Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Health Care Transition Albert C Hergenroeder Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Health Care Transition Albert C Hergenroeder Ebook All Chapter PDF
Hergenroeder
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/health-care-transition-albert-c-hergenroeder/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/essentials-of-psychiatry-in-
primary-care-behavioral-health-in-the-medical-setting-robert-c-
smith/
https://textbookfull.com/product/indias-public-health-care-
delivery-policies-for-universal-health-care-1st-edition-sanjeev-
kelkar/
https://textbookfull.com/product/nutrition-for-health-and-health-
care-linda-kelly-debruyne/
https://textbookfull.com/product/health-care-information-systems-
a-practical-approach-for-health-care-management-4th-edition-
karen-a-wager/
Rethinking Health Care Ethics Stephen Scher
https://textbookfull.com/product/rethinking-health-care-ethics-
stephen-scher/
https://textbookfull.com/product/health-care-entities-
september-2017-aicpa/
https://textbookfull.com/product/screening-in-child-health-care-
report-of-the-dutch-working-party-on-child-health-care-1st-
edition-balledux/
https://textbookfull.com/product/palliative-care-within-mental-
health-care-and-practice-1st-edition-david-cooper/
https://textbookfull.com/product/public-health-nursing-
population-centered-health-care-in-the-community-marcia-stanhope/
Albert C. Hergenroeder
Constance M. Wiemann
Editors
123
Health Care Transition
Albert C. Hergenroeder
Constance M. Wiemann
Editors
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer International Publishing AG
part of Springer Nature
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
v
vi Preface
the field reference, including the framework, tools, and case-based examples
needed to develop and evaluate an HCT planning program that can be imple-
mented regardless of a patient’s disease or disability. The editors of this book
have been involved in developing HCT programs over the past 17 years.
Drawing from their own personal experience as well as the empirical litera-
ture, the editors and invited chapter authors provide valuable perspectives on
issues to consider in developing HCT programs across a range of health-care
settings.
This textbook focuses on how to develop HCT programs regardless of
disease or disability. As such, it does not cover condition-specific transition
concerns, except as illustrated through case studies. We prefer to think of the
transition process as occurring in three phases: preparation, transfer, and
engagement of the AYASHCN in the adult health-care system. A process for
this course from pediatric to adult-based care is presented in Chap. 1 as the 6
Core Elements of HCT. This process can be applied to any HCT model.
Wherever possible, youth/young adult, caregiver, and both pediatric and
adult provider perspectives and voices are represented. The terms children
with special health-care needs (CSHCN), youth with special health-care
needs (YSHCN), and adolescents and young adults with special health-care
needs (AYASHCN) are used throughout the book where appropriate. Many
chapters contain brief case examples to illustrate key concepts or address
literature gaps. As HCT is a process with overlapping components, there is
some overlap among chapters. In addition, we have tried to cross-reference
chapters, where appropriate.
This textbook begins with an introductory chapter (Part I) defining HCT
describing the urgent need for comprehensive transition planning, the subse-
quent morbidity and mortality associated with poor transition outcomes, bar-
riers to HCT, and a framework for developing and evaluating health-care
transition programs. Part II focuses on the anatomic and neurochemical
changes that occur in the brain during adolescence and young adulthood, the
impact of these changes on cognitive function and behavior, and the ways in
which cognitive function and behavior influence AYASHCN management of
their illness during transition. The HCT perspectives of important partici-
pants in the HCT transition process—youth/young adults, caregivers, and
both pediatric and adult providers—are presented in Part III, as well as
changes in insurance and additional financial barriers experienced as youth
age into young adulthood. Part IV presents ten chapters each addressing an
aspect of developing HCT programs, from establishing administrative struc-
tures and processes to preparing, transferring, and tracking AYASHCN as
they leave the pediatric setting to their successful acceptance into the adult
health-care system. A successful transition from the perspective of five key
stakeholders in the transition process—patients, caregivers, pediatric provid-
ers, adult providers, and third-party payors—is presented in Part V. Issues of
HCT finance are covered in two chapters (Part VI). Part VII explores special
issues in HCT, such as HCT and the medical home, the international perspec-
tive on transition, legal issues in HCT, and transitioning youth with medical
complexity or cognitive/intellectual disabilities. The chapters in this section
that represent relatively new topics in HCT include the hospitalist’s and
Preface vii
d entist’s perspectives on HCT and the increased role of pharmacists and pal-
liative care. Models of HCT programs are presented in Part VIII, including a
case study of a hospital-based transition planning program and an overview
of a variety of programmatic models currently operating in the field, as well
as the state of the field in terms of evidence to support best practice. A single
concluding chapter forms Part IX.
