Professional Documents
Culture Documents
River Water Management System and Supply Water Quality Monitor System 97
Fig.1 Configuration of river water management system
Tributary
observation site Various water NTT
quality monitors private Water pollution reporting
Acute toxicants line Administrator
monitor pH
Purification plant Factory DO River user
Filter
Purification plant
Fallow COD Telemeter
Mass media
field/retarding Official report
basin
Optical fiber
transmission
Outdoor type acute
Residential area toxicants monitor
Wastewater Electronic Tributary
treatment plant bulletin board observation site
Oil film
Factory monitoring
Main stream
Purification plant observation site City Wastewater
treatment plant
Flowing water
preservation path
Factory
Fig.2 River management tasks the water environment. But this method has draw-
backs such as lengthy breeding time, individual varia-
River Flood control tion in resistance to toxicity and ambiguity in judg-
management
Irrigation
ment of an abnormal state.
Fuji Electric has developed a biosensor, which
Environment Regular detects toxicants using the activity of nitrifying bacte-
(water quality) observation ria. These microorganisms are a reliable index of
Measure against
pollutants because they are extremely sensitive to
water pollution toxic substances. Acute toxicants such as cyanide,
chlorinated organic compounds and agricultural chemi-
cals are detectable with this type of sensor. Although
toxicants cannot be identified, they can be screened.
3.1.1 Oil detection Detection sensitivity in terms of concentration is about
As oil flows down a river it disperses upon the 10 times as high as the fifty percent (median) lethal
surface of the water. Using an image analysis method, concentration for fish in 24 hours, and detection time is
an infrared ray camera can observe slight changes in about 20 minutes. Details are listed in Table 1.
the refractive index of the water surface due to arrival Further, this sensor has a function for storing test
of oil. water as soon as a harmful toxicant is detected. The
3.1.2 Acute toxicant monitor stored water is usable for chemical identification of the
When the cause of water pollution is dissolved toxicant by subsequent water quality analyses.
chemicals such as cyanide or phenol, it is difficult to
defect the pollution early or before its effect appears. 3.2 Check severity of damage and report to concerned
At present, the accepted method is to breed fish and parties
continuously observe their behavior as they respond to Once water pollution has occurred, it is important
[DB: Database]
to evaluate the severity of the damage closely at the subsequent tasks for recovery from water pollution.
site and report the results to an anti-pollution activity 3.2.2 First reporting function
center. It is also necessary to share information with After checking the severity of damage at the site, it
both the river water users and the party concerned is necessary to arouse attention by issuing a prelimi-
with the cleanup. Because water pollution can occur at nary report of pollution to all river users, including
unknown locations, fixed-point observations alone are water supply utility companies, fishermen’s coopera-
insufficient. A highly mobile information acquisition tive associations, and river administration organiza-
system is required. tions such as the water pollution control liaison
3.2.1 Acquiring field damage information council. For this purpose, automatic reporting is made
Damage due to water pollution can have various to all parties concerned by means of telephone, facsimi-
effects, and there are cases where it is difficult to le, electronic mail, etc.
understand the situation exactly by the oral and
written reports sent from the field. Due to the rapid 3.3 Localization/identification of pollution source and
growth of mobile computing technology in recent years, pollutants
image information of pollution sites is now transfer- Because water pollution occurs suddenly, adequate
able to anti-pollution activity centers immediately by preparations need to be made. Particularly at the
using a combination of digital cameras, portable infor- early stage of water pollution, it is important to
mation terminals and cellular phones. Moreover, localize the pollution source and identify the pollutant,
when a portable map coordinate recognition unit, thereby preventing the pollution range from expand-
which utilizes a geo-stationary satellite, is added to the ing.
