally
ill/ retarted 6.
person. 40
8. Patrol member 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 0. Strong
must be 20 75 ly 40 80 ly 40 ly
familiar, as Agree Agree Agree
much as
possible, with
known
criminals/ex-
convicts
residing in or
frequenting the 6.
patrol beat 80
9. Patrol members 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Agree 0. Strong
must be 40 80 ly 00 63 49 ly
familiar as Agree Agree
much as
possible with
known
criminals/ ex-
convict
residing in or
frequenting the 6.
patrol beat 60
10. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Agree 0. Strong
members must be 20 75 ly 00 89 00 ly
on the alert Agree 7. Agree
for loiters 00
11. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 0. Agree 0. Strong
members must 60 80 ly 89 40 ly
Keep watch on Agree Agree
uninhabited 6. 6.
homes 00 80
12. Patrol 6. 0. Agree 5. 0. Agree 6. 0. Strong
members observe 00 63 80 98 80 40 ly
the practice of Agree
“shaking doors”
of unguarded
business
establishments
during night
patrol. Check
for signs of
intrusion
13. Patrol 5. 0. Agree 0. Agree 0. Strong
members 40 80 80 00 ly
establish good Agree
rapport with
the people on 5. 7.
your beat 60 00
14. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 0. Agree 0. Strong
members develop 80 40 ly 75 49 ly
contacts by Agree Agree
getting to know
as many people
as possible who
can give
factual
information
about crime
condition in 5. 6.
the patrol beat 80 60
15. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Strong
members use 60 80 ly 75 ly 49 ly
tact and Agree Agree Agree
persuasiveness
when conducting
spot inquiry or
questioning
individuals for 6. 6.
information 20 60
16. When 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong
requiring 20 40 ly 20 80 ly 60 49 ly
identification Agree Agree Agree
from a
suspicious
person or any
individual,
patrol members
avoid taking
the wallet or
bag in which
the
cards/documents
are placed. Let

the individual
remove and hand
them to you
17. When 6. 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Strong
checking 20 75 ly 49 ly 00 ly
suspicious Agree Agree Agree
persons,
places,
buildings/
establishments
and vehicles
especially
during night
time, patrol
member is
prepared to use
non-lethal
equipment like
nightstick.
Flash light
should be held
tightly away
from the body
to avoid making
the patrol
member a 6. 7.
possible target 60 00
18. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Strong
member should 40 49 ly 75 ly 49 ly
avoid loitering Agree Agree Agree
in theaters,
restaurants and
other
recreational 6. 6.
places 20 60
Overall 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Strong
6. 18 ly 6. 16 ly 6. 20 ly
28 Agree 26 Agree 79 Agree

barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Santo
Angel, as perceived by the three (3) groups of respondents
in terms of Patrol Guidelines. The table revealed that,
statement 14 (Patrol members develop contacts by getting to

know as many people as possible who can give factual
information about crime condition in the patrol beat) got
the highest mean as perceived by the first group of
respondents with a mean value of 6.80 (SD=0.40) interpreted
as Strongly Agree. Meanwhile, statement 1 (Patrol members
observe precautionary measures and personal safety while on
patrol) got the highest mean as perceived by the second
group of respondents with a mean value of 7.00 (SD= 0.00)
interpreted as Strongly Agree. And statement 1,3,7,10, 13
and 17 (Patrol members observe precautionary measures and
personal safety while on patrol; Patrol members must be on
the alert for loiters; Patrol members establish good
rapport with the people on your beat; When checking
suspicious persons, places, buildings/ establishments and
vehicles especially during night time, patrol member is
prepared to use non-lethal equipment like nightstick. Flash
light should be held tightly away from the body to avoid
making the patrol member a possible target) got the highest
mean value of 7.00 (SD=0.00) as perceived by the third group
of respondents interpreted as Strongly Agree. On the other
hand, statement 13 (Patrol members establish good rapport
with the people on your beat) got the lowest mean value of
5.40 (SD= 0.80) as perceived by the first groups of
respondents interpreted as Agree. Similarly, statement 13
(Patrol members establish good rapport with the people on
your beat) got the lowest mean value of 5.60 (SD= 0.80)
interpreted as Agree as perceived by the second group. While
statement 4 (Patrol members must be always on the look-out
for indications of vices and other illegal activities on
their beat) got the lowest mean value of 6.40 (SD= 0.49)
interpreted as Strongly Agree as perceived by the third
group. Overall, the threes group of respondents has same
level of perception on the level of implementation of the
in terms of Patrol Guidelines, wherein the three groups
stated that they are Strongly Agree.
The implication derived from Table 5 suggests a high