In all, there are 37 chapters from 63 authors representing 46 medical cen-
ters in North America and Europe.
It is important to note that as of the writing of this textbook, the infrastruc-
ture of HCT finance is currently being threatened by repeal of the ACA, with
proposed dramatic reductions in Medicaid and CHIP payments upon which
many AYASHCN depend for life-sustaining therapies.
Part I Introduction
ix
x Contents
Part IX Conclusions
37 Conclusions������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 381
Constance M. Wiemann and Albert C. Hergenroeder
Appendix ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 383
Index�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 385
Contributors
xiii
xiv Contributors
and consent for adolescents to take on a greater MCHB continues to support a national resource
role in their own health care, (3) family support center on health-care transition, called Got
to encourage and support adolescent indepen- Transition [8], and numerous training and special
dence, and (4) professional sensitivity to the psy- projects that incorporate health-care transition.
chosocial issues of disability, including shared The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
responsibility between pediatric and adult profes- Administration (SAMHSA), too, has established
sionals to assure that care is continuous. a “Healthy Transitions” grant program, to sup-
In 2002, the American Academy of Pediatrics port state interventions for 16–25-year-olds with
(AAP), the American Academy of Family serious mental health conditions [9]. In addition,
Physicians (AAFP), and the American College of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Physicians (ACP) published a consensus state- (CMS) includes care transitions in its Medicaid
ment on health-care transition for young adults health home option for individuals with chronic
with special health-care needs [4]. This policy conditions [10]. Another important national
statement defined six steps needed to “maximize effort is the National Committee on Quality
lifelong functioning and potential through the Assurance’s patient-centered medical home rec-
provision of high-quality, developmentally ognition requirements that incorporate pediatric-
appropriate health care services that continues to-
adult transitions [11]. All of these efforts
uninterrupted as the individual moves from ado- demonstrate growing national attention on
lescence to adulthood.” [4]. These steps called for health-care transition.
(1) ensuring that all YSHCN have an identified In 2011, the AAP, AAFP, and ACP released a
provider with responsibility for transition plan- joint clinical report that, for the first time, went
ning; (2) identifying core transition knowledge beyond a general statement on transition and
and skills as part of physician training and certifi- offered specific guidance for primary and spe-
cation; (3) preparing up-to-date medical summa- cialty care on practice-based transition supports
ries; (4) developing written transition plans using an age-based algorithm for all youth with a
starting at age 14; (5) applying the same guide- component for YSHCN that begins in early ado-
lines for primary and preventive care for all youth lescence and continues into young adulthood
and young adults, including those with special [12]. This clinical report defined six practice-
needs; and (6) ensuring access to affordable and based steps, including (1) discussing an office
continuous health insurance coverage. transition policy with youth and parents, (2)
developing a transition plan with youth and par-
ents, (3) reviewing and updating the transition
Current Health-Care Transition plan and preparing for adult care, (4) increased
Priorities and National Professional engagement of youth in self-care and decision-
HCT Efforts making in preparation for an adult approach to
care starting at age 18, (5) incorporating transition
Health-care transition is one of the Healthy planning in chronic care management and
People 2020 national objectives [5]. Specifically, addressing age-appropriate transition issues, and
Healthy People calls for increasing the propor- (6) ensuring transition completion. Further, the
tion of YSHCN whose health-care provider has clinical report recommended that transition plan-
discussed transition planning from pediatric to ning begin between ages 12 and 14 and that trans-
adult health care. Health-care transition is also an fer out of pediatric care should take place between
MCHB Title V national performance priority: to 18 and 21. Finally, the clinical report emphasized
increase the proportion of youth with and without the importance of communication between pedi-
special health-care needs who receive the ser- atric and adult providers as well as timely
vices necessary to make transitions to adult care exchange of current medical information. The
[6]. As many as 32 state Title V programs have 2011 clinical report served as the framework and
elected to focus on transition as a priority [7]. set the stage for the current HCT quality improve-
1 Introduction: Historical Perspectives, Current Priorities, and Healthcare Transition Processes 5
ment process called the Six Core Elements of to and regular use of health care. Clearly, the
Health Care Transition, discussed below [13]. implications of these utilization patterns suggest
This 2011 clinical report is currently being the urgency of outreach and facilitated access as
updated jointly by the AAP, AAFP, and ACP and part of all transition interventions.
