NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

m
co
Assessment 2: Criteria and Rubric Development
s.
Student Name
e
Capella University
ic
Course Name
rv
Prof Name
se
MAR 11, 2024
i ng
rit
W
N
BS
Do you need Help to complete your Capella Uni MSN FlexPath Class in 1 Billing?
Call Us Now (612) 234-7670
Email Us Contact@bsnwritingservices.com
Website: BSNWritingservices.com
For Free MSN Sample: BSNWritingservices.com/free-Sample
m
co
e s.
ic
rv
se
i ng
rit
W
N
Part One – Assessment Description and Rationale

BS
Description of the Assessment
This appraisal essentially fixates on assessing the student's grip and utilization of moral
standards intended for pediatric nursing. The complete idea of this assessment
Call Us Now (612) 234-7670
envelops an expansive range of abilities, requiring support in a composed assessment,
commitment to a constant, active reenactment, and reflection through a composed
paper. Every evaluation component targets different learning spaces, guaranteeing a
comprehensive assessment of the student's capability in both hypothetical information
and pragmatic application.
m
Domains and Assessment Tools
co
Mental Space: The composed assessment assesses students' appreciation and
use of primary moral standards in pediatric nursing (Mileski et al., 2022).
s.
Psychomotor Space: The recreation surveys the student's capacity to explore
and determine moral problems in a pediatric clinical climate (Endres et al., 2021).
e
Full of feeling Space: The intelligent paper prompts students to investigate the
ic
close to home and moral parts of their jobs in pediatric consideration (Morrill and
Westrick, 2022). rv
Validity and Reliability of the Assessment
se
Guaranteeing the legitimacy and unwavering quality of this evaluation is central.

ng
Post-evaluation, workforce, and understudy reviews will be directed to assemble input,
guaranteeing the appraisal's significance, precision, and arrangement with the course's
i
rit
center targets. Dissecting grades and following understudy movement will give bits of
knowledge into the appraisal's adequacy, guaranteeing arrangement with the

W
educational program and exact estimation of fundamental abilities. Episodic remarks will
N
likewise be looked to improve the input cycle, offering a subjective aspect for refining
BS
and upgrading future evaluations.
Call Us Now (612) 234-7670
Communication of Grading Expectations
Straightforwardness is urgent for appraisal adequacy. A far reaching reviewing rubric
itemizing standards and weightage for every evaluation part will be given at the course's
origin (Aflalo, 2022). This proactive methodology enables understudies by explaining
the evaluating system and benchmarks. Occasional criticism meetings and gatherings
m
will be booked to give an open stage to understudies to voice questions, look for
explanations, or examine the evaluation inside and out. Official correspondence from
co
the personnel, clarifying assumptions and guidelines, will additionally smooth out the
s.
evaluation cycle, setting a make way for students to follow and succeed.
e
Part Two – Grading Rubric
ic
Criteria/Domai Non-performa
rv
n nce Basic Proficient Distinguished
se
Understands Demonstrates
ng
Displays a
Demonstrates and applies comprehensive
Knowledge and basic grasp of
limited ethical understanding
i
Application of ethical
rit
understanding principles in and flawless

Ethical principles but
W
of ethical pediatric application of

Principles struggles to
principles. nursing ethical
N
apply them.
situations. principles.
BS
Practical Handles most Excellently

Unable to Manages
Demonstration dilemmas navigates and
navigate basic
of Ethical effectively. resolves all
Call Us Now (612) 234-7670
Dilemma ethical dilemmas with ethical
Resolution dilemmas. minor errors. scenarios.
Provides deep,
Offers Showcases
Depth of Demonstrates insightful
superficial genuine
Reflection on basic reflection reflection
reflection on reflection with
m
Ethical with limited showcasing a
ethical some
co
Implications depth. comprehensive
implications. insights.
understanding.
s.
Clearly
e
Excellently
Does not defines the
ic
Role in Ethical Vaguely defines and
define the role role and
Decision-Makin identifies their leads ethical
in ethical
rv actively
g in a Team role but lacks decision-making
se
decisions contributes to
Setting clarity. processes in
within a team. team
team scenarios.
ng
decisions.
i
The writing Academic

rit
Academic, Flawless
style is writing style
Writing: Clarity, formal writing academic writing
W
non-academic but with

Grammar, & with minor with smooth
with multiple several
N
Transition errors; good transitions

grammatical grammatical
BS
transitions. between topics.

errors. errors.
Call Us Now (612) 234-7670
Partially Perfectly
Mostly follows
Does not adheres to adheres to the
Adherence to APA format
follow the APA APA format latest APA
APA Format but has minor
format. with several format edition
errors.
mistakes. with no errors.
m
co
e s.
ic
rv
se
i ng
rit
W
N
BS
Call Us Now (612) 234-7670
References
Aflalo, E. (2022). Changes in students’ perceptions of self-assessment in courses with
different approaches to assessment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(11).
https://doi.org/10.14221/1835-517X.5684
m
Endres, K., Burm, S., Weiman, D., Karol, D., Dudek, N., Cowley, L., & LaDonna, K.
(2021). Navigating the uncertainty of health advocacy teaching and evaluation from the
co
trainee’s perspective. Medical Teacher, 44(1), 79–86.
s.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2021.1967905
e
Mileski, M., McClay, R., Heinemann, K., & Dray, G. (2022). Efficacy of the use of the
ic
Calgary family intervention model in bedside nursing education: A systematic review.
rv
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Volume 15(15), 1323–1347.
se
https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s370053
Morrill, D., & Westrick, S. J. (2022). Fostering nursing students’ moral decision-making
ng
through the use of an effective learning module. Nurse Educator, Publish Ahead of
i
Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001178
rit
W
N
BS
Call Us Now (612) 234-7670

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

m

Part One – Assessment Description and Rationale

Description of the Assessment

commitment to a constant, active reenactment, and reflection through a composed

paper. Every evaluation component targets different learning spaces, guaranteeing a

comprehensive assessment of the student's capability in both hypothetical information

and pragmatic application.

Guaranteeing the legitimacy and unwavering quality of this evaluation is central.

Post-evaluation, workforce, and understudy reviews will be directed to assemble input,

knowledge into the appraisal's adequacy, guaranteeing arrangement with the

and upgrading future evaluations.

Straightforwardness is urgent for appraisal adequacy. A far reaching reviewing rubric

origin (Aflalo, 2022). This proactive methodology enables understudies by explaining

understanding principles in and flawless

of ethical pediatric application of

Practical Handles most Excellently

The writing Academic

non-academic but with

Transition errors; good transitions

transitions. between topics.

Aflalo, E. (2022). Changes in students’ perceptions of self-assessment in courses with

different approaches to assessment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(11).

You might also like