level of consensus among the three groups of respondents
regarding the implementation of barangay patrol operations

by the barangay tanods in selected barangays in Sta. Cruz
Laguna, specifically Barangay Santo Angel, in terms of
patrol guidelines. The uniform perception of "Strongly
Agree" across all groups indicates a cohesive understanding
and appreciation of the patrol guidelines among respondents.
This alignment in perception is indicative of effective
communication, training, and implementation strategies
within the barangay tanod system. It reflects a positive
outcome in terms of ensuring safety and security within
Barangay Santo Angel, emphasizing the importance of
consistent and well-understood patrol procedures in
maintaining community order.
B. Technique in Traffic Direction and Control (Santo Angel)

Officials

ON ON ON
1. Police member 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong
keep intersection 80 40 ly 60 80 ly 20 98 ly
always open. Agree Agree Agree
2. Police member 0. Strong 0. Agree 5. 1. Agree
never allow the 40 ly 89 60 36
motorists to cross Agree
when they don’t have 6. 6.
any exit. 80 00
3. Stop motorist at 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Agree
their designated 40 ly 40 ly 80
stopping lane. Agree Agree
However, police
member do not stop
motorist near you,
provide motorist
sufficient distance 6. 6. 5.
to stop gradually 80 20 60
4. Patrol member 0. Strong 0. Agree 1. Agree
prefer to stop fast 6. 40 ly 6. 63 5. 36
moving vehicles. 80 Agree 00 60
5. When two or more 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. 4. 1. Modera
vehicles are about 60 49 ly 00 63 60 62 tely
to obstruct their Agree Agree Agree
intersection, the
police member should
stop the motorist
affecting it.
6. If two or more 6. 0. Strong 0. Agree 1. Neithe
personnel are 60 49 ly 40 33 r
conducting traffic Agree agree
direction and nor
control, the first disagr
command must be ee
given by the team
leader followed by 5. 4.
the member. 80 20
Overall 0. Strong 0. Agree 0. Agree
6. 27 ly 6. 27 5. 19
73 Agree 10 30

in terms of Technique in Traffic Direction and Control. The
table revealed that, statement 1,2, 3 and 4 (Police member
keep intersection always open; Police member never allow
the motorists to cross when they don’t have any exit; Stop
motorist at their designated stopping lane. However, police
member do not stop motorist near you, provide motorist
sufficient distance to stop gradually; Patrol member prefer
to stop fast moving vehicles.) got the highest mean as
perceived by the first group of respondents with a mean
Meanwhile, statement 1 (Police member keep intersection
always open.) got the highest mean as perceived by the
second group of respondents with a mean value of 6.60 (SD=
0.80) interpreted as Strongly Agree. And statement 1
(Police member keep intersection always open.) got the
highest mean value of 6.20 (SD=0.98) as perceived by the
third group of respondents interpreted as Strongly Agree, On
the other hand, statement 5 and 6 (When two or more
vehicles are about to obstruct their intersection, the
police member should stop the motorist affecting it; If two
or more personnel are conducting traffic direction and
control, the first command must be given by the team leader

followed by the member.) got the lowest mean value of 6.60
(SD= 0.49) as perceived by the first groups of respondents
interpreted as Strongly Agree. While statement 6 (If two or
more personnel are conducting traffic direction and
control, the first command must be given by the team leader
followed by the member) got the lowest mean of 5.80
(SD=0.80) as perceived by second group interpreted as Agree
as. Also, statement 6 (If two or more personnel are
conducting traffic direction and control, the first command
must be given by the team leader followed by the member) got
the lowest mean value of 4.20 (SD= 1.33) interpreted as
Neither Agree or Disagree as perceived by the third group.
Overall, the three group of respondents has different
perception on the level of implementation of the barangay
patrol operations by the barangay tanod in selected
Technique in Traffic Direction and Control, wherein the
first group stated that they are Strongly Agree while the
second and third group stated that they are Agree.
The implication drawn from Table 6 indicates varying

