Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EPOS 395-397
purpura (due to small vessel vasculitis) as compared to those with myocardial, respiratory and gastrointestinal
involvement who are more often pANCA negative(416, 420).
Other biomarkers have been investigated including serum TARC/CCL17, eotaxin-3, IgG4 and IgG4/IgG ratio but
none were useful in discriminating between active disease and remission(421).
Imaging
Sinus CT does not show anything other than what would be expected in diffuse polypoid rhinosinusitis i.e. pan-
opacification(422). Mean Lund-Mackay scores of 9-17 have been reported in large cohorts of EGPA(412, 422).
Expansion and bone erosion may be seen in the ethmoid complex with widening of the intercanthal distance. In
addition, there may be evidence of mucocele formation, notably in the fronto-ethmoidal region.
High resolution CT of the chest is recommended to demonstrate atypical ‘fluffy’ or nodular migratory pulmonary
infiltrates which would only be seen in 64% of plain chest x-rays(423). Peripheral nodules (25%), ground glass
opacities (86%) and bronchial wall thickening and bronchiectasis (66%) are also found on CT.
Histopathology
Histopathologically the condition is characterised by eosinophilic inflammation and infiltration, extravascular
granulomas and necrotizing vasculitis in the presence of asthma. However, in studies where sinonasal tissue was
examined, eosinophilic infiltration was seen in 35-100%, whilst necrotising vasculitis and eosinophilic granulomas
were not seen(408, 424).
Although the histology is important, this combined with clinical criteria are required to make the diagnosis and a
low threshold of suspicion is required in any patient with eosinophilic diseases i.e. significant adult-onset asthma,
recurrent CRSwNP and allergic rhinitis. Once EGPA is diagnosed, investigation for lung, kidney, heart,
gastrointestinal and peripheral nerve involvement is recommended as these are associated with poor prognosis (394).
This can include imaging, biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage, renal and cardiac function tests.
Differential diagnosis
The differential diagnosis is from other eosinophilic pneumonias, idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, c-ANCA
positive granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis, sarcoid, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and
parasitic infections. Thus in addition to ANCA, the EGPA Consensus Task Force recommended as a minimum
initial differential diagnostic work-up the following: serologic testing for toxocariasis, HIV, specific IgE and IgG
for Aspergillus spp, a search for Aspergillus spp in sputum and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, tryptase and
vitamin B12, full blood count and CT of the chest(394). However, EGPA can usually be distinguished from other
primary systemic vasculitides by the presence of asthma and a marked blood eosinophilia.
8.7.3.4. Treatment
In 2009, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) published treatment recommendations for small to
medium sized vessel vasculitides. Without treatment, the mortality rate is high once the vasculitis phase is
reached(425, 426). A multidisciplinary management is widely recommended in the literature(394) and with appropriate
treatment, survival rates are comparable to GPA(426).
Long –term studies have shown that overall remission rates are good, ranging from 81-92% but over a quarter do
relapse either within the first year of treatment or much later(427). This is higher in MPO /pANCA positive patients.
Overall mortality in treated patients who relapsed was only 3.1%.
Factors predicting poor outcome are: cardiomyopathy (an independent risk factor) or two features of the ‘five-
factor’ score (FFS) (creatininemia >140umoles/litre; proteinuria >1g/day; involvement of central nervous system,
gastrointestinal or heart)(426, 428). If one of these factors is present at onset, the five year mortality is 25.9%, when
two or more are present, this increases to 46% at five years(428). Survival at one and five years was 100% if the
score was 0. The FFS was revisited in 2011 by the French Vasculitis Study group as follows: 1) age >65yrs; 2)
cardiac symptoms; 3) gastrointestinal involvement; 4) renal insufficiency characterised by a serum creatinine >150
umol/l; 5) absence of ENT manifestations. With each factor accorded one point, a revised FFS of 0, 1 and 2 is
associated with a five-year mortality rate of 9%, 21% and 40% respectively(429). A subsequent study showed that
age >65 years was the only factor associated with higher risk of death during follow-up(427).
Systemic
In most patients, disease control is achieved with immunosuppressant therapy, usually oral prednisolone +/-
cytotoxic drugs such as pulsed cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate
dependent on the severity of the disease at presentation. Patients without poor prognostic factors can often be
managed with glucocorticoids alone. Additional systemic treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin,
leflunomide, anti-TNFa, interferon-a and plasma exchange(430).
Rituximab is now frequently being used in selected ANCA-positive patients with renal involvement or refractory
disease though the evidence is less robust that in GPA(394, 431-434) and other new biologic therapies may be helpful e.g.
anti-IL 5 (mepolizumab)(435-437) or anti-IgE (omalizumab) monoclonal antibodies(438, 439).
Nasal
Alkaline/saline nasal irrigations, topical intranasal corticosteroids and nasal lubricants are the mainstay of
treatment (Level IV).
Endoscopic surgery can be successfully undertaken in those whose CRS with nasal polyps do not respond to
systemic and local steroids. The numbers of reported EGPA surgical cases in the literature is small(440) and surgery is
often associated with a high recurrence rate though patients may still obtain benefit(422). A number of patients
develop paranasal sinus mucoceles which may also be dealt with endoscopically. In a series of 25 patients, 48%
had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery, often multiple times(410).