Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edition G. R. Berridge
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/diplomacy-theory-and-practice-6th-edition-g-r-berridg
e/
g.r.berridge
DIPLO M A CY
theory and practice
Diplomacy
“I discovered Geoff Berridge’s book on diplomacy after serving as a diplomat for over
30 years. It is well-researched, sophisticated, inspiring and, where the subject invites
it, suitably ironic. I used the 4th edition with my students and will now continue
working with the 5th edition.”
—Dr Max Schweizer, Head Foreign Affairs and Applied Diplomacy, ZHAW School of
Management and Law, Switzerland
“Berridge’s Diplomacy is an enlightening journey that takes the student, the practitio-
ner and the general reader from the front to the backstage of current diplomatic
practice. The thoroughly updated and expanded text—also enriched with a stimulat-
ing new treatment of embassies—is an invaluable guide to the stratagems and out-
comes, continuities and innovations, of a centuries’ long process.”
—Arianna Arisi Rota, Professor of History of Diplomacy at the University of
Pavia, Italy
“This is an excellent text-book which fills a gap in the current writing on diplomacy.”
—Lord Wright of Richmond, Permanent Under-Secretary of State at the Foreign
Office (UK), 1986–91
“Berridge’s study of diplomacy is the standard text on the subject—succinct yet sub-
stantial in content, lucid in style.”
—John W. Young, Professor of International History, University of Nottingham, UK
G. R. Berridge
Diplomacy
Theory and Practice
G. R. Berridge
Politics and International Relations
University of Leicester
Leicester, UK
DiploFoundation
Geneva, Switzerland
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the
whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information
storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does
not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective
laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the
editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or
omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Cover illustration: The front cover shows a meeting in Geneva in 2016 of the World Health Assembly, the main
decision-making body of the World Health Organization. Credit: Xinhua / Alamy Stock Photo.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Also by G. R. Berridge
BRITISH DIPLOMACY IN TURKEY, 1583 TO THE PRESENT: A Study in the
Evolution of the Resident Embassy
BRITISH HEADS OF MISSION AT CONSTANTINOPLE, 1583–1922
THE COUNTER-REVOLUTION IN DIPLOMACY and Other Essays
DIPLOMACY AND SECRET SERVICE: A Short Introduction
DIPLOMACY AT THE UN (co-editor with A. Jennings)
THE DIPLOMACY OF ANCIENT GREECE: A Short Introduction
DIPLOMATIC CLASSICS: Selected Texts from Commynes to Vattel
DIPLOMATIC THEORY FROM MACHIAVELLI TO KISSINGER (with
Maurice Keens-Soper, and T. G. Otte)
A DIPLOMATIC WHISTLEBLOWER IN THE VICTORIAN ERA: The Life
and Writings of E. C. Grenville-Murray
ECONOMIC POWER IN ANGLO-SOUTH AFRICAN DIPLOMACY:
Simonstown, Sharpeville and After
EMBASSIES IN ARMED CONFLICT
GERALD FITZMAURICE (1865–1939), CHIEF DRAGOMAN OF THE
BRITISH EMBASSY IN TURKEY
INTERNATIONAL POLITICS: States, Power and Conflict since 1945,
Third Edition
AN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (with D. Heater)
THE PALGRAVE MACMILLAN DICTIONARY OF DIPLOMACY: Third
Edition (with Lorna Lloyd)
THE POLITICS OF THE SOUTH AFRICA RUN: European Shipping and
Pretoria
RETURN TO THE UN: UN Diplomacy in Regional Conflicts
SOUTH AFRICA, THE COLONIAL POWERS AND ‘AFRICAN DEFENCE’:
The Rise and Fall of the White Entente, 1948–60
TALKING TO THE ENEMY: How States without ‘Diplomatic Relations’
Communicate
TILKIDOM AND THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: The Letters of Gerald
Fitzmaurice to George Lloyd
For Jack Spence
Preface and Acknowledgments
This edition of Diplomacy: Theory and Practice has been updated throughout
and—despite the excision of some long passages that I concluded were either
out of place or no longer important—considerably expanded. With the
Covid-19 pandemic in mind and because I had ignored it in previous edi-
tions, health diplomacy finds a major place for illustrative purposes. Among
other subjects new to this edition are capacity-building in following up,
embassy branch offices, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change,
interpreters at summits, and—unavoidably—the diplomatic implications of
former US President Donald J. Trump. Subjects covered in the previous edi-
tion but to which increased attention is given in this one include the use of
embassies for transnational repression, video-conferencing, Twitter, intelli-
gence officers on special missions, and the variation in representative offices
by degree of diplomatic status.
An innovation to which I must give special notice is the addition at the end
of each chapter of a list of ‘Topics for seminar discussion or essays’. This draws
not only on my teaching career but also on my long experience of vetting
draft exam questions while an external examiner at five British universities. A
good question should be short and clear—and provoke thought, which is
therefore what I have tried to achieve on these lists. A few cautions: first, very
few of these questions can be answered well by reliance on this book alone,
hence the ‘Further reading’; second, some questions overlap, which does not
matter unless they are used by a lecturer setting an exam; and third, most lists
feature a comparative question (e.g., ‘Compare the roles of Austria and
ix
x Preface and Acknowledgments
Jakovljevic, who has for many years expertly managed my website, on which
the book is updated. Finally, I wish to thank most warmly the two anony-
mous readers of my proposal for this edition for giving me valuable ideas that
have shaped the final draft and Anne-Kathrin Birchley-Brun of the publisher
for her patient and prompt support throughout. The responsibility for all
remaining deficiencies is mine alone.
