Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF An Integrated Approach For An Archaeological and Environmental Park in South Eastern Turkey Tilmen Hoyuk Nicolo Marchetti Ebook Full Chapter
PDF An Integrated Approach For An Archaeological and Environmental Park in South Eastern Turkey Tilmen Hoyuk Nicolo Marchetti Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/cases-and-concepts-in-
comparative-politics-an-integrated-approach-first-edition-
patrick-h-oneil/
https://textbookfull.com/product/managing-and-measuring-
performance-in-public-and-nonprofit-organizations-an-integrated-
approach-2nd-edition-theodore-h-poister/
https://textbookfull.com/product/plant-systematics-an-integrated-
approach-singh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/coastal-wetlands-an-integrated-
ecosystem-approach-gerardo-perillo/
Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach William
N. Dunn
https://textbookfull.com/product/public-policy-analysis-an-
integrated-approach-william-n-dunn/
https://textbookfull.com/product/strategic-management-theory-an-
integrated-approach-charles-w-l-hill/
https://textbookfull.com/product/text-segmentation-and-
recognition-for-enhanced-image-spam-detection-an-integrated-
approach-mallikka-rajalingam/
https://textbookfull.com/product/risk-management-competency-
development-in-banks-an-integrated-approach-eric-h-y-koh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/an-integrated-approach-to-
communication-theory-and-research-don-w-stacks/
Nicolò Marchetti
Giovanna Franco
Stefano Francesco Musso
Maria Benedetta Spadolini Editors
An Integrated
Approach for an
Archaeological and
Environmental Park
in South-Eastern
Turkey
Tilmen Höyük
An Integrated Approach for an Archaeological
and Environmental Park in South-Eastern Turkey
Nicolò Marchetti Giovanna Franco
• •
An Integrated Approach
for an Archaeological
and Environmental Park
in South-Eastern Turkey
Tilmen Höyük
123
Editors
Nicolò Marchetti Giovanna Franco
Department of History and Cultures Architecture and Design Department
Alma Mater Studiorum - University University of Genoa
of Bologna Genoa, Italy
Bologna, Italy
Maria Benedetta Spadolini
Stefano Francesco Musso Architecture and Design Department
Architecture and Design Department University of Genoa
University of Genoa Genoa, Italy
Genoa, Italy
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
This book is dedicated to the memory of
Giorgio Squinzi, Adriana Spazzoli and Aykut
Tuzcu
Preface and acknowledgements
This book is the final report on a scientific research funded under the FIRB 2003
(Fondo per gli investimenti della ricerca di base) programme by the Italian Ministry
for Education, Universities, and Research, through a project called New method-
ologies related to integrated projects of archaeological parks in the Mediterranean
area. Elaboration, experimentation, verification of advanced technologies and
transferability of results in the enhancement of areas of significant cultural, envi-
ronmental and touristic interest. Selection of study cases in northern Syria and
southern Turkey (principal investigator Paolo Matthiae, Sapienza University of
Rome, Italy).
The core feature of the entire programme was that such a project was going to be
developed and carried out by a multidisciplinary team: it foresaw the planning,
design and implementation of an archaeological park in a sensitive (on multiple
levels) location within the Mediterranean area in order to propose and realize in
practice a ‘model’, potentially transferable to other sites as well.
To achieve this main aim, the work has been divided among five research units
characterized by highly differentiated skills but closely integrated within the
common objective of developing and applying new methodologies and technolo-
gies for the planning and management of archaeological parks in the Mediterranean
areas. The first study case coincided with the first unit of the PI Matthiae and it was
about the archaeological park of Ebla in Syria, which is not reported here and which
was successfully completed just before the outbreak of the Civil War in Syria. The
other four units were all about the second study case, Tilmen Höyük in Turkey
where Nicolò Marchetti had been directing archaeological excavations since 2003.
His unit (based at the then Department of Archaeology, now of History and
Cultures, of the Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna) was about
archaeological research and the definition of contents, another unit from the same
university led by Paola Rossi (from the then Department of Agro-Environmental
Science and Technology, now of Agricultural and Food Sciences) took care of
environmental characterization, a third unit coordinated by M. Benedetta Spadolini
(based at the Faculty of Architecture of the University of Genoa) was tasked with
vii
viii Preface and acknowledgements
the actual planning of the archaeological park and the last unit worked on envi-
ronmental remote monitoring (Vincenzo Fortunati of Ecosearch Ltd.).
