withinterpret

licated method
interpret
analysis
minimized. ing mancesions
performarce
Since understand reduceneedsmanceVariation
UnderstandingThe 2-1
it. the
VA must purpose
was variation
ofaverage of and and
experimentalthe characteristics
a
method developed variance product
whichexpectations.
be
results characteristic control of
is and made product
a is design
ly and from (ANOVA) reducing a variation
or
by large concerning
process.
has data of or
cultural Sir
a and variation, part
factors
ofa
The process
the Introduction
¢nalysis to
Ronald of
lot will product The purpose
product
a
ed influence product
of make of which
loss development
tical Fisher bethe
niments. discussion the the the function
or of or
parameters
experimentation or
statistical product
necessary process. the process; process
in average
l the quantifies is
orBy relative to Variance of
r 1930s relativeprocess subsequently,
auty
ANOVA affect improve
decisions. îmethod properly and
as variation
ted tolosses the the should to
isway aquality,
used customer the
need
not This adjust perfor Chapter
deci beperfor
a to to
are of
a to to
2
 24
analytical
2-2-1 simplest No-Way
ANOVA2-2 SlOn, ANOVA differences
tions,
the that
analyses up
rte,PumpDO. TABLE
NOTTl ozmin
Plow Vriation
breakg
1.total
appropriate eXAmpies simplify
anaiyeis
intoits reader. would
of duction No-way discussed
ofASe, No The
theAlthough
measuring to
Zero The Analysis traditionalexperimental
mnorerather Taguchl
has discussion
although
2-1 date asSsumed Sums
o/min mathematically
variation lineANOVA situation aresome will
Lo-Capscty down methodcalculations,
in
actually
in method comnprehensive than Techniques in
= of this this to of
later intrinsically be average
variation
down
into variance fow squares statistics
473 sample for structure.applied
this
into data begins designs of
using
ns of rather book rate.
simpliication. chapters. to is
5 1 ANOVA
the
accountable collected analyze laid analysis for
Pump components. isThe a with performance
are
6 2 average is these
be
entirely set book to pure Quellty
a than carried
simplified first. will tied Thesituations
somejudgment,
Flow mathermatical data of a and will will
3
observations or windshield set bemethod
to
to the etperimental start Engineering
Rate (or collected much one
fictitious Imagine of has
mention very
2 components: twsources;
only
mean) No-way O test out of
units experimental another, car in
in in some thiswith groups
the easier specialized
this takes
of an could
5
of technique
total washer practical
no-way be
chapter.
allANOVA, mathematical identicalthe are and an very a
4
manner ifbut used variation of
designs
the variation engineer the items
data quite put be
pumps data,
like ANOVA, groundwork experimentalthe with simple
4 data into value thfore In
points.
manner
to understanding of
the which possible. that and any the tested.
demonstrate real
8 points single for is which chapter, next
case into
simplest is ability sent subsequent
decomposed breaks Many inthe or, but set account.
regardless and The
relative Table
purpose to as
ANOVAdigits will is it of
of of a in datasitua build deci
case, total the the the pro this bethe
to to2-1.

case
thisIn 2.
error
as therate Some The
divided reader's
extending
y datz,oz/min portion The manufactures
performance.
expect from pumps The tionally
Flgure No-way the use of
4
magnitude pump pump' present, ofanyword variation
2
were s notation
2-1 them called
1
+5 attributedopportunity
into somegiven
OW-capacity fromn ANOVA to
randomly "observation" N= 8 T= T= N= Y: y=
two to
performance but flovW
pump,
Why = of
2
+6 identical pump experimental is
the
zero
of be?
a average sum observation,
total ith
portions: to each can are flow
necessary
+8
to causing
meter. response; individual
pump error. to not selected is oz/minT= 40 number of
number
Pump
4 understand. be pumps;
observation rateactually all
the all There has of
erformance; Error one illustrated under observationg to
of a will all response,
y3 error)
5 observation. portion a ofdemonstrate data
the froma unknown; observations introductíon
+5
portion however, particular =
includes nonetheless the will observations
points
6 can A pump
plot conditions
production of be z/min 8
total graphically, be tthere
he
data
7 attributed some oz/minT=
5.0 around to
+4t
represented
the These ofthe
lo w it
vuriation. pump-to-pump connotation. = th e Analysis
rates will unknown be is
8
+6 measurement
data of
only TIN calculation
line
observed
line the
to which be the
identical; estimated =
average Variance
of
the appears by slight
which test. y
segments measurement The
mean enhances a and
line variation
differences Also, meth0d:
errors ostensibly
in would true (tradi
segment
acceptedthrough
and Fig.2-1.
can these fiow
25

plus one the wein

be
e y data, oz/min
4 But the also The sumsperformed
measure each very which the magnitude
6 extending f pump. tothe 26
2-2 Note The
T mean
magnitude be the
y +5
= informative;
of of error effects Taguchi
quared the isthe magnitude
average
TIN, squares of
is term also
+5
then 222.0
SS, = SS, SS, the which
line summation uf
line
a of
so egual Techniques
SS,, =SS.m
N(T)2 and of around the pump
+5
computed: = (total=segments
total value from
number
Pump
= the 52total allows
however, line of
summed. to characteristics
+5 Sums portion + ariation the from the the
the segment for
m 62variation)
sums can a sum the ofaverage line
+5 of + cleareraverage each
Quality
; squaresReferring of 82 of bethere lir.e
the +
present.
squared observation
of duesegment Engineering
squares is picture segments the
22 is israw value
n line then to that
+5
due + equala er
segment to 52 Referring
mathematical ror todue are
8
computed: and to data
-5 T2 tw Fig. zero
the
+ develop.
then to due as is varying to
T5 2-2, 42 points.
zero. shown indicated the
to as
mean +
the due 42 summed to the showmmean
Fig. The This Themean slightly
variation to +62
operation in by
the magnitudes
2-1, summnation
to
in Fig. the Fig. in is
mean itself equals indicated from
provide
the difference2-3. 2-2.
due
can total to is 40.0, pump
to benot "he
of of by

h N,
which the with known sums Note
that
and In This average
squared The Hgure
sums the this
is is of 4 6 8
t demonstrates portion 2-3
the appropriate
methodcomponents.
squares 22.0SS, = SS,
of SS,value. and 1

summation Low-capacity
squares = summed of
the is 02error
Referring the
to +
canshare total equal
In (not 12sums magnitude pumpnumber
of this + to Pump
the be
variation to a222.0 3
apportioned
written SS, proof) 32 ofprovide to SS, =
performance;
SS,m squares case, the +
= sum =
squares Fig.
(-3)2 of
can
SS,, a200.0 2-3, a 402
i=1generally
N basic
of measure the -1 o
of to be + the + 200.0 =variation
Introduction
each + 02 the line
each
decomposed SS, property 22.0 -1
sums +
variation
segment
observation (-12 of due
source. the +1

