A. Ahrabi T. Ake F.

Pyne
Meeting Date:
(BPE) (BPE) (BPE) As of 2/9/21, a reoccurrence TEAM meeting has been set up and invitation sent out.
T.
Srinivas Shailendra
Veerendar Aluvala Balamurugan
May 18, 2021 Arugula Kumar Das
(BHEL) Murali
(BHEL) (BHEL)
(BHEL)
Vijaya Kumar Saravanakum
A Ganesan
Reference Document: Talluri a
(BHEL)
(BHEL) (BHEL)
100820-PENA-0001-09
Microsoft TEAM Meeting notes from 5/18/21 at 7:00 AM Items "Closed" are highlighted in Green and will be hidden a week later.

Date Completion
Item Description Due Date Owner Status Comments
initiated Date
3/22/21, Please provide Yadadri comparison for our review.
3/23/21, BHEL provided Yadadri comparison.
3/25/21, BHEL shared list of documents submitted earlier with status as on today for Yadadri project.
Yadadri 800MW flow modeling approach- A comparison of parameters is 3/29/21, BHEL submitted flow model spec along with some documents in this week.
5.0 3/22/21 BHEL Open
also enclosed 4/20/21, BPE will review documents as they are submitted.
5/11/21, BPE has received GAs. BHEL will submit the updated GAs through our FTP site to include the oversized
dampers / blanking plates.
5/18/21, Still with BHEL

3/22/21, Submitted STAAD file and supporting documentation has been queued for review by our Stress Analysis
engineering.
3/29/21, BPE expects to have comments back to BHEL by 4/2/21.
4/20/21, BPE expects to have comments back to BHEL by 4/23/21
4/27/21, Transmittal 100820-DTNG-0037to BHEL.
Comments to the STAAD model as follows:
1. All primary load cases have been reviewed and are ok as is.
Comments on Bhusawal SCR Staad model submitted to M/S BPE in 2. The Code Check for the steel design shows 4 beams which are overstressed. However these are just small sections of
11.0 3/22/21 4/5/21 F. Cordella Open
LOTB-SS001 shall be provided beams and are ok as is.
3. The STAAD program does not do a code check on plate elements. How does BHEL qualify the stress in the plate
elements as acceptable ?
4. Have the deflections been evaluated ?
Overall, the model looks good.
BHEL to advise on item 3 and 4.
5/11/21, Status on item 3 and 4??
5/18/21, A. Ahrabi to reference BHEL transmittal LOTB-SS003. It is with BPE SA for review.

4/12/21, It is not clear what is requested by this feedback. If the request is to tie two compressors to common lines then
BPE recommends the standard arrangement of two complete compressor skids each with trap, 4-way valve, and
As per our customer feedback “Common line is to be provided after
compressor (see 100806-10551-094900015 Ammonia Railcar Unloading System P&ID). In the arrangement, one would
22.0 4/7/21 Ammonia unloading compressor and before 4way valve”. BPE may check 4/13/21 BHEL Open
close two manual valves to isolate one compressor, then open two valves to bring the other compressor in service.
the provision of common line in the compressor skid.
4/20/21, BHEL to provide a P&ID / Sketch to show their suggested layout and question.
5/18/21, Still with BHEL
4/20/21, Per Mr. Veerendar , BHEL has proposed a new arrangement for inlet / outlet duct based on the damper location.
BHEL will be providing BPE with new arrangement drawings for review. See email dated 4/20/21.
31.0 4/20/21 For Yadadri project Change in Damper location 4/27/21 BHEL Open 5/11/21, Based on our meeting between BPE and BHEL on May 7, 2021, We have received email information. on the
arrangements / damper size and locations. BHEL will transmit the same through FTP site.
5/18/21, Still with BHEL. Due by 5/24/21

5/7/21, BHEL received the calculations made (excel file) by BPE through email. BHEL will check the receipt of same through
CODOCx and confirm. 5/14/21 BHEL returned calculation with clarification for BPEI reply. Apart from questions draft loss
41.0 5/7/21 Yadadri, Draft loss calculations at Design Point 5/21/21 BPE Open
sheets are o.k.
5/18/21, Terry Ake has recieved the infomation through an email. Will have this recieved through DCAP.