above combination, live image information and direct 3.3.1 Pollution source database (DB)
correspondence from the exact location can be estab- With regard to riverside enterprises dealing with
lished between multiple pollution sites and the anti- harmful substances, this database contains the names
pollution activity center. This will facilitate all of those substances, their possible destinations in the
River Water Management System and Supply Water Quality Monitor System 99
Table 1 Chemicals detectable with acute toxicants monitor
Detectable
No. Item Reference value Toxicity to fish
concentration
1 General bacteria 100m/L or less
2 Coliform group Not detectable
3 Cadmium 0.01mg/L or less
4 Mercury 0.0005mg/L or less ––––– 0.1: “C”, 0.2: “R”
5 Selenium 0.01mg/L or less
6 Lead 0.05mg/L or less
7 Arsenic 0.01mg/L or less
8 Hexavalent chromium 0.05mg/L or less
9 Cyanide 0.01mg/L or less 0.05 0.48 to 0.78: “C”
10 Nitrogen in nitric acid/nitrous acid 10mg/L or less
11 Fluorine 0.8mg/L or less
12 Carbon tetrachloride 0.002mg/L or less 20
13 1,2-dichloroethane 0.004mg/L or less 60 430: “B” (96h)
14 1,1-dichloroethylene 0.02mg/L or less 30 74: “B” (96h)
15 Dichloromethane 0.02mg/L or less 30
16 cis-1,2-dichloroethylene 0.04mg/L or less 15 140: “B” (96h)
17 Tetrachloroethylene 0.01mg/L or less 6 13: “B” (96h)
18 1,1,2-trichloroethane 0.006mg/L or less 10
19 Trichloroethylene 0.03mg/L or less 9 45: “B” (96h)
20 Benzene 0.01mg/L or less 60 46: “G” (24h)
21 Chloroform 0.06mg/L or less
22 Dibromochloromethane 0.1mg/L or less
23 Bromodichloromethane 0.03mg/L or less
24 Bromoform 0.09mg/L or less
25 Total trihalomethanes 0.1mg/L or less
26 1,3-dichloropropane (D-D) 0.002mg/L or less 4
27 Simazine (CAT) 0.003mg/L or less 0.6
28 Thiuram (thiram) 0.006mg/L or less 0.06 0.10: “C”
29 Thiobencarb (Benthiocarb) 0.02mg/L or less 80 1.6: “C”
Items related to properties which tap water should have : 17 items
30 Zinc 1.0mg/L or less
31 Iron 0.3mg/L or less
32 Copper 1.0mg/L or less
33 Sodium 200mg/L or less
34 Manganese 0.05mg/L or less
35 Chlorine ion 200mg/L or less
36 Calcium, magnesium, etc. (hardness) 300mg/L or less
37 Residue on evaporation 500mg/L or less
38 Anion surface active agent 0. 2mg/L or less 18.7: “C”, 3.7: “S”
39 1,1,1-trichloroethane 0.3mg/L or less 16 72: “B” (96h)
40 Phenols 0.005mg/L or less 0.7 24.7: “C” (24h)
41 Organic substance, etc. (potassium permanganate consumption) 10mg/L or less
42 pH level 5.8 or more and 8.6 or less
43 Taste Not abnormal
44 Odor Not abnormal
45 Chromaticity Level 5 or less
46 Turbidity Level 2 or less
: Detectable item
< Note > Toxicity to fish is indicated in median lethal concentration (TLm). The alphabetic letter suffixed to each numeral abbreviates the
name of the test sample fish shown below. The numeral in parentheses denotes an exposure time (h).
[ Test sample fish ] “C”: Carp, “S”: Sweetfish, “R”: Rainbow trout, “G”: Gold fish, “B”: Bluegill
TLm stands for median tolerance limit.
River Water Management System and Supply Water Quality Monitor System 101
ants to recognize that he/she is responsible for imple- “Hue” indicates the color of the water and “coloration
menting the countermeasures against water pollution. grade” represents the degree of water coloration. For
This is required for the following reason. Usually instance, a yellowish hue suggests coloration due to an
inhabitants report water pollution sightings to the organic substance and a reddish hue may be attribut-
police or a fire station. A report to the river able to inflow of iron rust. According to the coloration
administrator, the organizer of the cleanup, is a rare grade, the level of abnormality can be surmised.
case. Hence, there are many cases when critical time
is lost. 4.1 Principle of coloration grade and hue measurement
Figure 4 shows the configuration of this sensor.
3.6 Estimation of damages The while light from the light source is dispersed with
Article 67 of the River Act stipulates the principle the above-mentioned optical color filters of three
that it is responsibility of the party, which caused the primary colors to obtained red, green and blue spec-
water pollution accident to bear the expenditure of the tral-sensitivity lights. These lights are radiated to
countermeasures taken. water samples to measure their respective transmit-
In this regard, the river water management system tance values. The resulting hue of the water sample is
offers the following support function. judged to be any of five bands; colorless, white/black,
In the pollution damage estimation database, the yellow, red and other. This color judgment method,
rate of each expenditure item, such as equipment/ known as the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric system
materials used or personnel expense, is determined for by the Commission Internationale de I’Eclairage, was
each step in the cleanup procedure (i.e. countermea- introduced as an effective tristimulus filter method for
sure against pollution and restoration of water envi- measuring coloration of tap water in the Standard
ronment). Rates, which are specifically due to the Methods for the Examination of Water (explanatory
occurrence of pollution, are then multiplied by the edition).