A of of to to
squares
ANOVA.
+ variation erior. Analysis
The into (-1)2 due due
from formulas two to to
due The + error error of
12 around Variance
i sources
= to
total is can
to1 for the
the
be
27
 andone thesenseered, To2-2-2 pleda 1.
problem
ractice
perforrm realy which
tion
oz/min
Pump no.TABLE
rate,
low there
t3çatamadetreedom when GIe requires
comparison
(ndependent)
there
inforraation. tw Appendix A. Here,
servations, This thiek data. comnplete
fom
2-2 mean) that from
exist to thoughtis isDegrees necessary. is
estinmate concept
pointassociated orly associated the the
High-Capacity of For being production
no-way
the
only and can the the error
summation
2,there l instance, mean.
of comparison
d.f. of
zero, be concept ANOVA of
seven 2the degrees SS, SS, The
15 1 independent
to associated
in
made
degree with
freedom ANOVA component
variation 3, are with terms the Anothermodel of = =
Pump
16independent of the (see ANOVA
2 SS, SS,
to3seven the referencebetweendegrees calculations, of each of of
of that mean Table the
18 3Flow 4, freedom freedom. on -
etc., error with the piece + was square
comparisons in this SS, method
SS,
Rate independent can(average) 2-2).
12 4 the reference the of
estimate.
as the point; freedom of actually
comparisons. data. be(d.f.)
information A observations.setof
It
=
15 5
shown mean degree one windshield 222 of
mean, made is used
for is other recommended the
Data 5.0 -
14 6
in With also point ofestimated is calculated,
differences
which oz/min all in to that 200 states
comparisons
Fig.point applies element
of
Data reference the
allow freedom =
J4
0.0 the purpose.
Anotherway that washer
is only datadata. 22 that
2-4. 1 oz/min. is
16 point can to only l from Answersarethat
in but of
Ir d.f.estimnated mnust
in
the pump
this be
l that toTherefore, one
(there
has Only
for all a this each
compared degrees
compared statistical be the
data can the meaning oneeach the
piece wasobserva
is consid reader is
eight only fair fair data from sam
set be of of not

is to dom.
Flgure
freedom table 2-2-3
is Oneinformation the The let freedom,
where
An Similar data
dependent 4 6 8
equal datatotal v, V,, 2-4
other
is
v
Variance ANOVA = = = pointLow-capacity
1

the =
for to set degree total
degrees degrees
descriptive degrees to
variance
error; the for for sums on is3
due table degrees
sums the this of of of the not 3
of freedom of pump
in to
freedom freedom 3
low-capacitynethod
the statistic
V. freedom
can squares,another
comparison number
Pump

of error
Error of performance;
now freedom
squares
example, SS 5 Independent
comparisons
V,= associated independent
V,==3.14 variance,
that
equals
be of associated
8
=
summation
a
ANOVA.
constructed =
of 6
22 SS. for pump 1 SS
data degrees
can the +
error +
with with
7
usually be data total SS, point cf
commparison; free
calculated can
divided which
set number error the 1
termed mean be to
(see
made 2
byfrom
summarizes and
Table of (always that
as
the just observations for 2
the 2-3). comparison
degrees
to
degrees
variance, 1) 3.
ANOVA all
the of
of in
ample that
her soms This 2-2-4
variance periment become
parameters, whenfastersquares
associated
Error Notice done S variance. By ErrorMeanSource
the ANOVA This
is Summary
ANOVA
No-Way
TABLE23 30
reference Method
way thethan by an definition, Total
practice
blem, is variance the due that Taguct.i
(setexperimental calculation
estimate
an
fa equal ANOVA with
including faster to el-ctronic
iue value method of of error, the 222 200
29 SS
problem least data iechniques
even 'to is error
numeracor the
method.
a S2 of o
ofdivided the squares measure for and S=
is o, = S= S= Vù 7 1 d.t
10 is collected
measurement calculating variation. = standard
hough minimumbased situations V calculator.
identical the
population sample
ves had that for
dedexactly
the
by
the on ). the of the is
the N-1
=1
=
N-1
1/ true
deviation
Quality

a Although
denominator tobut standard
to degreesvalue least
zero variationbecomeerror same The
the standard Engineering
all the error unknown
formula
l.
rence of
squares variancecalculation standard
same involved more deviation is
ofthe the variance deviation
standard
freedom due deviation equal
is standard
error sums to formula
complex, used
approach; in the deviation
line in all thedegrees as to
variance for of tahe is the
squares example for
was error. uncontrolledANOVA above
particular deviation square
10 the ofthe calculation
freedomis sums
units Notice
asabout
error given,much
the will oot
ex of
of