perceptions among the three groups of respondents regarding
the level of implementation of barangay patrol operations by
the barangay tanods in selected barangays in Sta. Cruz
Laguna, specifically Barangay Santo Angel, in terms of
techniques in traffic direction and control. While the first
group strongly agrees with the implementation, indicating a
high level of satisfaction, the second and third groups show
general agreement. These differences suggest potential
variations in understanding or expectations regarding
traffic direction and control techniques among different
groups of respondents. Addressing these differences and
ensuring alignment in perceptions can contribute to more
effective and cohesive patrol operations, enhancing traffic
management and safety in Barangay Santo Angel and similar
areas.
SUMMARY

on on on
Patrol Strongly 6.2 Strongly 6.7 Strongly
Guidelin 6.2 Agree 6 Agree 9 Agree
es 8
Techniqu 6.7 Strongly 6.1 Agree 5.3 Agree
e in 3 Agree 0 0
Traffic
Directio
n and
Control
OVERALL 6.5 Strongly 6.1 Strongly 6.0 Agree
0 Agree 8 Agree 5

specifically Barangay Santo Angel, as perceived by the three
(3) groups of respondents in terms of Patrol Guideline and
revealed that the three groups of respondent has different
Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat, based on the
overall mean value. wherein the first and second group
stated that they are Strongly Agree while the third group
stated that they are Agree.
The implication derived from Table 7 highlights

implementation of barangay patrol operations by the barangay
specifically Barangay Santo Angel, among the three groups of
respondents. While the first and second groups expressed
strong agreement with the implementation, indicating a high
level of satisfaction, the third group showed a slightly
lower level of agreement, though still indicating general
agreement. These variations suggest potential differences in
understanding or expectations regarding both patrol
guidelines and techniques in traffic direction and control
among different groups of respondents. Addressing these
differences and ensuring alignment in perceptions can

enhancing community safety and security in Barangay Santo
Angel and similar areas.
Significant difference on the level of perception of the

respondents on Determinants Leading Children At Risk in
Selected Barangay of Santa Cruz, Laguna"
Df p
1 value
e Ho
Officials Guidelin Ho nt
Tanod es
Residents
Brgy. Techniqu 33.6 2 12 <0.00 Accept Not
Officials e in 1 Ho Significa
Tanod Traffic nt
Residents Directio
n and
Control

Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat, as perceived by
the three (3) groups of respondents in terms of Patrol
Guideline and Technique in Traffic Direction and Control.
The f-value and p-value were presented for each comparison.
The p-value represents the probability that the observed
difference occurred by chance, and a p-value less than 0.05
is considered statistically significant.

Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat. The analysis
of variance showed that there is significant difference on
the level of perception of the groups of respondents on
Patrol Guideline F (2,12) = 11.2, p = .002 likewise with
Technique in Traffic Direction and Control F (2,12) = 33.6,
p = <0.001. The null hypothesis is said to be rejected based

on the significance level that is less than .05.
The implication drawn from the analysis suggests

specifically Barangay Duhat. The rejection of the null
hypothesis indicates that these differences are
statistically significant for both patrol guidelines and
techniques in traffic direction and control.
These findings underscore the importance of recognizing

and addressing variations in perception among different
groups of stakeholders involved in barangay patrol
operations. Understanding these differences can inform
targeted interventions and strategies to improve
coordination, communication, and implementation, ultimately
enhancing the effectiveness of barangay patrol operations
and contributing to the safety and security of the community
in Barangay Duhat and similar areas.
A. Patrol Guidelines (Santisima)