Several colleagues from the Universities mentioned above and from other
partner Universities and Institutions in Turkey worked actively on the Tilmen
Höyük project with us through the years 2003 to 2008 and, in addition to those who
are already authors in this volume, we would like to name them here, as a token of
our appreciation and gratitude. Refik Duru and Gülsün Umurtak from Istanbul
University were extraordinary in their generous scientific sharing throughout the
whole project and our debt towards them is immense. Meltem Eti from Marmara
University, Istanbul greatly helped us in solving many logistical issues, like the past
Rector of Gaziantep University, Erhan Ekinci. The Directorate General for Cultural
Heritage and Museums (Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Ankara) supported us in
every possible way through the years: the then Director General Orhan Düzgün
with his then Deputies Ömer Çakır and Abdullah Kocapınar and the Director of
Excavations Melik Ayaz deserve much of our gratitude. In Gaziantep the then
Director of the Provincial Culture Directorate, Salih Efiloğlu, and in Adana the then
Regional Cultural Heritage Conservation Committee Director, Ismail Salman, were
instrumental in 2007 in obtaining all needed permissions for the archaeological
park. The successive directors of Gaziantep Museum between 2003 and 2008—
Hamza Göllüce, Fatma Bulgan, Mehmet Önal, Ahmet Denizhanoğulları—are to be
thanked for their constant cooperation at all levels, even helping us with the difficult
regulations of the Customs Authority. The Representatives of the Ministry of
Culture and Tourism attached to the Expedition—Burhan Balcıoğlu (2003, 2004,
2005, 2008, from Gaziantep Museum), Taner Atalay (2006, from Gaziantep
Museum), Yaşar Ünlü (2007, from Mersin Museum)—not only assisted us in our
daily needs on the field but all became close friends, like our colleague Ahmet
Beyazlar who at the time was serving in Gaziantep Museum.
The Authorities in Gaziantep Province were on our side on countless occasions:
the successive Governors of Gaziantep—Lütfüllah Bilgin (2004, 2005) and
Süleyman Kamçı (2006, 2007)—together with the then Gaziantep Metropolitan
Municipality Mayor, Asım Güzelbey and the then Local Governor of Islahiye,
Bekir Yılmaz inspired us with their enthusiasm for the Tilmen Höyük project. The
then Italian Ambassador in Turkey, Carlo Marsili, the then Italian Consul in Izmir,
Simon Carta, and the then director of the Italian Cultural Institute in Ankara,
Angela Tangianu, have always fully supported us. Finally, the late Aykut Tuzcu
from the Gaziantep Sabah newspaper has always been more than a finest counsellor
for us, truly being a devoted supporter of the Expedition well beyond the termi-
nation of the Tilmen project. Adil Konukoğlu and the Sanko Holding provided
support for the park maintenance after 2007.
As for the members of the Turco-Italian Archaeological Expedition to Tilmen
Höyük who worked on the field for circa 2 months every year it is our pleasure to
list them here: in 2003, the archaeologists Benedetta Panciroli, Alessia Bontempo,
Luisa Guerri, Luciano Cuccui, architects Ivan Solinas and Beatrice Speranza and
topographer Massimo Zanfini; in 2004, the archaeologists Benedetta Panciroli,
Alessandro Colantoni, Luciano Cuccui, Luisa Guerri, Marco Baldacci, Alessia
Preface and acknowledgements ix
Bontempo, Nilüfer Sayıt, Sinem Üstün, Tuğba Güngör, conservator Elisa Spagnoli
and topographer Massimo Zanfini; in 2005, the archaeologists Benedetta Panciroli,
Alessandro Colantoni, Luciano Cuccui, Luisa Guerri, Marco Baldacci, Antonio
Bonomo, Alessia Bontempo, Nihal Akıllı, Işık Aycin, Tolga Ölmezses, conservator
Deniz Hepdinç, draftsman Burhan Gülkan and topographers Giampaolo Luglio and
Massimo Zanfini, in addition to other Faculty members of the University of
Bologna (Paola Rossi, Marco Bittelli, Gabriele Bitelli, Luca Vittuari and Valentina
Girelli); in 2006, the archaeologists Nihal Akıllı, Esra Alp, Işık Aycin, Antonio
Bonomo, Alessandro Colantoni, Luciano Cuccui, Luisa Guerri, Anna Rita Lisella,
Valentina Orsi, Benedetta Panciroli, Ginevra Zoni, conservators Laura Benucci,
Deniz Hepdinç and Suzan Okumuş, draftsmen Kevin Ferrari and Sara De Angelis,
topographers Giampaolo Luglio and Massimo Zanfini; in 2007, the archaeologists
Esra Alp, Ezgi Avar, Antonio Bonomo, Alessandro Campedelli, Ece Cilacı,
Alessandro Colantoni, Luciano Cuccui, Gizem Dertürk, Çetin Gökkaya, Luisa
Guerri, Anna Rita Lisella, Benedetta Panciroli, Ginevra Zoni, conservators Laura
Benucci, Giada Bertocci, Eva Jorge Herrero, Deniz Hepdinç and Fadime Arslan,
draftsmen Kevin Ferrari and Murat Helvacı, botanic specialists Paola Rossi, Halil
Çakan, remote monitoring specialists Luca Berichillo and Salvatore Maiorana,
topographers Giampaolo Luglio, Pietro Baldassarri and Massimo Zanfini, archi-