of
The mathematical
discussion.the proposes
givcleaning
e aivelocity
r fuid
engineer Again,a 2-3-1
responses Before where
perform£nce
situation
One-way One-Way
ANOVA2-3reference S0
same typical
movement
N= n, T= T= A, A, asprÙper velocity happens
A, A, A, Product
an no
= symbol A fluidagenerated as
totalnumberaverage sumaverage = = for =2nd = test imaginary,case parameters ANOVA
considers
sum e line
3rd = lst factor = test fluid
adequately isbefore that
mber that of past too when
development of
of of for level level level data three a is
of of observations
all of test the under velocity. the low, one-way by is product is the the
ervationsobservations
observations
all of of of is the
charged yet the the
condition.level orifice were averageerror
of collected windshield the
different
observations orifice orifice to
windshield potentially effect next
ons investigation fluid situation
designation satisty ANOVA controlled. or sums
area area erea will with process, most value
under some orifice of
under under themerely
will the very one of
= = = washer complex squaresIntroductlon
of
= A, will .0045 .0030 .0015 notation areas driver not is
(outlet applicable.task real, controlled
in the
A, TIN A,level contrast
be dribble
be observations
level level to of pumps.
used in² in? in?orifice determine is able
of
situation ANOVA are to
(2.90 (1.94 (.97 theestablishing
= in out, parameter mininized Analysis
to order car. to Imagine to
A/n,. denote mm2) Obviously,
mm?) m1n?) area) distribute
The and is
no-way to
towhich presented conduct. of
if Variance
the simn engineer too the the ANOYA, upon when
stur. jii may higl, if
fi1jdsam.e
the
c as the This the
31
 32
givenWith
which andTable
NOTE
Dropped Level iABLE24
Tp 3.The components.
2. 1. As2-3-3 2. 1. Tro 2-3-2
The
observations level The The before, Excluding
nciuding also Taguchi
1 methods Sums 2-4. this
is orifice
fUs Method
pump calculationsvariation variation
variation the notation
8.8 Using
=30
Area,in² around
.0045.0030.0015
the of ft/s. sum area,Techniques
and the can A, A,
m/s. Velority tota! 1 the squares ka3= 17.1
ft/sT= A
destroyed under the of of (including mean = Then,
= ofthe
making
of the the mean be = 8.8 notatinn in
are average
the 3.2 5.1observations mind,
Data
variation used for
each average average (one-way ft/s ft's ft
it, identical
individual (Sec. (Sec. s
Quality
the a
no fUs (First in
data.
Velocity, factor of mean) 2-3-6)2-3-3) system,total the
ANOVA
Experiment) all(mean)
(mean) can ANOVA) N=
11
4 na, =3 nA, 4
nA, = of Engineering
engineer
of
Grand
total
17.1, 172.7 tolevel the
thobservations
observations be 12
e aroundthe
of of
decomposed to pump A, to
represents.0015
no-way observations all complete test. constructs
observations A,= A,with.0015
A,
ftT=
U1s.6 The
Total = =
ANOVA 2.2
the fus.8 1.7 test
into ft/s
four
fUs data
under calculations: in² in2 pumps
relative its
example, orifice
orifice is
appropriate
average of each shown
with
factor to area, area
with zero in a

Velocity, ft/s calculations. This the

Figure area. the
Flgure
variation exception
calculation Graphically,
2-5 2-6
Pump shows SS, SS, =
A
The due of
= the
velocity; is graphically
magnitudebased to 2.22 i
1= this
component
the
+t can
total
on SS, = SS, mean. 1.92
number
Pump be
variation 6 the the
of +t seen of
format
the 17.12 2.72 variation
11 N line
e D
(T)2 quiteIntroduction
(method line 26.583 = segment
which is +
used =
segments MT² clearly due
1). in to
previous to
.82 Analysis
11 factor
in
=31.190
Fig.
12
31-/g0 due
sums
to proportional to
h, of
2-5. Variance
outlet
each
of
squares
level orifice
33
oi
2
 alocity

mentfactor Four
(See lentThis
to factoi A, 1

condition. 26 guchi
Appendix calculation A. due A Pump
SS, = SS, SS, Figure
4.007 to is A, Techniques
(a squared
= = The levelA, velocity;
4.64545)² na,
E, method 2-7same
of proof Aj isand variation for
10 shows
- type (A , 5 Quality
2.)
SSA is
+ T2 summed. -).
number
Pump
6 A

-) very 3(.14545)2
tedious, na,
+
graphically.
this of
information There
For mean.
due
to
7

r
Engineering

(Az
instance,are
butit + -
4(-.75454)2 T)2 four
is 10
is used A3
mathematically +
observations the 11
na, for
Ag the length 2

- other
TË2 under cf
levels line
equiva
level seg
of

Veloclty. (t/s
tically.for tionlevel wayError
ccounted proportional Flgure
igure 3

withinANOVA of
variation
2-7
the 2-& Pump
controlled
the the SS, SS, shows A,
to
= velocity;
SS
controlled leastagain
is
--+0>= variation
the
the A

squares 02 + 8.482 variation

factor. remaining
based (-.3)²+
(-.2)2 number
Pump
groups.Error 5.12 due
are on + due 3
the +.52 portion to
evaluated to factor Introductlon
Again, method -1)2
variation + 114.007 )3.22
error.
(-.2)2 A.
+ of
thearound of .32 the 10
isleast + to
total the -.2)2+ line 11 Analysis
the 02
controlledsquares, =(.600 segment, 12
ariationaverage +
22 of
but Variance
for in which
can
variaeach one
be is 35
 Velocity. fUs
mean)th2-3-4
of in
(including e Agure
ept The 2
degrees
method Taguchi
egrees Degrees
2-8

of Pump
1 of 1, A,Technlques
d.f. of including
freedom velocity;
of
reedom
for freedom
Ve VA V 31.190 4
each = = = SS, variation for
for the
V ka N Quality
fair for = the
mean, = =
number
Pump
a Vm
-l= 1| 26.583 SS,
ntrolled
son. mean, due
Engineering
- 3-1 the to
VA + error.
fototal
r + SS,
= 4.007
factor 1l = factor
2 degrees +
A, -l- SS,
+
pared such A, .600
10
A3
2 and of
as = freedom
A 8 for
follow
to 12
Az error.
is
has the the
same1 sum,
d.£.

*Dropped As A2 AjLevel TABLE 2. measurevalue.

factors
1.tions,characteristics, effects.
better
the fomean
r It2-3-6meaningvariance(ncluding parisonErroreight and
The mean)the2-3-5 error.
In has
observations Thearound The the edification, ANOVA A,
2-5
total might In doesbeenMethod ANOVA Table estimation degrees
pump variationvariation situation In compared
being of
d..
8
678
22J0 Velocity,
123 ft/s Factor the variation lower-is-better how
of a most
not
shown this
of
2-5 to
1.5
and of
for average be affect 2 summarysummary
estimated,
destroyed and under of of experimental neither (excluding estimate shows .6
freedom
error
Error of infar in
is is to
the the reducing the th e th e one
always Aa
may a th e
each average of exclusionthe of is table estimate for has
it, Degrees individual
all average calculations doesprevious the
no 2.2 be situation variation th e and shown factor doneerror, 1
data. factor decomposed
observations the situations, it mean). variance d.f.
of the
of afectexafnple and within of Also
1 Freedom
observations
level.
observations
average is relevance in the eight Introduction
from the due for Table
due error A, apparent
mean variation with the the groups. fair
into zero
to to that to
factorA 2
calculations
the variation to2-6. comparisons
degrees A,
d.f.for
from zero. will
factorA to
the the effect, For
around under and mean Now, Analysis
in
exception variation be
the howdueto of
instance,
the
discussed is not
each ANOVA ha_ due as freedom. data
the successful the for estimated. well anwithin Variance of
no of to estimate set
average factor mean
practical
therror,
e due
as'error the
calcula lower-is later. groups. are
fector to com
level the is and the The the 37
of a of
 The Equation
Fig.
2-7.to (SeeMathematically, linesame
conçept Again, (MethodTABLE
A, Source
Summary 1) 38
variation
The
variation Appendix segments Taguchi
-6
gtaphically
31.190
26.5836:583" One-Way
2-1 SS, = SS
4.607 SS, = 4.007
.f00 ss Techniques
due will is of
due section = summing
be this .6452 applied 11
8 2 ANOVA
to
SS, M this
error to
used 2.904
factors is 075 for
SS, = E, equivalent
SS,
t
inthe can Quality
is primarily 31.190 proof .3452
also method be
is squares
demonstrated
calculated 3). + Engineering
identical -
nA, 1.1452
26.583 From
as to 2
the also. of
the
to definition previous
identically =
+
method NT2 (-.755)2
""+
magnitudes as
4.607
shown
calculations,
1; tofor
refer
method total in
of
Fig.
to the
variation.
Fig.
1; various 2-9.
2-8. refer (2-1) The