number of actions taken by the staff and entrusted Next, the newly defined “coloration grade” is
party to estimate the total damage to be claimed. described. First, luminance is introduced as the z axis
into an xy coordinate scheme that defines the hue and
4. Supply Water Quality Monitor System purity of color in a three-dimensional color space (Fig.
50
40 Coloration Water supply
30 grade cut off
Below is an example field test where the monitor
(%)
Other
Reddish Hue Water supply water tap in city A, which was observed with the
Yellowish cut off
White/black
monitor equipment at the time of water interruption.
Colorless The interruption lasted from 11:30 to 12:45. From
6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 13:00, shortly after recovery from the interruption,
Time
levels of coloration grade, chromaticity and turbidity
rose and the hue turned yellowish. Then at 14:30,
1
chromaticity returned to normal levels. At the same
Turbidity (level)
0.8 Turbidity Water supply time, hue turned white/black. Later, at 15:45, colora-
0.6 cut off
0.4 tion grade and turbidity returned to normal levels, and
0.2 hue turned colorless.
0
6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 From the above data, the following assumptions
Time
can be made. Yellowish water containing suspended
matter flowed in from 13:00 to 14:30. Then only
suspended matter continued flowing in until 15:45.
5
Chromaticity
0.8 Water Water supply The color-turbidity sensor allows for simultaneous
0.6 pressure cut off multi-measurement of hue, such as the red color of iron
(MPa)
0.4
0.2 rust (typical coloration of tap water), the black color
0
6:00 9:00 12:00 15:00 18:00
due to manganese, the yellow color derived from
Time dissolved organic substances, the white color due to
bubbling or mixing of zinc, etc. This measurement is
more useful for water quality control than the conven-
tional chromaticity measurement, which detects only
5). Next, a colorless water measurement point is the presence of a yellowish brown color. Clearly, this
replaced with W and a sample water measurement measurement is extremely useful for both checking the
point is replaced with S. S’s projection onto the xy deterioration of water pipes and tracing the behavior of
River Water Management System and Supply Water Quality Monitor System 103
water each minute after recovery from a water inter- addition, both systems provide fully automated, daily
ruption event, such as an earthquake or water leakage water supply inspection by water supply utilities.
correction, to name a few. These systems respond to a wide range of changing
water conditions, providing general maintenance of
5. Conclusion water quality from water source to tap water supply.
Finally, the authors would like to express their
The river water management system and supply gratitude to the river management authorities and the
water quality monitor system have been introduced Japan Water Works Association for their guidance and
above. These systems contribute to the protection of recent advancements in the field of water quality
the environment, which is one area drawing great control.
attention in the field of river management. In
Dissolved ozone
concentration setting
FI
FI TI PI O3 I Ozonation Dissolved ozone
FI O3I
Power reactor concentration
regulator
M Sedimented
Ozone water
Dry air
generator Activated carbon
Air Air Air Ozone Ozone biological filtration
flow rate temperature pressure concentration diffusion rate
Fig.3 Constant-value control of residual ozone concentration characteristics are discussed below.
(PI control) (1) Principle of ozone concentration control
If raw water and ozone come in contact in the
ozone contactor, most of the injected ozone is exhaust-
ed by the reaction as well as by self-disintegration, but
Ozonizer : Fuji ozonizer FOG-3
Controller : Fuji compact controller S
some is carried out with the treated water as dissolved
Control Data : P 50.1% 1562.0s D 0s ozone. The remainder is discharged into the atmo-
Setting (1) 15% 0.3mg/L sphere as off-gas ozone. Ideally, the quantity of ozone
Manipulating Setting (2) 30% 0.6mg/L
output to be injected is just enough for the intended reaction,
Dissolved ozone without any remaining off-gas ozone or dissolved
Manipulating output
concentration
ozone. In actuality, however, some excessive ozone
Time must be injected to achieve the desired reaction. The
Setting(2) off-gas ozone and dissolved ozone increase if excessive
Dissolved ozone ozone is injected but decrease if too little ozone is
Setting(1) concentration injected. Hence, the ozone concentration is the substi-
Setting tute index that shows an excess or lack of ozone in the
change contactor. The constant-value control for off-gas ozone
or dissolved ozone concentration utilizes this correla-
tion for ozone dose control.