xiii
Contents
2 Prenegotiations 23
Agreeing the Need to Negotiate 24
Agreeing the Agenda 27
Agreeing Procedure 29
Secrecy 30
Format 30
Venue 33
Delegations 36
Timing 38
Summary 39
Further Reading 39
3 ‘Around-the-Table’ Negotiations 41
The Formula Stage 41
The Details Stage 45
xv
xvi Contents
Difficulties 46
Negotiating Strategies 47
Summary 50
Further Reading 50
4 Diplomatic Momentum 53
Deadlines 55
Self-imposed Deadlines 55
External Deadlines 56
Symbolic Deadlines 58
Overlapping Deadlines 59
Metaphors of Movement 60
Publicity 63
Raising the Level of the Talks 65
Summary 66
Further Reading 67
5 Packaging Agreements 69
International Legal Obligations at a Premium 70
Signaling Importance at a Premium 71
Convenience at a Premium 73
Saving Face at a Premium 74
Both Languages, or More 75
Small Print 76
Euphemisms 78
‘Separate but Related’ Agreements 79
Summary 80
Further Reading 81
6 Following Up 83
Early Methods 84
Monitoring 87
Review Meetings 90
Capacity-Building 94
Summary 95
Further Reading 95
Contents xvii
7 Embassies101
The Normal Embassy 105
The Fortress Embassy 115
The Mini-Embassy 118
The Militarized Embassy 119
Summary 121
Further Reading 122
8 Telecommunications125
Telephone Diplomacy Flourishes 126
Video-Conferencing Peaks 133
Summary 137
Further Reading 138
9 Consulates141
Consular Functions 146
Career Consuls 149
Honorary Consuls 152
Consular Sections 154
Summary 155
Further Reading 155
10 Secret Intelligence159
Ambassadors as Agent-Runners 160
Service Attachés 161
Intelligence Officers 163
Cuckoos in the Nest? 169
Summary 175
Further Reading 176
11 Conferences179
International Organizations 181
Procedure 183
Venue 183
Participation 184
Agenda 189
Public Debate and Private Discussion 190
Decision-Making 191
xviii Contents
12 Summits199
Professional Anathemas 200
General Case for the Defense 203
Serial Summits 204
Ad hoc Summits 206
The High-Level Exchange of Views 208
Secrets of Success 209
Summary 212
Further Reading 213
13 Public Diplomacy215
Rebranding Propaganda 215
The Importance of Public Diplomacy 217
The Role of the Foreign Ministry 219
The Role of the Embassy 222
Summary 225
Further Reading 226
14 Embassy Substitutes231
Interests Sections 231
Consulates 236
Representative Offices 238
Front Missions 242
Summary 243
Further Reading 244
15 Special Missions247
The Advantages of Special Missions 247
The Variety of Special Missions 249
Unofficial Envoys 249
Official Envoys 251
To Go Secretly or Openly? 255
Summary 257
Further Reading 258
Contents xix
16 Mediation261
The Nature of Mediation 262
Different Mediators and Different Motives 264
Track One 264
Track Two 267
Multiparty Mediation 268
The Ideal Mediator 270
The Ripe Moment 273
Summary 274
Further Reading 275
References281
Index295
Abbreviations
xxi
xxii Abbreviations
xxv
xxvi List of Boxes
xxvii
xxviii Introduction
Not so much later but more varied and probably more effective in its meth-
ods seems to have been the diplomacy of ancient China. As early as the last
two decades of the eighth century BCE, in a large region of some hundreds of
independent political entities well before the empire emerged in 221 BCE,
there is evidence of what were probably already well-established diplomatic
customs. Rulers themselves met in twos or threes, for example, to form mili-
tary plans, affirm friendly relations, make peace, or settle a marriage alli-
ance—although they convened ‘in the open, generally by lakes or on hills at
more or less sacred spots’, a practice probably born in times ‘when rulers dared
not open their capitals or cities to other rulers accompanied by retinues’
(Britton: 619). (However, princes in some friendly relationships made court
visits of a highly ceremonial nature in order to solidify their friendships.)
More numerous contacts were made by envoys of high rank enjoying the
‘extra-clan immunity’ of nobles; their missions were designed for similar pur-
poses but also included the delivery of gifts and preparations for the princes’
conferences (Britton: 634). Treaties were solemnized by blood oaths, and
mediation—uninvited as well as encouraged—was also a customary practice.
In the Greek world of the fifth and fourth centuries BCE, which included
over 1000 city-states, conditions both demanded and favored an even more
sophisticated diplomacy, and great advances were made. First and foremost,
city-states appointed resident representatives to look after their interests
abroad, albeit not from their own people but instead from citizens of the for-
eign city-state, who for this reason bear a superficial resemblance to the mod-
ern honorary consul (see Chap. 9). The proxenos, as he was known, who was
usually an influential politician or judge, differed from the honorary consul in
so far as he was expected to handle any high-level political matters that came
up as well as the more mundane business of looking after visitors from the city
he served. Even small city-states appointed many proxenoi. The ancient Greeks
also employed large special missions, invented the oratorical techniques
required to gain popular acceptance of a bad as well as a good argument (the
art of rhetoric), publicized important treaties by inscribing them on stone or
bronze pillars (stelai) located in temples or other sacred places, practiced mul-
tilateral diplomacy in religious and military ‘leagues’, and employed media-
tion more or less thinly disguised as arbitration in the settlement of many
territorial disputes.