A mean In In the2-3-7
(excluding
mean) Figure Velocity, ft/s
new method
method
2-9
definition is Degrees
subtracted Pump
2, 1,
the the Ag
ofvelocity; 3

used mean degrees freedom

from
1(always);Vn
= V total
in
methodN-1=
being
both =
of variationnumber
Pump
Vm
N=1 freedom
excluded,
sides t Ag
VA (method 7
2 V
is of t
t formula
Ve
e
Introduction
Ve VA the 2).
t the 9
equation
Ve
degree was 11
10
2 to
written Ag Ahalysis
of
freedom
of
Varlance
for
the
 40
Therefore,
where
wOud
of identical
ANOVA
garded e the2-3-8
(excluding
T'hmean)
2-3-9 2-9.sary 2-8.Prsciice
Tabie ity
T Source
Summary
A withina
statistics,
(MethodTABLE2) arounderrOr The
ple). tables hoV Taguchi
punp
Itis ANOVA
variance for ANOVA
This variance the the in VA V
2-7 is Central effective
problem using
variance Ve
the tagain
he using variancemethod = = Technlques
controlled based performance *
4.607 4.007 One-Way the summarysummary v ka
SS situation grand N
oflimit ANOVA
.600
method -1
central based
upon factorA, recommended
generally 2. some values VA -
due 2, 1 =
ANOVA average theorem for
10 8
group Imagine which ==3-
is the upon table factor to l table 10 11 Quality
2.004
.075, limitbased parameter
the
oraretable
variation shown larger methodis -2 1l 1
(the T.the using a mean calculated
might = =
Engineering
theoremn on The thatsimilar the for = 2 10
data variation in orifices mnost method
popular 8
one error
of the method the be be is 2.
for
points th e relevant;
in The for for for
(CLT). of ANOVA reader
experiment a
withlower-is-better
reducing 2 the the the
the variance
actual of 2.
factor
value
appears
under the d.f. d.f. total
The
calculate the
The
fundamnental method.
this
for A for for
averages
tables,
individual results results and d.£.
condition
CLT shown on the
provides the error factor
in
taveragge
he error
Table
is the mean
Only in
a
has inA1, an higher-capac shown characteristic A
areitems in
three A1,
observations the A, a
theorems estimate shown measure one-wayis 2-7.
forANOVA in to
tenets exam andA3 necesTabie zero. casedisre The
in
of of

A, Level TABLE
A1
VÝ. 2. 1.
A
sampled; All
deviation.
TABLE
Summary
Source As (2-2) thformula
e the This The Samnple
distribution
The distributionaverage The 2-8
A of
estimates variance
sample the varianceaverage Area,in?
Pump
may formula .004 .006 .008
2-9
therefore,above ofaverages Velocity
One-Way be
2.4825 2.0150
averages. states
of the
4675 SS of of
ofrewritten that ofof
the are the the 2.3 1.5
o, distribution
the the
tend Data
ANOVA use individuals that predicated
describes it distribution
individuals individuals
11 2 sample
has (Second
Velocity,
1.9 1.4 1.2 fUs
1.008
.052
Graphically,
S the to
a be
variance constant
the averages ofnormally 1.9 1.2 Experment)
on Introdúction to
S; noo= divided the of Grand
total

third the
= sample
individuals
n this of fact 2.1 1.8 1.3
(S, by average is
appears
sample and less distributed
the that averages Total
most 18.3
8.2 5.9 4.2
Variance
Analysis(of
sample than
averages and one J

in important
population the
constant regardless
will
Fig. size variance
will approach
2-10.used
be tenet
standard is
to of
Formulaobtain equal being of
the the
(2-2) the
is
to
 But
Substitute individuals,
formulaforusing samplesample
taking This2-3-10
of FAgure
The the
=.252 S
the size sizeformula
2-10
variance CLT Taguchi
the Variance
(1.050 Centrai
k variance can
(equai
variance
of
ka
1- for can Techniques
nbe
- N of
applied = calculation
be limit
S,(z)?S=n 1.525) and sample sample
4.
formula used theorem.
= of
A the to for
4 tosize
(.252) + for S?
= averages thesamplemake using Quality
(1.475 modified
y.
N practice for
= 3-1 all anCLT Engineering
1.008 where - -1N A,, samples
averages estimate
1.525)2 for problem,
A,
n averages.
= +
and is of (averages) n>1
4 required). and
(2.050 As where individual
multiplying
Rather can
-
1.525)2 be alThis l
levels variance (individuals) n=1
calculated
than property
had by
this the by
a

