Group 1 - Final Paper

The Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Philippine Globalization
DR. YANGA’S COLLEGES, INC.

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
In fulfilment of the subject requirements in

CBAEco113: Fundamentals of Microeconomic
1st Semester A.Y. 2023-2024
Submitted to
MR. AURELIO C. JUSON, JR.
Submitted by:
CASTRO, ARIELLE ROSE M.
COLCOL, DONNA MAE D.C.
DELA CRUZ, JULIAN PAUL YEOJ M.
DELA CRUZ, SOPHIA MARIE N.
GARCIA, PRINCESS JANEZ C.
PASCUAL, MARK WILLIAM L.
SIPCON, ANGEL GODWILL ANNE C.
TANDIAMA, ROCELLE S.
ZAFRA, ALYSSA CASANDRA D.L.
BSBA 1A – P.A.C.E.D.
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration

2
I. PURPOSE AND RATIONALE
Globalization lays the foundations for enhanced trade, new markets, cross-border
technology, and knowledge transfers. These developments have contributed to substantial
economic growth, employment, and increased productivity worldwide (Takefman, 2023).
Globalization brought opportunities in the Philippine market for trade, increased capital inflows,
and promoted greater labor migration and vigor. It influenced employment, tourism, agriculture,
education, and global trade in the Philippines. Globalization also increases the
interconnectedness and interdependence of countries, economies, cultures, and societies on a
global scale.
According to Westcott (2021), globalization has made advances in transportation which
enabled global mobility. It has allowed people to move quickly and relatively cheaply. In the
Philippines, the ease of travel has motivated Filipino travelers to demand more places to visit and
aspire to work worldwide resulting in enhanced economic growth.
However, in 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a
global health emergency. It has brought about unfavorable effects on all sectors of the Philippine
economy, with the Philippine Statistics Authority’s latest Labor Force Survey reporting that there
are currently 3.5 million unemployed Filipinos, estimating the unemployment rate at 7.4%
(Velasco, n.d.). This pandemic has disrupted global supply chains, affecting the manufacturing
and export sectors in the Philippines. It has disconnected the Philippines from the global world
affecting the overall economy of the country, especially in terms of employment, tourism,
agriculture, education, and global trade. It decreased mobility and economic activity.
3
Because of lockdowns, logistic challenges, and travel restrictions caused by the COVID-
19 pandemic, there were delays in the production and shipment of goods, decreasing economic
activity and impacting businesses and industries dependent on global trade. Among all the
sectors, the tourism industry has been greatly affected by the pandemic. It adversely affected the
tourist industry by lowering the Global Domestic Product and other key macroeconomic and
microeconomic indicators (Kalonda, 2023). This industry alone already increased the
unemployment rate, poverty, food supply, accommodation, and many more. Because of the
COVID-19 pandemic, Simeon (2021) reported that the livelihood of 80% of those in the informal
sector were adversely affected. These workers are the most vulnerable.
Hence, even though globalization has paved the way for Philippine trade and increased
international migration, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a global economic downturn and
repercussions on the Philippine economy. Contraction in global demand, reduced trade, and
decreased economic activities in major economies affected the overall economic performance of
the country. These negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the globalization of the
Philippine economy in terms of employment, tourism, agriculture, and global trends mean that
there is a need for recommendations and actions to solve these problems to maintain and foster
the economic growth of the Philippines.
Certainly, globalization has a beneficial impact on the Philippine economy particularly on
tourism, employment, agriculture, and global trends, but not having enough knowledge and
intervention amid uncertainties like the COVID-19 pandemic might put the Philippine economy at
risk. The researchers would like to know the impact of globalization on the Philippine economy
4
particularly on the aspects of employment, tourism, agriculture, education, and global trends, the
discrepancies caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, how it affects the community, and
recommend economic policies based on it. The pandemic has accelerated shifts in global
dynamics, emphasizing the need for adaptability. Understanding the specific repercussions on
international trade, supply chains, and economic partnerships enables various stakeholders to
craft adaptive policies that foster resilience and recovery. By examining how the pandemic has
affected global trade, agriculture, tourism, education, and employment, the researchers can
contribute to the development of strategies that secure the Philippine economy against future
concussions and these are what motivated them to pursue this study.
II. CONTEXT
Background
The COVID-19 Pandemic had a great impact on the Philippines in its different industries
and sectors especially when it comes with employment, tourism, agriculture, education, and
global trade. The Philippine economy has been greatly impacted by the rise of the pandemic
resulting in uncertain and weak recovery. Having a sufficient understanding of this could enable
everyone to recognize the elements that need to be taken into account when making decisions.
COVID–19 Pandemic is an infectious disease that is caused by the severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), this novel coronavirus (nCoV) was originated
in Wuhan City in China, the World Health Organization declared Public Health Emergency of
International Concern on 30th of January in 2020 and to characterize the outbreak as a pandemic
on 11 March 2020 (Mohan & Vinod, 2020). Conversely, on the 5th of May in 2023, more than
5
three (3) years into the pandemic, the World Health Organization Emergency Committee on
COVID-19 suggested to the Director-General, which has also accepted the suggestion, that the
infectious disease was by now well-established and in progress, and no longer fit the definition of
Public Health Emergency of International Concern or PHEIC. However, this does not mean that
the pandemic is over, but the global emergency it caused is - for now (Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) Pandemic, 2023).
According to Lozano, Bird, and Mendoza (2021), when the pandemic hit the country, it
resulted in a reverse impact with the Philippine economy, wiping out 1.7 million wage and salary
jobs in the 12 months to January 2021 from its growth of an average 4.6% annually and
destructing the already-shrinked total informal employment from then. This large shock to the
economy might put continual lower employment rate even after the economy has started to grow
again.
Nevertheless, in the present, the quality of jobs for Filipinos continues to improve as the
country’s underemployment rate decreased to 10.7 percent in September 2023, the lowest figure
recorded since earliest available starting in April 2005 (Lo, 2023). The most recent
underemployment rate, which stands at 14.8%, is substantially lower than both the pre-pandemic
rate of 15.4% in September 2022 and the 11.7 percent in August 2023.
Before the pandemic, the tourism industry was one of the key contributors to the sustained
growth of the Philippine economy. Over the past decade, the country’s tourism direct gross value
added in current prices grew by almost five-fold. However, the sudden hiatus in the demand for
travel and tourism-related activities because of the imposed strict quarantine measures caused
by the pandemic resulted in severe loss of revenues and surge in unemployment across all
6
tourism enterprises. Based on the economic newsletter by Caynila, Luna, and Milla (2022), the
tight lockdown in the Philippines called Enhanced Community Quarantine or ECQ resulted in a
sharp decline in domestic demand and production, international trade, and high unemployment.
The country’s tourism sector felt the negative impact of the pandemic much earlier in 2020, as
countries started to impose travel restrictions and measures as early as January 2020. Both the
country’s international tourist arrivals and tourism receipts fell by about 80 percent in 2020 and
by about 90 percent in 2021.
Now, the tourism sector in the Philippines is gradually regaining its footing and is seen
with a promising potential for further development and growth. A recent data from the Department
of Tourism (DOT) reveals that the Philippines recorded over four million international arrivals in
the first nine months of this year. DOT said that this positive development positions the country
well on track to meet and even exceed its full-year target of 4.8 million foreign arrivals, especially
with the upcoming holiday season. The sector has already contributed P344 billion in revenues
to the economy, underlining its significant contribution to the national output (Zaldarriaga, 2023).
Even before the pandemic, the Philippines had among the world’s largest education gaps,
with more than 90 percent of students unable to read and comprehend simple texts by age 10,
according to the World Bank. Hence, education is also one of the sector that is greatly affected
by the COVID-19 pandemic. Students, schools, colleges, and universities have been deeply
affected. Philippines is one of the countries has ordered nationwide school closure to contain the
covid-19 pandemic and reduce the number of infected in the country. Students did no’t have
formal classes from March 2020 to October 2020 and did not have face-face class for almost 2
years in the Philippines (ABConservation, 2022). Students from public schools were enrolled
under the modular learning system of where students will be provided with the sets of self-learning
7
materials that distributed to parents and guardians of the student while universities and some
private schools practiced blended learning system through online classes.
Luckily, in August 2022, schools in the Philippines like Pedro Guevara Elementary School
in Manila, which had shut classrooms since March 2020, has adopted a hybrid system of in-
person and remote learning as it transitions its nearly 6,000 students back to face-to-face classes
(Agence France-Presse, 2022). Now, despite of the struggles it has faced and still facing, the
Philippine Education, through the government, is exploring ways to improve the quality of
education and the state of the learning environment for the Filipino students.
Aside from these, when the pandemic hit the globe, especially the Philippines, it has
highlighted the urgent need to redefine agricultural systems as food systems, the connection
between supply chains and consumption patterns, as well as the role of the government in
cultivating stakeholders. According to the Department of Agriculture (2022), the Covid-19
pandemic decreased the volume of agricultural production by 3.11 percent or 17.03 million tons
because of a decline in agricultural farm labor affecting about 100.77 million people. Because of
this, innovation is crucial for efficient production and to increase productivity.
Then, after two years of contraction due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the agriculture
industry in the Philippines finally showed signs of recovery in 2022, although it remains to reflect
a slower growth in comparison to the pre-pandemic periods. Preliminary figures for 2022 reported
about a quarter of employed Filipinos work in the agricultural sector which is made up of four sub-
sectors: farming, fisheries, livestock, and forestry. In the same year, the sector generated a gross
8
value added (GVA) of about 1.78 trillion Philippine pesos, equivalent to about 8.9 percent of the
gross domestic product of the country (Statista, 2023).
Lastly, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the globalization of the Philippines in terms
of international trade. In consonance with Arenas, et. al. (2022), a new world banking paper
showed that domestic lockdown measures did not significantly affect international trade but
external lockdowns affected both imports and exports. In a study about the impacts of lockdown
policies on International trade in the Philippines, using a monthly series of product-by-country
data for the period from January 2019 to December 2020 and an event-study design, it showed
that introduction of lockdown measures by trading partners led to a 7% and 57% monthly average
drop in export and import values respectively. This was largely influenced by the fall in trade at
the extensive number of products or margin.
The Philippines' economy recovered well from the pandemic, but it has subsequently had
to deal with a number of major international shocks. Growth fell from 7.6 percent in 2022 to 4.3
percent in the second quarter of 2023, mostly as a result of tighter policies and a collapsing global
economy. Growth is expected to pick up steam by year's end, reaching 6.0 percent in 2024 after
bottoming out at the end of the second quarter. This will be aided by an increase in public
spending and better foreign demand for Philippine exports (IMF Staff Completes 2023 Article IV
Mission to the Philippines, 2023).
In this study, the researchers provide information about the economic impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on the globalization of the Philippine economy in terms of employment,
tourism, education, agriculture, and global trade. Despite the improvement and recovery of the
economy after the pandemic, it is necessary for policymakers and other stakeholders to be aware
9
of the gaps and problems the country experienced amidst the pandemic to create solutions for
future occurrences.
Key Statistics
Unemployment Rate
According to the Labor Force Survey, in 2019, the Philippines recorded an unemployment
rate of 5.1%, marking a modest 0.2% decrease from the preceding year. However, the onset of
the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 led to a sharp rise in unemployment, with the rate climbing to
10.3%, representing a significant 5.2% increase from 2019 as presented in “Table 1”. This surge
in unemployment reflected the widespread economic disruptions caused by the pandemic,
including lockdowns, business closures, and disruptions to global trade.
Table 1. Key Labor and Employment Indicators
Labor Force
Employment Underemployment Unemployment
Participation
Philippines Rate Rate Rate
Rate
(%) (%) (%)
(%)
2019 61.3 94.9 13.8 5.1
2020 59.5 89.7 16.2 10.3
2021 63.3 92.2 15.9 7.8
2022 64.7 94.6 14.2 5.4
2023 64.7 95.4 12.5 4.6
Note: The data is from “Labor Force Survey” by Philippine Statistics Authority, Republic of the
Philippines. (2023, December 7). https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/labor-force-survey

