Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sensitive Research in
Social Work
Sharif Haider
Health, Wellbeing and Social Care
Open University
London, UK
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of
illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar
or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Contents
v
vi Contents
Appendixes355
Index 359
List of Figures
vii
List of Tables
ix
List of Boxes
xi
xii List of Boxes
xiii
xiv List of Activities
Sensitive Research
Although the name ‘sensitive research’ gives an idea of what such research
concerns, defining it is difficult because it is socially constructed. Probably
for this reason, it embodies a wide range of perspectives. For some
authors, it is researching sensitive topics that makes a particular study
sensitive, while for others the term refers to researching vulnerable peo-
ple, which warrants a sensitive approach to conducting research. The
term ‘sensitive’ is also often used interchangeably with the terms ‘vulner-
able’, ‘hidden population’ and ‘hard-to-reach’ people. Some also hold
that if a particular piece of research poses risks to participants and
researchers, the study can be deemed as sensitive. So the definition of
sensitive research is not simple or straightforward. Nevertheless, a num-
ber of writers have made attempts to define it. Table 1.1 gives the various
definitions of sensitive research.
Based on these examples, one can see that some authors define sensi-
tive research loosely and widely, others narrowly. Some authors concen-
trate on threats to people involved in research, some only on taboo topics
(Farberow, 1963), and some on the ethical aspects of research. Three
elements can be identified from these definitions:
1. Research topic
2. Participants
3. Threats
sexual behaviour, drug and alcohol abuse, criminal offences and fraud,
ethical problems, and attitudes involving abortion, euthanasia and suicide,
charity, politics, medical compliance, psychological problems and a diverse
miscellaneous category.
1 Sensitive Social Work Research 3
(continued)
4 S. Haider
Authors Definition
Liamputtong ‘I refer to the “vulnerable”, “difficult-to-access” and “hidden
(2007, P. 4–6) populations” of several social groups: Homeless people,
children and adolescents, older people, people with
disabilities, chronically and terminally ill persons, women
who have experienced violence such as rape and domestic
violence, female and male sex workers, gay men and lesbians,
indigenous populations, people from ethnic minority
backgrounds, the mentally ill, illicit drug users and dealers,
and those who are affected by stigmatised diseases such as
mental illness and HIV/AIDS. The list is not exhaustive, but
these groups of people are often hard to reach; they are the
silent, the hidden, the deviant, the tabooed, the marginalised
and hence ‘invisible’ populations in society … A closely
related issue with vulnerable and marginalised people is the
concept of ‘sensitive research … I would include issues like
miscarriage, abortion, exploitation of the marginalised, the
critically ill, being old, children who work as prostitutes and
so on, as sensitive research’.
Mallon et al., ‘Sensitivity is often thought of in terms of two key elements:
(2020, P. 2) Firstly, the inherent sensitive or taboo qualities of the
research topic itself and secondly the methodological and
practical means of sensitively addressing such “sensitive”
issues’.
Mallon et al. (2020) agree that the core of sensitive research is ‘emotion’.
This could be a result of undertaking research project, and it could be
experienced by participants, researchers and others associated with the
research, including readers. However, they advise against using the term
‘sensitive research’ normatively and routinely for a range of research topics
related with emotions. This does not imply they deny that emotions
should not be used to categorise sensitive research—indeed, far from it.
They advise that researchers critically explore the complex mix of emotions
experienced by everyone in their research before labelling their studies as
sensitive research. According to them, researchers should take account of
1 Sensitive Social Work Research 5
• lack autonomy
• have limited access to services (Johnson et al., 2016)
• are stigmatised
• have particular health conditions associated with stigmas
• are excluded from the main spheres of public and economic life
• are in environments that constrain freedom and restrict access to most
resources (Johnson et al., 2016).
This list allows the conclusion that assumptions are made when label-
ling people as vulnerable. In some instances the person may not be vul-
nerable, even though they have one of the above characteristics.
Another way of exploring vulnerability is by concentrating on the
interaction between an individual’s characteristics and their environment
(Luna and Vanderpoel, 2013). Vulnerability is therefore context-
dependent. This way, researchers can explore layers of vulnerability, which
will help to fully safeguard their participants. According to Millum et al.