will likely be released in 2018.
and consent changes that happen at age 18 as 3. Meeting with adults at school or somewhere
well as the eventual shift to an adult provider. In else to set goals for what you would do after
addition, these data show that about 30% of high school and make a plan to achieve them
YSHCN are not actively working with their pro- (called a transition plan).
vider to gain self-care skills [20].
According to the 2007 Survey of Adult The main factors associated with not receiving
Transition and Health, 76% of young adults, aged transition counseling were not having a personal
19–23, reported not receiving transition counsel- doctor or nurse and problems with provider-
ing services [21]. This national survey sample is patient communications.
of young adults whose parents were interviewed Much has been written about disease-specific
when their youth were 14–17, as part of the 2001 barriers experienced by youth, young adult, fam-
National Survey of Children with Special Health ily, and clinicians (see Tables 1.1 and 1.2) as well
Care Needs. Receipt of transition counseling in as adverse outcomes associated with lack of
this survey used the following three measures: structured transition support. These barriers are
discussed throughout the book, in nearly every
1. Doctors have discussed how their needs would chapter, and from a variety of personal, profes-
change with age. sional, and systems perspectives. Most com-
2. Doctors have discussed how to obtain health monly youth and families are anxious about
insurance as an adult. leaving their long-standing pediatric clinicians,
the lack of information regarding the transition
process, and poor communication between pedi-
Table 1.1 Barriers: youth and families’ perspectives atric and adult clinicians. Pediatric providers
[22–24] express concern about the lack of adult clinicians
• Hard to leave long-standing pediatric provider(s) available and their training in the care of youth
• Lack of information about transition process with pediatric-onset chronic illnesses. Recent
• Difficult to find adult specialty doctors/adult adult provider surveys, however, show that many
support systems adult clinicians are interested in learning from
• Not prepared for adult care their pediatric colleagues and are willing to care
• Lack of communication/coordination between for young adults with pediatric-onset diseases if
pediatric and adult providers/systems
improved communications and infrastructure
support can be provided especially for those
Table 1.2 Barriers: pediatric and adult clinicians’ per- youth with medically complex diseases [32].
spectives [25–31] Many studies show the adverse impacts from
• Poor communication and coordination between lack of health-care transition support in terms of
pediatric and adult providers/systems medical complications [33, 34], limitations in
• Hard to let go of long-standing relationships health and well-being [35, 36], lack of treatment
• Low levels of youth/young adults’ knowledge of and medication adherence [34, 37], discontinuity
their own health, privacy and consent issues,
how to use health care of care [38], consumer dissatisfaction [35, 39],
• Limited adult health system infrastructure and higher emergency room, hospital utilization,
support and higher costs of care [34, 40, 41]. For example,
– Inadequate care coordination support in a review of transition for youth with diabetes,
– Little information on community resources
delayed first appointments in adult care, increased
– Poor access to adult mental health clinicians
hospitalizations, and worsening A1C levels were
• Adult clinicians’ lack of knowledge/training in
pediatric-onset diseases, young adult health and seen in the transition period [42]. In studies of
communication transition for youth with HIV, youth had poor
• Adult clinicians’ preference for consultation medication adherence and worsening disease with
support from pediatric colleagues lower CD4 counts during transition to adult pro-
• Little time and low payment for HCT activities viders [43]. Other studies report young adults
1 Introduction: Historical Perspectives, Current Priorities, and Healthcare Transition Processes 7
with sickle cell disease transferring from pediatric Elements approach and tools were feasible to use
clinics had increased episodes of pain and higher in both primary and subspecialty clinical settings
mortality [44] and youth with transplants had and resulted in measurable improvements in the
higher rates of rejection and allograft loss imme- transition process [46].