In late medieval Europe, the Byzantine Empire’s contribution in its declin-
ing centuries was to what would now be called public diplomacy, turning its
genius to ‘maintaining the illusion of world domination’ (Wozniac). Thus
other rulers were treated as junior members of the Emperor’s ‘family of kings’;
by means of elaborate ceremonial and extraordinary artifice, foreign envoys
Introduction xxix
Further Reading
Frey, Linda and Marsha Frey, ‘“The reign of the charlatans is over”’: the French
revolutionary attack on diplomatic practice’, The Journal of Modern History,
vol. 65(4), Dec., 1993.
Frodsham, J. D. (transl. and ed.), The First Chinese Embassy to the West: The
Journals of Kuo Sung-T’ao, Liu Hsi-Hung and Chang Te-Yi (Clarendon
Press: Oxford, 1974).
Hamilton, Keith and Richard Langhorne, The Practice of Diplomacy, 2nd edn
(Routledge: London, 2011). Chs 1–4.
Jones, Raymond A., The British Diplomatic Service, 1815–1914 (Colin
Smythe: Gerrards Cross, Bucks., 1983).
Liverani, Mario, International Relations in the Ancient Near East (Palgrave:
Basingstoke, 2001). Intro. and ch. 10.
Machiavelli, Niccolò, trsl. by Christian E. Detmold, The Historical, Political,
and Diplomatic Writings of Niccolo Machiavelli, (James R. Osgood: Boston,
1882), vol. III (‘Missions’) and vol. IV (‘Missions continued’). More com-
monly known as the ‘Legations’, these are Machiavelli’s diplomatic des-
patches sent back to Florence. Detmold’s English translation of the
complete works is highly regarded and still, as far as I know, the only one
available of the ‘Legations’.
Mack, William, Proxeny and Polis: Institutional networks in the Ancient Greek
World (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2015).
Mack, William (Project Director), Proxeny Networks of the Ancient World (a
database of proxeny networks of the Greek city-states) [www].
Mattingly, G., Renaissance Diplomacy (Penguin: Harmondsworth, 1965).
Meier, S. A., The Messenger in the Ancient Semitic World (Scholars Press:
Atlanta, GA, 1988).
Mösslang, M, and T. Riotte (eds), The Diplomats’ World: A cultural history of
diplomacy, 1815–1914 (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2008).
Munn-Rankin, J. M., ‘Diplomacy in Western Asia in the early second millen-
nium B.C.’, Iraq, Spring 1956, vol. 18(1).
Nicolson, Harold, The Evolution of Diplomatic Method (Constable:
London, 1954).
Peyrefitte, Alain, The Collision of Two Civilisations: The British expedition to
China 1792–4, trsl. from the French by J. Rothschild (Harvill:
London, 1993).
Queller, Donald E., The Office of Ambassador in the Middle Ages (Princeton
University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1967).
Queller, Donald E., ‘The development of ambassadorial relazioni’, in J. R. Hale
(ed), Renaissance Venice (Faber and Faber: London, 1974).
xxxii Introduction
It is difficult to find a state today that does not have, in addition to a diplo-
matic service, a ministry dedicated to its administration and direction. This is
usually known as the ministry of foreign affairs or, for short, foreign ministry.
It is easy to forget that this ministry came relatively late onto the scene. In
fact, its appearance in Europe post-dated the arrival of the resident diplomatic
mission by nearly three centuries. This chapter will begin by looking briefly at
the origins and development of the foreign ministry, and then examine its
different roles.
Until the sixteenth century, the individual states of Europe did not concen-
trate responsibility for foreign affairs in one administrative unit but allocated
it between different, infant bureaucracies on a geographical basis. Some of
these offices were also responsible for certain domestic matters. This picture
began to change under the combined pressure of the multiplying interna-
tional relationships and thickening networks of resident embassies that were a
feature of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The first of these trends
increased the possibilities of inconsistency in the formulation and execution
of foreign policy, and this demanded more unified direction and better pre-
served archives. The second trend—foreign policy execution by means of resi-
dent missions—increased vastly the quantity of correspondence flowing
home. This added the need for attention to methods of communication with
the missions, including the creation and renewal of their ciphers. It also meant
regard to their staffing and, especially, their financing—including that of their
secret intelligence activities, because separate secret service agencies did not
appear until very much later (see Chap. 10). All of this demanded better pre-
served archives as well, not to mention more clerks and messengers. In sum,
the rapid increase in négociation continuelle abroad required not only continu-
ous organization at home but also one bureaucracy, rather than several in
competition.
It has often been assumed that it was in France that the first foreign minis-
try began to emerge when, in 1589, Henry III gave to one of his secretaries of
state, Louis de Revol, sole responsibility for foreign affairs, an administrative
innovation that—after some regression—was confirmed by Richelieu in
1626. But there might well be other candidates, within and beyond Europe,
for the title of first foreign ministry. Moreover, the office of the French secre-
tary of state for foreign affairs in Richelieu’s time was little more than a per-
sonal staff: it was not even an outline version of a modern foreign ministry,
with an organized archive and defined bureaucratic structure. This had to wait
until the last years of the reign of Louis XIV at the beginning of the eigh-
teenth century (Picavet: 39–40).