tectural designer Elena Rosa, architectural conservation specialist Chiara Davite; in
2008, archaeologists Stefano Bassetto, Giacomo Benati, Antonio Bonomo,
Alessandro Campedelli, Luciano Cuccui, Luisa Guerri, Federico Zaina, Ginevra
Zoni, conservator Deniz Hepdinç, remote monitoring specialist Luca Berichillo,
topographer Massimo Zanfini. Members of the Faculty of Architecture of the
University of Genoa, Stefano Musso, Giovanna Franco, Maria Benedetta Spadolini
and Niccolò Casiddu carried out scientific visits at the site in 2005 and 2006.
Elena Rosa and Sandra Antonetti worked on an earlier draft of this volume and
we are very grateful for their efforts. Federico Poole revised the English language of
some chapters.
All photos of Tilmen Höyük and of the work at the site are the copyleft of the
Turco-Italian Archaeological Expedition at Tilmen Höyük.
The company Abet Laminati from Bra, Italy (which in 2007 was celebrating its 50
years of activity) generously supplied the information panels located through the
archaeological park. The Mapei Group (which in 2007 turned 70 years old) freely
supplied every year large quantities of products to be used for conservation activities
both of structures and of the small finds: their enlightened engagement for culture,
especially that of its late president Giorgio Squinzi and its late marketing director
Adriana Spazzoli, is to be commended more than we can write here in words. This
book is dedicated to their memory and to that of our beloved friend Aykut Tuzcu.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Nicolò Marchetti and Stefano Francesco Musso
xi
xii Contents
Roofing History. A Protective Shelter for the Middle Bronze Age K-5
Residency Between Project and Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
Giorgio Mor and Pietro Baldassarri
Detailed Design of the Protective Shelter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
Remarks on the Building Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
Moving Through. The Issue of Accessibility and Archaeological
Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
Niccolò Casiddu
International Legislation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
People with Reduced Mobility: Conservation, Enjoyment, Accessibility . . . 186
Strategic Guidelines: Criteria for Expanded Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
Strategic Guidelines: Management Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
xv
xvi About the Editors
Abstract The archaeological and environmental park of Tilmen Höyük has been
functioning since 2007 almost without any major problem and with a very low
maintenance cost. This book presents the results of a conservation and presentation
project developed between the years 2003 and 2008. We advocate for an integral open
access of the data elaborated and a global public presentation at an archaeological site
for which a scientific project has been carried out in close contact also with the local
and regional communities: the theoretical issues and actions presented here are useful
for the scientific community in designing field projects, such as the system prototypes
for the public visit of the archaeological areas, with low production costs and modular
features. These are potentially transferable to other similar archaeological sites in
the Mediterranean area, dating both from the Classical and pre-Classical periods.
Archaeology has changed dramatically in the last twenty years: having previously
opened itself to the cooperation with other disciplines, it has broadened its sub-
ject of enquiry deriving historical meanings from the analytical framework, thus
contributing to generating new research horizons with new questions attached. At
the same time, the strive towards explanation has entailed, although regrettably not
too often, an anthropological perspective based on hybridization and cross-cultural
approaches. Thus, if the dialectics between processualism and post-processualism
in archaeology seems now to have been resolved, at least theoretically, within this
extended perspective, we still have to come to terms which the resulting continuum
which we get, where even the accepted basic dichotomy between ecofact and arti-
fact becomes blurred once our vision goes without any discontinuity from cognitive,
behavioral, processual and environmental aspects. We now recognize the peculiarity
N. Marchetti (B)
Department of History and Cultures, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna,
Piazza S. Giovanni in Monte 2, Bologna 40124, Italy
e-mail: nicolo.marchetti@unibo.it
S. F. Musso
Architecture and Design Department, University of Genoa, Stradone S. Agostino 37, Genoa
16123, Italy
of all processes, with the paradox that environment itself cannot be deemed “altered”
by human activity, but man-environment interaction is a single concept in which both
ends receive mutual feedback at varying degrees.
