Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
INAMUDDIN
RAJENDER BODDULA
ABDULAH M. ASIRI
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing
from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies
and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency,
can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as
may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any
information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they
should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional
responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for
any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any
use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
ISBN: 978-0-12-819540-6
Hilal Acidereli
Sen Research Group, Department of Biochemistry, Dumlupınar University, K€
utahya, Turkey
Elham Azadi
Organic Polymer Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Isfahan University
of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Smritilekha Bera
School of Chemical Sciences, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India
Pubanita Bhuyan
Department of Chemistry, Rajiv Gandhi University, Arunachal Pradesh, India
Anshu Dandia
Department of Chemistry, Centre of Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India
Anton V. Dolzhenko
School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia;
School of Pharmacy, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth,
WA, Australia
Muhammad Faisal
Department of Chemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Neha N. Gharat
Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India
Shyam L. Gupta
Government Polytechnic College, Kalimori, Alwar, India
Mehdi Hatami
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran
ix
x Contributors
Saeed Khalili
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran
Anil Kumar
Synthetic Organic Chemistry Lab, Faculty of Sciences, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra,
Jammu & Kashmir, India
Bhagirath Limbani
School of Chemical Sciences, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India
Manzar Mahmoudian
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran
Shadpour Mallakpour
Organic Polymer Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry; Research
Institute for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Isfahan University of Technology,
Isfahan, Iran
Dhananjoy Mondal
School of Chemical Sciences, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India
Mina Naghdi
Organic Polymer Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Isfahan University
of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Karuna N. Nagula
Department of Pharmaceutics, Parul Institute of Pharmacy & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Vijay Parewa
Department of Chemistry, Centre of Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India
Pravin D. Patil
Department of Biotechnology, Priyadarshini Institute of Engineering and Technology, Nagpur,
Maharashtra, India
Virendra K. Rathod
Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India
Contributors xi
Deepti Rathore
Alankar P.G. Girls College, Jaipur, India
Lakhinath Saikia
Department of Chemistry, Rajiv Gandhi University, Arunachal Pradesh, India
Fatih Sen
Sen Research Group, Department of Biochemistry, Dumlupınar University, K€
utahya, Turkey
Rashmi Sharma
Synthetic Organic Chemistry Lab, Faculty of Sciences, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra,
Jammu & Kashmir, India
Ruchi Sharma
Department of Chemistry, Centre of Advanced Studies, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India
Sergei A. Smolnikov
School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
Manishkumar S. Tiwari
Department of Chemical Engineering, NMIMS Mukesh Patel School of Technology
Management & Engineering, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
1. Introduction
Traditional methods to carry out organic synthesis reactions face drawbacks such as long
reaction time, non-satisfactory yields, more solvent, toxic/costly reagent requirements
and high temperatures and on the other hand, results in uneconomical products. Use
of heterogeneous systems gives rise to mass transfer resistance issues depending on the
number and type of phases present. It may also lead to agglomeration of particles which
lowers surface area and eventually slows down the reaction rate. To overcome all these
issues, the use of ultrasound (US) is a cost-effective method to intensify various reactions
such as aqueous and nonaqueous homogeneous reactions, heterogeneous reactions,
phase-transfer reactions, metal-organic frameworks, bio-enzymatic, among others.
Application of sound waves along with its chemical effects is termed as sonochemistry.
The application of ultrasound waves was first tried in the early nineties by Richards and
Loomis. This was followed by Schultes and Frenzel who studied the aqueous hydrogen
peroxide formation at 540 kHz. Furthermore, in 1936, Schultes and Gohr observed that
light could be produced by the high-intensity sonochemical reaction of liquids in the
range of 190–750 nm wavelength. This phenomenon was termed as sonoluminescence.
This long journey of sonochemistry has been remarkable after the 1980s, where cavita-
tion phenomena was considered.
