Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jay Rubenstein
1
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries.
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
© Jay Rubenstein 2019
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,
or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with
the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning
reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the
Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Rubenstein, Jay, 1967– author.
Title: Nebuchadnezzar’s dream : the Crusades, apocalyptic prophecy, and the
end of history / Jay Rubenstein.
Description: New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2019] | Includes
bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2018008319 | ISBN 9780190274207 (hardback : alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: Crusades—First, 1096–1099. | Crusades—Second, 1147–1149. |
Jerusalem—History—Latin Kingdom, 1099–1244. | End of the world—History
of doctrines—Middle Ages, 600–1500.
Classification: LCC D161.2 .R746 2019 | DDC 956/.014--dc23 LC record available at
https://lccn.loc.gov/2018008319
1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2
Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc.
United States of America
F or E dwa r d
C ON T E N T S
List of Figures ix
List of Tables xi
Maps xiii
Preface xvii
vii
viii Contents
Acknowledgments 221
Notes 223
Index 269
L I S T OF F IGU R E S
ix
L I S T OF TA BL E S
xi
North Sea
World of the Crusades
First Crusade
London
Second Crusade of Louis VII
ATLANTIC
Cologne
Third Crusade of Frederick Barbarossa
Third Crusade of Richard the Lion Heart
OCEAN Paris
Metz Mainz
Vézelay
Blois
k Sea
Clermont
Damascus
Tyre
Tunis
Acre
Jerusalem
Mediterranean Sea
Alexandria
Cairo
0 200 400 600 Miles
MAP 1
Europe in the
Crusade Era North Sea
German
Bruges
Empire
Flanders Cologne
English Cha nnel Saint-Omer
Mainz
Nogent-sous-Coucy
Caen Reims
Paris
Dol Saint-Evroul
Chartres Troyes Freising Reichersberg
Reichersberg
Clairvaux
Tours Abbey Schäftlarn
Abbey
Bourgueil Tegernsee
Cîteaux Abbey
FRANCE Abbey
Saint-Léonard Cluny
de Noblat Abbey
Montferrat Ferrara
ITALY
0 200 400 Km
MAP 2
Joachim of Fiore's
Italy
Adriatic Sea
Viterbo
Rome
Veroli
Casamari
I TA LY
Naples
Fiore
Tyrrhenian Sea
Corazzo
Ionian Sea
Messina
Palermo
Mount Etna
Sicily
Mediterranean Sea
0 50 100 Miles
Malta 0 80 160 Km
MAP 3
P R E FAC E
This book began with an observation and the question that followed
upon it. The observation involves one of the most creative historians
of the Middle Ages, Guibert of Nogent (ca. 1060–1125), and how he
looked at the key event of his lifetime, the First Crusade. In addition
to being one of the most perceptive writers of his day, Guibert was
also one of the most melancholic and dyspeptic, not often given to
enthusiasm about the state of human affairs. Upon first hearing the
news of the campaign for Jerusalem’s capture, he became uncharac-
teristically excited about the crusade. By the end of his life, however,
his attitude toward it had grown more jaundiced. He had become
disillusioned with the whole enterprise.1 The question then followed
from this observation: Was Guibert’s disillusionment widely shared?
How did his contemporaries look upon the event that has come to
define their age?
To answer this question in full, which this book will try to do,
requires first addressing another question. If disillusionment such as
Guibert’s followed the First Crusade, what was the illusion that had
originally inspired it? The First Crusade, and in particular the cap-
ture of Jerusalem, had changed the course of history. Indeed, it rep-
resented in the eyes of contemporaries probably the most important
event ever. But more fundamentally, it changed not just perceptions
of the past but of the future. Human potential seemed limitless, but
time itself was winding down. Divine closure, in the form of the
Apocalypse, was at hand.
That is where my work ended, but when I began, I was confident
that the Apocalypse and the crusades had nothing to do with one
another. Recent historians have almost all agreed on this point: When
talking about the crusade movement, it is best to avoid prophecy.
Such an attitude, more importantly, conformed to Guibert’s preju-
dices, too. It was a point of principle for him. Rather than a prophetic
framework, the most meaningful level of interpretation of any event
or idea was, for him, moral, or tropological, something akin to what
modern readers think of when they hear the word psychological: How
xvii
xviii Preface
is the human mind structured, and what makes people behave as they
do? Guibert’s goal as a teacher and writer was to change hearts.
Promises of heavenly reward and threats of hellfire, he thought, were
ineffective tools for reaching listeners and teaching them how to
behave. Whatever the reason for Guibert’s disillusionment, it could
not be because it didn’t meet his apocalyptic expectations. Guibert
had none to begin with.
Yet during the course of my work, I kept noticing exceptions
in the foundational sources for crusade history to what I believed
the anti-apocalyptic rule. Eventually, I had made note of so many
instances of apocalyptic language that I had to throw the rule out
altogether. That earlier, skeptical consensus was understandable.
Historians try to empathize with their sources, to treat them (with
rare exception) respectfully, or to at least assume that historical fig-
ures with whom they are engaged were rational actors, that they had
sound reasons for what they thought and wrote, and weren’t prone
to lunacy. In our age, those who believe in the Apocalypse are dis-
missed as mad, the kind of people who reject reality and retreat into
allegorical or literal bunkers.
