REMEDIAL LAW

COURSE SYLLABUS

COURSE CODE: Civil Procedure 2

COURSE TITLE: Civ Pro 2
COURSE CREDIT: 3 UNITS
COURSE PREREQUISITE/S:
FACULTY:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
TERM/ACADEMIC YEAR: SECOND SEMESTER SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024
DAY/TIME/ROOM/SECTION:
COURSE DELIVERY MODE: FULL ONLINE
CONSULTATION DAY/TIME:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

A detailed evaluation of the law on the Rules of Court, as amended, including

pertinent special laws, administrative circulars, and Supreme Court decisions.

COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (ELGAs)

Know and understand the laws, memorize provisions critical and analytical
thinking, effective in written and oral communication, logical reasoning, and sound
judgment, exercise of proper professional and ethical responsibilities

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (LOs):

1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

2. Comprehension/Understanding: describe, explain, identify, recognize
3. Application/Applying: choose, demonstrate, implement, perform
4. Analysis/Analyzing: analyze, categorize, compare, differentiate
5. Evaluation/Evaluating: assess, critique, evaluate, rank, rate
6. Synthesis/Creating: construct, design, formulate, organize, synthesize

Upon completion of the Course Title course, the student is expected to be able to:

Expected College of
Law Graduate LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)
Attributes (ELGAs)
Critical and analytical LO1. Exhibit a clear and in-depth understanding of remedial law, and
thinking civil and criminal procedure in particular, in preparation for the bar
Effective in written and examination and practice of legal profession
oral communication LO2. Analyze the practical and policy implications of current and
Logical reasoning proposed statutes, regulations, judicial rulings, legal arguments, and
Sound judgment strategies in preparing for a legal case
Exercise of proper LO3. Assess client concerns and translating them into responsive legal
professional and ethical arguments and strategies.
responsibilities

ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:

The student will be graded according to the following:

1
 Percentage
(Weight is based
Scope of Work
Requirements (Based on the Learning Outcomes) on the
(Individual)
importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations, Quizzes, Case Digests, Individual
LO2 and Examinations Individual
LO3 Individual

Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Midterm Exams Individual 16.67%
Class Standing after Midterms Individual 33.33%
Final Exams Individual 33.33%
TOTAL 100

LEARNING PLAN:

Design or the structure of the course that includes content/topics to be covered;

learning resources to be used; weekly schedule of the topics to be taken up; and the
learning methods to be utilized that are most likely to lead students towards the
goals and learning outcomes that were defined.

LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)

Course Introduction Syllabus Lecture

Ÿ Course overview Discussion
Ÿ Course assignments
Ÿ Course requirements

Module 1 • Syllabus Ÿ Recitation

• Textbooks Ÿ Quiz
I. Rule 36 Judgment and Final Order • Supreme
A. Distinguished from Interlocutory Court
Order Decisions
1. Rule 41, Sec. 1 (SCRA)
• Garrido v. Tortogo, G.R. No.
156358, 17 August 2011
B. Supplemental and Amended
Judgment
• Planters Development Bank v.
Sps. Lopez, G.R. No. 186332,
October 23, 2013
C. Judgment Nunc pro tunc
• Baterina v. Musngi, G.R. Nos.
239203-09, July 28, 2021
D. Entry of Judgment and Final Order

2
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
1. Immutability of Final Judgments;
Exceptions
• Philippine Veterans Bank v. Bank
of Commerce, G.R. Nos. 217938 &
217945, September 15, 2021
2. Bar by Prior Judgment
• Padillo v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 119707, November 29, 2001
• People v. Escobar G.R. No.
214300, 26 July 2017
3. Conclusiveness of Judgment
• Padua v. Heirs of De Guzman.,
G.R. No. 221521, February 3, 2021
4. Law of the Case
• Philippine Ports Authority v.
Nasipit Integrated Arrastre and
Stevedoring Services, Inc., G.R.
No. 214864, March 22, 2017

Module 2:

I. Post-judgment Remedies
A. Rule 37 - Motion for New Trial or
Reconsideration
a. Berry Rule
b. Sec. 3, Rule 41
• Dinglasan, Jr. v. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 145420, September 19, 2006
• Marikina Valley Development Corp.
v. Flojo, G.R. No. 110801, December 8,
1995
• Carreon v. Aguillon, G.R. No. 240108 ,
June 29, 2020
• Valdez v. Sundiang, G.R. No. 248786,
October 14, 2020