(2) Process control characteristics
minutes until the ozone concentration reaches equilib- There are two kinds of dissolved ozone control: one
rium. An example of the dissolved ozone constant- loop control and cascade control. One loop control
value control using PI control is shown in Fig. 3. As compares the setting of the controlled value of dis-
shown, the overshoot of dissolved ozone concentration solved ozone concentration with its actual measure-
after changing its setting is about 12%, and its settling ment and outputs. According to its deviation, control
time is about 30 minutes. The change in water quality signals are sent to the power regulation inverter of the
can usually be followed up, but if there is a drastic ozone generator. The inverter, after receiving this
change in the water flow rate, it cannot be followed up signal, changes its output power frequency, resulting
alone by controlling the concentration of the off-gas in a change of the ozone generation rate so that the
ozone or dissolved ozone. Even in such cases, stable dissolved ozone concentration coincides with the set-
control is realized by controlling the ozone generation ting.
rate, calculated by the product of the injection rate Cascade control uses the dissolved ozone as the
multiplied by the raw water flow rate, where the primary control target value. By constantly controlling
optimal injection rate is determined from the off-gas or the power for the ozonizer, a quick ozone generation
dissolved ozone concentration. The principle of this rate that follows up the water quality is possible. The
ozone concentration control and its process control power required by the ozonizer highly related to the
40 0.8
UV (−)
Water temperature
Inlet
valve M
Air vent P
0.4 M valve Back-washing
20
Trough M pump
UV
M Back-washing
Inlet valve
0 0 manifold
26D12H00M 16H00M 20H00M 27D00H00M 04H00M Air blower
channel M M
Ozone generation rate (kg/h)
B
30 3 Air washing
M
valve
Ozone generation rate
Effluent
Carbon adsorption basin
M drainage
20 2 Injection rate Drain valve valve
Wastewater gate
Outlet manifold
Outlet manifold channel
channel
10 1
26D12H00M 16H00M 20H00M 27D00H00M 04H00M
0.4 fluctuations.
Ozone dose control should reduce operating costs of
the facility as well as achieve stable water quality.
0.2 Dissolved ozone concentration necessary for
26D12H00M 16H00M 20H00M 27D00H00M 04H00M
achieving the intended reaction is determined by
factors including the speed of ozone reaction with
material to be treated and dissolvable ozone injection
ozone generation rate and is hardly affected by other rate. Fuji Electric provides a variety of control
factors. The ozone generation rate can be controlled systems that can handle variations in water quality.
more stably by controlling the ozonizer’s power supply. Essentially, it is desirable for the control to select,
(3) Locating and selecting sensors in addition to water flow rate, such water quality
Stable measurement of the dissolved ozone concen- indices as concentration of odor source material and
tration control is generally difficult due to the lack of organic material. Fuji Electric is pursuing the realiza-
sensibility of the sensors or dirt in the sampling tion of the original method of determining the optimal
system. In giving stable control characteristics to the injection rate from water quality data that includes
dissolved ozone control, attention should be paid to the trihalomethane and odor source material. But we are
following points: still in the testing stages due to the complexity of the
(a) Sampling should be made at places such as the correlation between various parameters, ozone injec-
residence basin outlet where water flow is tion rate and treated water quality.
stable.
(b) placing a filter in front of the sensor should be 3.2 Activated carbon treatment process
avoided at all costs, and sensors with high The activated carbon absorption facility can be
sensibility should be selected. either fixed or fluid. A typical flow diagram of the
3.1.2 Actual example of optimal application of dissolved treatment is shown in Fig. 5. The following should be
ozone concentration control considered in designing an activated carbon absorption
As opposed to off-gas ozone concentration control, facility in order to utilize its absorption performance
the dissolved ozone concentration control monitors effectively: contact time, spatial velocity (SV), linear
residual ozone in the treated water. The control index velocity (LV), carbon layer thickness, granule diameter
is closer to the actual water quality, enabling improved and the water collection facility.
ozone dose control for fluctuations in water quality. In the water collection facility, a suitable washing
Figure 4 shows an example of a dissolved ozone control is important for operation. These include a
concentration control, which has been in operation for washing method for the activated carbon layer, wash-
about 5 years for a water supply. ing time and washing water.