10
Encouragingly, as showed in “Table 1” as well, 2021 saw a positive turn of events, with
the unemployment rate decreasing to 7.8%, a 2.5% improvement from the previous year. This
reduction could be attributed to the gradual economic recovery and the implementation of
measures to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on businesses and employment. The year 2022
witnessed a further decline in the unemployment rate, reaching 5.4%, indicating a 2.4% decrease
from 2021. This decline aligns with the global trend of recovery as countries adapted to the
challenges posed by the pandemic and worked towards restoring economic stability. As we look
ahead to 2023, there is a cautiously optimistic estimate of the unemployment rate dropping to
4.6%. This projection suggests a continued recovery and stabilization of the Philippine job market,
signifying resilience and adaptability in the face of global challenges (Labor Force Survey |
Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines, 2023).
Changes in the unemployment rate have a direct connection to the Philippine economy's
globalization. Because of the global interconnectedness of economies, global events such as the
COVID-19 pandemic have an impact on local labor markets. The initial increase in unemployment
in 2020 mirrored problems in global trade and supply chains, highlighting the Philippines'
vulnerability to external shocks.
Inflation Rate
Inflation, as influenced by the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic, serves as a
barometer for the economic challenges faced by the Philippines on the global stage. The trends
observed underscore the need for strategic economic policies and measures that balance the
forces of globalization with the imperative of maintaining stability and resilience in the face of
uncertainty. As the nation progresses, fostering a nuanced approach to economic dynamics will
11
be pivotal in navigating the complexities of a rapidly evolving global landscape (Philippines 1963-
2023, n.d).
Table 2. Year-on-Year Inflation Rates in the Philippines
Year
Month
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
January 3.4 4.4 3 3.7 3 8.7
February 3.7 3.8 2.5 4.2 3 8.6
March 4.3 3.4 2.2 4.1 4/0 7.6
April 4.3 3.2 1.8 4.1 4.9 6.6
May 4.6 3.2 1.6 4.1 5.4 6.1
June 5 2.7 2.3 3.7 6.1 5.4
July 5.8 2.2 2.4 3.7 6.4 4.7
August 6.6 1.4 2.2 4.4 6.3 5.3
September 6.9 0.5 2.2 4.2 6.9 6.1
October 6.9 0.6 2.3 4 7.7 4.9
November 6.1 1.2 3 3.7 8 4.1
December 5.2 2.4 3.3 3.1 8.1
Average 5.2 2.4 2.4 3.9 5.8 6.2
Note: The data is from Philippine Statistics Authority, Retail Price Survey of Commodities for the
Generation of Consumer Price Index. Republic of the Philippines. (2023, November 7).
https://psa.gov.ph/content/summary-inflation-report-consumer-price-index-2018100-october
2023
As shown in the “Table 2”, the year 2019 presented a favorable economic landscape,
marked by an inflation rate of 2.4%, reflecting a notable 2.8% decline from the preceding year.
12
The Philippine economy maintained stability in 2020, with the inflation rate holding steady at 2.4%,
showcasing resilience despite the global challenges posed by the pandemic. However, as the
world grappled with the ongoing effects of COVID-19, 2021 witnessed a shift, with the inflation
rate rising to 3.9%. This represented a 1.5% increase from the previous year, signaling the
beginning of inflationary pressures linked to the pandemic's impact on supply chains and global
economic dynamics. The year 2022 recorded a further increase in the inflation rate, reaching
5.8%. This 1.9% uptick from 2021 highlighted the persistent challenges posed by the global
landscape and the need for economic adaptability in the face of evolving circumstances. Looking
ahead to 2023, there is an estimated inflation rate of 6.2%. This projection suggests a continuation
of inflationary pressures, underlining the ongoing challenges posed by the lingering effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic on the global and Philippine economy.
Demographics
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced the globalization of the Philippine
economy, particularly in the realm of demographics. The impacts are diverse, affecting migration
patterns, labor dynamics, and the use of digital technologies and skills.
Migration Patterns
The pandemic has altered the traditional migration patterns of Filipinos, both within the
country and abroad. The enforced lockdowns, travel restrictions, and economic uncertainties
prompted many Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) to return home. According to data from the
Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), Around April to September 2020, approximately 1.77 million
Filipinos were working in other countries. Most of them, about 1.71 million, had contracts for their
jobs, about 96.4% of all those working abroad during that time.
13
Figure 1. Number of Overseas Filipino Workers and Overseas Contract Workers
in 2019 and 2020
Note: Reference period is April to September 2019 and April to September 2020
Estimates were based on the 2015-based Population Projections. Reprinted from
Philippine Statistics Authority, 2019 and 2020. Survey on Overseas Filipino.
https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/iesd/202212/2020
The number of Filipino workers overseas decreased by about 18.6% from 2019 to 2020,
which is like 405.62 thousand fewer workers. Just before the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, there
were 2.18 million OFWs. Out of these, 2.11 million had work contracts, and around 69 thousand
were other Filipino workers with the right visas and permits (2020 Overseas Filipino Workers
(Final Results) | Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines, 2022).
Figure 2. Number of Overseas Filipino Workers and Overseas Contract Workers
in 2021 and 2022

14
Note: The estimates cover overseas Filipinos whose departure occurred within the last five (5) years and
who are working or had worked abroad during the past six months (April to September) of the survey
period. Reprinted from Philippine Statistics Authority, 2021 and 2022. Survey on Overseas Filipino.
https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/survey/labor-and-employment/survey-overseas-filipinos
Now, fast forward to April to September 2022, and the number of OFWs increased to 1.96
million. That's 7.6% more than the 1.83 million OFWs during the same months in 2021 (Survey
on Overseas Filipinos | Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines, 2023). Out of
all these workers, 1.94 million had work contracts. So, it seems like more Filipinos are now getting
opportunities to work abroad.
Labor Dynamics and Digital Transformation
According to Secretary Bonoan (2023). the COVID-19 pandemic was an eye-opener as
we realized the significance and benefits of harnessing digital technology to continue business
operations without disrupting important government services that the general public depends on
(Press Releases, 2023).