(2019, P. 4)
Intrusive threats: These are concern areas that are private, stressful and
sacred. An example is topics related to sexual practices. Bereavement-
related research can also be sensitive because of its association with emo-
tion; it is a highly emotionally charged topic. This subject could upset
people and make researchers feel uncomfortable. According to Lee (1993)
research into such areas may be threatening to those studied because of the
levels of stress which it may induce. An additional problem here, which
also affects research into the private sphere, has to do with maintaining and
appropriate demeanour in face-to-face contact with the researcher. (P. 6)
tions by corrupt individuals pose risks and entails risks and threats to
researchers conducting their legitimate research. Furthermore
a) where research intrudes into the private sphere or delves into some
deeply personal experience;
b) where the study is concerned with deviance and social control;
c) where is impinges on the vested interests of powerful persons or the
exercise of coercion or domination; and
d) where it deals with things sacred to those being studied which they do
not wish profaned. (P. 513)
• Outcomes
• Accountability
• Inclusiveness
policy rather than practice driven initiatives which has arguably compro-
mised its significance and impact.
sensitive research addresses some of society’s most pressing social issues and
policy questions. Although ignoring the ethical issues in sensitive research
is not a responsible approach to science, shying away from controversial
topics, simply because they are controversial, is also an avoidance of
responsibility.
1 Sensitive Social Work Research 13
Research Process
A research process enables the systematic conduct of studies. Figure 1.2
illustrates a prototypical research process. It has six distinct stages.
Meticulous consideration must be given to a number of issues and
challenges, and decisions about how to proceed at each stage must be
thought through and made. Although the research process looks lin-
ear, the researcher will most likely move forward and backward between
stages when undertaking their research. The process is thus not always
as orderly as presented in Fig. 1.2; it can become messy, in particular
as regards sensitive research, where the researcher must constantly go
back and forth to ensure the quality of research. For example, while
designing the data collection stage, researchers may wish to tweak
research problems.
Write the
Research
Analyse and Report
Interpret
Collect Data data
Research
Design
Literature
Review
Research
Problem
The desired research topic must firstly be chosen, a choice based on con-
siderations of practicability and value. Once the subject has been identified,
the researcher can concentrate on developing their research question(s).
The nine chapters of this book will enable the researcher to understand
every stage of the research process and equip them with the tools and
techniques they need to undertake their sensitive social work research.
Key Summary
Sensitive social work research is more than just collecting and analysing
data about a sensitive topic from vulnerable people; it is about making
positive differences in vulnerable people’s lives. In the process of doing so,
it includes them in the research process. Furthermore, human rights and
empowering values should be part of every aspect of the research process.
The research processes and the outcomes of sensitive social work research
should both be emancipatory and transformative in nature.
Sensitive research should not only contribute to theory but also
improve the practice of social work.
1 Sensitive Social Work Research 17
Key Terms
Sensitive research
Sensitive social work research
Research topic
Taboo topics
Hidden population
Hard-to-reach
Research participants
Research threats
Vulnerabilities
18 S. Haider
Stigma
Economic life
Intrusive threat
Threat of sanction
Political threat
Research outcomes
Research accountability
Research inclusiveness
References
Barnard, M. (2005). Discomforting research: Colliding moralities and looking
for ‘truth’ in a study of parental drug problem. Sociology Health and Illness,
27(1), 1–19.
Bilotta, N. (2020). Anti-oppressive social work research: Prioritising refuges
voices in Kakuma Refugee Camp. Ethics and Social Welfare, 14(4), 397–414.
Boldt, J. (2019). The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy.
Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine, 14, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s13010-019-0075-6
Bracken-Roche, D., Bell, E., Macdonald, M. E., & Racine, E. (2017). The
concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies
and guidelines. Health Research Policy Systems, 15, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12961-016-0164-6
Butler, I. (2002). A code of ethics for social work and social care research. British
Journal of Social Work, 32, 239–248.
Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of
Sociology, 28, 21–38.