With the increase of the UV ray absorption rate Although, “intermediate ozonation + activated car-
(UV260) as an index of water pollution, the ozone bon” and “rear ozonation activated carbon” are applied
injection rate increases simultaneously at the inlet of in conjunction with ozonation, the treatment processes
Air vent
Washing is started about once every 3 days when:
Washing water flow rate
100
(m3/min.basin)
Water
(1) the filtration operation time has reached 96 hours.
& water
Yasuo Nakahara
Souichirou Yamamoto
Kouji Kawakami
2. Environmental Changes and Water Quality Monocycled type River head Recycled type
Regulation
Water purification Water purification
plant plant
2.1 Mechanisms that produce trihalomethane and envi-
ronmental changes Urban area Urban area
The expansion and concentration of population and
Wastewater treat- Wastewater treat-
industry has caused rapid increases in water demand ment plant ment plant
and at the same time, a shortage of water has exerted
an enormous adverse influence on the society.
A conventional waterworks and sewerage system
Water purification
usually has a water purification plant in a river plant
upstream, and a wastewater treatment plant that
processes drainage in the vicinity of the river mouth to Urban area
discharge the processed water to the sea. This type of Wastewater treat-
water purification system is known as “monocycled”. Sea ment plant
On the other hand, new systems have two or more
water purification plants and wastewater treatment
plants existing together in one river. This type of
H C Cl H C Br
Table 2 Number of water service utilities in excess of trihalom-
Br Br ethane standard values
Dibromochloromethane Tribromomethane
(bromoform) Number of Number of
utilities in utilities in Number of
Total trihalomethanes Term of survey excess of 70% excess of utilities
I I
of standard standard surveyed
values values
H C Cl H C Cl 1991 to 1993 94 –––– ––––
1993 34 8 ––––
Cl Br
Dichloroiodomethane Bromochloroiodemethane 1,469 (only in-
Jan. to Aug.,
I I 79 4 cluding surface
1994
water utilities)
H C I H C Br
Cl Br
Chlorodiiodomethane Dibromoiodemethane
I I
wastewater treatment plant. This process forms the
H C Br H C I trihalomethane.
In general, changes in the following water environ-
I I
Bromodiiodemethane Triiodomethane ment cause an increase in trihalomethane concentra-
(iodoform) tion.
(1) Prechlorination
If the river is short in length, ammonia is insuffi-
ciently nitrified by self-purification. In this case,
prechlorination is performed in the water purification
At that time, another paper was published con- plant to oxidize ammonia with chlorine completely.
cerning the high cancer death rate of the citizens of Therefore, biodegradable persistent organic matter
New Orleans, downstream of the Mississippi in the reacts with highly concentrated chlorine before it is
United States. The reported cause was drinking removed by coagulation-sedimentation and produces
water. trihalomethane.
Simultaneously, trihalomethane (especially high (2) Concentrated biodegradable persistent organic
concentrations of chloroform) was detected in drinking matter
water in a survey by the Environmental Protection To use river water repeatedly to prevent shortages,
Agency in the United States. Further, an animal the waterworks and sewerage systems of the recycled
experiment has disclosed the carcinogenicity of triha- type have been expanding. Therefore, large amounts
lomethane. Since these events, the worldwide concern of biodegradable persistent organic matter that have
for trihalomethane has risen. leaked from wastewater treatment plants have become
Figure 2 shows the family of trihalomethanes. more concentrated in the downstream areas.
Chloroform, bromodichloromethane, dibromochlo- As mentioned above, the trihalomethane problem
romethane and bromoform are types of trihalom- in our country is significant due to the fact that river
ethane. Their content rate is high in drinking water distance is short in Japan.
and is generically defined as the total trihalomethane
content. These trihalomethanes are produced in the 2.2 Water quality regulations
following processes. The first regulation concerning trihalomethane in
At first, the above-mentioned BOD formation po- Japan assumed a control target value of the total
tentials biometabolize by self-purification of the river trihalomethanes concentration to be “0.1 mg/L or less”,
and the sewerage process, and produce biodegradable based on the maximum permissible concentration level
persistent organic matter, for example, humic acid or (0.1 mg/L) that the Environmental Protection Agency
fulvic acid, etc. Then, this matter is disinfected by established in 1979. The maximum permissible con-
chlorine in the water purification plant and in the centration level is prescribed in the notice “Measures
40
20
10
y = 0.96x − 0.79
r = 0.9807
0
0 10 20 30 40
Fig.5 Measuring principles of the trihalomethane analyzer Gas chromatography (µg/L)
led to the separation unit and dissolves the trihalom- (2) Specification
ethane concentrated in the gas phase section through A summary of the trihalomethane analyzer specifi-
another gas permeable membrane. cations is listed below.