This conceptual framework does bear on how we research at the field, of course,
and this also creates a new or changed relation with local communities. When we
plunge into the challenges of the present time, we cannot distinguish any more
between a self-contained science, with its intrinsic sets of actions supposedly uncon-
nected with outer contemporary society (not to speak of course of the post-processual
claim that the sciences of “others” are equally viable), and the views, expectations,
hopes and fears about the(ir) past of the people from either a village, a city or a
nation and beyond. This integrality of approach in an archaeological project obvi-
ously results in a complex articulation of it. This book presents the results—not the
archaeological ones, to be presented elsewhere—of a project developed between the
years 2003 and 2008 (Fig. 4). We aim here at substantiating our integrated view for
an integral open access of the data elaborated and a global public presentation at an
archaeological site for which a scientific project has been carried out in close contact
also with the local and regional communities (Figs. 2 and 3). We believe that the
theoretical issues and actions presented here are useful for the scientific community
in designing field projects: the first decade of the 21st century AD offered many
promises but few practical possibilities for taking full avail of digital data integra-
tion in archaeology (which is only becoming possible in these very last years), but
precisely because of this we can offer here a well manageable case study, which is in
part no more state-of-the-art for its technological content but still represents a quite
advanced approach as for publicly presenting the archaeological heritage (Fig. 1).
The archaeological and environmental park of Tilmen Höyük has been functioning
since 2007 almost without any major problem and with a very low maintenance cost,
being quite positively reviewed upon by colleagues and visitors alike. Although there
is no standstill in science, we do feel satisfied with what we achieved there. As it
should, in time another expedition will come and other display methods will be
applied by Turkish cultural authorities at the site. But having gone through most of
the necessary steps for a successful and comprehensive public presentation, we are
glad to report on them here (Fig. 4).
The traditional methods of setting into historical perspective as well as conservating
ancient structures have been considerably enriched by new methods of analysis and
verification. The first aspect has been dealt with by the archaeologists, who defined
the architectural and material culture of the developed Old Syrian period (c. 1850–
1600 BCE) in an alleged cultural backwater such as the valley of Islahiye (Figs. 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10 and 11), with the architects systematically referencing comparable sites in
the pre-Classical eastern Mediterranean, as well as their current state as far as their
public presentation is concerned.
This base research was then turned into an applied one assuming as main bench-
mark the requirements of historical, archaeological, architectural, technological,
chemico-physical, environmental and social sciences, with a particular attention to
the problems presented by the foreseen mixed touristical and didactic uses of the site
Introduction 3
Fig. 1 Map of the Northern Levant with the main ancient and modern cities. (by courtesy of Marco
Valeri)
Fig. 3 Basaltic outcrops at the road junction leading to the archaeological site of Tilmen Höyük,
note the brown road signage indicating heritage sites
Fig. 4 The archaeological park of Tilmen Höyük (orthophoto taken at the end of the 2007 season)
Introduction 5
Fig. 5 View of Residency C (left) and Royal Palace A (right) from West, c. 1700–1500 BCE. This
and all following views of the excavations were taken in 2006 before the start of the works for the
archaeological park
Fig. 6 View of the Islahiye Valley from Royal Palace A looking South-West, in background the
Amanus range
Fig. 7 The throne room of Royal Palace A towards the Kurt Dağları mountain ranges, from North-
West
Fig. 9 Houses in area G, view from North-East, in central foregorund discarded basalt boulders
from the excavations which later on were incorporated into an elevated viewpoint for visitors
Fig. 10 The south-western corner of the Tilmen acropolis from South-West, note the characteristic
vegetation including also wild olive trees
• Feasibility and maintainability: use of local materials, simple design of new ele-
ments and structures taking into account the local restrains concerning technical
and technological assets.
• Understatement and simplicity: design of elements and structures, which, thanks to
the selected materials, technologies and building techniques, avoid any temptation
to overwhelm the site and its natural assets.