15
The global economic slowdown made the Philippines think hard about how people do their
jobs. It messed with how jobs and businesses connect. Because everyone started working from
home and using more tech stuff, businesses had to switch things up. Even big shots like the
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) industry in the Philippines had to start doing remote work.
This shook up the usual way people did their jobs in offices.
Around the same time, due to the pandemic, people started using technology more.
Businesses began doing more things on the internet, like selling stuff and talking to each other.
This meant everyone had to get better at using digital tools, and suddenly, there was a big need
for these skills. Jobs started asking for more tech smarts too.
Skills
The pandemic highlighted the importance of learning new skills in times of economic
uncertainties. The Philippine government launched programs to enhance the skills of the
workforce, aligning them with the demands of a changing global economy. It's about getting the
right skills to do our jobs well in this big, ever-changing world.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
In 2019, the Philippine GDP stood at $376.82 billion, showcasing an impressive 8.64%
increase from the previous year. This upward trajectory was a testament to the country's
economic vigor. However, the onset of the pandemic in 2020 brought about a challenging
scenario, resulting in a 4% decline in GDP to $361.75 billion. Despite the setbacks in 2020, the
Philippine economy exhibited resilience. In 2021, the GDP rebounded with a remarkable 8.94%
increase, reaching $394.09 billion. This recovery, driven by strategic interventions and
16
adaptability, showcased the nation's ability to navigate adversity. The momentum continued into
2022, with a 2.59% increase in GDP, reaching $404.28 billion. This growth signaled a sustained
recovery, bolstered by efforts to adapt to the 'new normal.' Looking ahead, a positive outlook is
anticipated, with an expected GDP of $427.73 billion by the end of 2023.
Figure 3. Gross Domestic Product from 2014 to 2022
Note: From World Bank, by Trading Economics (n.d). https://tradingeconomics.com/philippines/gdp
The unprecedented disruptions caused by the pandemic, including lockdowns and supply
chain disruptions, significantly impacted the global economy. The Philippines was not immune to
these challenges, and the 2020 GDP contraction mirrored the global economic downturn.
Gross National Product (GNP)
Figure 4. Gross National Product from 2014 to 2023

17
Note: From CEIC Data (1981-2023). https://tradingeconomics.com/philippines/gdp
The year 2019 saw the Philippines flourishing with a GNP of $416.22 billion, marking a
heartening 5.3% increase from the previous year. This robust growth reflected the nation's
increasing prosperity. However, the onset of the pandemic in 2020 introduced unforeseen
challenges, resulting in a significant dip to $375.81 billion with a 9.71% decline echoing the global
economic downturn. The resilience of the Filipino spirit shone through in 2021, with a 7.55%
increase in GNP, reaching $404.20 billion. This rebound was a testament to the collective
determination to overcome adversity and rebuild lives and communities. The year 2022 witnessed
a remarkable recovery, with a 13.07% increase in GNP, reaching $457.02 billion. This resurgence
reflected the nation's adaptability, innovation, and collaborative efforts to reposition itself in the
global landscape. As of September 2023, the GNP stands at $116.257 billion, signaling a
continued trajectory of recovery. The ongoing efforts of individuals, communities, and the nation
as a whole contribute to this ongoing narrative of resilience and renewal.
Public Healthcare System

18
One of the most immediate and tangible effects of the pandemic has been the strain on
the Philippine healthcare system. The surge in COVID-19 cases necessitated a rapid and
comprehensive response, exposing both strengths and weaknesses in the existing infrastructure.
According to the Department of Health (DOH) Philippines in 2020, the pandemic led to an
increased demand for healthcare services, testing the resilience of public hospitals and healthcare
facilities across the nation.
The interconnectedness of the global community became glaringly evident as the
Philippines sought assistance and cooperation from international organizations and partners. The
World Health Organization (WHO) played a crucial role in providing technical support, expertise,
and access to vital resources. This collaborative effort highlighted the importance of global
solidarity in addressing public health crises.
Moreover, the pandemic acted as a catalyst for advancements in telemedicine and digital
health solutions in the Philippines. The government, in collaboration with private entities, worked
towards enhancing the accessibility of healthcare services through virtual platforms. This shift
towards digital healthcare not only addressed immediate challenges posed by the pandemic but
also paved the way for a more inclusive and technologically-driven healthcare system (Others,
2022).
In terms of policy changes, the Philippine government implemented measures to
strengthen the public health system's capacity and resilience. Increased budget allocations for
health, as reflected in the national budget, signaled a commitment to fortify the country's
healthcare infrastructure. The integration of lessons learned from the pandemic into future
19
healthcare policies underscored the need for adaptive governance in the face of global health
threats (Management, n.d.).
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the globalization of the Philippine economy in
the realm of public healthcare has been profound and multifaceted. It has prompted a
reassessment of healthcare infrastructure, global collaborations, digital solutions, and policy
frameworks. As the Philippines navigates the ongoing challenges posed by the pandemic, the
lessons learned and the collaborative efforts undertaken will undoubtedly shape the future of the
nation's public healthcare system.
Budget
The COVID-19 pandemic has left an indelible mark on the globalization of the Philippine
economy, particularly when examining its impact on the national budget. At the outset of the
pandemic, the Philippine government faced the daunting task of addressing both the immediate
health crisis and its economic ramifications. The need for extensive healthcare measures, social
assistance programs, and economic stimulus packages compelled the government to reassess
its budgetary allocations.
According to data from the Department of Budget and Management (n.d.), there was a
notable shift in spending priorities to accommodate the exigencies brought about by the
pandemic. The DBM has released a total of P64.169 billion since 2021 to cover the payment of
COVID-19 allowances and the compensation of eligible healthcare and non-healthcare workers.
This amount is estimated to cover a total of P4,359,140 health emergency allowances and
compensation claims (DBM: Almost P20-billion Allocated for Healthcare Workers’ Allowances,
COVID-19 Compensation in 2024; P64.17-billion for Claims Released Since 2021, n.d.).
20
The pandemic-induced economic slowdown had a tangible impact on government
revenues, with decreased economic activity leading to reduced tax collections. This compelled
the government to adopt innovative strategies to generate funds. The issuance of bonds and
securing financial assistance from international organizations became crucial components of the
government's fiscal toolkit. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) played a pivotal role in providing
financial support to help the Philippines weather the economic storm.
The human dimension of the budgetary adjustments is most evident in the implementation
of social assistance programs aimed at mitigating the impact of the pandemic on vulnerable
populations. The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) spearheaded
initiatives such as the Social Amelioration Program (SAP), which provided financial aid to affected
families. This not only demonstrated a commitment to social equity but also highlighted the
interconnectedness of economic policies and the well-being of Filipino citizens.
The education sector also witnessed budgetary shifts, reflecting the challenges posed by
the pandemic. The Department of Education (DepEd) had to adapt its budget to support distance
learning initiatives, invest in technology, and provide support to teachers and students. The
education budget became a critical tool in ensuring continuity in learning amid the disruptions
caused by the pandemic.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the globalization of the Philippine economy, as
seen through the lens of the national budget, is a narrative of adaptability, innovation, and a
commitment to human welfare. The budgetary response to the pandemic underscored the
importance of adaptability and resilience in the face of unprecedented challenges.