ces.Statistically,
is 2-3-12
level determined
who: S ever, Now averaging
them: part a istheEach For For
For Individual 2-3-11variancetable,
variance
called available, inividual Notice
that
vented o as being
thesethere correct
the the the
Ftest ofthe of
whether an to these As Ag A Indivldual but
determined
from estimates are information. value? within of
F group group groupvariation,
variance
the test,thereis for
two
an
is sample itisthis
varlance abligation =.0370
an S, .0630S, =.0570S,
OVApamedthese the
Obviously, the Variance reallyvalue
a independent estimate
tool variationfrom appear A, can averages.
estimates
comparison
.0570 Using an is
after which A
exists group be ecual
hÍd. better Calculation estimáte
estimated
the >>.0521.008 to + all of
Sir
provides
of S, >>S estimates be .0630 individual
to where
cannot where where.n can the to
variation estimate
Ronald
The are individuals. considerably
3 use formula be the
t all of
Introduction
F
ficantly be n=4 n calculated: one variance
individual
est a
.0370
of =4
her,a of usescorrect.
thevariance =4
decision
is
of
individual forother
y averages information
all and and
and individual
different .052 way, of to
ofSincewith u
ferent. at
ritish the = v
=
u variancefactor Analysis
= based
a some 3 3
and variance; information all 3 3
n, in A
nfidence S, rather ofd.£. variance, on in of
of This this Which
this based the Variance
being the
tool case:hor. tnz data ANOVA
by actuai on
is
the the 43
 of
lyiewpoint?
practical
Statistically,
Thevarince Comparing
varíanceis: ii
tte
Looiking the risk Ín
this
Fanve andnator.
denominator degreessidered.
associated appendixes.
ances theTo list areWhen
denominator
becomes acceptedthe Taguchl
timate practice erample, Each
is statistically of One, required
is ratio
this
in the
are this Confidence freedom with
the the combination as Techniques
10%. format the
of F
too believedmeans problemappropriate isThe an degrees confidence
the Fratios being
becones
ividual value V VË aSsociated
high 9.
assumed =
isk a=
for sampledetermine large unequal
The.
degrees = = for
when with
to of the degreesdegrees determining
1 of tolarge Quality
F10,2:9
Faata>> the F= necessary - of enough, achieve
variance be at data ratio
F10:2:9 table,
confidence of
risk confidence,
freedom variance with
level
whetheranFenough, at
ering unequal. least .0521.008 F10:2:9
freedom of of necessary; some F
Engineering
of 3.01 = freedomfreedom the three some
90% wi th 19.4 = F an has in
based the ratio numerator sample the confidence confidencethen
What the for level explicit an pieces
the confidence
two two,
on tothe for for numerator;
F ratio
two of the
table, estimates look
of variance
ratio of
variation
actual does numerator denominator90% numerator F the sampletwo
value degrees information levellevel.
for associated degrees
this the is
required are F
vidual ofmean two of the
in
where the
inand
ofthree, provided
sample vari tables
averages estimates is of variances
individual tables and 2 freedom,
with denomi freedom are
from so which
the con
vari isfor
the it. in
is a

is bethere tained from does small

populations havingtable confidenceF averages
chance affects the2-3-9individualance.
population
reallyconfidence a s the applies.
risk factor' As ratio
Flgure larger somerolledConfidence data is Averages
attain the
lower.experimenter
0.0
is one value, thwhen of flow from
2-11 does risk onFor some when
e graphically are
actual levels population obtaining F would variation
level is
the same
pulling ratio
velocity
Averages Invalue instance,
of a with the th e being being
0.5 not intwo are
this really st¡ndard
being chance the specified mean tables (note:appear
difference may
cause ordifferent samples
experimenter is
sampled,varying
sampled.
of is statistical applied
generated
a displayed that
situation wrong.
simply the more
attaining
of ratio the
practice 1.0 be do die error and for as is
a magnitude. F present.much
fromdata
rawmeans
Estimated
difference in When chosen have confidence ispopulations averages variance). out of in ratio
99% in The it
problemVelocityY,fUs A performance stacking 5/6, sense,
the difierent in at the
confidence by Fig. in is
1.5 the would of Fig.believed
data more
to
alpha reduce stating or
the theleast
ANOVA the from 2-12. thanIntroduction
Rather
2. 83%.It that
statement as The have Sincesame
F
the
2-11.from than
windshield
in the itareratio; rather the
2.0
performance risk average
the
a is odds been
magnitude practice In Inthe two
level),
whenvariation
averages
excessIve much
This
in
is will odds number
a isconsidered.
used population
it believe
the case, summnary,
another would to
is riskconfidence are
sampled practice or Analysis
possible to in is alpha the
believing
more that be
2.5 the be in much great the problem
washer
expected much
This is
performanes.
required an oftheir which this
of outlet form havingexpected
chance to1,2, that risk (a alpha problem of
when error, favorlevei roll example, the moxe when indicated
against group pump.exceeds athe
at Variance
3.0 3, two is
that to a 4, the chosen risk orifice very different onlyone from
the alpha, for confidence
6, or easily or of graph in
makea that a so 5
samples Fratiomore items in is high Sec.
experifactor factor,therecould means
A as the the area the of
the 45
high ob a
the but the
ally, rangestraight and areaChap. expected torange useful may ence were thmenter,
The e of Figure
0.5 - 2.0 - 25
46
statistically The th e
1.0 1.5 F 3.0
the
expected
tation may
4. of to(fronn befactorial
very 2-12 Taguchi
performace F
actual line To orifice the high,
bedistance small ratiobased Averages estimate 4

obtain an Techniques
determined
predicts evaluate experimenter. but effect. does 0.004
sample
due areas engineering on
therelative
some of of the versus
to There not
ofthe where a
tested
set difference
each necessarily data for
ANOVA averageparticular nonlinear to
orifice
variation from of could Quality
averagesbecausepump,viewpoint) the at
the hand, area.
factor Orifice
area,in?
from the in exist Engineering
results average is reflect 0.006
performance
of graph.
flow falling the best level believes A,
variance, a
ndividuals. the velocity, sample averages in very n=1
falls of estimated level the
experiment high that
each In on n
a averages. engineering =
4
into the straight averages with
population the will may Fratio, it
previous
two appropriate graphthe to does.
be be not only
falls covered 0.008
egories line. linear
are The if The
a
error
beimportance
within wouid small
Apractically
within confidence magnitude
method
later over variance
orifice differ
ini the fall, the the -HA,
in of