• Authenticity and integrity: selection of materials, restoration techniques and
‘design behaviour’ to grant a rigorous compliance towards the archaeological
remains, in their existing formal and physical consistency and in their historically
acquired relationships with the environment.
• Accessibility and inclusiveness: careful planning of the works, interventions and
elements necessary to allow a safe accessibility to the site and its visit and the
awareness of its historical, cultural, archaeological and naturalistic values.
All research activities have been further conceived and managed in order to acquire
results and products potentially transferable to other similar archaeological sites in
the Mediterranean area, both from the Classical and pre-Classical periods. The wide
range of cultural, technical and informative material produced during three years
(data-base, technical reports, surveys, design drawings and technical descriptions)
can be thus an important ground on which building some guidelines as regards
excavation campaigns and survey methodologies, conservation methods for ancient
structures and planning activities to design and realize an archaeological park to
protect and enhance them.
As a fundamental part of the research, as far as accessibility and use are concerned,
the research unit of Genoa University, in particular, designed and built on site some
modular systems. The first one was a prototype for covering archaeological remains:
that very simple structure, for the many reasons underscored at the beginning of our
work, is characterized by low costs, local materials, easy and simple constructability
and it is thus potentially adaptable to other sites. Besides this modular protective
shelter, the Genoa research unit designed and installed on site several other modular
devices—fixed and mobile—necessary for a correct use of the park as the essays in
this book explain and record in detailed ways.
The research programme included also the design and accomplishment of the visit
paths of the park, by installing a complete and structured system of information panels
characterized by a simple, coordinated and comprehensible design layout (see the
Additional Materials on https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030327538). The
panels, of archaeological or naturalistic content, were steadily set on site with dry
techniques and without interfering too hardly with the ancient remains and the
surrounding landscape.
The eco-sustainability of the whole intervention and site management required
vegetation control plans along with a remote monitoring of the features bound to the
environment and to structural stability, obtained through the pilot-project of a GSM-
connected network—developed by the Ecosearch unit—sending the data collected
by sensors located within the park to a web site. The model for soil conservation and
for the enhancement of the area affected by the excavations has been validated in situ,
8 N. Marchetti and S. F. Musso
Nicolò Marchetti
N. Marchetti (B)
Department of History and Cultures, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna,
Piazza S. Giovanni in Monte 2, Bologna 40124, Italy
e-mail: nicolo.marchetti@unibo.it
In other words, public presentation must be an integrated goal from the start of any
excavation project.
It is a basic truism that an archaeological dig is a destructive process and that such
destruction is halted at some time according to the main aims set by the excavation
director (and/or cultural authorities such a State Ministry etc.): when the period at
which the dig especially aims is reached (if indeed present and preserved) the inves-
tigation is often paused in that given area and the resulting remains may potentially
be presented to the public (I do not deal here with cases of temporary presenta-
tions in the course of the sometimes lengthy excavation process or with subsequent,
reframed reprisals of the investigations aiming at deeper, earlier remains). The case
study of Tilmen Höyük provides us with sufficiently general variables and problems
and may thus serve as a useful basis for a modelization of viable approaches to public
archaeology, independently of the case-specific Turkish regulations and constraints.
Tilmen Höyük lies in south-eastern Turkey (UTM 37 S, 295822.00 m E,
4100665.00 m N), in the province (il) of Gaziantep, district (ilçe) of Islahiye. The
site lies in a narrow plain disseminated with basalt outcrops and delimited by the
mountain ranges of the Amanus and the Kurt Dağı to the West and East respec-
tively. The first excavations in the area were undertaken by a German expedition at
Zincirli Höyük, ancient Sam’al, in 1883, but systematic surveys in the valley when
only undertaken when U. Bahadır Alkım of Istanbul University moved there in 1955
coming from Karatepe and started a program, which lasted until 1972, of archae-
ological researches involving also large-scale excavations (see Marchetti 2011b on
the history of studies in the Islahiye valley).
Tilmen Höyük was excavated between 1959 and 1964 and between 1969 and
1972 (Duru 2003; 2013). In 1990 the construction of a small dam on the Kara Su
stream (which flows both East and West of the site) removed a large stretch of the
outer city megalithic walls and created a tiny artificial basin just at the north-western
foot of the acropolis. The resulting wetter environment has generated a flourishing
vegetation cover all over the site. In 2002, Refik Duru, a member of the original team,
carried out a rehabilitation campaign, repairing some of the damaged monuments
and starting to control vegetation at the site.