Indeed, it was only during the eighteenth century that a recognizably mod-
ern foreign ministry became the general rule in Europe, and even then the
administrative separation of foreign and domestic business was by no means
watertight. Britain came late, having to wait until 1782 for the creation of the
Foreign Office. The US Department of State was established shortly after this,
in 1789 (Box 1.1). It was the middle of the nineteenth century before China,
Japan, and Turkey followed suit.
Even in Europe, however, it was well into the nineteenth century before
foreign ministries, which remained small, became anything like bureaucrati-
cally sophisticated. By this time, they were divided into different administra-
tive units on the basis either of specialization in a particular function (e.g.,
protocol and treaties), or—more commonly—geographical regions. In addi-
tion to the foreign minister, who was its temporary political head, the typical
1 The Foreign Ministry 3
foreign ministry had by this time also acquired a permanent senior official to
oversee its administration. As time wore on, this official also acquired influ-
ence over policy, sometimes very great. Entry into the foreign ministry increas-
ingly demanded suitable educational qualifications, although the pool from
which recruits came was limited to the upper reaches of the social hierarchy
until well into the twentieth century, and certainly in some states—and prob-
ably in many—still is.
The foreign ministry continued to have rivals for influence over the formu-
lation and execution of foreign policy in the nineteenth century. Among these
were the monarchs or presidents, chancellors or prime ministers, who felt that
their positions gave them special prerogatives to dabble in this area, as also the
war offices with their nascent intelligence services. Nevertheless, assisted fur-
ther by the greater control of missions abroad given to it by the communica-
tions revolution of the nineteenth century (Box 1.2), if the foreign ministry
had a golden age, this was probably it. It did not last long. Distaste for both
commerce and popular meddling in foreign policy was entrenched in most
foreign ministries, which were essentially aristocratic in ethos, and this put
them on the defensive in the following century. World War I was also a tre-
mendous blow to their prestige because it seemed to prove the failings of the
old diplomacy over which they presided. Much of the growing dissatisfaction
with the way ministries such as these were staffed and organized, as well as
with the manner in which they conducted their affairs, focused on the admin-
istrative (and in some instances social) divisions within the bureaucracy of
diplomacy.
Despite the intimate link between those in the foreign ministry and the
diplomats serving abroad, both their work and the social milieux in which they
mixed were very different. Persons attracted to the one sphere of activity were
not, as a rule, attracted to the other, and they were usually recruited by differ-
ent methods. Foreign ministry officials had more in common with the civil
servants in other government ministries than with their own glittering diplo-
mats, whom in any case they rarely met and had good grounds for believing
looked on them as social inferiors. They also tended to develop different out-
looks. American diplomats, who closed ranks in the face of frequent ridicule at
home (notably in the Middle and Far West), developed a particularly strong
‘fraternal spirit’ (Simpson: 3–4). The result was that, except in small states, it
became the norm for the two branches of diplomacy—the foreign ministry
and its representatives abroad—to be organized separately and have distinct
career ladders. Between them there was little if any transfer. It was also usual
for the representatives abroad to be themselves divided into separate services,
the diplomatic and the consular—and, later on, the commercial as well.
Box 1.3 Foreign Ministries: Formal Titles Making a Point, and Some
Metonyms
Most foreign ministries describe themselves as the ‘Ministry of Foreign Affairs’
(or some generic equivalent), but in their formal titles it is now common to see
text added that advertises a priority of the moment or a recent merger with
another ministry, or makes some other point. It is a pity that a few feel the need
to add the word ‘Cooperation’, as if otherwise they might be suspected of a
greater interest in the opposite. Some foreign ministries are also referred to by
the names of buildings or streets with which they are associated (metonyms).
The following list illustrates the variety of titles given to foreign ministries at the
time of writing (2021), together with some metonyms:
Australia: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Austria: Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs
Belgium: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade, and Development
Cooperation
Benin: Ministry of Foreign Affair and African Integration
Botswana: Ministry of International Affairs and Cooperation
Brazil: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (‘Itamaraty’)
France: Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs (‘Quai d’Orsay’)
India: Ministry of External Affairs (‘South Block’)
Italy: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (‘Farnesina’)
Japan: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (‘Gaimusho’)
Malaysia: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (‘Wisma Putra’)
Mauritius: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and
International Trade
Senegal: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Senegalese Abroad
South Africa: Department of International Relations and Cooperation
Syria: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates
United Kingdom: Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
United States of America: Department of State (‘Foggy Bottom’)
1 The Foreign Ministry 5
• Providing the personnel for the state’s diplomatic and consular missions
abroad, including posts at the permanent headquarters of international
organizations. This means not only their recruitment and training, some-
times in a fully-fledged diplomatic academy such as the Rio Branco Institute
in Brazil, but also the sensitive job of selecting the right persons for particu-
lar posts, which is of special importance in the case of mini-embassies
(see Chap. 7).
• Supporting the diplomats and their families, especially when they find
themselves in hardship posts or in the midst of an emergency. Because of
the murderous attacks on its embassies in recent decades, the US
Department of State has had to devote considerable energy and resources
to giving them greater protection, and since 1999 has required an Office of
Casualty Assistance.
• Providing the physical fabric of the missions abroad, which means renting,
purchasing, or even constructing suitable buildings, and then providing
them with equipment and furnishings, regular maintenance, guards, and
secure communications with home.