21
Infrastructure
One of the immediate effects of the pandemic on the Philippines' infrastructure was the
disruption of ongoing projects due to lockdowns and restrictions. Construction activities, a vital
component of the nation's infrastructure development, faced setbacks, leading to delays and cost
overruns. The National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) reported a decline in
infrastructure spending in 2020, reflecting the hurdles encountered by the construction sector.
The human face of these disruptions was felt keenly by the labor force engaged in
construction. Workers faced uncertainties as projects were put on hold, leading to financial strains
for many families. The construction sector, which had been a significant source of employment,
witnessed a decline in job opportunities. The impact on the livelihoods of these workers
underscored the interconnectedness between infrastructure development and the well-being of
individuals and communities.
As the pandemic unfolded, the resilience of the Philippines' infrastructure was put to the
test. The Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) played a pivotal role in adapting to
the challenges. Embracing a "new normal," the department intensified efforts to incorporate
technology into infrastructure projects. The use of digital tools and virtual collaboration became
essential in ensuring the continuity of planning and implementation. In April 2023, the DPWH
signed an MOU with the DICT to ensure faster, more streamlined, and convenient service delivery
to its stakeholders nationwide.
Furthermore, the pandemic prompted a reevaluation of infrastructure priorities, with a
heightened focus on digital infrastructure. The DICT created the National Broadband Plan (NBP)
22
intending to accelerate the deployment of fiber optic cables and wireless technologies throughout
the country, particularly in outlying or remote areas, in order to improve the country's overall
internet speed (Department of Information and Communications Technology, 2017).
In the global context, the pandemic emphasized the need for resilient and interconnected
infrastructure. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) provided support to the Philippines,
acknowledging the importance of infrastructure investments in economic recovery. This
collaboration highlighted the interconnectedness of global financial institutions and the
Philippines' efforts to strengthen its infrastructure backbone.
Global Economic Prospect
According to information found in the book "Southeast Asia: Rising from the Pandemic,"
2020 witnessed a severe contraction in Southeast Asia due to border restrictions and lockdowns
imposed to curb the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Some economies in the
region suffered more severe damage than others. However, Southeast Asia is only now, two
years after the pandemic began, starting to recover slowly. The pace of recovery, however,
remains uneven and is susceptible to changes in the pandemic's trajectory. In addition to
providing a closer look at a few key drivers of economic growth for Cambodia, Indonesia, the Lao
People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and
Viet Nam, this research also outlines recovery possibilities and long-term challenges for the area.
These growth drivers include bolstering existing ones and encouraging the development of new
ones, especially those that help diversify growth sources for nations heavily reliant on natural
resources. The report's policy suggestions aim to assist governments in implementing their post-
COVID-19 recovery strategies and ensuring robust, equitable growth for everyone.
23
The tourism industry plays a crucial role in output growth and job creation in the area.
However, the recovery of the tourism sector from the COVID-19 pandemic depends on the extent
of disruption caused. Due to travel restrictions and social distancing measures, the current state
of tourism-related goods and services, such as lodging and entertainment, is unlikely to improve.
In July to September 2021, foreign visitor numbers increased by 58% compared to the same
period in 2020, but it remained 64% lower than the levels in 2019. Domestic travel and summer
travelers from the northern region contributed to this improvement. However, travel to Asia and
the Pacific remained 95% below 2019 levels due to restrictions on unnecessary travel. This will
continue to negatively impact economic growth expectations in Southeast Asia, particularly in
countries like Thailand and Cambodia, which heavily rely on foreign travel.
Additionally, according to the same book, policymakers should consider more expansive
and extensive structural changes to increase productivity in the area. Currently, a reform
movement is gaining momentum in the region, aiming to improve and be more environmentally
friendly. Much of Southeast Asia harbors a sincere desire to enhance the health of the country's
mechanisms, simplify national laws to encourage competition, make wise investments in hygienic
infrastructure to promote development, and embrace innovation and technology to foster a
sustainable economy. In light of these objectives, implementing top priority reforms can contribute
to a stronger and more resilient financial and social structure in the area: (i) Promoting the health
and well-being of people in the region. (ii) Accelerating market reopening, creating jobs, and
supporting MSMEs. (iii) Building competitiveness and human capital. (iv) Governments in the
region need to lead efforts to take care of our planet.
Indonesia: Boosting Post-Pandemic Productivity Prospects

24
There is a chance that the COVID-19 epidemic will leave economies with long-term
damage. Although forecasting these consequences is difficult, preliminary data suggest that
scarring is not expected to be significant in Indonesia. The economy experienced a slight
downturn, but it recovered quickly. There's a fair likelihood that some of the advances in labor
productivity can be maintained. Indonesia is implementing changes to increase productivity and
investment. However, a great deal of uncertainty still exists, and in 2022, the likelihood of negative
outcomes has grown. Continued macroeconomic policy flexibility will be necessary to maintain
the recovery, including social safety nets and stimulus plans if necessary. To mitigate the risk of
damage and foster sustainable development, structural adjustments are essential to boost public
infrastructure, employment opportunities, education and training, and private capital (Southeast
Asia Rising From the Pandemic, 2023).
Cambodia: Identifying Drivers for a Stronger Recovery
The government of Cambodia has been able to relax restrictions and reopen its borders
due to the country's exceptional vaccination record, which considerably outperforms that of other
nations with comparable populations and income levels. Acting from a strong position, Cambodia
has effectively contained the pandemic and reported comparatively few deaths. Despite this
encouraging outcome, the pandemic has severely damaged Cambodia's economy. The travel
and hospitality industry has collapsed, the building and textile industry have survived significant
shocks, while the real estate sector has significantly slowed. Fortunately, there have also been
some positive aspects, such as a sharp rise in exports of goods other than clothing and a
significant increase in exports of agricultural products. Maintaining these patterns will assist the
government in realizing its goal of a more diverse and resilient economy.