Officials

ON ON ON
1. Patrol members 0. Strong 7. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong
observe 00 ly 00 00 ly 60 49 ly
precautionary Agree Agree Agree
measures and
personal safety
while on 7.
patrol. 00
2. Patrol members 0. Strong 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong
observe 00 ly 80 ly 40 66 ly
defensive Agree Agree Agree
driving and
follow traffic
rules and 7. 6.
regulations. 00 40
select routes 00 ly 20 75 ly 30 78 ly
which provide Agree Agree Agree
best
visibility. 00
4. Patrol members 0. Strong 0. Strong 5. 1. Agree
must be always 40 ly 40 ly 70 42
on the look-out Agree Agree
for indications
of vices and
other illegal
activities on 6. 6.
their beat 80 20
5. Patrol members 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 5. 1. Agree
must be 80 40 ly 20 40 ly 80 40
knowledgeable Agree Agree
of conditions,
events and
details of
places on their
beat
6. Patrol members 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 0.
must be 80 40 ly 20 75 ly 67
observant of Agree Agree Agree
people, places,
situations or
conditions and
develop a
suspicious
attitude
especially if
the subject
appears to be
slightly out of 5.
the ordinary. 50
7. Patrol members 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Agree
keep under 00 ly 20 75 ly 10 94
close Agree Agree
observation
action of
juvenile/troubl
e makers/
agitators and
the mentally
ill/ retarted 7.
person. 00
8. Patrol member 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 5. 0. Agree
must be 80 40 ly 40 49 ly 90 83
familiar, as Agree Agree

much as
possible, with
known
criminals/ex-
convicts
residing in or
frequenting the
patrol beat
9. Patrol members 7. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 5. 0. Agree
must be 00 00 ly 40 49 ly 90 83
familiar as Agree Agree
much as
possible with
known
criminals/ ex-
convict
residing in or
frequenting the
patrol beat
10. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong
members must be 80 40 ly 20 40 ly 20 98 ly
on the alert Agree Agree Agree
for loiters
11. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 5. 1. Agree
members must 80 40 ly 20 40 ly 60 50
Keep watch on Agree Agree
uninhabited
homes
12. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 5. 0. Agree 6. 0. Agree
members observe 80 40 ly 80 75 10 83
the practice of Agree
“shaking doors”
of unguarded
business
establishments
during night
patrol. Check
for signs of
intrusion
13. Patrol 7. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 5. 1. Agree
members 00 00 ly 80 40 ly 90 04
establish good Agree Agree
rapport with
the people on
your beat
14. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 6. 1. Strong 5. 0.
members develop 60 49 ly 20 17 ly 70 78
contacts by Agree Agree Agree
getting to know
as many people
as possible who
can give
factual
information
about crime
condition in
the patrol beat
15. Patrol 6. 0. Strong 5. 1. Agree 6. 0. Strong
members use 60 49 ly 80 17 20 75 ly
tact and Agree Agree
persuasiveness
when conducting
spot inquiry or
questioning
individuals for
information
16. When 0. Strong 5. 0. Agree 5. 0. Agree
requiring 40 ly 80 98 90 94
identification Agree
from a
suspicious
person or any
individual,
patrol members
avoid taking
the wallet or
bag in which
the
cards/documents
are placed. Let
the individual
remove and hand 6.
them to you 80
17. When 7. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Agree
checking 00 00 ly 40 80 ly 10 94
suspicious Agree Agree
persons,
places,
buildings/
establishments
and vehicles
especially
during night
time, patrol
member is
prepared to use
non-lethal
equipment like
nightstick.
Flash light
should be held
tightly away
from the body
to avoid making
the patrol
member a
possible target
18. Patrol 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 5. 0. Agree
member should 40 ly 80 40 ly 80 98
avoid loitering Agree Agree
in theaters,
restaurants and
other
recreational 6.
places 80
Overall 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Agree
6. 18 ly 6. 16 ly 5. 36
86 Agree 29 Agree 98

in terms of Patrol Guidelines. The table revealed that,
statement 1,2,3,7,9,13 and 17 (Patrol members observe
precautionary measures and personal safety while on patrol;
Patrol members observe defensive driving and follow traffic
rules and regulations; Patrol members select routes which
provide best visibility; Patrol members establish good
rapport with the people on your beat) got the highest mean
as perceived by the first group of respondents with a mean
Meanwhile, statement 1 (Patrol members observe
got the highest mean as perceived by the second group of
respondents with a mean value of 7.00 (SD= 0.00) interpreted
as Strongly Agree. And statement 1 (Patrol members observe