• Performance measurement of missions against stated objectives, including
periodic visits of inspection. The reports that follow such visits are usually
valuable, provided they are conducted by persons commanding professional
6 G. R. Berridge
two main reasons for this. First, the conduct of bilateral relations with an
important individual state or region by half a dozen or more functional
departments, each with a different global agenda, is hardly likely to be well
coordinated. Second, functional departments inevitably have little—if any—
of the kind of specialist knowledge of the languages or history of the world’s
regions essential for judicious policy advice; a persuasive internal FCO report
laid much of the blame on country ignorance for the failure of British policy
in Iran prior to the fall of the Shah in 1979 (Browne: chs. 10, 11; FAC 2011:
11, 68–70).
It is chiefly for one or both of these reasons that, in the late 1970s, major
reforms in the French foreign ministry restored administrative divisions on
geographical lines after decades of advance by the functional principle; that
geographical departments still actively jostle functional departments in the
FCDO; and that the State Department’s six regional bureaus remain ‘the
heart’ of its operations, even if they might look ‘a mere bump on its impossi-
bly complex and horizontal wiring diagram’ (Pope: 20). It is also reassuring
that, even among small states, it is not difficult to find foreign ministries
where geographical departments are prominent in their structures; Armenia
and Botswana provide good examples. With the rise in importance of interna-
tional organizations, most foreign ministries now have multilateral depart-
ments as well, some of which also have a geographical focus in so far as they
deal with regional bodies such as the African Union (AU).
Some foreign ministries also have departments known by names such as
‘intelligence and research’ or ‘research and analysis’. These specialize in general
background research and assessing the significance of information obtained
by secret intelligence agencies (see Chap. 10). Although chiefly a consumer of
the product of these agencies, the foreign ministry sometimes plays a key role
in its assessment in high-level inter-departmental committees.
If policy is to be well made and implemented properly, the foreign minis-
try’s institutional memory must be in good order. This applies especially to the
details of promises made and received in the past, and potential promises that
have been long gestating in negotiations. This is why such an important sec-
tion of even the earliest foreign ministries was their archive (later, ‘registry’) of
correspondence and treaties, as well as maps, reports, internal memoranda,
and other important documents. Before separate foreign ministries were cre-
ated, such archives were kept by other secretaries of state or palace officials.
They even existed in the palaces of the Great Kings of the ancient Near East.
Preserving securely, organizing systematically, and facilitating rapid access to
their archives by indexing are key foreign ministry responsibilities. A related
task in the foreign ministries of liberal democracies is determining carefully
1 The Foreign Ministry 9
of the Shah in 1979. Thus, one proposal made by the secret FCO report to
help avoid such embarrassments in the future was that the planning staff
should regularly suggest ‘improbable scenarios’ for political risk countries and
challenge the embassy and the geographical department to refute them. This
was also one of the report’s recommendations accepted by the British ambas-
sador to Iran at the time, Sir Anthony Parsons, who believed that his failure
was not one of information but of imagination. A radical report on Dutch
diplomacy maintained that the most important element of the professional
expertise of The Netherlands’ foreign ministry should be its ‘ability to predict
future developments’ (Advisory Committee: 73).
Foreign ministry planners are usually given freedom from current opera-
tional preoccupations but are not left so remote from them that they become
‘too academic’ (Coles: 71, 87–8). With their strategic brief and supposed to
provide independent judgments, it is not surprising that they are usually per-
mitted to work directly under the ministry’s executive head. However, it is
often difficult to get busy foreign ministers and senior officials, who must
inevitably give priority to current events, to focus on discussions of even the
medium term, while the operational departments might well be obstructive.
As one former policy planner has observed, although they always say they
want ‘a strong institutionalized challenge’ to their assumptions, ‘in reality they
prefer a quiet life’ (Cowper-Coles 2012: 142). The result is that the policy
planners often feel they are wasting their time, which was certainly true of
George Kennan. The first director of the State Department’s planning staff, he
resigned after Dean Acheson, who had replaced Marshall as secretary of state,
began to make him feel like a ‘court jester’ and the operational units began to
insist on policy recommendations going up through the ‘line of command’
(Kennan: 426–7, 465–6). Today’s State Department policy planners, who
provide ‘mostly a speechwriting shop’, probably feel the same, although they
have only themselves to blame: the first QDDR was at once turgid and other-
worldly, ‘drew nothing but yawns’ in the White House, and is best forgotten
(Pope: 39).
A related development of recent years is the appearance in a few foreign
ministries, notably those of Norway and the UK, of a department dedicated
to the big data analysis that has proved so productive for decision-making in
the business world. In February 2018 a report on the subject commissioned
by the Policy Planning and Research Unit of the Finnish foreign ministry was
published by DiploFoundation. This supported the creation of a ‘small, inno-
vative’ big data unit in the foreign ministry to ‘explore possible big data appli-
cations’, and also the appointment of a ‘big data champion’ in those
departments most likely to benefit from them (Jacobson et al.: 45–8). It also
1 The Foreign Ministry 11
concluded that even large foreign ministries would need to outsource a great
deal of big data work to the private sector.
The foreign ministry’s influence on government policy varies from one state
to another. It is usually highest in those with both a constitutional mode of
government and long-established, strongly staffed foreign ministries with the
reputation for being one of the ‘great offices of state’, as in France and Britain.
This is one of the reasons why a major problem faced by Tony Blair (British
prime minister from 1997 until 2007) when re-shuffling his cabinets was that
everyone wanted to be foreign secretary and, once they had it, wanted to cling
on to it ‘until the end of time, or at least the end of the government…’ (Blair
210a: 270, 340). However, even in such states the foreign ministry is at a
permanent disadvantage relative to the military-intelligence complex if acute
military insecurity is ingrained, as in Israel.