2. 1.
AtTAt At T Source
ASummaryTABLE
taneously,ment casting
3.5 neers which rocating
lar an 2-4-1although
During Two-way,
controlled 2-4 ANOVAWOuld have and the The
e ANOVAtechnique
will twaroTwo-Way
eastleastleast Factors
Factors
tables)
no factors
toproduct.aluminum be factors
2-10
99% 95% 90% could 4.5% were was Casting now
2.4825 hardness. one used, Summary effect
confidence.
2.0150
Complete
SS magnesiumB=
engines. utilization ANOVA used appear which which are whichwhich
nfidence.
dence. 4675 % usingA interested
and how
= be The seminar
experiment but believed
on
% run the casting
to througho:1t
hardness have have
11
One-Way copper this
According attain parametersthe is as the have have
One the shown
magnesium
symbology to a is average. in anFratio an an
.0521.008 in problem student
foundry graphicai
still an to
V evaluate the th e next Tabie influence F F
ANOVA
content was analysis in ratio
F
possible. the ratio ratio
19.4* to proper
efiect highest
content specifications measured existed proposed
which in remainderTabis 2-10. A
content
these of
representations this complete less larger the cxceeding less
Introductlon
hardness 2-10
Method
copper experimentalorder than
average than
mnanufacured at than
factorscouid on the tis will
1.2B,= 3.A,
5= of form the some some
the eperiment.
the and rdvfthe
of the
of ANOVA this 2
be. andcriterion value to
ke t he Aalysis
Rockrell
and copper
magnesium
1.2 will tex:. the ofcriie,:on aieriCn
critericn
casting situation.
Metho? the the ior
condition: te pistons be to basic
l.8B,= 4.5Ag 1.8o. content casting
revir; ANOVA are the
format of
parti: Bfer a Heiscontinue (F Varlanca
scale worked analytical population,
believed ratio
Antaperi c0 für
couibeatni p:23s. for
table
si.nul Cngi thee from
the
to 47
I. *
 B TABLE 48
B B, TABLE nent, centage the
wiil mutual A An 4. 3. 2.Intwo-way Gents:
1. simplifyered qitefrTm and four ble The
2-4-2 B
Some xBrepresents Variation
Variation Remembering
equationVariation
Variation combinatiocs
beeffect different
resulting
experin:ertai
each 2-11Taguchi
2-12 Sums anyway, possibly
as
discussed
preliminary
summarized ofeffect the Two-Way
Two-Wry
magnesium, on ANOVA of
batch Techniques
hardness of for due due ue due discussion. 70hardness mixes
squares look
77,7876,78 A copper the uf A,
Experimental in SS,
total to to to to points that cxist:
conditions Experimental
erTOr factorfactur total castingslike of
interaction the
calculationsmore variation the metal for
in = (rwO-way
Table then of and
SS,
ineraction Trar.sformed
variation variation
those
ofmeasured. A,B,, Quality
detail the B A
magnesium hardness constituents and
Data percentage an + in A,B2, can Layout
79,80 2-14. Engineering
SS may hardness A,
,74 will in factors of
interaction ANOVA)
may
Table
due
all
Sec. of TwO AzB, be
speed + he factors results is to
be subtracted shown
2-4-4. in SSAA
A written 2-12. are
of
affecting and decomposed measured.
th e parts and
the copper is prepared,
in
A are mean
ANOVA said B. + and are ABz.Table
The SS, shown
from willrandomly
dependscasting
to B
into The Imagine
interaction
be castings 2-11.
fpresent.
or considnotresults
in
each be
more Four
this hardness. on Table
the
value selected poured, that
experi comnpo could possi
2-13.
This per the is to
the
If

B, TABLE
B ANOVA
The
TABLE
Data general The
Tbtal Ba
total 2-13
variation
2-14
Transtormed
formula variation
29 7,8 6,8 A,
TwO-Way
due =62 7,8 6,8 A.
10
9, 3,4 A, for
26
to is
nA, =
4 nA, =4 Az
= A,
26 29
= Data
Layout, +
any
factor 82 for
Total nA, A?
34 21
Summarlzed Ai number +t
32 N
TwG-Way
A
10
9, 3,4
TA2 can + RB, =4 rg, =
4 B, Az
Grand
total A 34
= B,
21
= Introduction
Analysis to
of be
T² levels
calculated +
102
of N=8 T=
55
nA, Az
T2 factor
552
a
coupleA
N 40.875 =
is Variance

of
'ways.

The
 TABLE each varistion
organizedall
make
thisup
points
data 4 calculated,
nizedWhen
shown.
factorsame To Similarly, equation
wTOng.term.
natorsmust Thecalculation.
Note
that This
otai the calculate
combination.
2-15
conceptA inthe
possible To If of sum is Toguchl
Data indue variation end the Forthese equal an
the simply tàe can the of
Summartzed
the fashion
to
the a the the opportune
factor Bof v¡riation two-levelbe plus Tochnlqves
manner the data squaring conditions
29 Discussed show var.ation
combinations numerator
simplified numerators 29
ofdue SS, terms
A wasTable
interaction SS= +
time
over shown
and organized the
o 26 for
the due due experiment 29?
factorcalc1 (29 aremust = Ouslity
Factor below B to of to
to 34)2(21 -
2-15. magnitude 3,2(B, - to 4

combinations in is this not the of 55 point

of lation factor 262
the equal
negative the
26
A A are Table A
applied 26)2 met, Engineering
factors When as was interaction specialwhen out
plus and
two
2-17.This in method B then the
552
calculated,
variation of 21.125 = is 32
a
points
make
this data 4
up methods Table
A but the R1125 denominator
sample
formula: term.termsmathematical =
te! and and
line 742SS the 4 1125

the data B, 2-16. will will of (neglecting

SS, The
4
4
for data due suffice
th e segmentsnot factors sizes =
isthe To calculation sum 8
calculatingorganized data to
data be check
are of of
summed calculatefactor graphically
at A
the the
was this due and equal, the
must of
negative
orgaB
point. to B, will denomi
square) the
the for into bethe was the the this
be SSA