got the highest mean value of 6.60 (SD=0.49) as perceived by
the third group of respondents interpreted as Strongly
Agree. On the other hand, statement 14 and15 (Patrol
members develop contacts by getting to know as many people
as possible who can give factual information about crime
condition in the patrol beat; Patrol members use tact and
persuasiveness when conducting spot inquiry or questioning
individuals for information) got the lowest mean value of
6.60 (SD= 0.49) as perceived by the first groups of
respondents interpreted as Strongly Agree. Similarly,
statement 12,15 and 16 (Patrol members use tact and
persuasiveness when conducting spot inquiry or questioning
individuals for information; When requiring identification
from a suspicious person or any individual, patrol members
avoid taking the wallet or bag in which the cards/documents
are placed. Let the individual remove and hand them to you)
got the lowest mean value of 5.80 (SD= 0.98) interpreted as
Agree as perceived by the second group. While statement 6
(Patrol members must be observant of people, places,
situations or conditions and develop a suspicious attitude
especially if the subject appears to be slightly out of the
ordinary.) got the lowest mean value of 5.50 (SD= 0.67)
interpreted as Agree as perceived by the third group.
Overall, the threes group of respondents has different level
of perception on the level of implementation of the barangay
in terms of Patrol Guidelines, wherein the first and second
groups stated that they are Strongly Agree, while the third
group stated that they are Agree.
The implication drawn from Table 8 suggests variations

in the perception of the level of implementation of barangay
patrol operations by the barangay tanods in selected
barangays in Sta. Cruz Laguna, specifically Barangay Santo
Angel. While all groups generally agree on most aspects of
patrol guidelines, there are some differences in specific
areas.
The first and second groups perceive the implementation

of patrol guidelines very positively, indicating a strong
agreement. However, the third group's perception, while
still positive, is slightly lower, indicating agreement
rather than strong agreement.
These differences in perception among the groups

highlight the importance of considering various perspectives
when assessing the effectiveness of barangay patrol
operations. Understanding these nuances can help identify
areas for improvement and tailor interventions to address
specific concerns, ultimately enhancing the overall
effectiveness of barangay patrol operations in Barangay
Santo Angel and similar areas.
B. Technique in Traffic Direction and Control (Santisima)

Officials

ON ON ON
1. Police member Strong 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong
keep intersection 7. 6. ly 60 49 ly 60 49 ly
always open. 00 80 Agree Agree Agree
2. Police member 0. Strong 0. Strong 4. 1. Modera
never allow the 40 ly 49 ly 80 17 tely
motorists to cross Agree Agree Agree
when they don’t have 6. 6.
any exit. 80 60
3. Stop motorist at 0. Strong 0. Agree 5. 0. Agree
their designated 40 ly 80 80 75
stopping lane. Agree
However, police
member do not stop
motorist near you,
provide motorist
sufficient distance 6. 5.
to stop gradually 80 60
4. Patrol member 0. Strong 0. Strong 1. Modera
prefer to stop fast 6. 49 ly 6. 75 ly 4. 74 tely
moving vehicles. 60 Agree 20 Agree 40 Agree
5. When two or more 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Strong 6. 0. Agree
vehicles are about 20 40 ly 40 49 ly 00 77
to obstruct their Agree Agree

intersection, the
police member should
stop the motorist
affecting it.
6. If two or more 0. Strong 0. Strong 0. Strong
personnel are 40 ly 49 ly 46 ly
conducting traffic Agree Agree Agree
direction and
control, the first
command must be
given by the team
leader followed by 6. 6. 6.
the member. 20 40 30
Overall 0. Strong 0. Strong 5. 0. Agree
6. 08 ly 6. 39 ly 65 37
60 Agree 30 Agree

barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay
Santisima, as perceived by the three (3) groups of
respondents in terms of Technique in Traffic Direction and
Control. The table revealed that, statement 1 (Police
member keep intersection always open.) got the highest mean
as perceived by the first group of respondents with a mean
Meanwhile, statement 1 and 2 (Police member keep
intersection always open; Police member never allow the
motorists to cross when they don’t have any exit.) got the
highest mean as perceived by the second group of respondents
with a mean value of 6.60 (SD= 0.49) interpreted as Strongly
Agree. And statement 1 (Police member keep intersection
always open.) got the highest mean value of 6.60 (SD=0.49)
as perceived by the third group of respondents interpreted
as Strongly Agree, On the other hand, statement 5 and 6
(When two or more vehicles are about to obstruct their
intersection, the police member should stop the motorist
affecting it; If two or more personnel are conducting
given by the team leader followed by the member.) got the
lowest mean value of 6.20 (SD= 0.40) as perceived by the
While statement 3 (Stop motorist at their designated

