You are on page 1of 2

EVALUATION FOR ORAL DEFENSE

YEAR LEVEL: STRAND & SECTION GROUP NUMBER:

TITLE OF RESEARCH PAPER:

SCHEDULE OF ORAL DEFENSE


DATE: TIME: VENUE:

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION:


CRITERIA WEIGHT (%) RATING

A. TITLE (Title is relevant/appropriate to the program of study) 15


B. TOPIC
1. Clear explanation of the research topic 5
2. Relevance and significance of the chosen topic 5
3. topic's relevance 5
C. Research Problem
1. Identified the research problem 5
2. Explained the research problem 5
3. Significance of the research problem in the field 5
D. Purpose Statement
1. Clarity and specificity of the purpose statement 5
2. Alignment of the purpose statement with the research problem 5
3. Potential contributions of the research to the field or society 5
E. ORAL PRESENTATION
1. Shows mastery of the topic 10
2. Able to answer clearly all questions raised by the panel members 10
3.Presents well all visual aids and other relevant materials 10
4. Effectively communicates the topic to the audience 10
TOTAL

Please tick appropriate blank:


Approved with no revisions
Approved with minor revisions
Approved with major revisions
Disapproved
Re-defense

RATED BY:

PANEL MEMBER
(Signature over printed name/date)
EVALUATION FOR ORAL DEFENSE
INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION:
LEADER RATING

ASST. LEADER

MEMBERS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
ADD (*) BEFORE EACH NAME IF MEMBER IS INACTIVE OR UNRESPONSIVE

RATED BY:

PANEL MEMBER
(Signature over printed name/date)

You might also like