Ultrasound has been used as a process intensification tool, between 20 kHz and
5 MHz frequency range, for the removal of biologically active compounds nanoscale
operations and formation of medicines. Chemical reactivity increases by ultrasound
through the formation and collapse of cavitation bubbles in a liquid medium. The prop-
agation of ultrasound waves takes place in a liquid medium in alternate compression as
well as rarefaction and cavities are formed. Once the attractive forces of the liquid over-
come by rarefaction cycle, the cavities grow to a maximum size and then burst resulting
in energy dissipation (Fig. 1) [1–3]. Due to turbulence, corresponding with the liquid
circulation associated with the creation and breakdown of the bubbles, mass transfer rates
are improved. Whether ultrasound can be applied to accelerate the reaction chemically as
well as physically depends on the local hot spots and by enhancing the mass transfer rates,
respectively. In addition to improvement in mass transfer rates, it also gives better catalyst
Green Sustainable Process for Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Science © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819540-6.00001-2 All rights reserved. 1
2 Green sustainable process for chemical and environmental engineering and science
5000K
150 Implosion
Growth
Bubble radius, mm
100
Shockwave
50
Hot Rapid
Formation spot quenching
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Time, ms
Fig. 1 Formation of bubble, development, and collapse. (Reproduced with permission from P.
Chowdhury, T. Viraraghavan, Sonochemical degradation of chlorinated organic compounds, phenolic
compounds and organic dyes—a review, Sci. Total Environ. 407(8) (2009) 2474–2492.)
the reactor. Thus, it is essential to optimize these parameters for the particular system to
get maximum yield at minimum cost. While carrying out US-assisted reactions, it is
advisable to study the following parameters for the development of new analytical
applications.
power in organic synthesis has been optimized. Effect of power on the release of iodine
by sonolysis of aqueous KI was reported [13]. Also, the initial power dissipation was pro-
portional to iodine release, till 40 W and remained constant till 100 W which dropped
significantly after 100 W.
Enzyme catalyzed reactions, prefer lower optimum power dissipation because enz-
ymes show the negative effect at higher power dissipation. Several reports such as [14]
lipase catalyzed esterification reaction of methyl caffeate (MC) with methanol along with
caffeic acid using Novozym 435 under the influence of ultrasound irradiation have been
reported. The impact of power on reaction has been studied by the increase in power
under pulse mode at 25 kHz frequency and temperature of 5°C which resulted in enha-
nced yield (99% conversion) at 150-W power dissipation under the time interval of 9 h.
In the case of heterogeneous reactions, a similar trend was repeated, which showed
93% yield (highest) at 75 W as optimum power dissipation. Beyond 80 W, there was no
further improvement observed. The influence of ultrasonic power on the formation of
methyl butyrate catalyzed by amberlyst-15 over the range of 50–145 W input power at
22 kHz frequency was studied [15], where the enhancement in conversion, till 100 W
was observed and beyond that conversion, was found to decrease.
All the above-reported trends show that with an increase in power dissipation up to a
certain optimum value, conversion of the US-assisted organic synthesis reactions reaches
the maximum value. Beyond certain optimum power dissipation, conversion gets
reduced, which depends on the specific class of reaction carried out. Therefore, the reac-
tor configuration, i.e., number and position of the transducers and the type of reaction are
the factors on which optimum power dissipation would be dependent. Laboratory-scale
investigations in reactors which are almost same as the design of the commercial-scale
unit can give rise to the actual value of power dissipation.
by rarefaction cycle which is required to attain cavitation and sometimes the rate of the
compression exceeds the duration which is required for the collapsing of bubbles [18].
Therefore the main phenomena of acoustic streaming arise where cavitation produced
by ultrasonic waves having frequency 16–100 kHz results in the formation of larger cav-
itation bubbles with elevated temperature and pressure conditions [19]. In the case of
homogeneous liquids, frequency plays an important role to attain optimum cavitation
because homogeneous ultrasonication is carried out beyond optimum (offset) value.
To overcome this counteracting behavior, there is a need to specify an optimum range
of frequencies.
In the sonochemical degradation of carbon tetrachloride, the authors have claimed
that at 500 kHz, the higher degradation rate is observed as compared to 20 kHz. Similarly,
decomposition of chlorobenzene and removal of 2-chlorophenol was reported [20, 21]
which demonstrates that for radicals, higher frequency is preferable as dominant chemical
effects occur that particularly intensify the oxidation reactions where a major controlling
factor is the hydroxyl radicals. For heterogeneous reactions, the opposite trends have
been observed in the literature.