In June 2003 the Universities of Bologna and of Istanbul agreed on a joint project
(which for the first two years was under the administrative responsibility of Gaziantep
Museum, then University of Bologna then applied for an excavation permit, classified
as “foreign” by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism) and since October 2003 yearly
campaigns have taken place until 2008 with the directorship of Nicolò Marchetti
and the scientific advisory of Refik Duru. The main aim of the new expedition
was “not only to better study the urbanism of this 5 hectares capital city and the
detailed chronology of its monuments and material culture, but also to contribute to
the historical framework of south-eastern Anatolia and northern Syria” (Marchetti
2005a: 129). The extensive excavations in different areas of the acropolis, of the lower
town and of the outer town (the latter in 2007 only) gave notable results but at the
same time fostered our attitude of carrying out conservation at the same time of the
excavations, getting used to the mutual, unavoidable interferences deriving from the
discussions with colleagues from different fields and towards the end even starting to
Never Ending Story. Responsibility, Strategy and Sustainability in Managing … 13
Fig. 1 Composite map of Tilmen Höyük: schematic structures in lighter gray have only been
surveyed by the Turkish Expedition, all the others in black and the detailed ones by the Turco-Italian
one. Most of the structures date from Middle Bronze II (c. 1800–1600 BCE)
plan some of the excavations in order to complete our conservation and presentation
actions, which has since remained one of our key principles in subsequent projects,
such as at Taşlı Geçit Höyük and Karkemish.1
Our aim was to expose extensively the Middle Bronze II (c. 1800–1600 BCE) town
(Fig. 1): previous excavations by Istanbul University had already revealed that this
was the main phase of the occupation of the site (earlier periods were exposed only
1 Funding for the excavations came from grants of Bologna University (2003–2008), the Fondazione
Cariplo (2005), the Italian Ministry for Foreign Affairs (DGPCC 5th Office now DGSP 6th Office,
2004–2008) and that for Education, Universities and Research (2006–2008, through a project unit
within a PRIN 2005 program coordinated by P. Matthiae). The Expedition also benefited of a 2017
grant to V. Orsi by The Shelby White and Leon Levy Program for Archaeological Publications,
which has allowed to digitalize a part of our archives.
14 N. Marchetti
Fig. 2 The central square between areas C and G in 2006 before the start of the works for the
archaeological park, view from WSW. The Deep Sounding by the Turkish Expedition from the
1960s had been backfilled, while the domestic area in area G (left) was greatly extended by the
renewed excavations in order to give a sense to visitors of the ancient urban shape. In left background
discarded stones from the excavations are visible, which were later turned into a raised visit path
in a limited way and only on the acropolis; see Duru 2003, 2013) and—after my
archaeological fieldwork at Tell Mardikh/Ebla in Syria (as an area supervisor) and
at Tell es-Sultan/Jericho in Palestine (as co-director of an Italo-Palestinian expedi-
tion)—I had many research questions about that crucial phase of the urbanization of
the northern Levant. Five full excavation campaigns between 2003 and 2007 (in 2008
we basically carried out only topographical surveying and maintenance work on the
park opened the year before), each lasting around two and half months, enabled us
to establish in detail the continuous stratigraphy of that urban site between Middle
Bronze I and Late Bronze I, with their chronological subphases, down to a Late
Roman and early Byzantine rural settlements, the latter both limited to the acropolis
(see the sections Reports and Studies in the References list below). We uncovered
several new monuments (fortresses H, P, P2, Q, temple M, residency K-5 (Figs. 3, 4,
5), houses in areas L and G (Fig. 2), rooms near gates K-3 and K-5 and the external
sectors R, V and Z) as well as new features of previously excavated ones (in palace
A, temple E, residency C [with B], gates K-1–K-6, K-2, K-3 and K-5), surveying in
detail also almost all the rest of the latter remains (D, F, the casemates and surviving
city walls).
The main underlying scientific idea was to understand the urban organization of
the Middle Bronze II settlement with its inner functional differentiations, by digging
not only buildings but the “empty” connecting spaces in between (Figs. 1 and 2).
