No Major findings Recommendation

1. Environmentally there is no vegetation coverage. Afforestation and planting indigenous

trees.
2. Less social service around the site.  Partnerships and Collaboration
 Integrated Service Hubs
 Multi-Use Facilities
 Accessible Design
 Cultural Competency Training
 Student-Led Initiatives

3. Flooding and river buffering problems. Build terracing around the buffer zone.
4. Unavailability of amenities.  Comprehensive Needs
Assessment
 Stakeholder Engagement
 Prioritize Essential Amenities
 Flexible Design Solutions
 Prioritize Essential Amenities
 Comprehensive Needs
Assessment
5. Low drainage system and waste management Use proper the slope to drainage
problems. system.
6. The site has landscape view and city scape view  Design Integration
towards the other directions.  Outdoor Spaces
 Urban Design Guidelines
7. The site has water bodies around the site.  Research and Education
 Recreation and Relaxation
 Environmental Conservation
 Water Management and
Infrastructure
 Community Engagement and
Outreach.
8. The site has humus soil which has low load bearing Spread Footing and Raft Foundations
capacity for construction. are mostly recommended.
9. Due to high consumption of energy . The design must be considered to give
priority renewable energy sources.
10. No Existing Historical Building characters. Designing According to standards and
regulations of the area
11. Cold during July - Sep Maximizing Solar heat Gain For colder
seasons.
12. The site is located in the outskirts of the city. - intensifying the existing occupation
- Designs backed by sustainability and
resilience.
13. Road directly in front or on east side of the area. Physical Recommendations
- Boundary wall or Fence
- plants and trees
- Gate Placement - side entrances
- Building Orientation or placement
UNIVERSITY SIZES: SMALL, MEDIUM, OR LARGE
- small:-have fewer than 5,000 students. These are typically private colleges
- medium:- between 5,000 to 15,000 students. For example, Yale, Brown, Howard, Duke,
University of Arkansas, University of Montana, and Binghamton University are all medium-sized.
University of yale - 410.7559 hec
University of Arkansas- 207.199 hec
- Large:- usually means more than 15,000 students, Examples University of Southern California,
New York University, and University of Pennsylvania
University of Southern california - 91.459 hec
University of Pennsylvania - 121.001 hec

PROS AND CONS OF SMALL SCHOOLS AND LARGE SCHOOLS

- Smaller schools, as a rule, are known for their tight-knit communities. You can get to know
many people in a small school and see familiar faces whether you are in the library, the
cafeteria, the quad, or in class. Because the community is small, it can be easier to develop
long-lasting relationships with professors and staff. This doesn’t mean you can’t develop
relationships with professors or be part of a tight-knit community at a large university – but it
might be easier to do these things at a small college.
- However, a smaller college may offer fewer academic majors and programs than a larger
school, as well as fewer social opportunities, activities, and events. In a small, tight-knit
community, you’re likely to see the same faces frequently, and it’s not so easy to avoid people
you’d rather not see.
- Large colleges are more likely than smaller colleges to have a wide variety of majors and
research facilities.
Technology universities area to to students Ratio
massachusetts institute of technology - 67.9872 hec

Students 11,858 (2022–23)

Undergraduates 4,657 (2022–23)

Postgraduates 7,201 (2022–23)

Georgia institute of technology - 161 hec
26,839 Students