25
Thailand: Recharging the Future of Tourism
Thailand's exports of goods and investments in export-oriented industries have returned
to pre-pandemic levels, but the services sector—particularly tourism, which accounted for over a
fifth of the nation's GDP and employment before the pandemic—is likely to recover more slowly.
However, the government views the pandemic as an opportunity to restructure the travel and
tourist sector, shifting from low-density, mass tourism to high-value, low-density tourism. This
strategic shift aims to improve economic resilience and align development strategies with climate
goals. The government is also making significant efforts to boost local travel, especially given the
expected gradual recovery of foreign travel. The utilization of digital platforms as a vital tool to
revitalize the tourism sector and infrastructure investments to modernize national transportation
links are two more areas undergoing significant transformation.
Vietnam: Leveraging Digital Transformation to Power Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery
A fourth wave of COVID-19 infections has severely impacted Vietnam's economy,
resulting in a steep decline in investments, consumption, and industrial production, with an even
worse impact on people's lives and enterprises. Consequently, Vietnam's GDP grew by a mere
2.6% in 2021. Nevertheless, the economy is anticipated to return to its pre-pandemic growth rate
of 6.5% to 7.0% in 2022 and beyond due to the rapid digitization of the economy, persistent global
economic recovery, and other important growth-promoting factors.
In the recent five years, the nation has made significant strides in establishing a digital
economy, evident in advancements in cybersecurity, digital platforms, the information and
communication technology (ICT) industry, digital infrastructure, and the legal framework. A young
26
and tech-savvy population, along with a surge in smartphone usage and increased reliance on
digital payments during the pandemic, has collectively propelled noteworthy progress in digital
finance. Banks, securities, and insurance, the three financial sub-sectors, have all achieved
success in embracing new digital technologies within the past five years. Viet Nam's digital finance
sector is poised for unprecedented growth in 2021–2025 and beyond, driven by its focus on
promoting non-cash payments, financial inclusion, and green finance. This growth is attributed to
the government's strong commitment to the sector and the implementation of policies, incentives,
and regulations for startups and emerging financial services, including a "sandbox regime" for
testing new products (Southeast Asia Rising From the Pandemic, 2023).
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, or the Keynesian Theory was
written by economist John Maynard Keynes in 1936. This theory states that employment revolves
around the idea that the level of employment in an economy is primarily influenced by the level of
aggregate demand. Keynesian theory declares that fluctuations in aggregate demand significantly
influence employment levels. It avers that managing and stabilizing aggregate demand through
government policies is crucial to preventing involuntary unemployment and maintaining a healthy
level of employment in the economy.
This Keynesian Theory supports the study of discovering the economic impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on Philippine Globalization in terms of employment because the pandemic
has caused a significant global demand shock, disrupting international trade and leading to
reduced demand for Philippine exports. This decline in aggregate demand resulted in increased
27
unemployment as businesses cut production and lay off workers. The theory highlights the
concept of involuntary unemployment, suggesting that individuals may lose their jobs not by
choice but due to economic circumstances. The pandemic-induced economic downturn has likely
resulted in involuntary unemployment for many individuals in various sectors.
Production Theory
According to the Production Theory, disruptions in the availability of crucial resources like
labor, supply chains, and capital can have profound effects on the agricultural production process.
This theory draws on concepts from different economic perspectives. Economists in the
neoclassical tradition, such as Alfred Marshall and later economists, emphasize the importance
of resource allocation and efficiency in production (Colman & Young, 1989).
The Production Theory states that disruptions in crucial resources can impact productivity
and output. This theory is applicable in assessing the impact of supply chain disruptions on
agricultural activities, considering interruptions in the flow of inputs and outputs. It supports this
study as the pandemic-induced constraints may have led to shifts in production functions, altering
the mix of crops, cultivation practices, and technology adoption. The Law of Diminishing Marginal
Returns is particularly relevant, suggesting that increased use of certain inputs may not have
resulted in proportional output increases due to pandemic-induced limitations.
Heckscher-Ohlin Model
The Heckscher-Ohlin Model is an economic theory that proposes that countries export
when they can most efficiently and plentifully produce. It explains how a nation should operate
and trade when resources are imbalanced throughout the world. This theory was written by Eli
Heckscher, Bertil Ohlin, and Paul Samuelson who expanded this model. The model emphasizes
28
the benefits of global trade and benefits to everyone when each country puts the most effort into
exporting resources that are locally and naturally abundant (Kopp, 2022).
The theory is rooted in the concept of comparative advantage suggesting that countries
should play to their strengths and specialize in producing goods where they have a relative
abundance of factors of production. This supports this study particularly in the impact of the
pandemic in terms of global trade because the COVID-19 pandemic affected industries, causing
changes to resource availability and production efficiency. Countries engage in global trade based
on their comparative advantage, and this model suggests that disruptions caused by the
pandemic may have influenced the types of goods that the Philippines can efficiently export,
affecting global trade. Because of disruptions, there may be changes in production patterns
leading to changes in exports and imports.
Mastery Learning Theory
The Mastery Learning Theory prioritizes clear learning objectives, allowing personalized
student progression. Continuous assessment, timely feedback, and targeted remediation address
diverse learning needs, ensuring mastery through criterion-referenced testing. Introducing three
learning domains: Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor this underscores the theory's
acknowledgment of multifaceted learning. In essence, Bloom's theory emphasizes personalized
and in-depth learning, contrasting with traditional uniform teaching methods (Bloom, 1968).
The key principles of the Mastery Learning Theory, such as flexibility, tailored methodologies,
and ongoing assessment, resonate strongly with the challenges posed by the global impact of
29
COVID-19 in the Philippines. This theory supports this study as both phenomena underscore the
necessity for tailored strategies in addressing diverse challenges, highlighting the significance of
specific aid and a comprehensive understanding of evolving circumstances.
III. Review of Related Literature and Studies
Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in terms of Global Trade
Local
The relationship between globalization and the economy of the Philippines has been the
subject of continuous discussion and investigation. Migrants and international trade have been
more significant than financial globalization in the Philippines. Globalization may have boosted
the economy and the number of jobs available, but research on its effects on poverty and
inequality is still initiated, and conclusions have been mixed. Because of globalization, several
sectors in the job market have benefited and suffered. To lessen the negative effects of
globalization and pave the way for changes to narrow the gap between the well-off and the poor,
more inclusive policies may be required.
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas has played a key role in achieving this objective through its
mandated efforts to keep inflation low and stable, increase access to financial services, and
strengthen rule-based global transactions (Guinigundo, 2018). Recognizing that reversing
globalization through protectionist measures is not the answer to the problems caused by
globalization is crucial. Less economic growth, increased inflation, and disruptions to global value
chains leading to job losses are all possible outcomes of such a strategy. On the contrary,
30
lessening the impact of globalization's negative side effects and helping people adjust is essential
if we want to see the gap between the well-off and the poor reduced. That could mean making
producers more productive and competitive on a global scale, or it could mean retraining workers
so they can get better-paid employment.
The Philippines is a perfect example of a country where the federal government, businesses,
and nonprofits must work together to help underprivileged people in urban and rural barangays
gain access to technology and training. Equally critical is ensuring that Filipino migrants can
participate in the development of their country and that their rights are protected, especially when
they reintegrate. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, like other central banks, needs to learn more
about the effects of globalization on inflation, financial stability, and the economy if it wants to
solve these problems.
Foreign
Before the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Philippines stood out as one of the
most vibrant economies in East Asia. The country's economic vitality hinged on several key
factors, including robust consumer demand, a flourishing labor market, and the crucial inflow of
remittances from overseas Filipinos. Moreover, the Philippines benefited from a wave of
urbanization, the growth of a burgeoning middle class, and the presence of a youthful
demographic, all of which acted as driving forces behind its economic prosperity. However, the
onset of the Coronavirus Disease2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 has brought about
significant disruptions to both daily lives and livelihoods. Governments worldwide, in a bid to curb
the spread of the virus, implemented restrictions on mobility and economic activities within their
31
respective territories. Regrettably, this global response resulted in a substantial decline of 3.36%
in the global economy in 2020. (WorldBank,2020)
In the majority of pandemic situations, the implementation of social distancing measures and
various types of lockdowns enforced by nations globally resulted in significant disturbances on
the supply side of the economy, necessitating compulsory closures of businesses. Strong
consumer demand served as a backbone for the Philippine economy, with Filipinos actively
participating in domestic consumption, including retail, services, and real estate. This demand
fueled various industries, contributing to the nation's robust economic growth (deLara-
Tuprioetal.,2022). The thriving labor market was another crucial driver of economic progress. The
Philippines had been experiencing a demographic dividend with a large and youthful workforce.
This demographic advantage resulted in a substantial labor force, often sought after by
international companies for outsourcing and other industries, which further boosted the economy.
Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in terms of Education
Local
In the Philippines, the government decided to close Luzon's airports on March 20 as part
of the Enhanced Community Quarantine (ECQ) that commenced on March 16 within the island.
The tourism sector had already been feeling the adverse effects of the pandemic on its
performance much earlier. In various other countries, travel restrictions and preventive measures
were implemented as early as January of the same year, which subsequently impacted the
number of international tourists arriving in the Philippines. Simultaneously, domestic tourists also
curtailed their travel due to concerns about contracting COVID-19. According to the Department
of Tourism, international tourist receipts in the first quarter of the year plummeted to PHP 85
32
billion, marking a 36% decrease compared to the revenues Recorded during the same period the
previous year (PricewaterhouseCoopers,2020).
The tourism industry in the Philippines, alongside overseas Filipino remittances and
business process outsourcing, significantly contributes to the country's positive external payments
balance and overall economic growth. It stands as one of the primary sources of employment in
the nation, benefiting a wide spectrum of enterprises and individuals while also sustaining
consistent foreign exchange (FX) inflows. However, due to the large number of people employed
in the tourism sector and the close interactions inherent in the industry, it bore a substantial brunt
of the COVID-19 pandemic. Encouragingly, the industry's outlook is becoming more optimistic as
mass vaccination efforts expand, and travel restrictions diminish (Kalonda,2023).
As discussed, the tourism industry emerged as one of the hardest-hit sectors during the
COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a cascade of macroeconomic and microeconomic implications.
The repercussions included a surge in the unemployment rate to 10.4%, an increase in the
poverty rate, diminished household income, and a reduction in job opportunities across various
sectors linked to the tourism industry, such as transportation, travel agencies, tour guides,
hospitality, and food supply, among others.
Foreign
The global spread of COVID-19 has posed a formidable challenge to the field of education,
particularly in the Philippines. Predictably, the closure of schools has brought about a myriad of
33
consequences that could potentially undermine both the social and economic development of
communities in the country. Furthermore, it has imposed severe hardships on Filipino learners.
According to UNESCO (n.d.), the adverse effects of school closures encompass disrupted
learning, perplexity, and stress for educators, unprepared parents for remote and homeschooling,
challenges in establishing, maintaining, and enhancing distance learning, and an alarming rise in
dropout rates. Given these repercussions, there is a growing yearning for the reopening of
schools, as mounting evidence suggests that distance learning falls short in comparison to in-
person instruction.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Philippines resorted to school closures as a
containment measure, prompting a shift towards distance learning mandated by the Department
of Education. Government data reveals that merely around 18 percent of Filipino households
possess internet access at home, with notably lower penetration rates in rural areas (Santos, A.
P., 2021). The adoption of this learning modality may not be inclusive, particularly for students
residing in rural areas who lack the necessary technology to engage effectively with digital tools.
This situation poses a significant challenge for underprivileged students, perpetuating educational
disparities and encroaching on their right to education. Moreover, as reported by UNICEF (n.d.,
as cited in Santos, 2021), over 80 percent of parents have reported slower learning progress
among their children studying from home, further underscoring the inefficiency and
ineffectiveness of the distance learning approach in educating Filipino students.
Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in terms of Agriculture
Local
34
The global health crisis, COVID-19, has had a significant effect on economies across the
globe, including the Philippines. In addition to affecting people's lives, it also has an impact on
business, the economy, education, and most importantly agriculture, where the majority of people
earn a living. Thus, the purpose of this review is to examine the body of research on how the
pandemic affected the Philippines economy's globalization, with an emphasis on the country's
agricultural industry and international trade.
The global supply chains have been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, posing serious
challenges to the Philippines' agriculture industry. According to a study by Santos et al. (2020),
the pandemic has affected the production and distribution of agricultural products by causing labor
shortages, limiting access to inputs, and disrupting logistics and transportation. Food prices have
gone up as a result, and the nation's food security has declined. In addition, because of supply
disruptions, travel restrictions, and the collapse of both domestic and foreign demand, imports
and exports have decreased since the lockdown. This challenging business agricultural sector.
The COVID-19 pandemic, however, has both positive and negative effects on the nation,
such as digital transformation. The agricultural industry has embraced digital technologies more
quickly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this instance, it's clear how the rapid
advancement of technology created a substitute for people to carry on with their agricultural
business operations. According to a study by Cruz et al. (2021), e-commerce and digital platforms
have been essential in facilitating trade and establishing connections between farmers and
consumers during the pandemic. Platforms such as TikTok, where numerous businesses have
set up accounts and engaged in live selling, serve as an illustration of this.

