Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enumeration
3
© 2021 USP
Probiotic potency
Dead cell
Viable cell
4
© 2021 USP
Can all bacterial cells form a CFU?
Dead cells
Incubation
6
© 2021 USP
Plate count methods in USP
Probiotic Tests <64> Enumeration assay for non-spore-forming bacteria strains Official
Lactobacillus rhamnosus <64> Official
Lactobacillus reuteri <64> Official
Lactobacillus acidophilus <64> 01Aug2022
Lactobacillus paracasei <64> 01Aug2022
Lacticaseibacillus casei <64> 01Aug2022
Bifidobacterium bifidum <64> modified (agar) Official
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis <64> modified (agar, incubation) Official
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum <64> modified (agar) Official
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis <64> modified (agar, sample preparation) 01Aug2022
Bacillus coagulans Specific method for Bacillus coagulans Official
Bacillus clausii Specific method for Bacillus clausii Official
Additional monographs under way Unknown Pending 7
© 2021 USP
General challenges of plate count methods
Comparison of methods
Time consuming
- up to 6 days
8
© 2021 USP
Impact of method uncertainty
10.5
USP Acceptance criteria:
≥ 100% of the labeled viable cell count (cfu/g)
10
method uncertainty
Log10 (CFU/g)
9 Label claim
Risk of OOS
8.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Months of storage 9
© 2021 USP
How to manage CFU methods
10
© 2021 USP
Dr. Christina Vegge | E-mail: dkchge@Chr-Hansen.com