B, TABLE mula,
tracted.quent
divided Note So the General number
number
condition onlyvariation B B.
TABLE
2-17 for number
all value that two
When by the 216
lower-order
Data AB, A,B, A,B, A,By formula.
of of
twhen,
he example possible the of levellevels due Data
Summarized also C=4 of
interactionnumber 15.125 = = = =(A to
includes the 142 = data
combinations factors. Summarfzed
5
14 A, A (A (A Let of an 34 21
interactions various x x xproblem, x combinations
points either
interaction.
of 2 72 B), B)_ B), (A
over B),=7
effects the data +2 = = =
x
factor over
Interactlon combinations 152 under B),
factor 19 15 14 n XB, of
points represent these
totalsof 4
and are factor and The data Facor
this of
7
Aa
AxB factor main for
calculated the
the first points Introduction
B
condition. A
that interacting
T2 and the second
8552 make
effects effects are is
- B.
sum
combination, - a
using summed, 1125
SS, Also, general is
up to
2
rnust which Then of each
a
- factors data a Ahalysis
the SS let specific
s
bemuzt
squared, 21.125 c method
general
subtracted. representunder of
the and Variance
method
be
up
subee nAxB); the for
for sub and
the ith for any 51
 Factor Factor also Total ticus. all 243 Then Gver
complex orderNote AxB,which efiect
which
groups two-factor, Speciic
tions
items The
degrees Degrees from
B A easiest that
interactions
assesses assessof to
degrees degrees ANOVAs iswhich
represents
forrmula.
factor
except that made, two-level
SS, this
of of way represents
freedom the
= = which method the A,the
of of freedom 40.875 SS, the the
SS, is toand In
freedom: freedom interaction to
calculate
interaction andmain
V SSAxB specific
= otherexperiment, the
VB VA Vy
-SSA = isuse includes
factor horizontally effects test
= = (two-way - accountable
SSA one
= VA = 1.125 the
RB kA diagonal
N-l= effects
+ lazyerror - formula
- (AXB, - diagonal
33)2(22 AXB,)2
data
-
t SSB effect, of
1= - VB
are SS - the onefactors
1= ANOVA). 21.125 technique. 8 summations
+ identical - variation
need to
2 +must interactive N may sum. sum thatother obtain
2 VAxB 8- SSAB SSAxB A
-1 -
1= 1=7 - be not 15.125 = Since
be
summation is, andB,
= The 15.125 diagonally. and
+ to Whatever
error, in be applied the
1 1 Ve + this effect were
degrees
the SS, subtracted. A,B,
one vertically
effect
= where case made
Method 3.500
comparison
possibility +
of variation and only; AB, AB, factor
of
freedom to in
2 also the + obtain two
AzB,=
calcula is lower
more AXB, exists B.direc
of.two
left Inthe
for = a

viceIf an data
versa. The ANOVA
tant (two-way
thesiumeffectresults
test ANOVA) 2-4-4 Table The
treatment ErrorInteraction
degrees of
At AttAt
e Source
A TABLEdecision
A Experlment be imply
tion. areaveragéfactor
different
XB
different.difterent. interaction. In 4
lYastleastleast
canfidence. 90%
thiscontent castingsummary
2-18 Notethere A (largest 2-13. d.£.
indicate
99% 95% of and effect
of plot for
3.500
21.125
40.875 15.125 1.125 ANOVAwhether that condition One (AxB)
confidence. is the all error
conidence. Later, lines
the there
shows hardness,
plays SS) summary
table
some The would of
in results The that the fair freedomn:
7 of this
repeated average on are degrees
Casting aerror factor exist this a ANOVA comparison is VAXB
methodor be hardness,
substantial copper
21.1251.125
15.125 case ùnder thewere available.readily
.875 not nonparallel magnesium in =7-1-1-1= 4 =
variation
the of A of
this same
data all parallel, Figure content (Va)
24.14* 1.29
17.29t will effect
A, results apparent freedom:
conditions results and (V)
is be points and
regardless part between Introduction
true. around depends 2-13. content the by is
shown all there lines in shown
=
underB, interaction itself in 1
at determining x
ABË eachresults would which two this
which the of on by has in
1
= Analysis
to

the situation
data
average
and
interaction underand the
indicate itself Table 1
be no
willAB, level level of points
all
interaction (thenohardness. effect
copper has 2-18. The of
aid thatforresults A, of
combìna by Variance
do ofthe aon
innot tactor within
referring
combination are factor substantial and
making presence the
appear under not B). A ANOVA
plotmagne resul each 53
very The and B to
the B of of
to
 Hardness, R 70 54
$S, An could
whereient 2-5 later variousA that
tailssome One chapters. Figure
2-5-1 xB
Geometrically,
More
10 12 14
Dispensing 2
equation= Taguchi
be for threeiiree-Way
nathernaticai
factor
final
ANOVA effect may 2-13
$S, Sums interpretation effects Copper-magnesium
as the be
ANOVA
+ incontrolled
B next useful, Techniques
SSp for ofexperiment Table has with can
squares
total largest, there content
Copper
fevel
+ three
any method be as
SS; 2-20. complications for
variation
assumed
levels
factors of seen seen is Magnesium
Content
level content
level
Magnesium
t Quality
(three-way would this and interaction.
SS,.) graphically. some in
and in will kind the Fig.
u:3y information Engineering
appear
experimental an be B
other A
t experiment. discuSsedin of 2-14.
effect
SSxc ANOVA) he ANOVA. information
written
factors like The The
is
t Table veryrelative B
available
SSpc tw
situation,.theo Three-way which effect
in
levels.2-19. small.
will
this magnitudes
*cSS,; will is
case: Here be the from
The demonstrate discussedlargest,
ANOVA
the
testarrange
is
a graph
of
data case
en in the the

Hardness, R, - 70
B, B, TABLE Also, Flgure
10

2-19 the 2-14

Three-Way -|
=
SS, Copper-magne_ium
total
12 A.

+ variation
32 Midpoint
fine2, on
A,
Experimental effectAxB
+
72 NT2 content
Copper
level
+ máy interaction;

Layout be
effectSB
+ calculated
152 magnitude Introductlon

Az 4
h22322 of
content
level
Magnesium
factorial A,
8. to
Ay
bètween
Midpoint
24 8, T Analysis
effects. and effect A
457.33 -
A,B A, of
Variance
C3 Ci Ca C

55
 B, Ba TABLE
calculate
stTwn the"To B
B, B, B,TAYE TABLE calculated:
raayWhen
be tactor TheB
determined:
2-20Taguchi
2-21
data
2-22 90 Aj the in
Table Data
Fctor data can Techniques
Factor
for
SSc = SS, = SSR = be SS=
A is 2-21. due to
variation Three-Way
98 86 48 B organized organized 15
13
6 14
10
t 35 A,
Effect Effect
142 nB, A,)A,
2- 8, for
Az 8482 B
C,(C)2, - N
Quality
Experiment
N
as 862 nB2
B} as
8 Engineering
in in
Table +
Table factor
982 B3 142)2
(90 -
140)2(92 -
2-23, 2-22,
24 /115
7 11 |1612
13 & '97 A
24 T2 A,
2322 the 12.
24
the
and 112.667 = data
variation 170.333 =
96.000 =
the
(-2 variation first
is