stopping lane. However, police member do not stop motorist
near you, provide motorist sufficient distance to stop
gradually) got the lowest mean of 5.60 (SD=0.80) as
perceived by second group interpreted as Agree as. Also,
statement 4 (Patrol member prefer to stop fast moving
vehicles) got the lowest mean value of 4.40 (SD= 1.74)
interpreted as Moderately Agree as perceived by the third
group. Overall, the three group of respondents has different
perception on the level of implementation of the barangay
barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay
Santisima, as perceived by the three (3) groups of
respondents in terms of Technique in Traffic Direction and
Control, wherein the first and second group stated that they
are Strongly Agree while the third group stated that they
are Agree.
The implication drawn from Table 9 suggests variations

in the perception of the level of implementation of barangay
barangays in Sta. Cruz Laguna, specifically Barangay
Santisima, in terms of technique in traffic direction and
control.
While all three groups generally agree on most aspects
of traffic direction and control techniques, there are some
differences in specific areas. The first and second groups
perceive the implementation of these techniques very
positively, indicating a strong agreement. However, the
third group's perception, while still positive, is slightly
lower, indicating agreement rather than strong agreement.
highlight the importance of considering various perspectives
when assessing the effectiveness of traffic direction and
control techniques employed by barangay tanods.
Understanding these nuances can help identify areas for
improvement and tailor interventions to address specific
concerns, ultimately enhancing the overall effectiveness of
traffic management in Barangay Santisima and similar areas.
SUMMARY

on on on
Patrol Strongly 6.2 Strongly 5.9 Agree

Guidelin 6.8 Agree 9 Agree 8
es 6
Techniqu 6.6 Strongly 6.3 Strongly 5.6 Agree
e in 0 Agree 0 Agree 5
Traffic
Directio
n and
Control
OVERALL 6.7 Strongly 6.3 Strongly 5.8 Agree
3 Agree 0 Agree 2

specifically Barangay Santisima, as perceived by the three
(3) groups of respondents in terms of Patrol Guideline and
revealed that the three groups of respondent has different
Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Santisima, based on
the overall mean value. wherein the first and second group
stated that they are Strongly Agree while the third group
stated that they are Agree.
The implication drawn from Table 10 suggests that there

are variations in the perception of the level of
tanod in selected barangays in Sta. Cruz Laguna,
specifically Barangay Santisima, when considering both
patrol guidelines and techniques in traffic direction and
control.
The overall mean values indicate that the first and

second groups perceive the implementation of both patrol
guidelines and traffic direction and control techniques very
positively, indicating a strong agreement. However, the
third group's perception, while still positive, is slightly
lower, indicating agreement rather than strong agreement.

underscore the importance of considering multiple aspects of
barangay patrol operations when assessing their

effectiveness. Addressing any disparities in perception can
help ensure a more comprehensive and balanced approach to
enhancing the overall implementation of patrol operations in
Barangay Santisima and similar areas.
Significant difference on the level of perception of the

respondents on Determinants Leading Children At Risk in
Selected Barangay of Santa Cruz, Laguna"
Df p
1 value
e Ho
Officials Guidelin 8 3 Ho nt
Tanod es
Residents
Brgy. Techniqu 13.6 2 17 0.000 Reject Significa
Officials e in 3 3 ed Ho nt
Tanod Traffic
Residents Directio
n and
Control

Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Santisima, as
Patrol Guideline and Technique in Traffic Direction and
Control. The f-value and p-value were presented for each
comparison. The p-value represents the probability that the
observed difference occurred by chance, and a p-value less
than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Santisima. The
analysis of variance showed that there is significant
difference on the level of perception of the groups of
respondents on Patrol Guideline F (2,17) = 13.48, p = .0003
likewise with Technique in Traffic Direction and Control F
(2,17) = 13.63, p = .0003 The null hypothesis is said to be
rejected based on the significance level that is less

than .05.
The implication drawn from the analysis indicates

tanod in selected barangays in Sta. Cruz Laguna,
specifically Barangay Santisima.
The analysis of variance revealed that there are

significant differences in perception among the groups of
respondents regarding both patrol guidelines and techniques
in traffic direction and control. This suggests that
different groups perceive the implementation of patrol
operations differently, which could stem from various
factors such as their roles, experiences, or perspectives.
Addressing these differences in perception is crucial

for ensuring a more unified and effective approach to
barangay patrol operations. It highlights the need for
targeted interventions or training programs aimed at
aligning perceptions and fostering a shared understanding of
the goals and methods of patrol operations among all
stakeholders involved in Barangay Santisima and similar
areas.
Issues and Concerns Encountered by the two (2) Groups of

Respondents on the Risk Factors of CICL in Barangay
Dayap, Calauan, Laguna.
Specific problem number four pertains to the issues and
concerns encountered by the two (2) groups of respondents on
the risk factors of CICL in Barangay Dayap, Calauan, Laguna.