A foreign ministry’s influence in the same state can also fluctuate markedly
over time, both in the case of that of its permanent officials relative to the
ministry’s political leadership and of the ministry as a whole relative to the rest
of government. One reason for this is the inevitable variation in the degree to
which prejudices embedded among officials chime with those of the political
leadership. For example, the pro-Indian tendency of the Department of State
at the time in the early 1970s when—for reasons of China policy—the Nixon
White House was ‘tilting’ to Pakistan, reduced further this foreign ministry’s
influence over US policy toward south Asia. But this was nothing compared
to the slump in the State Department’s position following the inauguration of
President Trump in January 2017. Led by secretaries of state without experi-
ence, hammered with savage budget cuts, subjected to a complete reorganiza-
tion without any strategic rationale, and embarrassed by a whole raft of senior
positions (including chiefs of mission) left unfilled, the department became
notorious in Washington for its demoralized staff and the exodus of experi-
enced personnel. Meanwhile, the FCO paid the price for its opposition to
Brexit, which it correctly judged would seriously weaken British diplomacy
while advancing the Russian goal of disharmony in Europe. Responsibility for
negotiating Brexit was given in July 2016 to a new ministry, the ‘Department
for Exiting the European Union’, and some of its tasks in economic diplo-
macy were simultaneously handed to a new ‘Department for [non-EU]
International Trade’.
Another reason for the fluctuation in a foreign ministry’s influence over
time is the inevitable variation in the political weight and experience of for-
eign affairs of individual foreign ministers. If new ministers are novices in
foreign affairs, senior officials are well placed to ‘educate’ them in the depart-
mental view. Such was the case with Jean Cruppi and Justin de Selves, who
12 G. R. Berridge
were successively French foreign ministers in 1911; it was their relative inex-
perience in foreign affairs that allowed a small group of activist officials in
the Quai d’Orsay to press successfully for a more forward foreign policy.
Today, with foreign ministers and any junior political colleagues in the min-
istry having to spend so much more time meeting their counterparts abroad,
in some circumstances a degree of role-reversal can be observed: diplomatic
officers at home shaping tactics and even strategy; ministers abroad seeking
to execute them. If the foreign minister is a political heavy-weight and the
president or prime minister has limited experience and interest in foreign
affairs, a perfect surge in foreign ministry influence is to be expected—as in
the case of the FCO following the appointment of William Hague as foreign
secretary and David Cameron as prime minister after the British general
election in 2010.
means as menacing to the foreign ministry as some observers thought and its
enemies hoped. This is because direct dial diplomacy threatened the overall
coherence of foreign policy. So, too, did other trends: pursuit of the same or
related negotiations through multilateral as well as bilateral channels, unoffi-
cial as well as official channels, and backchannels as well as front channels.
The chaos in the conduct of foreign relations that this promised could only be
reduced by some authoritative body charged with coordinating the foreign
activities of the other government departments: enter the hardy foreign
ministry.
It has been noted earlier in this chapter that foreign ministries have had
coordination very much in mind in reasserting the geographical principle in
their internal administration, but how do they try to promote coordination
beyond their own doors? Their strategies include the following:
Summary
In most states today, the foreign ministry must formally share control over the
making of foreign policy with other ministries and executive agencies—and
to a growing extent with its missions abroad. Nevertheless, it tends to retain signifi-
cant influence via its broader perspective, geographical expertise, control of the
diplomatic service, investment in public diplomacy (discussed in Chap. 13), nur-
turing of domestic allies, and acceptance by outsiders that it is well positioned to
make a major contribution to the coordination of the state’s complex interna-
tional relations. Most of these relationships issue, from time to time, in the activity
of negotiation, which—even narrowly conceived—represents the most important
function of diplomacy. It is therefore appropriate to turn next to this subject.
Further Reading1
Advisory Committee on Modernising the Diplomatic Service, Modernising Dutch
Diplomacy: Progress Report, Final Report (May 2014) [www].
1
Many foreign ministries have their own websites, some of which provide at least a list of the different
departments (sometimes even an organization chart), while a few go so far as to give a detailed history of
the ministry; in the last regard, the website of the Canadian foreign ministry (‘Global Affairs Canada’) is
outstanding. The back copies of State Magazine, available via the US State Department’s website, are
also useful.
18 G. R. Berridge
Exercise.
1. Why is the school a good situation in which to train children in morality?
2. Is the man who simply does not injure others to be thought of as living a moral
life?
3. Do you think any teacher has a right to claim that she is not responsible for
the moral training of her pupils? Why?
4. In what way do the instincts furnish the basis for moral training?
5. Should you treat all of the children alike in situations which involve a moral
issue?
6. How would you hope to have boys come to render the moral judgment that it
is wrong to throw stones through the windows of a vacant house?
7. How may school spirit and school standards contribute to the development of
morality?
8. Name some troublesome things which boys do that might be explained by
bad physical conditions in the school or in the home.
9. What do you understand by the direct method of moral instruction? What is
the strength and the weakness of this method?
10. Do you think the moral significance of a story or a poem should be taught in
a lesson in literature?
11. Name school situations which involve moral judgments and which offer
opportunity for training in morality.
12. How would you hope to train children to form the habit of asking themselves
whether a proposed line of action was right before acting?
13. How may the one who does wrong in school provide the opportunity for the
best sort of training in morality?
14. Is there ever any defense for corporal punishment?
15. How important do you consider the influence of the teacher in developing
morally sound boys and girls?
