Matthew

1. Did they make the subject of their research clear from the Introduction? Did
they identify the problem, or the gap in information they are addressing using
a type of rhetorical analysis and/or framework to do so?
The subject of their research is made clear as he is talking about human and
robot interactions to identify multifaceted strategies for imbuing robots. The
problem is identified and it is clear what framework is being used.
2. Does the information on the Background and Significance and/or
Literature Review add context to their research, and help you understand
the subject the author is choosing to analyze?
All the information found in the background and significance as well as the
literature review do add context to his research and it's easy to understand
3. Does their Research Design and Methods section tell you what you would
need to know to replicate their process? Does it make sure not to incorporate
an analysis just yet?’’
Their Research Design and Methods tell you what you would need to know but
replicating the process would not be easy. Yes, it makes sure not to incorporate
an analysis just yet.
4. Does their Preliminary Suppositions and Implications section indicate what
they plan to find in their analysis? Does it show they have clearly defined
what the research is meant to analyze, and the possible results that may
come out of it?
Their Preliminary Suppositions and Implications section does indicate what they
plan to find in their analysis. It also shows what the research is meant to analyze
and the possible results from it.
5. Are they following APA or MLA formatting throughout the draft? Did they add
a title page, page numbers, and other formatting requirements?
MLA format is being followed throughout the draft except for in-text citations.
6. Do they incorporate in-text citations, even when not directly citing sources?
In-text citations are not incorporated.
7. Are there any other aspects of their draft they can improve on? Elaborate if
so.
Overall, I think the draft is very good besides the lack of in-text citations.

Tristen
1. Did they make the subject of their research clear from the Introduction? Did
they identify the problem, or the gap in information they are addressing using
a type of rhetorical analysis and/or framework to do so?
The subject of their research is made clear as he is talking about how Hayao
Miyazaki uses ideologies and rhetoric to craft his female morally gray
 antagonists. The problem is identified and it is clear what framework is being
used.
2. Does the information on the Background and Significance and/or
Literature Review add context to their research, and help you understand
the subject the author is choosing to analyze?
All the information found in the background and significance as well as the
literature review do add context to his research and it's easy to understand.
3. Does their Research Design and Methods section tell you what you would
need to know to replicate their process? Does it make sure not to incorporate
an analysis just yet?
Their Research Design and Methods section clearly states how he performed his
research so it can be replicated. Yes, it makes sure not to incorporate an
analysis just yet.
4. Does their Preliminary Suppositions and Implications section indicate what
they plan to find in their analysis? Does it show they have clearly defined
what the research is meant to analyze, and the possible results that may
come out of it?
Their Preliminary Suppositions and Implications section does indicate what they
plan to find in their analysis. It also shows what the research is meant to analyze
and the possible results from it.
5. Are they following APA or MLA formatting throughout the draft? Did they add
a title page, page numbers, and other formatting requirements?
MLA format is being followed throughout the draft.
6. Do they incorporate in-text citations, even when not directly citing sources?
In-text citations are incorporated throughout the draft.
7. Are there any other aspects of their draft they can improve on? Elaborate if
so.
Overall, I think it is a very good draft.

Katelyn

1. Did they make the subject of their research clear from the Introduction? Did
they identify the problem, or the gap in information they are addressing using
a type of rhetorical analysis and/or framework to do so?
The subject of their research is made clear as she is talking about the ways that
Netflix has been able to gain and hold the success of their multibillion dollar
company.
2. Does the information on the Background and Significance and/or
Literature Review add context to their research, and help you understand
the subject the author is choosing to analyze?
 All the information found in the background and significance as well as the
literature review do add context to his research and it's easy to understand.
3. Does their Research Design and Methods section tell you what you would
need to know to replicate their process? Does it make sure not to incorporate
an analysis just yet?
Their Research Design and Methods section clearly states how the research is
performed so it can be replicated. Yes, it makes sure not to incorporate an
analysis just yet.
4. Does their Preliminary Suppositions and Implications section indicate what
they plan to find in their analysis? Does it show they have clearly defined
what the research is meant to analyze, and the possible results that may
come out of it?
Their Preliminary Suppositions and Implications section does indicate what they
plan to find in their analysis. It also shows what the research is meant to analyze
and the possible results from it.
5. Are they following APA or MLA formatting throughout the draft? Did they add
a title page, page numbers, and other formatting requirements?
MLA formatting is being followed except for in-text citations
6. Do they incorporate in-text citations, even when not directly citing sources?
In-text citations are not incorporated.
7. Are there any other aspects of their draft they can improve on? Elaborate if
so.
Overall, a pretty good draft just fix the spelling and grammar errors and add in-
text citations.