Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The construction of a cable bridge is a complex undertaking that requires careful planning and
execution. A work breakdown structure (WBS) is a helpful tool that can be used to break down
the project into smaller, more manageable tasks.
Project Management
The first step in any construction project is to establish a strong project management team. This
team will be responsible for developing a project charter and scope statement, identifying
stakeholders, and creating a communication plan. The project charter formally defines the project
and outlines its goals and objectives. The scope statement details the specific deliverables that
will be included in the project. Identifying stakeholders is important for ensuring that everyone
who has an interest in the project is kept informed of its progress. A communication plan outlines
how information will be shared among stakeholders throughout the project lifecycle.
Design and Engineering
Once the project management team is in place, the design and engineering phase can begin. This
phase involves conducting geotechnical and hydrological studies to determine the feasibility of
building a cable bridge at the chosen location. These studies will also provide important
information for the design of the bridge foundations. The results of these studies will inform the
design of the bridge superstructure, which includes the towers, pylons, and deck. The cable
system, which is a key component of a cable bridge, is also designed during this phase. The
electrical systems that will power the bridge lighting and other fixtures are also designed at this
time.
Material Procurement
While the design and engineering work is underway, the procurement team can begin to procure
the materials that will be needed for construction. This includes steel for the superstructure and
substructure, cables and anchorage systems, concrete, asphalt, and other construction materials.
The procurement team will also need to secure the necessary construction equipment and
machinery.
Construction
The construction phase of a cable bridge project is typically divided into several stages. The first
stage involves site preparation and earthworks. This includes clearing the site, excavating the
soil, and grading the land to prepare for the construction of the foundations. The next stage
involves the construction of the foundations, which will support the towers and pylons of the
bridge. The towers and pylons are then constructed, followed by the superstructure, which
includes the deck. Once the superstructure is in place, the cable system can be installed. The final
stage of construction involves finishing the bridge deck and installing any other necessary
components, such as lighting and signage.
Project Controls
Throughout the construction project, the project management team will be responsible for
monitoring progress, managing risks and issues, and controlling costs. They will use a variety of
tools and techniques to track progress, identify and mitigate risks, and ensure that the project
stays on budget.
Conclusion
The construction of a cable bridge is a complex undertaking that requires careful planning and
execution. A work breakdown structure (WBS) is a valuable tool that can be used to break down
the project into smaller, more manageable tasks.
This example showcases Earned Value Management (EVM) analysis for a cable bridge
construction project with an estimated budget of ₹184 crore. Remember, these are hypothetical
numbers for demonstration purposes only.
Project Schedule: Let's assume the project is divided into 5 phases spread over 24 months (2
years).
Phase Duration Budget Allocation (Crore)
(Months)
Mobilization & Planning 3 10
Foundation Construction 6 45
Superstructure Construction 8 70
Cable System Installation 4 35
Deck Finishing & Commissioning 3 24
Sample Month (Month 6):
We will analyze EVM metrics for month 6, assuming the project is halfway through the
foundation construction phase.
Managerial Implications:
Schedule Delay: The project seems to be behind schedule based on the SPI. The project
manager needs to investigate the reasons for the delay and take corrective actions such as:
o Resource allocation optimization
o Prioritizing critical tasks
o Revising the schedule (if necessary)
Cost Overrun: The CPI indicates cost overspending. The project manager should analyze
the reasons behind this and implement cost-saving measures like:
o Identifying areas for cost reduction
o Negotiating with vendors
o Monitoring project expenses more closely
Conclusion:
EVM analysis provides valuable insights into project performance. This example demonstrates
how EVM can be used to identify schedule delays and cost overruns early in the cable bridge
construction project. By taking timely corrective actions based on EVM data, project managers
can increase the probability of project success, ensuring the bridge is completed on time and
within budget.
While we can't perform a full CPM and PERT analysis without a detailed network diagram of
the cable bridge project, we can demonstrate the calculations using the same sample data from
the previous EVM example. This will showcase the different approaches of each method.
Important Note:
CPM focuses on the most time-consuming path through the project network, identifying the
critical activities that impact the overall project duration.
1. Calculate Early Start (ES) and Early Finish (EF) for each activity:
3. Calculate Late Start (LS) and Late Finish (LF) for each activity (optional):
PERT acknowledges activity time variability by considering optimistic, pessimistic, and most
likely durations for each activity.
1. Estimate Optimistic (O), Most Likely (M), and Pessimistic (P) durations for each activity.
o Most Likely duration is the expected time for the activity to be completed.
o Pessimistic duration is the longest possible time the activity might take.
o You'll need expert judgment to estimate these durations for your specific project.
o TE = (O + 4M + P) / 6
o V = (P - O) / 6
4. Construct a PERT network diagram and identify critical activities based on expected
durations and variances.
Conclusion:
Both CPM and PERT are valuable project management tools. While CPM offers a clear picture
of the critical path, PERT provides a more probabilistic view of project completion time.
Choosing the best method depends on the project's complexity and risk tolerance.