Module 3
Rules 40, 41, 44, 50
B. Appeal - Appeals in general
• Custodio v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
NO. 116100, 9 February 1996
1. Judgment and final orders subject to
appeal
2. Matters not appealable
a. Remedy – Rule 65
3. Remedies against judgment and
orders which are not appealable
a. Rule 41, Sec. 1, compare with Rule

3
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
40, Sec. 8
4. Modes of appeal
a. Appeal when matter of right and
when discretionary
5. Issues to be raised on appeal in civil
cases
• Republic v. Capital Resources
Corp., G.R. No. 217210, November
7, 2016
• Borromeo v. Mina, G.R. No.
193747, June 5, 2013
6. Period of appeal; Fresh Period Rule
• Neypes v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 141524, September 14, 2005||
• Heirs of Albano v. Spouses
Ravanes, G.R. No. 183645, July 20,
2016
• Puerto del Sol Palawan, Inc. v.
Gabaen, G.R. No. 212607, March
27, 2019
7. Perfection of appeal
• Ang v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
238203, September 3, 2020
• Regional Agrarian Reform
Adjudication Board v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 165155, April
12, 2010
• Bernardo v. Soriano, G.R. No.
200104, June 19, 2019
8. Residual Jurisdiction
• Development Bank of the
Philippines v. Carpio, G.R. No.
195450, February 1, 2017
9. Appeal from judgment or final orders
of the MTC, MeTC, MTC in cities,
MCTC
a. Appeals in Summary Procedure,
Rules on Expedited Procedures in
the First Level Courts, OCA Circular
No. 69-2022
b. Remedy against Decision in Small
Claims, Rules on Expedited
Procedures in the First Level Courts,
OCA Circular No. 69-2022
• A.L. Ang Network, Inc. v. Emma
Mondejar, G.R. No. 200804, 22
January 2014
c. Rule 40

4
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
• Encarnacion v. Amigo, G.R. No.
169793, 15 September 2006
• Canlas v. Tubil G.R. No. 184285, 25
September 2009
i. Applicability of Rule 41
provisions to Rule 40, insofar as
they are not inconsistent (Rule 40,
Sec. 9)
10. Appeal from judgments or final
orders of the RTC
a. Appeal of Judgment of RTC
rendered in exercise of its original
jurisdiction - Ordinary Appeal Rule
41, Rule 44
i. Appeal of judgments in
certiorari, prohibition, mandamus,
quo warranto and habeas corpus
ii. Dismissal of Appeal by RTC,
Sec. 13, Rule 41
• Philippine Bank of
Communications v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 218901,
February 15, 2017
iii. Dismissal of Appeal by CA,
Rule 50
• Heirs of Garcia I v.
Municipality of Iba, Zambales,
G.R. No. 162217, July 22, 2015
iv. Rules 48-55, Procedure in the
CA
b. Appeal of Judgment of RTC
rendered in exercise of its original
jurisdiction – Petition for Review on
Certiorari, Rule 45 on pure question
of law
i. Distinguish Question of Fact from
Question of Law
• Dangdang-David v. Alba, G.R.
No. 204621, October 6, 2021
• Republic v. De Borja, G.R. No.
187448, January 9, 2017

Module 4
Procedure on Appeals with the CA
Rules 48, 49, 50-55

Original Cases with the CA – Rules 46,

65, 66

5
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)

Module 5
c. Appeal of Judgment of RTC
rendered in exercise of its appellate
jurisdiction, Rule 42
i. Sec. 2, Appeals in Summary
Procedure, Rules on Expedited
Procedures in the First Level
Courts, OCA Circular No. 69-
2022
ii. Rules 48-55, Procedure in the
CA
• Ross Rica Sales v. Ong, G.R.
No. 132197, 16 August 2005
• Land Bank of the Phils. v.
Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
221636, July 11, 2016
• Anderson v. Ho, G.R. No.
172590, 7 January 2013
• Intramuros Administration v.
Offshore Construction
Development Co., G.R. No.
196795, March 7, 2018