35
Foreign
The COVID-19 pandemic is not just affecting the Philippines; it is also affecting other parts
of the world. The pandemic caused significant disruptions to global supply chains, which in turn
led to a decline in demand for certain agricultural products, according to a study conducted by Lin
&Yu (2020). Measures like the travel ban and lockdowns also made it hard to move goods, which
had an additional negative effect on exports. Due to these constraints and limitations, the
agriculture industry finds it difficult to stay in business. Similar to Cruz et al.'s study from 2021,
China acknowledges the introduction and application of technology. According to the authors, the
pandemic has brought attention to the necessity of diversifying export markets and making
investments in technological solutions to lessen trade disruptions in the future. In conclusion, the
COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the Philippines economy's globalization as well
as that of other nations, especially in the agriculture sector. The pandemic has created
opportunities for digital transformation in addition to its challenges.
Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in terms of Employment
Local
According to the study of Gonzales, Epetia, and Corpus (2023) The COVID-19 pandemic
significantly impacted the Philippines' labor market, affecting employment and wages. Across
industries, skill levels, and work classes, the probability of employment declined, accompanied
by reduced daily working hours. While real daily wages moderately decreased overall at the
pandemic's onset, the agriculture sector experienced simultaneous increases in employment and
wages, reflecting robust demand. The pandemic's impact on the labor market, especially in
contact-intensive sectors, was more pronounced in terms of employment than real wages. One
36
year into the pandemic, the recovery varied among sectors, with some witnessing a significant
increase in employment probability. However, real wage recovery was less favorable for women,
particularly young females with middle-skill and high-skill jobs, facing wage cuts. Male workers,
notably in the rural sector, saw a recovery in real daily pay a year after lockdowns.
Agriculture in the Philippines had a unique experience during the crisis, with its
employment share temporarily increasing, countering a 15-year declining trend. The sector
helped mitigate employment losses in non-agriculture sectors during the initial pandemic phase,
absorbing workers from construction and services. Although the probability of wage employment
in agriculture declined, indicating a shift from urban to rural areas and non-wage employment,
there was a simultaneous recovery in wage employment and real daily wages in the later
pandemic phase, revealing increased demand. The Philippine government responded to the
COVID-19 crisis with labor market policies, including social protection programs for displaced
workers, initiatives to boost private-sector-led economic recovery, and the National Employment
Recovery Strategy (NERS). NERS targets specific sectors and individuals facing harsh labor
market conditions, aiming to revive employment and wages.
Based on Anri Ichimura study (2020) The far-reaching economic repercussions of COVID-
19 are evident across all sectors, with the travel industry bearing a particularly heavy blow.
Disrupted supply chains, slowed trade linkages, and a virtual standstill in business travel
characterize the global landscape, with the Asian Development Bank's analysis projecting a
potential global impact ranging from $77 billion to $347 billion, contingent on the evolving
outbreak. In the Philippines, the best-case scenario foresees a 0.2 percent loss in total GDP,
amounting to $668.93 million (P33.89 billion) and approximately 87,330 job losses, while the
worst-case scenario predicts a 0.59 percent decline, translating to about $1.94 billion (P98.29
37
billion) and 252,130 job losses. The broader impact of COVID-19 extends to various industries,
with anticipated losses in agriculture, construction, business, and trade. Notably, the travel sector,
encompassing transport services and hospitality, faces severe setbacks, with the hotel and
restaurant industry expecting a $205.71 million loss and the transport industry projecting a
$149.95 million downturn.
Foreign
According to NEDA, the COVID-19 pandemic, officially declared a global crisis by the
World Health Organization on March 11, has left an indelible mark on the global economy. As
Europe became the new epicenter, by March 19, there were 218,823 confirmed cases and 8,810
deaths globally, with the Philippines reporting 217 cases, 17 deaths, and 8 recoveries. To curb
the virus, nations implemented measures like mass testing, travel restrictions, and lockdowns,
prompting adjustments in monetary and fiscal policies. This health crisis has precipitated an
economic downturn, potentially leading to a global recession. Notably, the tourism sector,
dependent on Chinese visitors, and exports, particularly with China as a key trading partner, have
suffered.
Overseas remittances, household consumption, and the Luzon-wide enhanced
community quarantine have further exacerbated economic challenges. The estimated cumulative
economic impact of COVID-19 is projected to range from 2.1 to 6.6 percent of nominal GDP in
2020, with implications for the country's real GDP growth. With variations in impact across
economic classes, responsive measures should be fine-tuned to balance health and economic
objectives. Urgent efforts are required to bolster health systems for future pandemics,
emphasizing the need for a strategic transition to a new normal state of economic activity. The
38
estimated impact assumes adverse effects until June, underscoring the importance of mitigating
COVID-19's impact on the broader economy.
Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in terms of Tourism
Local
According to the study of Caynila, Luna, and Milla (2022) The Philippines' tourism sector,
vital for external payments and economic growth, faces COVID-19 challenges. Despite a
significant pandemic impact, recovery prospects arise with accelerated inoculation and eased
travel restrictions. Travel services contribute 20% to total service exports but dropped from
US$9.8 billion in 2019 to US$600 million in 2021 due to the pandemic. Pre-pandemic, tourism
drove economic growth, contributing 16.1% to GDP in 2019. However, the pandemic led to a
decline in domestic tourism expenditure and industry contraction, causing severe revenue loss
and unemployment. International tourist arrivals plummeted by 74% in 2020, showing a slight
recovery in 2021 but still below pre-pandemic levels. The Department of Tourism targets domestic
travel recovery by 2022, emphasizing promotion amid closed overseas markets. Projecting robust
travel receipt recovery in 2022, the DOT focuses on easing travel restrictions for fully vaccinated
international tourists. Tourism and travel export recovery hinge on global vaccination progress,
traveler confidence, and lifted restrictions. The DOT implements measures like the Tourism
Response and Recovery Plan (TRRP) and prioritized vaccination for tourism frontliners. While
Ukraine's war poses risks, the World Bank expects economic reopening and vaccination progress
to boost market confidence, especially in transportation, domestic tourism, and retail trade.
According to PWC, the COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted the global tourism
industry, with border closures, airport shutdowns, and mass gathering restrictions jeopardizing
39
around 100 to 120 million jobs, according to estimates from the World Tourism Organization. In
the first quarter of 2020, international tourist arrivals witnessed a 22% decline, resulting in an
estimated global tourism receipt loss of US$80 billion. The Philippine tourism sector felt the brunt
early on, with closures and restrictions causing a 36% drop in international tourist receipts to
PHP85 billion in the first quarter. A joint survey by PwC Philippines and the Department of Tourism
in May 2020 revealed that 97% of decision-makers across various subsectors anticipated a
significant impact from COVID-19, with 88% expecting losses exceeding 50% of their 2020
revenues. Recovery efforts, including a proposed PHP1.3 trillion economic stimulus package and
PHP58 billion for tourism enterprises, aim to alleviate the financial strain.
Foreign
Based on Science Direct (2020), the global tourism industry has undergone significant
disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a study that employed text mining
techniques to analyze traveler responses. Focusing on approximately 75,000 comments from
TripAdvisor forums between December 30, 2019, and March 15, 2020, the research honed in on
23,515 cases from US, Europe, and Asia forums. Findings revealed that global crises notably
affect the tourism sector, prompting swift traveler decisions to cancel or delay plans upon
pandemic awareness. The study underscored a surge in discussions about travel insurance as a
means of financial protection against trip cancellations. Moreover, it highlighted the pandemic's
substantial impact on global mobility, surpassing previous epidemics like SARS, primarily due to
China's enhanced global role. The rapid dissemination of pandemic-related information on social
media was found to unsettle consumers and dampen economic activity. Additionally, the study
emphasized the heightened risk of epidemic or pandemic spread as a major concern for the
tourism industry, particularly as travelers explore distant destinations with unfamiliar health risks.
Analyzing TripAdvisor comments underscored travelers' rapid responses to pandemic