diately following transfer [45]. The Six Core Elements of HCT define the
basic components of health-care transition sup-
port that any practice, health-care system, transi-
he Six Core Elements of HCT
T tion model, or program can use to develop a
Quality Improvement Process successful transition process that includes the
and Evidence for Structured HCT three key components of HCT: preparation, trans-
Interventions fer, and integration into adult care. Clinicians/sys-
tems can choose to implement all or only a few of
With the 2011 AAP/AAFP/ACP Clinical Report the core elements, and they can also customize the
as a framework, a new quality improvement sample tools to fit their patient population needs
structured transition process, called the Six Core and resources. Using a quality improvement pro-
Elements of Health Care Transition, was devel- cess allows flexibility to determine how much
oped and tested between 2011 and 2013 in learn- support youth will require to attain needed skills
ing collaboratives launched in Washington DC, related to self-care and health system utilization.
Massachusetts, Colorado, New Hampshire, and Patients with medically complex conditions,
Wisconsin (Fig. 1.1). These learning collabora- developmental disabilities, and mental health
tives utilized the evidence-based quality improve- conditions will likely require more time and sys-
ment methodology from the National Initiative tem support. Patients who have more family sup-
for Children’s Healthcare Quality and pioneered port and resources, greater self- management
by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. skills, or less complex disease will likely require
This work demonstrated that the Six Core less system support.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Transition Transfer Transition
Transition Tracking Readiness/ Transition of Care/Initial Completion/
Policy and Self Care Planning Adult ongoing care/
Monitoring Assessment Provider Visit Consumer
Feedback
Fig. 1.1 Six Core Elements of Transition-Transitioning Youth to an Adult Health Care Provider Version [8]
8 P. H. White and M. A. McManus
The Six Core Elements approach includes gram that utilized the Six Core Elements and
packages and sample tools for different settings: combines quality improvement with improving
(1) for those youth who are leaving a pediatric, transition care [54].
med-peds, or family physician practice to move to In a 2017 systematic review of evaluation
an adult provider (called “Transitioning Youth to studies conducted between 1995 and 2016,
Adult Health Care”), (2) for those who will be Gabriel et al. [55] identified 43 transition stud-
transitioning to an adult model of care but not ies that found significant positive effects of
changing providers (called “Transitioning to an structured transition interventions. Almost all of
Adult Approach to Care without changing these studies examined youth with a single
providers”) for use by family medicine and med- chronic condition. Using the triple aim frame-
peds providers, and (3) for those who are integrat- work of population health, consumer experi-
ing into an adult practice (called “Integrating ence, and costs of care, the authors discovered
Young Adults into Adult Health Care”) for use by statistically significant positive outcomes in 28
internal medicine, family medicine, and med- studies. Positive population health outcomes
peds providers accepting transfer of young adults. were most often reported in terms of adherence
A side-by-side display comparing the three pack- to care, improved patient-reported health and
ages can be found at http://gottransition.org/ quality of life, and development of self-care
resourceGet.cfm?id=206. skills. Additional positive outcomes in the sys-
The Six Core Elements quality improvement tematic review included improved experience of
approach has been successfully customized and care, increased ambulatory care visits, less time
utilized in different settings and models of care, between the last pediatric and initial adult visit,
including many American College of Physicians and lower emergency room and hospital use.
subspecialty societies [47], a DC Medicaid- Many different HCT models were used in these
managed care organization [48], and several evaluation studies, but descriptive information
integrated care systems in both primary and about these interventions was limited, which
subspecialty care settings, such as Henry Ford precluded associating significant positive out-
Health System, Walter Reed Medical Center, comes with particular models.