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Undertaking sensi-
tive research in the health and social sciences: Managing boundaries, emotions
and risks. Cambridge University Press.
Dominelli, L. (2005). Social work research: Contested knowledge for practice.
In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work futures, crossing
boundaries, transforming practice. Macmillan.
Donnelly, S., Raghallaigh, M. N., & Foreman, M. (2019). Reflection on the use
of community based participatory research to affect social and political
change: Examples from research with refugees and older people in Ireland.
European Journal of Social Work, 22(5), 831–844.
1 Sensitive Social Work Research 19
Suggested Reading
Paradigm
The word paradigm originated in the late fifteenth century via late Latin
from the Greek paradeigma, from paradeiknunai, ‘to show side by side’,
with the elements para- (‘beside’) and deiknunai (‘to show.’) Kuhn (1970)
in his influential book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, based on his
work on the philosophy of science, defined paradigm as
paradigms or worldviews are neither right nor wrong; one way of seeing is
another way of not seeing. However, paradigms are powerful ways of look-
ing at that reality, and they are windows giving us information about the
social world and often frame the particular questions we seek to answer.
Brown and Duenas (2020) suggest that the paradigm of a piece of work
is constructed from a few building blocks, the first four being:
• Axiology
• Ontology
• Epistemology
• Methodology
Fig. 2.1 The first set of building blocks forming a piece of work’s research paradigm
Axiology
This refers to the study of values and value judgements. It has two
components:
Ontology
The origin of this term can be traced back to the eighteenth century, from
the Latin ontologia, in turn from the Greek ōn, ont (‘being’) and λογία
(logia), meaning ‘the study of a certain subject’.
Ontology seeks to answer the ‘what’ question of the nature and form
of reality (Corbetta, 2011), whether the investigated reality is indeed real
and exists objectively and independently of human interpretation—that
is, outside the human mind. That is a singular truth is out in the world
for researchers to explore.
Epistemology
This term dates to the mid-nineteenth century, being derived from the
Greek epistēmē (‘knowledge’), in turn from epistasthai (‘know, know how
to do’). Insofar as it concerns social work research focuses on the
2 The Philosophy of Sensitive Social Work Research 25
Ontological Epistemological
questions questions
can affect what and how they decide to study (Grix, 2002). The aim of
this diagram is to demonstrate the logical relationships between key con-
cepts in research. Methods should be viewed as free from ontological and
epistemological assumptions, and the choice of research method should
be guided by research question(s) (Grix, 2002).
This diagram also constitutes a warning to researchers to refrain from
‘method-led’ research that uses familiar methods prior to working out the
methodology, epistemology and ontology. Instead it encourages ‘question-
led’ research in which research questions indicate the appropriate research
method(s). Grix (2002) maintains that choosing the research method
first (i.e. ‘method-led-research’) undermines the interconnectedness of
the five key components of research, and argues that a research study
should be judged the way its constituent components logically cohere.
Positivism
There are two versions of positivism. The one initially developed in the
nineteenth century is now not used even by those who fully subscribe to
the core principles of positivism. In the twentieth century a new version
of positivism developed in order to minimise some of the weaknesses of
the previous version. The principles of positivism indicate that the social
world can be understood and explained through observation, measure-
ment, mathematical methods and models and statistical analysis. These
generate hypotheses based on what is known about the subject of the
research, and try to test those hypotheses using samples of the popula-
tion. Explore Box 2.1 for an example of a research study based on
positivism.
Although positivism enables the natural sciences such as physics and
chemistry to advance our knowledge and understanding, a particular
criticism doubts that it can answer all questions. Its ability to predict,
control variables, measure precisely, exist independently and replicate
research is also disputed (Bryman, 2016). Its research outputs have been
scrutinised, and different ways of seeing the uncertain, unpredictable,
complex and volatile social world have been developed. Rather than
believing that absolute truth exists independently, some researchers have
2 The Philosophy of Sensitive Social Work Research 27
started to look for provisional truths for their research outcomes. For
example, Freud’s perceived unconscious mind is constructed by both
internal and external factors and is fluid and dynamic, in that the interac-
tion of internal and external factors shapes that unconscious mind.