Module 6

11. Appeal from Quasi-Judicial

Agencies to the Court of Appeals, Rule
43
• Erice v. Sison, A.M. No. RTJ-15-
2407, November 22, 2017
• Gatchalian v. Office of the
Ombudsman, G.R. No. 229288 ,
August 1, 2018
• St. Martin Funeral Home v. NLRC,
G.R. No. 130866, September 16,
1998
• Alcaraz v. Gonzales, G.R. No.
164715, 20 September 2006
• Global Medical Center of Laguna,
Inc. v. Ross Systems International,
Inc., G.R. No. 230112 and 230119, 11
May 2021
i. Appeal from CTA, Sec. 1,
Rule 16, Revised Rules of the

6
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
Court of Tax Appeals, A.M.
No. 05-11-07-CTA

Module 7
12. Appeal to the Supreme Court
a. Rule 45, Petition for Review on
Certiorari
i. Distinguish Rule 45 from Rule 65
• Mackay v. Angeles, G.R. No.
144230, September 30, 2003
1. When Rule 65 may, by
exception, be treated as under
Rule 45
• City of Manila v. Grecia-Cuerdo,
G.R. No. 175723, February 4, 2014
ii. Question of Law from Question
of Fact
• Asian Terminals, Inc. v. Simon
Enterprises, Inc., G.R. No. 177116,
February 27, 2013
• Global Medical Center of Laguna,
Inc. v. Ross Systems International,
Inc., G.R. No. 230112 and 230119, 11
May 2021
iii. Rule 56, and applicability of
provisions of Rules 48, 51, 52
iv. Revised Guidelines on
Submission of Electronic Copies of
Supreme Court-Bound Papers
Pursuant to the Efficient Use of
Paper Rule, A.M. No. 10-3-7-
SC/A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC, 22
February 2022
b. Notice of Appeal
i. From Sandiganbayan, 2018 Revised
Internal Rules of the Sandiganbayan,
A.M. No. 13-7-05-SB
ii. From CA, Rule 124, Sec. 13(c)
iii. Revised Guidelines on Submission
of Electronic Copies of Supreme
Court-Bound Papers Pursuant to the
Efficient Use of Paper Rule, A.M. No.
10-3-7-SC/A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC, 22
February 2022
iv. Rule 56, and applicability of
provisions of Rules 48, 51, 52

Module 8

7
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
C. Rule 38 - Relief from judgments, orders
and other proceedings
• Madarang v. Spouses Morales, G.R.
No. 199283, June 9, 2014
• Purcon v. MRM Philippines, G.R. No.
182718, 26 September 2008
• Valencia v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 119118, February 19, 2001
• Gomez v. Montalban, G.R. No.
174414, 14 March 2008
• Santos v. Santos, G.R. No. 214593,
July 17, 2019

D. Rule 47 - Annulment of judgments or

final orders and resolutions
• Republic v. De Castro, G.R. No.
189724, 7 February 2011
• Spouses Flores v. Spouses Estrellado,
G.R. No. 251669, December 7, 2021
• Spouses Alvarez v. Court of Appeals
(Former 12th Division), G.R. No.
192472, June 3, 2019
• Ancheta v. Cambay, G.R. No. 204272,
January 18, 2021
• Llamas v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
149588, September 29, 2009

E. Collateral attack of judgments

• Pacasum, Sr. v. Zamoranos, G.R.
No.193719, March 21, 2017

MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Module 9:

I. Rule 39 - Execution, Satisfaction and

Effect of Remedies
a. Execution as a Matter of Right
i. Difference between final order/
judgment for purposes of appeal
and for purposes of execution
ii. Execution in Small Claims, Rules
on Expedited Procedures in First
Level Courts, OCA Circular No. 69-
2022
b. Execution Pending Appeal
• Heirs of Casiño, Sr. v.
Development Bank of the