Cleveland Clinic, the University of Rochester
Medical System [49], and Kansas City Mercy
Children’s Hospital (for all their pediatric Health-Care Transition Process
departments) [50]. Got Transition, with their and Outcome Measurement
system partners, published a tip sheet “Starting
a Transition Improvement Process Using the An essential part of the transition process is mea-
Six Core Elements of Health Care Transition” suring transition performance among individual
that summarizes the key initial steps for a clinicians/practices and networks/systems in
health-care quality improvement process [51]. terms of both process and outcome. For example,
Due to requests from many primary care prac- if one measures implementation progress using
tices, Got Transition developed a tip sheet the Six Core Elements process, each of the Six
“Incorporating Pediatric-To-Adult Transition Core Elements packages has measurement tools
into NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home to track transition implementation improvements.
Recognition” [52]. Got Transition also has col- There are two options: (1) the “Current
laborated with school-based health clinics to Assessment of Health Care Transition Activities,”
customize the Six Core Elements for their stu- which is a qualitative self-assessment method to
dent population, including utilizing the readi- determine the level of health-care transition sup-
ness assessment results for building self-care port available, and (2) the “Health Care Transition
skills in health education classes [53]. In addi- Process Measurement Tool,” which is an objec-
tion, with a med-peds residency education pro- tive scoring method for assessing implementation
1 Introduction: Historical Perspectives, Current Priorities, and Healthcare Transition Processes 9
of the Six Core Elements. Each can be completed sition care. There is no consensus regarding rec-
at the beginning of a quality improvement (QI) ommended HCT models, and it is likely that
process to provide as a baseline and then periodi- many models of care will be needed to reflect the
cally to assess progress. complexity of the population transitioning with,
A useful framework for measuring outcomes for example, more support being needed for the
is based on the triple aims of population health, more complex youth and young adult population.
consumer experience, and utilization and costs There are several chapters in this text that pro-
(see also Chaps. 23, 24, and 25) [56]. To measure vide the reader with current opinions on various
population health, several variables can be con- transition interventions, models, and measures
sidered, including self-care skills, adherence to (see Part IV, Chaps. 9–18; Part VII, Chaps. 26–
care (e.g., medications and drug blood levels), 28; and, Part VIII, Chaps. 35 and 36).
continuity of care, disease-specific measures
(e.g., A1C levels), mortality, and quality of life Conclusion
(QoL) [55]. The latter variable is a difficult indi- Now is the time to improve the transition from
cator of the transition impact because the health- pediatric adult-based care for youth with and
care transition process may be a minor component without special needs. There is increased need
affecting the young adult’s QoL. Consumer expe- and interest from health-care systems, primary
rience can be measured with the “Consumer HCT and specialty care practices, hospitals, public
Feedback Survey” that is a part of the Six Core health programs, and national organizations.
Elements packages. The questions are mainly Many transition improvements are being under-
based on the questions from the National Survey taken. The Six Core Elements offer a process
of Children with Special Health Care Needs and that can be successfully adapted and imple-
the ADAPT survey [57]. There are only a few mented in a variety of settings and models. This
studies measuring consumer feedback, and many introduction has covered the history and current
are disease-specific, such as the “Mind the Gap experience around HCT and the latter is covered
Scale” for youth with arthritis [58]. There is little in greater detail in the following chapters.
data from surveys of clinician experience of a
structured transition process in the literature. One
study used a structured interview format to obtain References
provider experience with the Six Core Elements
approach [46]. To measure utilization and cost, 1. Magrab PR, Millar HEC, editors. Surgeon General’s
variables include the outpatient, inpatient and conference: growing up and getting medical care:
youth with special health care needs. Jekyll Island,
emergency room use, time lapse between pediat- GA: Office of the Surgeon General; 1989.
ric and adult health visits, and their associated 2. McPherson M, Weissman G, Strickland BB, van Dyck
costs [55]. Other chapters add to the discussion PC, Blumberg SJ, Newacheck PW. Implementing
of patient and family experiences and outcomes community-based systems of services for children
and youths with special health care needs: how well
(see Chaps. 4, 5, 19, 26, 35, and 36). are we doing? Pediatrics. 2004;113:1538–44.
3. Blum RW, Garell D, Hodgman CH, Jorissen TW,
Okinow NA, Orr DP, et al. Transition from child-
Health-Care Transition centered to adult health-care systems for adolescents
with chronic conditions. A position paper of the
Interventions and Models of Care Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health.
1993;14:570–6.