Also, the synthesis of 4-methyl cinnamoyl glycerol using enzyme over the frequency
of 20–40 kHz in 48 h has been reported. As frequency increases from 20 to 35 kHz, con-
version increases and beyond 35 kHz, it decreases because at this frequency deactivation
of the enzyme occurs, due to physical effects and high shear forces [22].
Overviewing these literature trends, it can be said that for enzymatic reactions or het-
erogeneous reactions, frequencies in the range of 20–50 kHz are preferred. Physical
effects are required in order to eliminate mass transfer resistances and to retain the catalyst
activity. Similarly, in the case of homogeneous reactions or heterogeneous reactions,
which involve radical mechanisms, higher frequencies (200–500 kHz) result in enhanced
reaction rates [23].
Similarly, reports have been validated [25] that with an increase in the ultrasonic duty
cycle, enzyme activity gets reduced as a result of the physical effects of shear and turbu-
lence. The synthesis of isoamyl butyrate has been studied [29], where 83% as an optimum
duty cycle has been reported. The same result of an optimum duty cycle in heteroge-
neously catalyzed formation of methyl butyrate has been reported [15] and investigated
that with an increase in the duty cycle over the range of 25%–75%, conversion increases
from 72% to 91.64% and as observed, beyond 75% duty cycle, conversion gets reduced.
Typically, it can be established that depending on the configuration of the reactor along
with the type of reaction system in the presence of a catalyst, the optimum duty cycle
would be intensified to obtain benefits of ultrasound operations.
In the cavity
extreme conditions on collapse
5000°C and 2000 atmospheres
Fig. 2 Cavitation in homogeneous phase. (Reproduced with permission from S. V. Sancheti, P. R. Gogate,
A review of engineering aspects of intensification of chemical synthesis using ultrasound, Ultrason.
Sonochem. 36 (2017) 527–543.)
8 Green sustainable process for chemical and environmental engineering and science
Powerful
disruption of
phase boundary
Fig. 3 Cavitation in dual-phasic liquid system. (Reproduced with permission from S. V. Sancheti, P. R.
Gogate, A review of engineering aspects of intensification of chemical synthesis using ultrasound,
Ultrason. Sonochem. 36 (2017) 527–543.)
3. The reactions that involve a radical mechanism or radical, as well as ionic mechanism,
get influenced by sonication. Radical reactions are affected by the chemical effects of
ultrasound irradiation, whereas ionic reactions are influenced by enhanced mass trans-
fer rates.
For heterogeneous systems in the presence of solids, the bubble collapse may be
symmetric or asymmetric. The size and type of the material in shock waves raise the
motion of solid particles in solution. The breakdown of the bubble due to such a
motion of solid particle results in the availability of increased area for reaction and
activation of the catalyst can also be done by physical effects. That results in the clean-
ing of the surfaces and also enhances transport rates that depend on the interruption of
the boundary layers (Fig. 4).
Ultrasound-assisted organic synthesis 9
Cleaning tank
Ultrasonic generator
Transducers
Fig. 5 Ultrasonic cleaning bath. (Reproduced with permission from E. M. Hussein, K. S. Khairou,
Sonochemistry: synthesis of bioactive heterocycles, Synth. Commun. 44(15) (2014) 2155–2191.)
Along with the benefits of ultrasound bath, there are several potential drawbacks like
variable acoustic intensity. It varies from bath to bath and one manufacturer to another.
Therefore, the issue of replicability from one bath to another may arise. Also, the place-
ment of the reaction flask, temperature, the height of both the bath liquid and of the solu-
tion within the reaction vessel are critical parameters [34, 35]. Coolants are used for
thermostating, as they are passed through copper coils without contacting walls. In
the case of homogeneous liquids, marginal acoustic intensities are present for the gener-
ation of cavitation. Also, in case of solids, the tensile strength of the liquid at the interface
causes the cavitation well below thresholds as compared to simple solutions. However,
for heterogeneous ultrasound irradiation, the sonication bath can be considered with lim-
ited potential.