The following are the combined issues and concerns
regarding the risk factors of CICL as perceived by the two
(2) groups of respondents:
1. The Barangay Dayap, Calauan, Laguna may consider
conducting more programs that would prevent or avoid
the occurrence of youthful offenders.
2. The said barangay may consider allotting more sports
and religious activities for children in conflict with
the law (CICL).
3. The said barangay may continuously sustain the regular
roving and monitoring of barangay officials together
with the barangay tanods to enhance patrolling
especially in midnight to lessen crime or offenses
involving minor to create peaceful and harmonious
community.
4. The said barangay may consider maintaining enough
budgets for the rehabilitation and reintegration of
children in conflict with the law (CICL).
5. The said barangay may conduct seminars to the community
in order for them to know the causes and effects of
youthful offenders.

11 MOGOTE Chapter 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

11 MOGOTE Chapter 4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

11 MOGOTE Chapter 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents, analyzes and interprets gathered

data of the study.

Status of Children in Conflict with the Law (CICL) in

Specific problem number one focused on the status of

children in conflict with the law in Barangay Dayap,

Figure 3 presents the statistics on the crimes

committed by the CICL in Barangay Dayap, Calauan, Laguna.

Figure 3. Crimes Committed by Children in Conflict with the

As presented in figure 3, it shows that there were only

three major crimes committed by CICL of Barangay Dayap,

Calauan, Laguna, such as curfew, robbery, and theft.

The said barangay recorded twenty-six (26) cases of

curfew, twenty-six (26) cases of theft, and only eleven (11)

cases of robbery. In total, they were sixty-three (63) cases

committed by the CICL. Generally, there is an increasing

number of crimes and/or infraction of law committed by the

Level of Perception on the Risk Factors of Children in

Specific problem number two focused on the level of

perception on the risk factors of children in conflict with

the law and its effect in terms of individual, family and

community in Brgy. Dayap Calauan Laguna as perceived by the

two groups of respondents.

Table 2 reveals the level of perception on the risk

factors of children in conflict with the law and its effect

in terms of family as perceived by the barangay officials.

Level of Perception on The Risk Factors of Children in

MEAN SD VERBAL MEAN SD VERBAL MEAN SD VERBAL

Table 2 displays the level of implementation of the

barangay patrol operations by the barangay tanod in selected

barangays in Sta Cruz Laguna specifically Barangay Duhat, as

perceived by the three (3) groups of respondents in terms of

Patrol Guidelines. The table revealed that, statement 1, 3,

4, 6, 7, 8,9 and 10 (Patrol members observe precautionary

measures and personal safety while on patrol; Patrol

members select routes which provide best visibility; Patrol

members must be always on the look-out for indications of

vices and other illegal activities on their beat) got the

highest mean as perceived by the first group of respondents

with a mean value of 7.00 (SD=0.00) interpreted as Strongly

Agree. Meanwhile, statement 1 (Patrol members observe

precautionary measures and personal safety while on patrol)

got the highest mean as perceived by the second group of

respondents with a mean value of 7.00 (SD= 0.00) interpreted

as Strongly Agree. And statement 5 and (Patrol members must

be knowledgeable of conditions, events and details of

places on their beat; When checking suspicious persons,

places, buildings/ establishments and vehicles especially

during night time, patrol member is prepared to use non-

lethal equipment like nightstick. Flash light should be

member a possible target) got the highest mean value of 6.40

(SD=0.49) as perceived by the third group of respondents

interpreted as Strongly Agree. On the other hand, statement

15 and 18 (Patrol members use tact and persuasiveness when

conducting spot inquiry or questioning individuals for

information; Patrol member should avoid loitering in

theaters, restaurants and other recreational places ) got