As mentioned previously, the 2011 AAP/AAFP/ 4. American Academy of Pediatrics, American
ACP Clinical Report and the Six Core Elements Academy of Family Physicians, American College of
Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.
of HCT, which address planning, transfer, and A consensus statement on health care transitions
integration into adult care, can be utilized in for young adults with special health care needs.
many different interventions and models of tran- Pediatrics. 2002;110:1304–6.
10 P. H. White and M. A. McManus
5. HealthyPeople.gov. Disability and Health. https:// tus of transition preparation among youth with
www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/ special needs in the United States. Pediatrics.
topic/disability-and-health/objectives. Accessed 29 2013;131:1090–7.
Jun 2017. 20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
6. Lu MC, Lauver CB, Dykton C, Kogan MD, Lawler Health Resources and Services Administration,
MH, Raskin-Ramos L, et al. Transformation of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Frequently
title V maternal and child health services block grant. asked questions: 2016 National Survey of Children’s
Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:927–31. Health. https://mchb.hrsa.gov/data/national-surveys/
7. McManus M, Beck D. Transition to adult health data-user. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
care and state title V program directions: a review of 21. Sawicki GS, Whitworth R, Gunn L, Butterfield R,
2017 block grant applications. Washington, DC: Got Lukens-Bull K, Wood D. Receipt of health care tran-
Transition; 2017. sition counseling in the National Survey of adult tran-
8. Got Transition. Got Transition Home Page. http:// sition and health. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e521–9.
www.gottransition.org. Accessed 29 Jun 2017. 22. Bregnballe V, Boisen KA, Schiotz PO, Pressler T,
9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Lomborg K. Flying the Nest: a challenge for young
Administration (SAMHSA). Healthy Transitions adults with cystic fibrosis and their parents. Patient
Grant Information. https://www.samhsa.gov/nitt-ta/ Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:229–36.
healthy-transitions-grant-information. Accessed 29 23. Heath G, Farre A, Shaw K. Parenting a child with
Jun 2017. chronic illness as they transition into adulthood: a
10. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Health systematic review and thematic synthesis of par-
Homes for Enrollees with Chronic Conditions. www. ents’ experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:
cms.gov/smdl/downloads/SMD10024.pdf. Accessed 76–92.
29 Jun 2017. 24. Rutishauser C, Sawyer SM, Ambresin AE. Transition
11. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). of young people with chronic conditions: a cross-
NCQA PMCH Standards and Guidelines. http://www. sectional study of patient perceptions before and after
ncqa.org/programs/recognition/practices/patient-cen- transfer from pediatric to adult health care. Eur J
tered-medical-home-pcmh/getting-recognized/docu- Pediatr. 2014;173:1067–74.
ments. Accessed 29 Jun 2017. 25. White P, McManus M, Alblan M, et al. Adult
12. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Physician Perspectives on Transition from Pediatric
Academy of Family Physicians, American College to Adult Health Care. Poster presented at the 16th
of Physicians, Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Annual Chronic Illness and Disability Conference,
Group, Cooley WC, Sagerman PJ. Supporting the Houston, TX, October 1–2, 2015.
health care transition from adolescence to adulthood 26. Garvey KC, Wolpert HA, Rhodes ET, Laffel LM,
in the medical home. Pediatrics. 2011;128:182–200. Kleinman K, Beste MG, et al. Health care transition
13. Got Transition. Six Core Elements of Health Care in patients with type 1 diabetes: young adult experi-
Transition. http://www.gottransition.org/resources/ ences and relationship to glycemic control. Diabetes
index.cfm. Accessed 29 Jun 2017. Care. 2012;35:1716–22.
14. Data Resource Center for Child & Adolescent Health. 27. Nehring WM, Betz CL, Lobo ML. Uncharted terri-
How Many Children in the United States Have Special tory: systematic review of providers’ roles, under-
Health Needs. http://childhealthdata.org/browse/sur- standing, and views pertaining to health care
vey. Accessed 29 Jun 2017. transition. J Pediatr Nurs. 2015;30:732–47.