due summed 2
to C. Ci C% C2 C, 2
factor due
to as
C

TABLE
possible To
combinations
factor 8.333SSAxB=
mined The SSAxB = calculate 2-23
B, B, BË TABLE
Variation
when 140 92
TABLE variation
122 Factor
2-24 the C
after 122 combinations
2-25 showna the
Ax
six due + as C
the 362 Effect
30 AiAxC combinations to due nAxB; shoWn
interaction
60 B.Interaction in
the data +
Interaction Table to 362 C1
36 12 A, in of
42
interactionSSAxC,= isthe 4 + factOrs
2-25. Table
Effect
organized
interaction 502+ the
80 62 A
Effect of
110)2
(122 -
M-SSA-
422
SS2-24. A
data Introduction
factor
of and
factors 24 +
56 50 36 Ag
B into 562 must
of B
110 and factors and be to
combinations Analysis
C B6.000 = 2322
C,
andCis
are
24 summed
arranged
A
-
arranged and
112.667
of
Variance
calculated
of C within into
may
factor -
in all
Table be 170.333 those 57
similarly A the
deter
2-26. and
 SS, left
Error SSAxBxc tracted Note SSAxBxC
combinations the To
rangemnent SSBxc = B, Ba 58
B,TABLE
= =from determine
000 = data Taguchl
457.333 SS, can that 2-26
from 13.000 =
bethe
=3.000 must 202
all

-
-
determined
SSA known
+
-(ANBC
42 the
lower-order
in
Table and the
be 282
+
60 38 52 34
Interaction
28 20
BxC
Techniques

112.667 - 16²
summation. variation
organized
SS nAxBxC). summed +
sources: + 2-27. 342 for
- by - 82+ Efect
- 2
interactions 4 + Quslty
170,333 SSc- finding 170,333 due 52*
for into
322""+
that to + Cz C C. Ca Engineering
C
C
SS4 the - all the 382
-- 96.000 treatment
KB
00-8.333 remainder and
interactionthe +
- SSgSSA - 60
SSAxc- possible
2322
- 24 factor
SSAxB- 2322
6.000 8.333 24
112.667 - effects
condition of
of factor
factors 170.333 -
- SSpxc the -6.000
3.000- total SSAxc
must like A,A,
-
SSAxBxC variation - B, B,
13.000 be - the and and 96.000
SSBxc
3.000 sub ar C
C,

B3 B, B, TABLE
The 2-5-3 The 2-5-2
(three-way
ANOVA)
will (three-way
mation ANOVA)
VAXBXC= degrees 2-27
be
ANOVA VBxC VAxc VAXB Degrees
ANOVA
ed v, kc-1=2-1=1 Ve = VB VA Ax
= = = ==N-1=
= of Bx
ciated
summarysummary = (Va) (Vg) (V) (V) kB kA of C
23-1-2 VAXBC
freedom
freedom nternction
in (vg) (vc) v)= (Vg) -1=2-1=
-1=3-1= 28 14 24 12 4 A,

er
(V) = = 24 for
with is table (1) (1) (1) -1= Effect
s. shown -l-2 = (2) (1) (2) the
ant (1) 2 23 various
(2) =2 =1 2= Introduction
in -l-2
Table (1)
= factors 32 24 28 22 20 16 Az
-2 VBxC 2 to
ors2-28. VAxC
and Analysis
=
À 12 interactions
edue
or of
Variance
s C2
to are C C C C, C
tilize
 A TABLE
C BSource 60
iscussedthere beta has mance
the
dressed, parameters
netboisfore, factors);
tunities treatment
ing, A
pooled
areicallyiic: 2-6 affecting
ofToereaccordingly.
in aware. interpreted "At *At *At AxBxC BxC AxBA
xC
Another basic .052 leastleast ie
same
no an st
risk the asrirolled Critique 2-28Taguchl
iseffect when Beferencing ras re 99% 95% 90%
of coin which will opportunity
Ftest tohowever, ass'irbeca1se ANMVA
more
missing is together obtained the confidence.
conideDce. 457.333 112.667Three-way
170.333
not onlimitation reduce mmaycoiditions limitations conffdence. 48.000 13.000 96.000
3.000 6.0008.333 Techniques
SS
is in be ption cf average
assessed,
in the the fact utilízed is will
go this groups the
an beta itthe unrecognized.
Sec. average variation be
to and the
by FTest 23
4.000
41 2 2 2 2
ANOVA
does risk of used (combinations may of for
important reduce ANOVA dividedaveraging practice in in 112.667
3-4-6. the risk. of 85.167
96.000
Summary Quallty
the to sumstheofthe this this 1.5006.E006.0004.167
not. of as not
performance saying detect should a
F variation
experimenter Another The reference be levels method, experiment.
by problem 24.0021.29" Englneering
test is 28.17
factor. true.
the the .38
1.63 1.50 1.04
F
beta aBecause that
a is
reduction be of of
factor that sought Because error the squares
total factor foralsample
l
The risk risk decision by in of
when variousdegrees which
Sec. Plots
alpha may which is
afïects only controlling of variances A.
,4

the variance
in i. out the of This 2-3-9,
not risk variation. making th e the should
and fact is the and loss levels of
know the the automatic freedom error.happens
estimates for of reader the
beta it of alpha utilized. function,
There oppor
levels is from
error
opposite
does.
saying average of be
tool equal
riskswhat risk
the each should
variance
made
Since and of automat
various
averag
chance aperfor design for error of
will factor side isother the and
all be
the
be of ad

Summary2-7
decomposition
method
2-1 orthogonal
Data Problems chapteron (have way and This
experimental
23,A, the 2-2
24AsAzA,burst
load.
AB,11,A,12
A,B,17,18 B15,, 13 2-3
B15,,A,14 progressed
chapter
ll, 19, 12, Perform (y):
Perform controlledANOVA.
Perform l1, 20, 15, 10, will
12, 18, 14 7,
1221, one-way no-way
9, be
situations Thisstarted
two-way 12, sequentially
applied groupsof
22
11, variation analysis
ANOVA8, with
ANOVA
9 arrays. to with or
ANOVA
some to the
on into through
method
any
very
(method identical
on these very set Introduction
the accountable simplest
ofobservations
data specialized canmore
2)
data for operating
points: be
four complex to
arranged appliedANOVA Analysis
types
sources.
situatioas
conditions)that
ANOVAs
of to that
for et
cardboard;
factors complex
aremore Variance
The can
structured
in
to to be
A the
ANOVA threedone
the
and allow 61
data next
B.
is