40
developments, with discussions predominantly revolving around canceling plans, securing travel
insurance, and navigating refund policies. The detailed analysis suggested the imperative
inclusion of travel insurance in future tourism packages, necessitating policy updates for
enhanced reliability and flexibility in refunds and plan changes.
IV. Conclusion
The impact of globalization on the Philippine economy across employment, tourism,
agriculture, education, and global trade has been a mixed tapestry of challenges and
opportunities, accentuated by the disruptive force of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Globalization, while creating job opportunities across various sectors, has showcased
disparities in employment patterns during the pandemic. The crisis triggered declines in
employment across industries, notably affecting women and rural workers. However, the
agriculture sector presented a unique narrative, experiencing a temporary rise in employment
share, albeit accompanied by fluctuations in wage employment.
The tourism industry, a significant contributor to economic growth, faced severe setbacks
due to pandemic-induced restrictions. Globalization's interconnectedness facilitated international
travel, yet the pandemic led to unprecedented declines in tourist arrivals, revenue loss, and
elevated unemployment within the sector. Recovery efforts centered on vaccination progress and
the gradual easing of travel restrictions for both domestic and international tourism.
Globalization in agriculture accelerated technological adoption, offering solutions amid
supply chain disruptions. While challenges such as labor shortages, logistics disruptions, and
41
decreased food security emerged, the crisis expedited digital transformation in the sector.
Platforms facilitating trade between farmers and consumers emerged, highlighting a twirl toward
digital solutions in agriculture.
Globalization, intertwined with technological advancement, revealed educational
disparities during the pandemic. School closures and the shift to distance learning exposed the
digital divide, impacting underprivileged students disproportionately. Access to technology
became a critical determinant of educational continuity, accentuating the need for inclusive
educational policies.
The globalization of trade, a cornerstone of economic growth, faced disruptions that
reverberated across sectors. Global value chains were severely affected, causing declines in
exports and imports, impacting various industries. Efforts to stabilize aggregate demand and
mitigate the negative impacts of disruptions were crucial in navigating the challenges posed by
the pandemic.
In conclusion, while globalization has significantly contributed to the Philippine economy's
growth and interconnectedness with the global landscape, the pandemic exposed vulnerabilities
across sectors. Mitigating the adverse effects of globalization-related disruptions, particularly in
employment, tourism, agriculture, education, and global trade, entails strategic policies aimed at
strengthening resilience, bridging disparities, and fostering inclusive growth in a post-pandemic
era. The pandemic's impact underscores the imperative for a comprehensive and adaptive
42
approach to global integration, emphasizing the need for resilience-building measures to navigate
unforeseen challenges in the future.
V. Recommendations
Employment
The employment sector can benefit significantly from Skills Development and Reskilling
Initiatives. By investing in programs that enhance skills and retrain workers, the employment
landscape can adapt to emerging needs. This strategy aligns the workforce with industries
experiencing growth post-pandemic, while also aiding those affected by job losses in sectors hit
hardest by the pandemic. The execution plan involves identifying growth sectors, mapping
existing skills against future demands, developing targeted training programs, and offering
accessible training modules through online platforms and community centers. Incentives such as
stipends or scholarships can motivate individuals undergoing training, while regular monitoring
and evaluation ensure program effectiveness. To execute this plan effectively, communicating
with public-private partnerships for funding, collaborating with industry experts for manpower, and
utilizing existing educational or community spaces for training must be in considerations.
Tourism
Encouraging domestic tourism growth is crucial for industry resurgence, reducing reliance
on international travel. Targeted promotional campaigns spotlighting local treasures and cultural
richness are important, paralleled by investments in tourism infrastructure like roads and
accommodations, especially in high-traffic zones. Collaboration with local stakeholders and

43
governments drives sustainable enhancements. Implementing strict safety standards aligns with
global practices, reinstating traveler trust post-pandemic. Crafting affordable tourism packages,
in tandem with local businesses, widens accessibility, while user-friendly digital platforms
enhance traveler experiences. Prioritizing infrastructure development in key tourist hubs,
supporting local labor, and simplifying logistics via partnerships sustainably rejuvenates domestic
tourism within budget limitations, using available resources effectively.
Agriculture
Integrating digital solutions into agriculture through Digital Integration and Market Access
initiatives holds immense potential for enhancing market connections for farmers. By creating
user-friendly platforms that link farmers directly to consumers, this strategy strengthens food
supply chains while increasing farmers' incomes by removing intermediaries. The execution plan
involves developing digital platforms, providing training on e-commerce and quality control,
establishing partnerships with marketplaces, ensuring quality standards, and facilitating financial
access for technology investment. To execute this plan effectively despite budget constraints,
starting with pilot programs in select regions before nationwide expansion is prudent. Using
existing community centers or agricultural hubs for training and employing a blend of agricultural
experts and tech professionals for manpower would optimize resources.
Education
Ensuring equal access to education through Bridging the Digital Divide and Teacher
Training initiatives is crucial. Providing devices and internet access to underprivileged students
while developing interactive digital learning materials aligned with the curriculum can bridge the
44
gap. Enhancing teacher training in online teaching methods further elevates the quality of remote
education. The execution plan involves technology distribution, curriculum development, teacher
training workshops, support systems, and community engagement. To navigate budget
constraints, focusing on high-need regions, utilizing volunteer educators or NGOs for training, and
partnering with telecom companies for discounted internet packages would optimize resources.
Global Trade
Diversification of Export Markets and Streamlining Trade Processes. This strategic
approach aims to mitigate overdependence on specific regions and boost the economy against
global disruptions by diversifying export markets. Simultaneously, it seeks to optimize trade
procedures to enhance efficiency and diminish transaction costs for businesses. The execution
plan involves a multi-pronged strategy: First, conducting thorough market analysis to identify
untapped markets and emerging economies for export diversification. Second, fostering trade
agreements or partnerships to facilitate smoother exports to these new markets. Third, improving
trade facilitation processes by simplifying procedures, reducing paperwork, and expediting
customs clearance. Fourth, initiating export promotion campaigns that spotlight Philippine
products in these fresh markets. Finally, providing vigorous support services to businesses
navigating complex international trade regulations and documentation. In implementing these
initiatives, it's crucial to consider several factors, including managing within budget constraints by
prioritizing select key markets or industries for export diversification, utilizing existing trade offices
or digital platforms for promotional activities due to facility constraints, and training government
trade officials to efficiently assist businesses in navigating trade procedures, acknowledging
manpower limitations. This comprehensive approach aims to fortify the Philippine economy's
45
global trade resilience, offering a pathway for sustained growth and adaptability in an ever-
evolving global market landscape.
Crafted with sector-specific needs in mind, these recommendations promote a strategic
path for policy implementation, thoughtfully accounting for budget constraints, existing facilities,
manpower availability, logistical considerations, and collaboration with diverse stakeholders. By
customizing these strategies to local contexts and maximizing the utilization of available
resources, the Philippines can skillfully steer towards post-pandemic resilience and sustainable
growth.
46
References
[PDF] The Tourism Area Life Cycle, Vol. 1 Applications and modifications by Richard Butler,
Richard Butler | Perlego. (2006b, January 11). https://www.perlego.com/book/971967/the-
tourism-area-life-cycle-vol-1-applications-and-modifications
2020 Overseas Filipino Workers (Final Results) | Philippine Statistics Authority
Republic of the Philippines. (2022, March 7). https://psa.gov.ph/content/2020-
overseas-filipino-workers-final-results
ABConservation (2022, January 15). La situation de l’éducation aux Philippines durant la
pandémie. https://www.abconservation.org/en/blog/2022/01/15/la-situation-de-
leducation-aux-philippines-durant-la-pandemie/
Agence France-Presse. (2022, August 22). Philippine classrooms reopen after more than two
years. Voice of America. https://www.voanews.com/a/philippine-classrooms-reopen-
after-more-than-two-years/6711225.html
Arenas, G., Majune, S. & Montfaucon, A.F. (2023, October 2). Did Covid-19 lockdowns impact
Philippines’ international trade? World Bank Blogs.
https://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/did-covid-19-lockdowns-impact-philippines-
international-trade
Bird, K., Lozano, C., & Mendoza, T. (2021). Philippines’ COVID-19 employment Challenge:
Labor market programs to the rescue | Asian Development Blog.
https://blogs.adb.org/blog/philippines-covid-19-employment-challenge-labor-market-
programs-to-rescue
Bloom, B. (n.d.). Bloom , Benjamin S . Learning for Mastery . Instruction and Curriculum . Regional
Education Laboratory for the Carolinas. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Bloom-
%2C-Benjamin-S-.-Learning-for-Mastery-.-and
Bloom/9ca9c22a56dbe6fcee5a855adfe23f5465cac6b1
47
Caynila, K.A., Luna, K.T., & Milla, S.A. (2022) The Philippine tourism sector amid the pandemic:
Developments and prospects. Economic Newsletter | Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.
https://www.bsp.gov.ph/Media_And_Research/Publications/EN22-02.pdf
CEICdata.com. (2018, June 1). Philippines Gross National Product (GNP). Economic Indicators
| CEIC. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/philippines/gross-national-product#
Colman, D., & Young, T. (1989). Economics of agricultural production: theoretical foundations.
In Cambridge University Press eBooks (pp. 5–29).
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511623509.002
Covid-19 Tracker | Department of Health Website. COVID-19 Tracker. (n.d.).
https://doh.gov.ph/covid19tracker
DBM: Almost P20-billion allocated for healthcare workers’ allowances, COVID-19 compensation
in 2024; P64.17-billion for claims released since 2021. (n.d.).
https://www.dbm.gov.ph/index.php/management-2/
De Lara-Tuprio, E. P., Estuar, M. R. J. E., Sescon, J. T., Lubangco, C. K., Castillo, R. C.
J. T., Teng, T. R., Tamayo, L. P. V., Macalalag, J. M. R., & Vedeja, G. M. (2022).
Economic losses from COVID-19 cases in the Philippines: a dynamic model of
health and economic policy trade-offs. Humanities and Social Sciences
Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01125-4
Department of Agriculture. (2022, June 13). FROM THE MANILA TIMES: ‘Make urban
agriculture a weapon vs Covid-19’ Official Portal of the Department of Agriculture.
https://www.da.gov.ph/from-the-manila-times-make-urban-agriculture-a-weapon-vs-
covid-19/
DICT (2017). National Broadband Plan: Building Infostructures for a Digital Nation.
Diliman, Quezon City. https://dict.gov.ph/wp-
content/uploads/2017/09/2017.08.09-National-Broadband-Plan.pdf
48
Guinigundo, D. C. (2018c). The globalisation experience and its challenges for the
Philippine economy. BIS Papers Chapters, 100, 259–272.
https://ideas.repec.org/h/bis/bisbpc/100-17.html
IMF staff completes 2023 Article IV mission to the Philippines. (2023, October 3). IMF.
https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2023/10/03/pr23331-philippines-imf-staff-
completes-2023-article-iv-mission-to-the-philippines
Kalonda, H. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on Philippines tourism industry: Macroeconomic an
microeconomic implications. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies,
5(3), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.32996/jefas.2023.5.3.2Simeon, Louise Maureen. 2021.
“Prioritize informal workers in economic recovery.” The Philippine Star, 16 August 2021.
https://www. philstar.com/, accessed on 15 December 2021.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money.
Kopp, C. M. (2022, April 27). Heckscher-Ohlin Model Definition: Evidence and Real-World
example. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/heckscherohlin
model.asp
Labor Force Survey | Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines. (2023,
December 7). https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/labor-force-survey
Lin, B., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural
exports. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(12), 2937–2945.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(20)63430-x
Lo, K. (2023, November 8). Quality of jobs continues to improve as PH records lowest-ever
underemployment rate - Department of Finance. Department of Finance.
https://www.dof.gov.ph/quality-of-jobs-continues-to-improve-as-ph-records-lowest-ever-
underemployment-rate/
Mohan, B., & Vinod, N. P. (2020). COVID-19: An Insight into SARS-CoV2 Pandemic Originated
49
at Wuhan City in Hubei Province of China. Journal of Infectious Diseases and
Epidemiology, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3658/1510146
Others. (2022, October 6). Telehealth and eMedicinedict.gov.ph/wp-
content/uploads/2014/05/Emed-telehealth_PFMarcelo_29jan. . . Telehealth and
eMedicine ICT Tools in achieving universal Health care PORTIA FERNANDEZ-
MARCELO,. vdocuments.mx. https://vdocuments.mx/telehealth-and-telehealth-and-
emedicine-ict-tools-in-achieving-universal-health.html
Philippines GNP 1962-2023. (n.d.). MacroTrends.
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/PHL/philippines/gnp-gross-national-prodct
Philippines inflation rate 1960-2023. (n.d.). MacroTrends.
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/PHL/philippines/inflation-rate-cp
Press releases. (2023, April 27). PIA. https://pia.gov.ph/press-
releases/2023/04/27/dpwh-dict-signs-mou-for-digitally-connected-service
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (n.d.). Impact of COVID-19 on the Philippine Tourism
industry. PwC. https://www.pwc.com/ph/en/publications/pwc-publications/tourism-covid-
19.html
Santos, J., De Jesus, L. F., Sealmoy, R. R., & Fajardo, R. R. C. (2020). Online distance
learning amidst COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research and
Innovation, 15, 291–304. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5271
Simeon, L.M.. (2021). “Prioritize informal workers in economic recovery.”
The Philippine Star, 16 August 2021. https://www. philstar.com/, accessed on 15
December 2021.
Shinozaki, S., & Rao, L. N. (2021). COVID-19 Impact on Micro, Small, and Medium Sized
Enterprises under the Lockdown: Evidence from a Rapid Survey in the Philippines.
Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3807080