8
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
Philippines, Malaybalay Branch,
Bukidnon, G.R. Nos. 204052-53,
March 11, 2020
• Centennial Guarantee Assurance
Corp. v. Universal Motors Corp.,
G.R. No. 189358, October 8, 2014
i. Discretionary Execution and stay
of Discretionary Execution
ii. Execution not stayed by Appeal,
exceptions
1. Forcible Entry and Unlawful
Detainer, Execution and Stay of
Execution, Sec. 19, Rule 70
o Office of the Court
Administrator v. Corpuz,
A.M. No. P-00-1418,
September 24, 2003
c. Period and Manner of Execution – By
Motion or Independent Action
• Villareal, Jr. v. Metropolitan
Waterworks and Sewerage System,
G.R. No. 232202, February 28, 2018
• Perez v. Manotok Realty, Inc., G.R.
No. 216157, October 14, 2019
• Villeza v. German Management
and Services, Inc., G.R. No. 182937,
August 9, 2010
• Infante v. Aran Builders, G.R. No.
156596, 24 August 2007
i. Voluntary Execution without Writ
of Execution - Procedure
d. Execution in case of death of party
i. Rule 86, Sec 7
ii. Rule 87, Sec. 1
e. Issuance, Form Contents, Return of
Writ of Execution
f. Execution of Judgment for Money
• Vergara, et al., v. Gedorio, et al.,
G.R. No. 154037, 30 April 2003
• Rule 61, Sec. 5
i. Properties exempt from Execution
ii. Examination of judgment obligor
and obligor of judgment obligor
when judgment is unsatisfied
iii. Levy, Garnishment – Manner of
Levy and Garnishment
• Miranda v. Spouses Mallari,
G.R. No. 218343, November 28,
2018

9
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
iv. Order for Application of
Property and Income to Satisfaction
of Judgment
v. Notice of Public Sale, Procedure
vi. Terceria
• Bigtas v. Sterling Bank of Asia,
G.R. No. 230804, March 24, 2021
• Power Sector Assets and
Liabilities Management Corp. v.
Maunlad Homes, Inc, G.R. No.
215933, February 8, 2017
vii. Rules on Redemption
• AQA Global Construction, Inc.
v. Planters Development Bank,
G.R. Nos. 211649 & 211742 ,
August 12, 2015
g. Execution of Judgment for a Specific
Act
• Barrete v. Amila, A.M. No. MTJ-
92-733, 23 February 1994
h. Execution of Special Judgment
• Sia v. Arcenas, G.R. Nos. 209672-
74, 14 January 2015
i. Effects of Judgments or Final Orders
• Metropolitan Manila
Development Authority v.
Concerned Residents of Manila
Bay, G.R. Nos. 171947-48, 15
February 2011
j. Effects of Foreign Judgments or Final
Orders
• Rules on Action for Support
and Petition for Recognition
and Enforcement of Foreign
Decisions or Judgments on
Support, A.M. No. 21-02-02-SC

Module 10

I. Provisional Remedies
a. Nature and Purpose
b. Jurisdiction over provisional remedies

A. Rule 57 Preliminary Attachment

1. Grounds for issuance of writ of
attachment
• Valmonte v. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 108538, 22 January 1996

10
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
2. Application, Requisites for issuance
of writ of attachment
• Davao Light & Power Co., Inc. v.
Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 93262,
November 29, 1991
• Torres v. Satsatin. G.R. No. 166759,
25 November 2009
3. Enforcement of Writ of Attachment
4. Manner of Attachment
5. Discharge of Attachment
• Davao Light & Power Co., Inc. v.
Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 93262,
November 29, 1991
6. Sale before entry of judgment
7. Third Party Claimant
• Bigtas v. Sterling Bank of Asia,
G.R. No. 230804, March 24, 2021
7. Satisaction of judgment out of
property attached
8. Claim for damages
• Excellent Quality Apparel, Inc. v.
Visayan Surety & Insurance Corp.,
G.R. No. 212025 , July 1, 2015
• China Banking Corp. v. Asian
Construction and Development
Corp., G.R. No. 158271, April 8,
2008

B. Rule 58 Preliminary Injunction

1. Distinguish: Main Action and
Provisional Remedy
• Garcia v. Honorable Clerk of
Court, G.R. No. 248542, January
22, 2020
• Sola v. First Jia Philippines West
View Estate and Development,
G.R. No. 249926, March 2, 2020
2. Application, Requisites, What Needs
to be Proven
• Australian Professional Realty v.
Municipality of Padre Garcia,
Batangas, G.R. No. 183367, 14
March 2012
3. TRO, Ex-parte TRO
• Spouses Lago v. Abul, Jr., A.M.
No. RTJ-10-2255, January 17, 2011
• Evy Construction and
Development Corp. v. Valiant Roll

