Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Template
Name: Keegan Meredith Program: Secondary Course: EDU 450
Education: English
Learning Objectives & Content Standard Alignment - Selects, creates, and sequences learning
experiences and performance tasks that support learners in reaching rigorous curriculum goals
based on content standards.
ELA.R.09.LT.03 - Understands how the theme or The lesson objectives focus on developing
central idea is developed over the course of a text students' ability to comprehend and analyze
including how it is shaped with specific details literary texts by differentiating between main
ideas and supporting details, employing active
reading techniques, identifying thesis statements,
practicing summarization skills, and analyzing
texts from various genres. These decisions are
made to meet the content standard by providing
students with opportunities to engage with
complex literary texts and develop their
comprehension and analysis skills.
Assessment - Uses assessment flexibly to expand and deepen understanding of learner performance
and determines best supports for continued learner growth.
Assessment: Instructional Decisions / Reasoning
Instructional Materials and Resources - Stays current in content knowledge and expands expertise in
reviewing instructional materials from the perspectives of both the discipline and individual learner
needs.
Materials, Resources, and/or Technology Instructional Decisions/ Reasoning
Revised 07/19/2018
Instructional Methods: Selects, creates, and sequences learning experiences and performance
tasks by using a variety of instructional approaches, strategies, and technologies that make
learning accessible to all learners and support learners in reaching rigorous curriculum goals.
Article Analysis Activity (30 minutes): Visual aids help clarify abstract
● Divide students into groups and concepts like analysis. Interactive
provide each group with one of the activities engage students and
selected articles. allow for immediate application of
● Instruct students to independently concepts.
highlight key points or main ideas in
their assigned article. Article Analysis Activity:
● After highlighting, have students Divide students into groups and
compare their highlights with a have them analyze different
partner who read the same article. articles.
● Next, have students swap papers
with someone who read a different Group work encourages
article. This will be timed and part of collaboration and peer learning.
the ultimate classroom faceoff. Analyzing different articles adds
● Instruct students to read only the variety and allows students to
highlights on the swapped paper explore different topics.
and discuss with their group mates if
they believe they have a solid Floating Observation:
understanding of the article based
on the highlights. Circulate around the classroom to
monitor student discussions.
Floating Observation (10 minutes):
● During the activity, circulate around Teacher presence during group
the classroom, eavesdropping on activities provides support,
ensures student engagement, and
student discussions and offering allows for real-time assessment of
assistance or guidance as needed. student understanding.
Closure:
Thank students for their
participation and provide any
additional instructions.
Accommodations:
Did the students meet the objective(s)/learning goal(s) of the lesson? How do you
know?
The students met the learning objectives for the lesson. I know this because the
annotations provided by the students show me the students are beginning to demonstrate
their ability to recognize a main idea and supporting details that support the main idea
which they have highlighted. They also were exposed to different genres and had to
practice their summarization skills to explain what the main ideas were within their
articles.
The assessment data tells me people are at different levels when it comes to recognizing
the main idea. Some students are proficient at determining details while others aren’t
sure what is the difference between summary and key details.
I believe the whole lesson went well. Students stayed on track and worked diligently to
complete the task while also engaging in analysis and practicing the main skills of the
lesson.
I would change how long I gave my students to go over the articles. Some students
finished faster than others and giving them a shorter deadline will enourage everyone to
increase the pace of their textual analysis.
What did you learn? How will this impact your next lesson?
I learned how to keep students active so that way their isn’t much dead time where it
will make it more difficult to steer students back on track when we re engage as a whole
class.
How many students met the objective(s)? Partially met? Did not meet? After analyzing
the assessment data what will you do to help ALL students meet the objective(s)
I believe all my students met the objective. I wasn’t looking for how proficient they
were at analyzing text. I was gauging their current ability while also enabling them to
actively practice analysis for improvement which all my students engaged in.
Teaching Standards and Rationale:
Standard #3 Learning Environments: The teacher works with learners to create environments that support
individual and collaborative learning, encouraging positive social interaction, active engagement in
learning, and self motivation.
3 (b) Develops learning experiences that engage learners in collaborative and self-directed learning and that
extend learner interaction with ideas and people locally and globally.
Rationale: The artifact demonstrates how the teacher collaborates with learners to create environments that
support individual and collaborative learning, aligning with Standard #3 of fostering learning environments
that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation. Furthermore, the
instructional decisions within the lesson plan reflect an emphasis on developing learning experiences that
engage learners in both collaborative and self-directed learning, as outlined in Indicator 3(b).
The instructional decisions within the lesson plan prioritize collaborative and self-directed learning experiences to
promote active engagement and positive social interaction. For instance, the article analysis activity involves
dividing students into groups and assigning them different articles, encouraging collaborative learning as they
work together to analyze and discuss the texts. Additionally, the Ultimate Class Faceoff introduces a competitive
element that further enhances collaborative learning by encouraging teamwork and peer support.
Moreover, the lesson plan incorporates opportunities for self-directed learning through activities such as
independent highlighting of key points in articles and reflecting on key takeaways through the exit ticket. These
activities empower students to take ownership of their learning process and develop self-motivation.
Furthermore, the instructional decisions extend learner interaction with ideas and people locally and globally.
By selecting articles on diverse topics and genres, the teacher exposes students to a range of ideas and
perspectives, fostering collaborative discussion and critical thinking. Additionally, the use of technology, such as
digital highlighting tools and multimedia elements in the slideshow presentation, opens avenues for global
interaction by allowing students to engage with content and resources beyond the classroom.
Standard # 1 Learner Development: The teacher understands how students learn and develop, recognizing
that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic,
social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and
challenging learning experiences.
Performance: 1(a) Regularly assesses individual and group performance in order to design and modify instruction
to meet learners’ needs in each area of development (cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical) and
scaffolds the next level of development
Rationale: Assessment plays a central role in the instructional decisions made within the lesson plan. The
pre-assessment activity serves as a diagnostic tool to assess students' prior knowledge and skills related to
identifying key points in texts, catering to the cognitive domain. By independently highlighting key points in
articles, students engage in a cognitive process that assesses their comprehension and analytical skills.
Additionally, the formative assessment in the form of an exit ticket allows the teacher to gauge individual student
comprehension and retention of lesson content across cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and potentially
physical areas of development. By collecting and reviewing exit tickets, the teacher can identify areas of
strength and weakness and adjust instruction to scaffold the next level of development for each student.
Furthermore, the instructional decisions within the lesson plan reflect an understanding of how students learn
and develop. For example, the use of a slideshow presentation and interactive activities caters to varied learning
styles, supporting cognitive development. Group work during the article analysis activity fosters social interaction
and peer learning, contributing to social and emotional development. Moreover, the inclusion of extensions for
students who want to delve deeper into the subject matter supports individual interests and promotes cognitive
and emotional growth.
Accommodations are also integrated into the instructional decisions to address diverse needs. Allowing extra
time for completing tasks or providing frequent breaks supports students who require additional processing time
or have attention-related challenges, aligning with the recognition of individual differences in cognitive and
physical development. Pairing students with peer buddies or providing one-on-one support during group
activities fosters social and emotional development while ensuring that all students can access the curriculum
effectively.
Revised 07/19/2018