Characteristics of Positivism
• Positivism is based on the principle that the world (in the present case,
the social world) exists outside the individual and can be investigated
by borrowing the methods used by the natural sciences.
• The social world can be understood objectively by using scientific
principles of deductive logic (see Box 2.3), logical determinism, ratio-
nality and causality, as well as mathematical and statistical analysis.
• It is inductive, meaning that researchers focus on a specific issue, then
extrapolate these to the general; it aims to generalise findings based on
empirical observation.
• The researcher’s role is to be neutral and objective; they must conduct
their research rationally and logically.
• There is a concern about whether objectivity possible. Grbich (2004)
asks how objective objectivity actually is.
• Statistical analysis and modelling fail to capture the complexity, con-
tingent and context-specific reality of the social world. It is difficult to
understand human beings, their interactions and behaviours.
• In some cases it is of prime importance to observe social interactions
rather than relying solely on questionnaire or structured interview
responses.
• The social world is complex, chaotic, uncertain and volatile, so the
value and influence of rational, ordered, logical and systematic analysis
might be limited.
• Predetermined and mostly closed questions fail to recognise the diverse
responses of respondents that reflect the reality of the social world.
• Some authors (e.g. Bryman, 2016) suggest that the focus on causal
explanations do not always portray the real picture of the social word
under investigation.
28 S. Haider
Interpretivism
Interpretivists reject the idea of using methods intended to understand
the physical sciences. Human behaviour is different from physical objects,
so, what humans do and why they do it cannot be investigated using the
2 The Philosophy of Sensitive Social Work Research 29
the main point about interpretivism is that we are interested in people and
the way that they interrelate – what they think and how they form ideas
about the world; how their worlds are constructed. Given that this is the
case we have to look closely at what people are doing by using our own
selves, our own knowledge of the world as people. We have to immerse
ourselves in the research contexts in which we are interested – for example
talking to people in depth, attending to every nuance of their behaviour,
every clue to the meanings that they are investing in something.
Characteristics of Interpretivism
Constructionism
Constructionism, sometimes labelled as constructivism, asserts that social
phenomena and their meanings are continually being accomplished by
social actors. It implies that social phenomena are not only produced
through social interaction but are in a constant state of revision (Bryman,
2016, P. 29).
This school of thought does not subscribe to the idea that social reality
can be explored through standardised measurement and observation, basi-
cally therefore rejecting the fundamental principle of positivism. They see
that people construct their understandings of themselves and their world
at particular times, occasions, and, for particular purposes, drawing on
many discourses from their contexts. So the idea that knowledge is a
Characteristics of Constructionism
Postmodernism
Grand theories such as Marxism tried to explain social world through
patterns of interrelationship (Agger, 1991). Postmodernists such as
French philosopher Lyotard rejected the idea that grand theories are able
to explain the world because it is complex, chaotic and uncertain. Hence,
postmodernism views the social reality is constructed in a number of
ways depending on individuals and social groups. So, truth is multifac-
eted which is opposite to positivism. Meaning postmodernists refuse to
accept social world is ordered and can be investigated objectively reality.
Instead, they view social world as chaotic and unknowable (Grbich, 2007).
The realities are constructed within a specific social and cultural con-
text (Grbich, 2004). So, meaning cannot be separated from that specific
social and cultural context. Postmodernism perceives multiple realities
and they are not fixed. So, no true reality exists; truth and reality exist
only in the subjective experiences of individuals, their perceptions of
their daily lives and the way they make sense of all these (Fontana, 2002;
Grbich, 2004).
32 S. Haider
Characteristics of Postmodernism
Feminism
The main aim of feminist research is to capture women’s life experiences in
a sensitive manner that should be beneficial to women. It thus focuses on
both the process of conducting research and on its outcome. Feminism
2 The Philosophy of Sensitive Social Work Research 33
Characteristics of Feminism
Elisabetta.
Count.
Not yet!
Elisabetta.
Elisabetta.
[Exit.
Count (sings).
Count.
Filippo.
Lady Giovanna.
I thank you, good Filippo.
[Exit Filippo.