system where contamination should be strictly prohibited. Due to extensive use of higher
levels of power dissipation, erosion of metal takes place into liquid along with the pitting
of the tip [36]. Also, the shape of the horn controls the cavitational activity along with the
transfer of energy considering the minimum effect on the surface erosion. Cup horns are a
known modification where a small sonication bath is driven by a horn extending through
its base (Fig. 6). Initially, it was used in cell disruption, but nowadays it has found appli-
cation in sonochemistry in indirect irradiation, but more power dissipation occurs in
comparison with the typical sonication bath. An ultrasonic horn is much better with
higher capability for processed volume. In the case of ultrasonic probe in standard pie-
zoelectric transducers, it is made up of Titanium crucible. In comparison with ultrasonic
cleaning bath, it is advantageous in terms of acoustic intensities, frequency control, as well
as thermostating capacity. As there is no contact between radiating surface and reaction
solution, the resulting intensities are smaller than that of direct immersion ultrasonic
horn. Therefore, homogeneous ultrasound irradiation is disadvantageous in terms of
activeness. But it is also advantageous as it is free from contamination against the erosion
of the titanium horn.
Fig. 6 Ultrasonic probe Cup horn. (Reproduced with permission from P. Chowdhury, T. Viraraghavan,
Sonochemical degradation of chlorinated organic compounds, phenolic compounds and organic
dyes—a review, Sci. Total Environ. 407 (8) (2009) 2474–2492.)
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
during our stay amongst the ice. When I say “in a rush” it is only
relatively speaking. For a rush was impossible in our circumstances.
The pilot’s room offered good sleeping accommodation for two people
if they went to bed quietly and carefully. There were so many uprights,
struts, and pipes that our bedroom had the appearance of a birdcage.
The making of a miscalculated movement landed one against a pipe or
a strut, sometimes both. In addition to this one could not stand at full
height. To speak of a rush under such conditions is therefore stupid.
The sight which met us when we put our heads through the trap-door
was interesting, but not altogether inviting. It was interesting to note
how much four desperate men can straighten out. The pool we had
made was now covered with ice in the center of which N 25 was stuck.
The pressure was tremendous and a catastrophe seemed
unavoidable. Gathering all his strength, Riiser-Larsen sprang like a
tiger. He jumped high in the air in order to land anywhere on the ice
which jammed the seaplane. The result was always the same. The ice
broke under him without resistance. Omdal had got hold of a tool (I
don’t know which one) and helped his comrade splendidly with its aid.
Larsen pushed for all he was worth against the seaplane’s nose and
tried to free it from the ice pressure. By this united work they managed
to loosen the machine about 45° and thereby lighten the pressure
against the sides. In the meantime Ellsworth and I were occupied in
putting the provisions and equipment on the old ice. We were masters
of the situation at last, but it was a near thing that time.
To return to our old quarters was unthinkable, so we looked round
for a safe place somewhere else. We lay in a favorable position for
crossing to N 24 and decided it might be wise to pursue this course.
There was a possibility that we might reach it by way of the new ice,
but this seemed unlikely after our last experience. However we would
try our best to get over because it would be an advantage to be able to
use N 24’s petrol without transporting it. Moreover it appeared that
conditions across there were calmer and offered a safer resting place.
That this was not the case we shall see later.
Thus we began again to hack and to level and by breakfast time
the track was finished. Exactly as though we ourselves had dispersed
it the fog lifted, and we could soon start. This reminds me of an
amusing occurrence, amusing for others, but not exactly for me. On
account of the small accommodation in the machines it was necessary
for us always to move about in tabloid form, bent, drawn together and
compact. The result of this was cramp, sometimes in the legs, in the
thighs, in the stomach, in the back. These attacks came on at the most
inopportune moments and the martyr was a never-failing object of
general amusement. Everything was ready that morning for departure
and I suddenly remembered my glasses which I had forgotten in the
mess and which I now rushed to fetch. But it was a mistaken move on
my part. My first hasty jerk gave me cramp in both thighs with the
result that I could not move from the spot. I heard titters and giggles
and notwithstanding the infernal pain I could not do otherwise than join
in the general amusement.
