Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anna Wilson - 313 Lesson Plan
Anna Wilson - 313 Lesson Plan
Standard(s)/Guideline(s):
Pre-assessment of current knowledge: What types of buildings do you know? What types of shapes do you see in those buildings?
structure as stable as they can. Differentiation: unstable tower fall over. Emphasize that construction workers
have to create balanced buildings to make them more stable.
Use bigger blocks for the kids who struggle to stack the Encourage students to take the alphabet blocks and come up
smaller ones with ways to build a tall stable tower. If students are only
Safety Considerations: building upwards, ask them to find ways to build their
Assist children whose fine motor skills are still developing to buildings wide as well as tall.
Falling blocks pick up the blocks and stack them If students would like to test their towers, gently bump the
table to see if they stay standing.
Do multiple demonstrations or build alongside the children Encourage students to rebuild their tower if it falls over.
who don’t understand that the blocks need to line up
Authentic Materials: (Describe authentic real-life, hands-on
materials.)
Adult Roles:
Reflection: (What have you learned about your students? How will this inform future instruction?)
I learned a lot about my students through doing this lesson plan. I had eight students complete this lesson, all of which achieved the five blocks tall objective, three
of which understood the concept of creating width, and seven of which rebuilt their towers when they fell. I expected more of the students to struggle with the five
blocks tall objective but was very impressed with the height some of them were able to achieve. Three of the students built tall towers but were more focused on
the height than the balance so their blocks did not line up. Of the students who did create width in their buildings, only one student created more than two rows
which I was surprised by. For the final objective, I only had one student not rebuild their tower when it fell. When his fell, he actually took a greater interest in
knocking over everyone else’s instead of rebuilding his own. This student is new to the classroom so I would chalk this behavior up to his younger age and not
being acquainted with the class rather than lack of perseverance. The other seven students got really in to trying to knock their own towers down by shaking the
table and all of them eagerly started rebuilding when their tower fell over to try and make it bigger. I did this lesson in two groups and I feel like the second group
definitely went smoother than the first group. Since it was my first time teaching the lesson, I got a little nervous and didn’t explain the activity as well as I wanted to
which led to some confusion in the nature of the activity. I got them to understand eventually, but I learned from my own mistakes and taught the second group
more coherently. I also chose to share certain pages of the book that I read instead of just reading the whole book to them which they didn’t like because they
wanted to know the whole story. If I were to do this lesson again, I would start by reading the book to the whole class and follow it up with the activity in small
Rev. 1/2024
Early Childhood Education
Learning Experience Template
groups. I would also try incorporating different shapes that the book depicts instead of just talking about squares. While focusing on one shape worked well for
what I wanted them to accomplish, the book didn’t quite fit as well as I wanted it to. Next time I would either find a different book or include all the shapes listed in
the book.
What I learned about my students is that they are good at stacking blocks to make towers. Some of them tend to rush to make a tower as quickly as they can
instead of patiently working to balance the tower they created, so I made sure to emphasize slowing down and lining the blocks up evenly so their towers could be
bigger. I also did various tests of their towers to show that creating a bigger base creates a more stable building. Once they had visuals, most of them were able to
grasp the concept and incorporate height and width into their buildings. This made me realize the importance of modeling and hands on activities at the preschool
level. Asking them questions got them thinking but most of the time the response I got was “I don’t know” and they wouldn’t attempt to try something new. As soon
as I showed them different types of towers and how they reacted when I shook the table, they started getting new ideas and used them to make their buildings
more stable. Shaking the table to see how stable their towers and buildings were sparked a conversation about earthquakes and how natural disasters affect
buildings. This was not a conversation I had expected but it encouraged them to make their buildings more stable and they got really in to rebuilding if the
“earthquake” took down their tower. In future lessons we could talk about the different shapes that make up buildings that aren’t squares or how squares fit with
other shapes to make bigger structures. We could also dive deeper into how weather affects buildings and the types of supports put in place to protect tall
buildings from natural disasters.
Overall I feel this lesson went really well and I really enjoyed implementing it with these students. Most of them didn’t want to walk away from the table and there
were lots of smiles and giggles as they tried to build a stable building and knock it down. There are definitely things I could change as I mentioned above but I feel
as if this went well.
Rev. 1/2024