15. Brault MW. Americans with disabilities: 2010. 28. Okumura MJ, Kerr EA, Cabana MD, Davis MM,
https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2012/ Demonner S, Heisler M. Physician views on barriers
demo/p70-131.html. Accessed 29 Jun 2017. to primary care for young adults with childhood-onset
16. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council chronic disease. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e748–54.
of the National Academies. Investing in the health 29. Peter NG, Forke CM, Ginsburg KR, Schwarz
and well-being of young adults. Washington, DC: The DF. Transition from pediatric to adult care: internists’
National Academies Press; 2014. perspectives. Pediatrics. 2009;123:417–23.
17. Society for Adolescent Health Medicine (SAHM). 30. Szalda DE, Jimenez ME, Long JE, Ni A, Shea JA,
Young adult health and well-being: a position state- Jan S. Healthcare system supports for young adult
ment of the Society for Adolescent Health and patients with pediatric onset chronic conditions: a
Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60:758–9. qualitative study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2015;30:126–32.
18. Spencer D, McManus M, Thiede Call K, Turner J, 31. Telfair J, Alexander LR, Loosier PS, Alleman-Velez
Harwood C, White P. Health care coverage and access PL, Simmons J. Providers’ perspectives and beliefs
among children, adolescents, and young adults, regarding transition to adult Care for Adolescents with
2012–2015: implications for future health reforms. J sickle cell disease. J Health Care Poor Underserved.
Adolesc Health. In press. 2004;15:443–61.
19. McManus MA, Pollack LR, Cooley WC, McAllister 32. White P, Cuomo C, Johnson-Hooper T, et al. Adult
JW, Lotstein D, Strickland B, et al. Current sta- Provider Willingness to Accept Young Adults into
1 Introduction: Historical Perspectives, Current Priorities, and Healthcare Transition Processes 11
Their Practice: Results from Three Integrated Delivery regarding self-care management and transitioning.
Systems. Poster presented at the 17th Annual Chronic Pediatr Nurs. 2013;39:81–9.
Illness and Disability Conference, Houston, TX, 46. McManus M, White P, Barbour A, Downing B,
October 27–28, 2016. Hawkins K, Quion N, et al. Pediatric to adult transi-
33. Logan J, Peralta E, Brown K, Moffett M, Advani A, tion: a quality improvement model for primary care. J
Leech N. Smoothing the transition from paediatric to Adolesc Health. 2015;56:73–8.
adult services in Type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Nurs. 47. American College of Physicians. Condition-Specific
2008;12:328–38. Tools. https://www.acponline.org/clinical-infor-
34. Cadario F, Prodam F, Bellone S, Trada M, Binotti M, mation/high-value-care/resources-for-clinicians/
Trada M, et al. Transition process of patients with pediatric-to-adult-care-transitions-initiative/condi-
type 1 diabetes (T1dm) from Paediatric to the adult tion-specific-tools. Accessed 29 Jun 2017.
health care service: a hospital-based approach. Clin 48. McManus M, White P, Pirtle R, Hancock C, Ablan M,
Endocrinol. 2009;71:346–50. Corona-Parra R. Incorporating the six Core elements
35. Chaudhry SR, Keaton M, Nasr SZ. Evaluation of a of health care transition into a Medicaid managed care
cystic fibrosis transition program from pediatric to plan: lessons learned from a pilot project. J Pediatr
adult care. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013;48:658–65. Nurs. 2015;30:700–13.
36. Maslow G, Adams C, Willis M, Neukirch J, Herts K, 49. Jones MR, Robbins BW, Augustine M, Doyle J, Mack-
Froehlich W, et al. An evaluation of a positive youth Fogg J, Jones H, et al. Transfer from pediatric to adult
development program for adolescents with chronic endocrinology. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(7):822–30.
illness. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:179–85. 50. Hickam T, White P, et al. Implementing a nationally
37. Annunziato RA, Baisley MC, Arrato N, Barton C, recognized pediatric-to-adult transitional care approach
Henderling F, Arnon R, et al. Strangers headed to a in a major children’s hospital. Health Soc Work. 2018.
strange land? A pilot study of using a transition coor- https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlx049/4744462.
dinator to improve transfer from pediatric to adult ser- 51. White P, Cooley WC, McAllister JW. Starting a tran-
vices. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1628–33. sition improvement process using the six Core ele-
38. Wojciechowski EA, Hurtig A, Dorn L. A natural his- ments of health care transition. Washington, DC: Got
tory study of adolescents and young adults with sickle Transition; 2015.