Never Ending Story. Responsibility, Strategy and Sustainability in Managing … 15
Fig. 3 Area K-5 in 2006, view from SW: the stratification of the monument is suggested by the
blocked door in foreground, while the slope which had to be managed in order to install the roofing
and bring visitors uphill is well evident
In doing so we understood how the city, probably called Zalwar, came to have a
monumental layout after Middle Bronze IA (c. 2000–1900/1850 BCE) and how it
was reorganized in the period immediately following the destruction inflicted by
the Old Hittite armies at the end of the 17th century BCE. We intended to give
visitors a real insight into the urban shape and functional organization of an early
2nd millennium BC royal citadel, conveying to them the historical data extracted from
material culture and analyses as well (Fig. 5): in fact, the idea of conservation and
public presentation of the site was embedded since the start into the project and this
led to conservation activities carried out in parallel with the excavations, guided but
some firm and simple principles such as avoiding reconstructions and consolidating
all excavated remains (those at least which we decided to leave and not to demolish
further) either in stone or in mudbrick. Even in cases of monuments excavated in
the 1960s and partially collapsed afterwards for which we had photographs of their
original state, we marked redressed stones with the insertion of a thin lead strip
separating the reconstructed part from the one which was still standing (Fig. 6).
If during the very first season we applied this approach (progressively defined
since the last years of my participation to the Ebla excavations in Syria where Paolo
Matthiae was pioneering the realization of an archaeological park in the Near East
and subsequently during my co-direction of the Tell es-Sultan/Jericho 1997–2000
project in Palestine, which included the development of an archaeological park finally
16 N. Marchetti
completed a few years ago, see Nigro 2000) in a quite unsophisticated way,2 I tried
immediately to seek more professional cooperations and external funds in view of
the tasks stated above. Thus, we were lucky enough to obtain in 2004 a competitive
research grant, in partnership with the Faculty of Architecture of Genoa University
and Ecosearch Ltd. (and P. Matthiae of Sapienza University of Rome as coordinator
but on a separate project about Ebla, see Pinnock 2018): the Italian Ministry for
Education, Universities and Research granted us a FIRB 2003 (for the years 2005–
2008, with 4 research units about Tilmen Höyük, see the Preface) aimed at the
conservation and public presentation of the site, which allowed the activities which
we report throughout this book. Furthermore, in 2008 we organized some training
courses on the communication of contents in archaeological parks thanks to an EU-
funded project “ARCHAIA” (a FP6-SSA, i.e. a Scientific Support Action within the
2 Asone can readily see from an unattractive structure of iron pipes which we built in 2003 to
support a dangerously leaning stone wall in area E (Fig. 7, both still standing to this day it must be
acknowledged).
Never Ending Story. Responsibility, Strategy and Sustainability in Managing … 17
Fig. 5 The extraction of a 1850 BCE large preservation jar from its spot of retrieval in area K-5
(see Fig. 4) stands for the dynamic process which an excavation entails, an information which must
be incorporated into the public presentation of archaeological areas
6th Framework Program of the EU, which I coordinated), the proceedings of which
were immediately published thereafter (Marchetti and Thuesen 2008).
The actions undertaken are described in detail in the following chapters, but I would
like here to state, though briefly, our archaeological perspective. Coping with many
external issues (such as for example the expectations of local communities about
touristic development coupled with the threats posed to a fast-changing environ-
ment) is indeed possible within an international cooperation framework, one which
involves not only specialists from many fields, but also several Universities, Muse-
ums, public Authorities and private Bodies uniting their efforts towards shared goals
and priorities. This multidisciplinary and multi-partner perspective responds to a
contemporary view in which integration (also intended as a continuous feedback
between all involved participants) is the method chosen for facing the complexities
and the challenges posed by an anthropological approach, both as far as the past and
the present are concerned. After the conservation actions had been decided together
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Neuralgic attacks are usually characterized, besides the pain, by a
highly-interesting series of symptoms, which are in part transitory
and functional, and in part due to structural changes in the tissues.4
4 See Notta, Arch. gén. de Méd., 1854; Anstie, Neuralgia and its Counterfeits.
The hair may become dry and brittle and inclined to fall out, or may
lose its color rapidly, regaining it after the attack has passed.
The skin and subjacent tissues, including the periosteum, from being
simply swelled or œdematous may become thickened and
hypertrophied. The writer has known a case of supraorbital
neuralgia, at first typically intermittent, to lead to a thickening of the
periosteum or bone over the orbit, which even at the end of several
years had not wholly disappeared.
The pain is usually of an intense, boring character, and does not dart
like the pain of superficial neuralgia, but is either constant or comes
in waves, which swell steadily to a maximum and then die away,
often leaving the patient in a state of profound temporary prostration.