50
Southeast Asia Rising from the Pandemic. (2023, October 5). Asian Development Bank.
https://www.adb.org/publications/southeast-asia-rising-from-
pandemic?fbclid=IwAR0IKy53MttlO3l67n85TeZPguIHLhiADc67Txe0fhCDCxiQ6mCxrG7
Zn8Y
Statista (2023, November 7). Topic: Agriculture in the Philippines.
https://www.statista.com/topics/5744/agriculture-industry-in-the-
philippines/#topicOverview
Summary Inflation Report Consumer Price Index (2018=100): October 2023 | Philippine
Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines. (2023, November 7).
https://psa.gov.ph/content/summary-inflation-report-consumer-price-index-
2018100-october-2023
Survey on Overseas Filipinos | Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the
Philippines. (2023, October 11). https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/survey/labor-and-
employment/survey-overseas-filipinos
Takefman, B. (2023, May 9). The effects of globalization on economic development.
ResearchFDI.https://researchfdi.com/resources/articles/the-effects-of-globalization-on-
economic-development/
The Impact of Globalization on the Philippine Economy: [Essay Example], 1665 words. (2023
January 5). GradesFixer. https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/the impact-of
TRADING ECONOMICS. (n.d.). Philippines GDP. https://tradingeconomics.com/philippines/gdp
Transforming Philippine agriculture. (2020). In World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks.
https://doi.org/10.1596/34012
Westcott, M. (2021, June 4). 14.1 Globalization and the tourism industry. Pressbooks.
https://opentextbc.ca/introtourism2e/chapter/globalization-and-the-tourism-industry/
Willies, D. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the education system in

51
developing countries. African Journal of Education and Practice, 9(1), 15–26.
https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.1882
World Bank Group. (2023, March 30). The Global Economic outlook During the COVID-
19 Pandemic: A changed world. World Bank.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/06/08/the-global-economic-outlook-
during-the-covid-19-pandemic-a-changed-world
Zaldarriaga, J. (2023, October 11). Destination Philippines: Toward post-pandemic tourism
success. Philstar.com.
https://www.philstar.com/business/2023/10/12/2302971/destination-philippines-toward-
post-pandemic-tourism-success

Group 1 - Final Paper

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Group 1 - Final Paper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Philippine Globalization

DR. YANGA’S COLLEGES, INC.

The Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Philippine Globalization

In fulfilment of the subject requirements in

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration

I. PURPOSE AND RATIONALE

technology, and knowledge transfers. These developments have contributed to substantial

economic growth, employment, and increased productivity worldwide (Takefman, 2023).

interconnectedness and interdependence of countries, economies, cultures, and societies on a

According to Westcott (2021), globalization has made advances in transportation which

aspire to work worldwide resulting in enhanced economic growth.

the economic growth of the Philippines.

Certainly, globalization has a beneficial impact on the Philippine economy particularly on

COVID–19 Pandemic is an infectious disease that is caused by the severe acute

(COVID-19) Pandemic, 2023).

by about 90 percent in 2021.

private schools practiced blended learning system through online classes.

cultivating stakeholders. According to the Department of Agriculture (2022), the Covid-19

this, innovation is crucial for efficient production and to increase productivity.

gross domestic product of the country (Statista, 2023).

policies on International trade in the Philippines, using a monthly series of product-by-country

the extensive number of products or margin.

Mission to the Philippines, 2023).

COVID-19 pandemic on the globalization of the Philippine economy in terms of employment,

in unemployment reflected the widespread economic disruptions caused by the pandemic,

including lockdowns, business closures, and disruptions to global trade.

Table 1. Key Labor and Employment Indicators

2019 61.3 94.9 13.8 5.1

2020 59.5 89.7 16.2 10.3

2021 63.3 92.2 15.9 7.8

2022 64.7 94.6 14.2 5.4

2023 64.7 95.4 12.5 4.6

Philippines. (2023, December 7). https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/labor-force-survey

Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines, 2023).

vulnerability to external shocks.

Inflation, as influenced by the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic, serves as a

Table 2. Year-on-Year Inflation Rates in the Philippines

January 3.4 4.4 3 3.7 3 8.7

February 3.7 3.8 2.5 4.2 3 8.6

March 4.3 3.4 2.2 4.1 4/0 7.6

April 4.3 3.2 1.8 4.1 4.9 6.6

May 4.6 3.2 1.6 4.1 5.4 6.1

June 5 2.7 2.3 3.7 6.1 5.4

July 5.8 2.2 2.4 3.7 6.4 4.7

August 6.6 1.4 2.2 4.4 6.3 5.3

September 6.9 0.5 2.2 4.2 6.9 6.1

October 6.9 0.6 2.3 4 7.7 4.9

November 6.1 1.2 3 3.7 8 4.1

December 5.2 2.4 3.3 3.1 8.1

Average 5.2 2.4 2.4 3.9 5.8 6.2

COVID-19 pandemic on the global and Philippine economy.

Figure 1. Number of Overseas Filipino Workers and Overseas Contract Workers

in 2019 and 2020

Estimates were based on the 2015-based Population Projections. Reprinted from

Philippine Statistics Authority, 2019 and 2020. Survey on Overseas Filipino.

(Final Results) | Philippine Statistics Authority | Republic of the Philippines, 2022).

Figure 2. Number of Overseas Filipino Workers and Overseas Contract Workers

in 2021 and 2022

opportunities to work abroad.

Labor Dynamics and Digital Transformation

According to Secretary Bonoan (2023). the COVID-19 pandemic was an eye-opener as

(Press Releases, 2023).

right skills to do our jobs well in this big, ever-changing world.

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)