Then, the carrier solution that dissolved the triha- (a) Measuring object: Total trihalomethanes
lomethane is led to the reaction unit. The trihalom- (b) Measuring system: Measurement of the fluo-
ethane and the nicotinamide produce a fluorescent rescence in the reaction of alkaline nicotina-
substance by the Fujiwara Reaction. In the fluores- mide and trihalomethane
cence detection unit, an exciting ray of 368 nm is (c) Measuring time: Within 40 minutes approx.
applied to the fluorescent substance, which radiates (d) Sample water: Drinking water from the water
fluorescence of 468 nm, representing the trihalom- supply, etc.
ethane concentration. (e) Range of measurement: 0 to 200 µg/L (equiva-
The most significant characteristic of this device is lent amount of chloroform)
that the Fujiwara Reaction occurs without being ( f ) Ambient temperature: 5 to 40°C
influenced by substances coexisting in the sample (g) Dimensions: W500 × H440 × D470 (mm)
water because only gaseous trihalomethane is extract- (h) Power source: 100V ±10V AC at 50/60 Hz
ed from the sample water into the separation unit. ( i ) Power consumption: 500VA or less
Samples of drinking water from various locations ( j ) Mass: 50 kg approx.
were measured by this trihalomethane analyzer and
gas chromatography. The correlation was examined as 5.2 Continuous monitoring system using the trihalom-
shown in Fig. 6. ethane analyzer
Figure 7 shows a comparison of measurements of Using trihalomethane analyzers, continuous moni-
trihalomethane concentration over the course of one toring of the total trihalomethanes can be centralized
day. These results verified that the sensitivity of this for the processes after feeding chlorine in the water
device is equal to that of the gas chromatography and purification plant and in the water distribution net-
is suitable for continuos measurement. work. Figure 8 shows this trihalomethane monitoring
Chlorine
feeding facility
O3 generator
Trihalomethane analyzer
Advanced treatment
Forecast of trihalomethane
formation
system.
(1) Trihalomethane monitoring in the water purifica- 5.3 Forecast of trihalomethane increase in the water
tion plant distribution network
The system measures the biodegradable persistent One of the troublesome points of the trihalom-
organic material in the river water as the trihalom- ethane problem is that the trihalomethane produced
ethane formation potentials, determines the initial by feeding chlorine into the water purification plant
concentration after feeding chlorine, and monitors the increases in a water distribution network.
concentration in the purified water reservoir, that is, Tambo et al. conducted research to quantify the
the final outlet for the water purification plant. increase of trihalomethane in a water distribution
In addition, these functions usually help monitor network. The following equation of increase can be
the initial trihalomethane concentration in the water applied.
a b c d
distribution network. THM = k [ Cl2 ] [ TOC ] [pH] [t] ……………… (1)
(2) Trihalomethane monitoring in the water distribu- Here,
tion network k, a, b, c, d : Constants
This system measures the trihalomethane concen- [Cl2 ] : Available chlorine concentration
tration at the observation site of each water supply [TOC ] : Total organic carbon
station and the main water distribution network to [pH ] : pH value
centralize real-time monitoring. Simulation (to be [t] : Chlorine contact time
described later) is used to forecast the trihalomethane The dependency of trihalomethane formation on
increase at the water service terminals. The trihalom- the chlorine feeding volume and the organic matter
ethane concentration can be monitored and forecast at concentration has been previously described. The
all locations of the water distribution network. above expression also shows that trihalomethane in-
Yoshio Tanaka
Yoshio Saito
Dabide Yamaguchi
2. Cryptosporidium
E860
Fig.2 Coagulation sensor
Mean Em1
Time
(a) Suspended solid only
Standard
deviation
ERMS2
Absorbance
E254
Suspended E’m2
solid
Mean
Dissolved Em2
organic E254
matter
Sensor unit Time
Converter unit (b) Suspended solid + dissolved organic matter
2.5 100
water was held below 1 mg/L. Turbidity removal rate
2 80
5.2 Application
5.2.1 Turbidity control of outlet water of sedimentation Laser diode Beam stop Pinhole
◆
◆ ◆
◆◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆ ◆◆
◆
◆