The second start was not more fortunate than the first. The ice
broke all the way and N 25 became famous as an icebreaker. One
good result came from it, however, namely, that we got near to the
other machine. That presented a sad appearance as it lay there lonely
and forlorn with one wing high in the air, and the other down on the ice.
They had been lucky enough to get its nose up on to a grade of the old
ice floe, but the tail lay right out in the ice.
The conditions here seemed quite promising. We had an open
waterway about 400 meters long with fine new ice quite near. The third
attempt to start was undertaken the same afternoon but without result.
We decided to join up the waterway and the new ice. It was possible
that the great speed one could attain on the waterway would carry one
up onto the ice and if that happened there was a big chance of rising in
the air as the track would then have become about 700 meters long. At
2 a.m. on the 4th June we started the work, continuing all day. As by
eventide we had got the track finished, down came the fog and
prevented us from starting. A little later the ice got rather lively,
beginning to screw during the night. Fortunately it was only the new-
frozen ice, but even it was eight inches thick. There were pipings and
singings all round us as the ice jammed against the machine. The
methods and tools we now used were most original. Dietrichson armed
himself with a four-yard-long aluminium pole with which he did
wonderful work. Omdal used the film camera tripod, which was very
heavy, ending in three iron-bound points. Every blow therefore was
trebled and was most effective. Riiser-Larsen was the only one who
had brought rubber boots with him; these reached to his waist. As the
ice encroached it was met by ringing blows. The battle against it
continued the whole night and by morning we could once again look
back upon a conquest. Meantime the old ice had crept up nearer to us.
It now appeared as though the “Sphinx” was taking aim at us; this was
an ugly forbidding iceberg, formed in the shape of the Sphinx. The
movements of the ice had caused the sides of the waterway to set
together and our starting place was ruined again. The fog lay thick on
the 5th of June while fine rain was falling. The ice cracked and piped
as though it would draw our attention to the fact that it still existed.
Now what should one do?
With his usual energy Riiser-Larsen had gone for a walk that
afternoon amongst the icebergs accompanied by Omdal; they wished
to see if they could find another place which could be converted into a
starting place. They had already turned round to return home, as the
fog was preventing them from seeing anything, when suddenly it lifted
and there they stood in the center of the only plain which could be
used. This was 500 meters square and not too uneven to be made
level by a little work and patience. They came back happy and full of
hope and shouted to the “Sphinx”: “You may be amused and smile
even when others despair—even when the position is hopeless we still
sing with pleasure aha! aha! aha! Things are improving day by day.”
The “Sphinx” frowned! It did not like this!
COLLECTING SNOW BLOCKS FOR A RUN-WAY
The way to the plain which the two men had found was both long
and difficult, but we lived under conditions where difficulties frightened
us no more. First of all the machine must be driven there—about 300
meters through new ice to a high old plain. Here we would have to
hack out a slide to drive the machine up. From here the road crossed
over to the Thermopylæ Pass, which was formed by two moderately
sized icebergs, and ended in a three-yards-wide ditch over which the
machine must be negotiated on to the next plain. On the other side
one could see the last obstacle which must be overcome in the form of
an old crack about five yards wide with sides formed of high icebergs
and loose snow—rotten conditions to work in. Early on the morning of
the 6th the work was started. After breakfast we took all our tools and
attacked the old ice where the grade should be built. In order to get to
this spot we had to pass round a corner which took us out of sight of
N 25. Under general circumstances one would not have left the
machine unattended, but conditions were otherwise than general and
we had no man we could spare. Singing “In Swinemunde träumt man
im Sand,” the popular melody associated with our comfortable days in
Spitzbergen, we used our knives, axes, and ice-anchor to the best
advantage, and fragments of ice flew in all directions. It is with pride
and joy that I look back on these days, joy because I worked in
company with such men, proud because our task was accomplished.
Let me say quite frankly and honestly that I often regarded the
situation as hopeless and impossible. Ice-walls upon ice-walls raised
themselves up and had to be removed from our course; an
unfathomable gulf seemed to yawn before us threatening to stop our
progress. It had to be bridged by cheeky heroes who, never grumbling,
tackled the most hopeless tasks with laughter and with song.