CHAPTER XV
CLASS MANAGEMENT
Exercises.
1. Distinguish between class management as a means and as an end. Give
examples of each.
2. How would you hope to have pupils feel their responsibility for good order in
the class?
3. Why do schemes of “pupil self-government” sometimes fail?
4. What is the argument in favor of having pupils pass into or out of the building
without marching in line?
5. Why is it important not to have the class periods too long?
6. Why do teachers sometimes divide their classes into two or more groups
even though they are all of the same school grade?
7. Can you ever expect to find a group of children all of whom will do equally
well in all subjects? Are the weaker pupils necessarily lazy?
8. Why is it important to make special provision for bright children?
9. What is the relation between the proper organization of class work and
teaching children how to study?
10. What do you think of a program which provides for class instruction during
every period of the day?
11. What criteria would you apply in judging your own class instruction?
12. What is “good order” in a schoolroom?
13. How would you judge of the success of a teacher in managing a class?
14. Name all of the activities of a class which in your judgment should be
reduced to routine.
15. What rules would you make on the first day of school for the guidance of
your pupils?
16. What is the relation of good teaching to good class management?
17. If a majority of the class are misbehaving, where would you expect to find
the cause?
CHAPTER XVI
LESSON PLANS
The best teachers never reach the point where preparation for the
day’s work is unnecessary. The teacher who stimulates her pupils to
their best effort must herself be interested in the work in hand. If
nothing new in material or method is found to vary the work, interest
soon lags. The lesson often repeated is as dry and lacking in power
to interest or inspire as the proverbial sermon taken from the barrel.
Even when a teacher has taught a most successful lesson, it is
dangerous to try to repeat that exercise in precisely the same way.
The two situations will not be alike. The fact that she tries to repeat
will take the edge off the lesson for the teacher, and make it
correspondingly dull for the pupils. Young and inexperienced
teachers are often most successful because of the zest with which
they attack the problems which are new to them. The older teacher
may be able to keep a class in order and teach them something with
a minimum of preparation; but her best work will be done only when
she has planned as carefully as the novice for whom the need of
preparation is so apparent.
The subject matter which should be drawn upon for any lesson
constantly changes. No two groups of children have had exactly the
same varieties of experience; hence the need for varying the
approach, as well as the demand for differences in observations,
experiments, reading, or other methods employed to bring the data
necessary for the solution of their problem before children. Subject
matter is growing, is being made all of the time. Last year’s
discussion of the geography of Europe, of South America, of Africa,
or of Asia will not suffice for this year, because interesting and
important events have occurred in these countries during the year
intervening. For the wide-awake teacher, even that most exact of the
sciences, mathematics, represented by arithmetic in our curriculum,
will change; since the number aspect of children’s experience will
vary. If spelling means the study of words which are needed for use
in written expression, the work in spelling will vary just as surely as
the occasions for written expression vary among children. No
teacher could, if she would, repeat a series of lessons which deal
with natural phenomena. In any field, the need for preparation
becomes apparent for one who would command the material which
should be made available for children.
In the preparation of a lesson plan the first and in some respects
the most important step is to become acquainted with the subject to
be taught. There is no method of teaching which can take the place
of a thoroughgoing knowledge of the material which bears upon the
topic to be treated. The teacher who finds in the life of the children
outside of school, in school activities, in books, pictures, magazines,
in study and travel, material for her daily class work, will make any
course of study vital and interesting to children. In such an
atmosphere pupils will grow not only in knowledge, but also in the
desire to inquire and investigate and in power to satisfy their
intellectual craving.
After the teacher has in hand an abundance of interesting
material, the next step in the plan is to organize the data to be
presented. Some organization is usually found in textbooks and
courses of study, and it is possible simply to try to fit any additional
material which may have been collected to the scheme provided.
The difficulty with this ready-made organization is found in the fact
that it has little or no relation to the needs or problems of the
particular group of children to be taught. Any organization which is to
be significant to children must take account of their point of view, and
attempt to present subject matter in response to the need which they
feel for the material to be presented. This is precisely what is meant
by the difference between the logical and psychological methods of
presenting subject matter. Not that the psychological method is
illogical, rather it takes account of the child’s needs and is for him
logical beyond the most complete adult logical scheme. It may seem
logical to the adult to teach the crayfish by calling attention to the
large parts and then to the smaller parts in order, or to deal with the
structure of the skeleton, nervous and circulatory systems,
connective tissues, and the like. To an eight-year-old child, the
problems which will probably be most logical, most satisfying to his
desire for investigation, will deal with the way in which the crayfish
gets his living, how he protects himself from his enemies, how he
brings disaster by making holes in levees, and how important he is
as an article of food. In satisfying these childish problems, much of
the information which might have been imparted, had the adult
scientific order been followed, will be mastered by the pupils. Much
more will be remembered, because the information is associated
with the solution of interesting problems. It may seem logical in
teaching India to a sixth-grade class to treat of prevailing winds,
surface features, climate, vegetation, animals, mineral products, and
people; but the children whose teacher approached this subject by
asking them to try to discover why they have had such terrible
famines in India probably remember more of the geography of India
to-day than those who followed the adult logical order. In
organization, then, the starting point is to get the child’s point of view,
to discover his problems, and to organize the material to be
presented with reference to these childish aims.