11
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
Forming Sales Corp., G.R. No.
207938, October 11, 2017
• Spouses Tumon v. Radiowealth
Finance Co., Inc., G.R. No. 243999,
March 18, 2021
4. Writ of Preliminary Injunction
• Evy Construction and
Development Corp. v. Valiant Roll
Forming Sales Corp., G.R. No.
207938, October 11, 2017
• Spouses Tumon v. Radiowealth
Finance Co., Inc., G.R. No. 243999,
March 18, 2021
5. Grounds for objection to/dissolution
of TRO/WPI
• City of Iloilo v. Honrado, G.R. No.
160399, December 9, 2015
• Spouses Laus v. Optimum
Security Services, Inc., G.R. No.
208343, February 3, 2016
• Rule 70, Sec. 15
• |||Philippine Associated
Smelting and Refining Corp. v.
Lim, G.R. No. 172948, October 5,
2016
• Strategic Alliance Development
Corp. v. Star Infrastructure
Development Corp., G.R. No.
187872, April 11, 2011
6. Claim for Damages
7. When TRO/WPI is prohibited/Not
allowed
• PD 605, PD 1818, PD 385
• Dynamic Builders & Construction
Co. (Phil.), Inc. v. Presbitero, Jr.,
G.R. No. 174202, April 7, 2015
• Antig v. Antipuesto, G.R. No.
192396, January 17, 2018
• Bank of the Philippine Islands v.
Hontanosas, Jr., G.R. No. 157163,
June 25, 2014

C. Rule 59 Receivership
1. Cases when receiver may be
appointed; Requisites
• Tantano v. Espina-Caboverde,
||

G.R. No. 203585, July 29, 2013

2. General powers of a receiver

12
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
3. Two kinds of bonds
4. Termination of receivership
5. Claim for Damages

D. Rule 60 Replevin
1. Principal and Provisional Remedy
• Enriquez v. The Mercantile
Insurance Co., Inc., G.R. No.
210950, August 15, 2018
• BA Finance Corp. v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 102998, July 5,
1996
• Servicewide Specialists, Inc. v.
Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 110048,
November 19, 1999
2. When writ may be issued; Requisites
3. When property is claimed by third
party
4. Objections to/dissolution/discharge
of writ
• Rivera v. Vargas, G.R. No. 165895,
5 June 2009
• Advent Capital and Financ Corp.
v. Young, G.R. No. 183018, 3
August 2011
• 5. Claim for damages
• Enriquez v. The Mercantile
Insurance Co., Inc., G.R. No.
210950, August 15, 2018
• Advent Capital and Finance Corp.
v. Young, G.R. No. 183018, 3
August 2011

E. Rule 61 Support
• Somosa-Ramos v. Vamenta Jr.,
G.R. No. L-34132, July 29, 1972
• San Juan v. Valenzuela, G.R. No.
L-59906, October 23, 1982

F. Provisional Remedies under Special

Law and Rules
• Provisional remedies In Family
Cases, A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC, Rile
on Provisional Orders
• Human Security Act
• Anti-Violence against Women and
Children Act
• Anti-Money Laundering Act

13
 LEARNING
METHODS
LEARNING
WEEK/ DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule of designed or
TOPIC/CONTENT (print and non-
each Topic, deployed by the
(arrangement or sequence of the major print materials
Assign, Exam for teacher to
topics is based on a logical order) and online/
the entire bring about, or
open-access
semester) create the
resources)
conditions for
learning)
• Financial Rehabilitation and
Insolvency Act
• Precautionary Hold Departure
Orders

FINAL EXAMINATION

POLICIES:

1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

2. Students who missed a quiz will get a grade of 60.
3. Students are prohibited from recording the online class as this is a violation of the
Copyright of the Professor.

Prepared by:

JUDGE GINA BIBAT-PALAMOS

JUSTICE WILHELINA JORGE-WAGAN

PROF. PLARIDEL BOHOL II

ATTY. RAMON S. ESGUERRA

VICE DEAN FRANCESCA LOURDES M. SEÑGA

14