cell disease as they transfer to adult care: a need for 52. Harwood C, McManus M, White P. Incorporating
case management services. J Pediatr Nurs. 2002;17: pediatric-to-adult transition into NCQA patient-cen-
18–27. tered medical home recognition. Washington, DC:
39. McDonagh JE, Southwood TR, Shaw KL, British Got Transition; 2017.
Society of P, Adolescent R. The impact of a coordi- 53. White P, Caskin A, Aramburu MG, Harwood C,
nated transitional care Programme on adolescents McManus P. Adapting the Six Core Elements of
with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology Health Care Transition for Use in a School-Based
(Oxford). 2007;46:161–8. Health Clinic and School Health Education. Poster
40. Gilmer TP, Ojeda VD, Fawley-King K, Larson presented at the 18th Annual Chronic Illness and
B, Garcia P. Change in mental health service use Disability Conference, Houston, TX, October 4–6,
after offering youth-specific versus adult programs 2017.
to transition-age youths. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63: 54. Volertas SD, Rossi-Foulkes R. Using quality improve-
592–6. ment in resident education to improve transition care.
41. Robertson LP, McDonagh JE, Southwood TR, Pediatr Ann. 2017;46:e203–6.
Shaw KL, British Society of Paediatric Adolescent 55. Gabriel P, McManus M, Rogers K, White P. Outcome
Rheumatology. Growing up and moving on: a mul- evidence for structured pediatric to adult health care
ticentre UK audit of the transfer of adolescents transition interventions: a systemic review. J Peds.
with juvenile idiopathic arthritis from paediatric 2017;188:263–269.e15.
to adult centred care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65: 56. Prior M, McManus M, White P, Davidson
74–80. L. Measuring the “triple aim” in transition care: a sys-
42. Wafa S, Nakhla M. Improving the transition from tematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e1648–61.
pediatric to adult diabetes healthcare: a literature 57. Sawicki GS, Garvey KC, Toomey SL, Williams KA,
review. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39:520–8. Hargraves JL, James T, et al. Preparation for transition
43. Wiener LS, Kohrt BA, Battles HB, Pao M. The HIV to adult care among Medicaid-insured adolescents.
experience: youth identified barriers for transition- Pediatrics. 2017;140(1):e20162768.
ing from pediatric to adult care. J Pediatr Psychol. 58. Shaw KL, Southwood TR, McDonagh JE, British
2011;36:141–54. Society of P, Adolescent R. Development and prelimi-
44. Majumdar S. The adolescent with sickle cell disease. nary validation of the ‘Mind the gap’ scale to assess
Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2013;24:295–306, xv. satisfaction with transitional health care among ado-
45. Lochridge J, Wolff J, Oliva M, O’Sullivan-Oliveira lescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Child Care
J. Perceptions of solid organ transplant recipients Health Dev. 2007;33:380–8.
Part II
The Adolescent and Young Adult:
A Developmental Perspective
The Anatomical, Hormonal
and Neurochemical Changes that 2
Occur During Brain Development
in Adolescents and Young Adults
5y
rs
AG
E
Fig. 2.2 Right lateral
and top views of the
dynamic sequence of >0.5
grey matter maturation
0.4
over the cortical surface. 20
The side bar shows a yrs 0.3
colour representation 0.2
in units of grey matter 0.1
volume. Fifty-two scans 0.0
from thirteen subjects Gray
each scanned four times Matter
at approximately 2-year Volume
intervals. Reprinted with
permission from [2]
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Mustapukuinen
mies
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Language: Finnish
Historiallinen romaani
Kirj.
STANLEY J. WEYMAN
V. Hämeen-Anttila
SISÄLLYS:
I. Fécampin markkinat.
II. Solomon Notredame.
III. Mies ja vaimo.
IV. Kaksiovinen talo.
V. Ylempi holviovi.
Vi. Kiinnytysjauhe.
Vii. Klytemnestra.
VIII. Kainin merkki.
IX. Oikeuden edessä.
X. Kaksi todistajaa.
I.
Fécampin markkinat.
"En."
"Minä."