Good organization demands that material presented to satisfy the
demand made by the child’s problem be grouped around few
coördinate heads.[26] Many topics of equal value in an outline
generally indicate a lack of organization, a lack of appreciation of the
relation of the various facts to be presented. For example, one might
think of a great many facts about plant growth; the seeds must be
put in the earth, the weather must be warm enough, they must have
water, they need to be hoed, the ground should be fertile, they need
air, they grow best when they have sunlight, they may have too
much moisture, in rocky ground the soil may not be deep enough,
they must not be too close together, weeds and insects must be
destroyed, the roots should not be disturbed, the choice of the seed
is important, and so on. For a group of lower-grade children there
are two problems; namely, (1) what kind of plants do we want, and
(2) what can we do to make them grow well. Under the first head
would come the plants which are suitable for our conditions of soil
and climate, and the question of seed selection. Under the second
head the topics will be moisture, sunlight, air, and cultivation,
including the destroying of insects or other pests. Each of these
topics will be suggested in answer to the problems which have been
raised (what plants we want, and how we can make them grow well)
by a group of children who have had any experience with growing
plants. If any important topic is omitted, the teacher will call for it by a
question which suggests the lack of a complete solution to the
problem which is being considered. This brings us to the next step in
plan making.
A good lesson plan will include pivotal questions which will serve
to call for the data as indicated by the main topics given in the
organization of the subject matter. The problem of questioning has
been discussed at some length in a previous chapter.[27] In planning
a lesson, a question or two which will discover to the children the
problem to be solved should come first in the plan. With the problem
before the children, the function of the question is to stimulate
thought in the direction of the solution of the problem. The writer is
familiar with the objection that questions cannot be prepared ahead
of time.
It is true that the form of question may need to be varied because
of progress or the lack of it, not anticipated by the teacher, but the
question carefully prepared ahead of time will help rather than hinder
in the formulation of a question to meet the situation. It is true, too,
that not all of the questions can be prepared ahead of time. All the
more reason for careful preparation of a few questions which will
enable the teacher to prevent wandering by children during the
development of the topic. Thought-provoking questions which guide
and stimulate children in the solution of their problems are
dependent upon the aim which has been established and upon the
organization of material which it is desired to follow in the solution of
the problem. One might as well deny the need of organizing material,
as to question the value of preparing a few pivotal questions as a
part of the plan.
Lessons often fail because the ground covered during the period
cannot be retraced by the children at the end of the exercise. In a
well-organized plan the teacher will provide for summaries as each
main point is covered. In general these summaries should aim to
recall the subject matter covered from the beginning of the lesson. It
may be suggested that any good teacher summarizes her work as
she passes from point to point in her teaching, and that no artificial
reminder is necessary. The difficulty is that a good summary is not
accomplished merely by asking for a recapitulation of the material
covered. The skillful teacher puts her question which involves a
summary in such form that the pupils get a new view of the ground
already covered. In the experience of the writer, questions which
involve a summary of the work covered, with the added element of a
new view as a stimulus to further thought on the subject, are more
rare than good questions introducing new topics.
A good plan will include a list of illustrations, illustrative material,
books including references to chapter or page, maps or charts which
are to be consulted during the recitation. Teacher and children are
often disappointed because of the lack of materials which could have
been at hand had the teacher only thought about the lesson before
teaching it. In like manner, the opportunities for motor expression,
other than reciting or discussing, should be noted in the plan.
Dramatization, constructive work, graphic representation at the seat
or on the blackboard, may make the difference between success and
failure in a recitation.
A lesson which has been well planned will naturally end in the
assignment of work to be done in preparation for the next recitation.
In the discussion of any problem there must arise questions which
cannot then be answered. A good lesson is characterized not simply
by the ability of children to report progress, but quite as much by
their statement of the questions still unanswered. The direction
sometimes given to call up again the question which is left
unanswered during the recitation indicates a teacher whose
assignments provide a real stimulus for study in preparation for the
next day’s work. If it is necessary to have a live problem before
children during the recitation conducted by the teacher, obviously it is
much more necessary to make assignments which involve real
issues for children to meet.
In outline form the discussion of plan making given above would
appear as given below. This lesson on plan making may be taken as
an illustration of the type of plan a teacher should prepare for a
development lesson. In this plan, as in others, it seems wise to keep
the subject matter separate from the method of procedure.
A plan for teaching lesson plans: Their importance and the
elements which enter into their composition.
Teacher’s aim: To show the importance of plan making and to
indicate the elements which enter into the construction of a good
plan.
Preparation (which aims to get the problem before the class). How
do you prepare for your day’s work? Do you think you would do
better work if you planned your several recitations somewhat
systematically?
Pupil’s aim: Why do I need to make plans, and what are the
elements of a good plan?
Subject Matter Method of Procedure
I. Necessity for planning. Do you ever grow tired of teaching
A. Lack of interest in old work. the same subject over and over
B. Subject matter changes. again?
Why does a sermon out of the
a. Subjects grow. “barrel” lack in interest or power to
b. The experiences of different inspire?
groups of children vary. Do you know a subject thoroughly
C. Not safe to depend upon the to-day because you once studied it?
inspiration of the moment Why do different groups of children
for respond differently to the same
a. Good questions. material?
b. Illustrations and illustrative Formulate three good questions
material. which you might use in teaching a
c. References to books or lesson on the oak tree to second-
magazines. grade children.
Do you think you might have asked
d. Plans for constructive work better questions if you had had time
and the like. to think them over?
What picture or other illustrative
material would you use in teaching
this lesson?
Do you think the children would
gain by drawing a picture of the oak
near by?
When do you think you will have
had enough experience in teaching
to be able to get along without
making plans?