Errol M.

Costales
GED101

MRR3
What is political about political self-deception?

1. What are the three (3) things that you significantly learned from the reading? Please start by
saying ' Before reading the article, I used to think that (insert thought). After reading the article,
I now think that (insert thought)'.

Before reading the article, I used to think that Political Self-Deception was just a personal
deception regarding the political aspect of the article community. After reading the article, I now
think that it concentrates more on the political leader than the broader audience. The argument
made in this article is that political self-deception can be identified by how political morality and
decisions are manifested as well as evaluated.

Before reading the article, I used to think that political judgment had an impact on one's political
aspirations. After reading the article, I now think that Political Judgment offers the solution to
the conundrum of what to do. The first fundamental idea presented in this article is a
generalization of the concept that political judgment considers the conditions and variables that
surround an issue.

Before reading the article, I used to think that in the Political World, leaders are responsible for
being intelligent officers who make decisions for the general public. After reading the article, I
now think that it is understandable to have reasons to doubt the advice of the intelligence
officers and assess the decision-makers choice in order to obtain an understanding of political
self-deception. This is something that I should have thought about before reading the article.

2. What three (3) things about the reading are unclear to you?

 When it comes to politics, there are no institutional penalties or evaluations for political self-
deception.

 From a realist's perspective, institutional constraints are widely understood but rarely, if
ever, implemented or acted upon in the modern era.
  Even though the modern era offers explanations and evaluations of the viewpoints held
by realists and leaders in moral education, politicians continue to be unaffected by these
teachings despite their availability.

3. What three (3) questions that you want to ask about the reading?

 To begin, which tangible and points of view should the general people incorporate into
their political opinions? Since moral education for leaders and realism have pros and
cons, it is important to consider both perspectives.

 The second question is this: where will the road leading to political self-deception arrive
soon? What kind of an effect would it have on the lives of those at the very top?

 And finally, what steps can the general public take to lessen the impact of political self-
deception and poor judgment?