Here’s a fine fowl for my lady; I had scant time to do him in. I
hope he be not underdone, for we be undone in the doing of
him.
Lady Giovanna.
And here are fine fruits for my lady—prunes, my lady, from the
tree that my lord himself planted here in the blossom of his
boyhood—and so I, Filippo, being, with your ladyship’s pardon,
and as your ladyship knows, his lordship’s own foster-brother,
would commend them to your ladyship’s most peculiar
appreciation.
Elisabetta.
Filippo!
Count.
I cannot,
Not a morsel, not one morsel. I have broken
My fast already. I will pledge you. Wine!
Filippo, wine!
Count.
Lady Giovanna.
Elisabetta.
Filippo! will you take the word out of your master’s own
mouth?
Filippo.
Was it there to take? Put it there, my lord.
Count.
Filippo.
Elisabetta.
Filippo!
Count.
A troop of horse——
Filippo.
Five
hundred!
Count.
Say fifty!
Filippo.
Filippo!
Filippo.
Count.
Elisabetta.
Count.
Elisabetta.
Ay, and I left two fingers there for dead. See, my lady!
(Showing his hand).
Lady Giovanna.
I see, Filippo!
Filippo.
Lady Giovanna.
[Smiling absently.
Filippo.
Elisabetta.
Count (rising).
Silence, Elisabetta!
Elisabetta.
Count.
Lady Giovanna.
Filippo.
But the prunes, my lady, from the tree that his lordship——
Lady Giovanna.
Count.
Elisabetta.
Filippo!
Count.
Elisabetta.
Filippo!
Filippo (turning).
[Exit.
Count.
And me too! Ay, the dear nurse will leave you alone; but, for
all that, she that has eaten the yolk is scarce like to swallow the
shell.
Lady Giovanna.
I have anger’d your good nurse; these old-world servants
Are all but flesh and blood with those they serve.
My lord, I have a present to return you,
And afterwards a boon to crave of you.
Count.
Lady Giovanna.
[Offering necklace.
If the phrase
“Return” displease you, we will say—exchange them
For your—for your——
Lady Giovanna.
Lady Giovanna.
No!
For that would seem accepting of your love,
I cannot brave my brother—but be sure
That I shall never marry again, my lord!
Count.
Sure?
Lady Giovanna.
Yes!
Count.
Lady Giovanna.
No!
For he would marry me to the richest man
In Florence; but I think you know the saying—
“Better a man without riches, than riches without a man.”
Count.
And be you
Gracious enough to let me know the boon
By granting which, if aught be mine to grant,
I should be made more happy than I hoped
Ever to be again.
Lady Giovanna.
Count.
Lady Giovanna.
Count.
What? my time?
Is it my time? Well, I can give my time
To him that is a part of you, your son.
Shall I return to the castle with you? Shall I
Sit by him, read to him, tell him my tales,
Sing him my songs? You know that I can touch
The ghittern to some purpose.
Lady Giovanna.
Count.
Lady Giovanna.
Count.
Give me.
Lady Giovanna.
His falcon.
My falcon!
Lady Giovanna.
Count.
Alas, I cannot!
Lady Giovanna.
[Turns.
Count.
No, Madonna!
And he will have to bear with it as he may.
Lady Giovanna.
Count.
Yes, Giovanna,
But he will keep his love to you for ever!
Lady Giovanna.
Count (impetuously).
—crown you
Again with the same crown my Queen of Beauty.
We two together
Will help to heal your son—your son and mine—
We shall do it—we shall do it.
[Embraces her.
Lady Giovanna.
S. D.
POEMS 6 0
MAUD, AND OTHER POEMS 3 6
THE PRINCESS 3 6
IDYLLS OF THE KING (Collected) 6 0
ENOCH ARDEN, etc. 3 6
THE HOLY GRAIL, AND OTHER POEMS 4 6
IN MEMORIAM 4 0
BALLADS, AND OTHER POEMS 5 0
HAROLD: A DRAMA 6 0
QUEEN MARY: A DRAMA 6 0
THE LOVER’S TALE 3 6
MACMILLAN AND CO., LONDON.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CUP; AND
THE FALCON ***