5/7/21, The economizer bypass inlet should be lower to allow for possible mixing device for the economizer bypass flow (previous
revision showed the bottom of the inlet and control damper at the 4475 elevation). BHEL clarified that the changes were made to
42.0 5/7/21 Yadadri, Location of econ. Bypass duct 5/21/21 BHEL 5/18/21 Closed reduce the resistance in the eco bypass duct. This change was necessary to have required bypass flow through this ducting during
lower loads.
5/18/21, BHEL will be sending revised GAs This item is closed.

5/7/21, Per Dr. Ruscheweyh' comment an additional damper to be added in the bypass duct in order to avoid excessive ash
accumulation. BHEL understand the concern of ash accumulation and will discuss internally. Reply separately with
43.0 5/7/21 Bhusawall, Additional Damper in Bypass duct 5/21/21 BHEL Open alternate solutions.
5/18/21, Still with BHEL. This info from BHEL is need as teh flow modeling is currently on going. Updated info
from BHEL may impact cost and schedule with modeling efforts.
5/7/21, Yadadri flow model PO – BHEL requested BPE to provide a preliminary schedule with start date (as early as possible) with an
expected date of PO from BHEL similar to Bhusawal.
44.0 5/7/21 Yadadri, Flow modeling by Howden. 5/21/21 BPE 5/18/21 Closed
5/17/21, BPE emailed the preliminary schedule to BHEL. Due to Howden's current work load and upcoming holidays, Howden will not
be able to start on flow model efforts for Yadadri until earliest Mid-July.

5/11/21, Can anhydrous ammonia pipe be routed along with demineralized water pipe on a pipe rack.
Is there any safety/performance related concerns are associated with this type of routing as per applicable codes.
45.0 5/11/21 Routing of Anhydrous ammonia pipe 5/21/21 BPE 5/18/21 Closed 5/18/21, similar to action item No. 24, All piping should follow requirements for support, slope, and access. Industry standard is to
have elecrical lines at the upper level, utilities would be next level down and then the process lines at the lowwer level on the pipe
rack. BPE does not have concerns with having the ammonia piping an dthe DM piping on the same rack.

5/11/21, How ammonia slip/unreacted ammonia at reactor outlet will be maintained within the allowable limits (3 ppm of 2.5 ppm).
BPE is requested to suggest techno-economical method (Among the existing methods) to address unreacted ammonia at reactor
outlet.
Also, let us know the practice / recommendation by BPE when there is no specific requirement from customer on ammonia analyzer to
measure Ammonia slip.
46.0 5/11/21 Ammonia slip / Unreacted ammonia at reactor outlet 5/21/21 BPE 5/18/21 Closed
5/11/21, Per BPE, In-line ammonia slip analyzers do not work very well, specially in a high ash environment. Following are few options
that the plant has for measuring the outlet ammonia slip levels
- Perform a wet chemistry analysis.
- Sample fly ash at the outlet of the SCR for ammonia content.
- Monitor pressure drop across the Air heater.

5/18/21, Per an email from Mr. Shailendra Kumar Das on5/17/21

BHEL is planning to release the document for Hydrostatic Relief valve Selection for Bhusawal 660 MW contract. Kindly let
us know what are the parameters are to be provided by Process group for the selection of hydrostatic relief valve. Based on
our understanding the following parameters are mentioned :

a. Relieving Capacity – Relieving capacity of hydrostatic relief valve will be maximum flow in kg/hr in that line.
47.0 5/18/21 Bhusawal, Hydrostatic relief valve data 5/21/21 BPE Open
b. Set Pressure – Set pressure will be equal to the MAWP or Design pressure of the pipe line
c. Allowable Over pressure – This is equals to ratio of Design pressure to operating pressure of that pipe line
d. Relieving flow temperature – Relieving flow temperature will be design temperature of the pipeline
e. Relieving flow pressure – Relieving flow pressure will be design pressure of the pipeline
f. Number of valves to be provided for each pipeline –
5/18/21, BPE engineering will review and advise.

48.0
49.0
50.0