Deep pressure often brings relief. A patient of the writer, who is
subject to attacks of this kind in the right hypochondrium, will bear
with her whole weight on some hard object as each paroxysm comes
on, or insist that some one shall press with his fists into the painful
neighborhood with such force that the skin is often found bruised and
discolored.
Neither is what is called migraine always one and the same disease.
1. Hereditary tendencies;
7 For tables of illustrative cases see Anstie, Neuralgia and its Counterfeits, and J. G.
Kerr, Pacific Med. and Surg. Journ., May, 1885.
Reasons will be offered later for suspecting that many cases usually
classed as neuralgia, and characterized by gradual onset and
protracted course, are essentially cases of neuritis; and there is need
of further inquiry as to how far hereditary influences are concerned in
producing them, and whether such influences act by increasing the
liability of the peripheral nerves to become inflamed, or only by
increasing the excitability of the sensory nervous centres.
Syphilitic patients are liable to suffer, not only from osteocopic pains
and pains due to the pressure of new growths, but also from attacks
of truly neuralgic character. These may occur either in the early or
the later stages of the disease. They may take the form of typical
neuralgias, as sciatica or neuralgia of the supraorbital nerve
(Fournier11), or they may be shifting, and liable to recur in frequent
attacks of short duration, like the pains from which many persons
suffer under changes of weather, anæmia, or fatigue.
11 Cited by Erb in Ziemssen's Encyclopædia.
Under the same general heading comes the debility from acute and
chronic diseases, and the enfeeblement of the nervous system from
moral causes, such as anxiety, disappointment, fright, overwork and
over-excitement, and especially sexual over-excitement, whether
gratified or suppressed (Anstie), or, on the other hand, too great
monotony of life; also from the abuse of tea, coffee, and tobacco.
Lead, arsenic, antimony, and mercury may seriously impair the
nutrition of all the nervous tissues, and in that way prepare the way
for neuralgia.
The action of damp cold upon the body is complicated, and it exerts
a depressing influence on the nervous centres in general which is
not readily to be explained. One important factor, however, is the
cooling of the superficial layers of the blood, which occurs the more
easily when the stimulus of the chilly air is not sufficiently sharp and
sudden to cause a firm contraction of the cutaneous vessels, while
the moisture rapidly absorbs the heat of the blood. From this result,
indirectly, various disorders of nutrition of the deeper-lying tissues or
distant organs; and, among these, congestion and neuritis of the
sensitive nerves.
Where these measures cannot be carried out, the writer has found it
of much service in these, as in a large class of debilitated conditions,
to let the patient rub himself toward the end of the forenoon in a
warm room with a towel wet in cold or warm water, and then lie down
for an hour or so or until the next meal. If acceptable, the same
operation may be repeated in the afternoon.
Neuralgic patients are apt to be underfed, and even where this is not
distinctly the case, a systematic course of over-feeding,23 with
nourishing and digestible food, such as milk, gruel, and eggs, given
at short intervals, is often of great service if thoroughly carried out.
The full benefit of this treatment cannot always be secured unless
the patient is removed from home, and, if need be, put to bed and
cared for by a competent nurse.
23 See S. Weir Mitchell, Fat and Blood; and Nervous Diseases, especially of Women.
Of the tonic drugs, cod-liver oil, iron, arsenic, and quinine are by far
the most important, and it is often well to give them simultaneously.
Iron may be used in large doses if well borne, for a short time at
least. Quinine may be given in small doses as a tonic, or in larger
doses to combat the neuralgic condition of the nervous system. This
remedy has long been found to be of great value in the periodical
neuralgias of the supraorbital branch of the fifth pair, but its
usefulness is not limited to these cases. It may be of service in
periodical neuralgias of every sort, and often even in non-periodical
neuralgia.
Opium is usually employed only for the momentary relief of pain, but
it has also been claimed that in small and repeated doses it may
exert a really curative action. This should not, however, be too much
counted on. Opium should never be used continuously for the simple
relief of pain unless under exceptional circumstances, the danger of
inducing the opium habit is so much to be dreaded. Moreover, both
patient and physician are less likely to seek more permanent means
of cure if this temporary remedy can always be appealed to. It is best
given by subcutaneous injections of the various salts of morphine.
The dose should always be small at first (gr. 1/12 and upward), unless
the idiosyncrasy of the patient is already known; and there is
probably no advantage in making the injections at the seat of pain or
in the immediate neighborhood of the nerve supplying the affected
part, except such as might attend the injection of any fluid (see
below).