For most historians, it has been far easier to see the crusades as
driven by a desire for wealth, territorial expanse, or colonial dreams.
Or if religion drove them, it would likely be a need for penance on
the part of the soldiers, a desire for salvation, a dream of redemption
for themselves or their families. In the halcyon days of the early
1990s, when history supposedly had ended and liberal democracies
stretched into the future as far as the prophetic eye could see, this
sort of modernizing, empathetic retelling of crusade history seemed
the only rational approach. Now that we have reentered an age
where religious violence is not so foreign, where its enactors openly
dream of bringing about the End Times in some form or other, an
apocalyptic reading of crusade sources seems compelling, or at least
pardonable.
The story told here, however, is not about the rage for apocalyp-
tic thinking that erupted in 1099. It is rather an examination of the
question that animated Guibert and other contemporary writers,
and one with revived relevance. What had the capture of Jerusalem
changed and would these changes endure? Behind it is the question
of how to live with an ongoing apocalyptic war, one that seemingly
can end only with the destruction of institutions of human judgment
and secular government and their transformation into something
eternally enduring. That was the illusion that Guibert embraced and
then gradually let go.
Preface xix
Part 1 lays the foundation for this project by laying bare the illu-
sion. In its initial conception, the First Crusade was understood and
interpreted in biblical, prophetic language. This vision originated
not with theologians. It came, rather, from Bohemond of Antioch,
from soldiers who had helped lead the crusade and who proclaimed
that by taking Jerusalem, the crusaders had fulfilled prophecies from
the book of Daniel, prophecies involving the ancient Babylonian
King Nebuchadnezzar and a dream about statues and a magical rock.
The dream’s interpretation had long been shrouded in obscurity,
but now those meanings were coming clear, according to Bohemond.
A man of remarkable charisma—he was tall and uncommonly hand-
some, it was said—Bohemond was a brilliant field tactician without
whose leadership the crusade would have likely failed during the
long siege of Antioch (October 1097–June 1098).
But for all his charm and genius, as well as his facility at self-
promotion, Bohemond was a soldier—and a mercenary’s son—not a
scholar. And he was an opportunist, too, having abandoned the cru-
sade shortly after the fall of Antioch, preferring to remain as the
city’s ruler rather than to continue on the road to Jerusalem. Even in
1106, as he preached about the prophetic significance of the cru-
sade, his eyes were fixed on not a Muslim but a Christian enemy, the
Byzantine ruler Alexius Comnenus, whose empire he hoped to claim.
Bohemond’s presentation was therefore, for multiple reasons, a bit
rough around the edges. Better-educated historians needed to put a
nicer gloss on it. None did more in this cause than Lambert of Saint-
Omer, a Flemish canon who is one of the principle figures in this
narrative. Lambert placed the conquest of Jerusalem at the culmina-
tion of world history. That was the illusion; that was the grand hope.
European soldiers had fulfilled prophecies of both the Old and New
Testaments.
But this view of history had consequences, which form the sub-
ject of Part 2. These consequences also help to explain the sources
of Guibert’s disillusionment. Because of their achievements, born of
personal purgation and purity, veteran crusaders were being held to
impossible standards of conduct and virtue. The turbulent and at
times pathologically brutal behavior of some of these men—justified
by appeals to their status as crusaders—would have given any thought-
ful observer cause to question how they or their achievements could
possibly fit into God’s plan. Additionally, the triumph of the crusade
carried in its wake hundreds of stories of tragedy, now mostly lost to
view but certainly known to contemporaries. It is not a question of
whether the First Crusade remained popular or else a target of
xx Preface
A
CCORDING TO DANIEL , in the second year of his reign
King Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon had a troubling dream.
He wished to know its meaning, even though the king him-
self seems to have forgotten its details. Thus when Nebuchadnezzar
called together his soothsayers, he set them a double task: describe
the dream and then interpret it. Understandably, the soothsayers
complained, “There is no one on earth, O king, who can accomplish
your command! Nor does any king, though great and mighty, ask such
a thing of any diviner, or wise man, or Chaldean.”1 Nebuchadnezzar,
unmoved, ordered them all put to death.
It is a singular moment in a legendary, near-mythical career.
During Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, Babylon assumed an imperial gran-
deur, which it had never previously possessed. At his command,
architects and engineers created the Hanging Gardens, one of
the Seven Wonders of the World. The wealth and splendor of his
court attracted merchants, diplomats, and settlers from many lands,
a diversity of peoples and tongues that itself was a wonder too. Their
presence beneath a three-hundred-foot ziggurat, dedicated to the
god Marduk, and their incessant multilingual chatter inspired the
city’s enslaved Jews to invent a tall tale, that of the Tower of Babel—a
fantasy of divine vengeance and destruction that remains a potent
explanation for the world’s ongoing discord.2
Those Jews’ presence in Babylon, during the period called “the
Babylonian Captivity,” has become likewise proverbial. Historically,
it was the culmination of a series of wars beginning in 605 bce.
3
4 Prophecy and the First Crusade
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.