Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Hydrogen Volume Ii Its Technology and Implication Transmission and Storage Transmission and Storage First Edition Cox Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Hydrogen Volume Ii Its Technology and Implication Transmission and Storage Transmission and Storage First Edition Cox Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/hydrogen-its-technology-and-
implication-implication-of-hydrogen-energy-volume-v-first-
edition-cox/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hydrogen-volume-i-its-
technology-and-implication-production-technology-first-edition-
cox/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hydrogen-storage-and-
technologies-1st-edition-mehmet-sankir/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-nanomaterials-for-
hydrogen-storage-first-edition-mieczyslaw-jurczyk/
Nanomaterials for Sustainable Hydrogen Production and
Storage 1st Edition Jude A Okolie
https://textbookfull.com/product/nanomaterials-for-sustainable-
hydrogen-production-and-storage-1st-edition-jude-a-okolie/
https://textbookfull.com/product/coulson-and-richardsons-
chemical-engineering-fourth-edition-volume-3a-chemical-and-
biochemical-reactors-and-reaction-engineering-r-ravi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microwave-and-rf-design-
volume-2-transmission-lines-michael-steer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/gaseous-and-electrochemical-
hydrogen-storage-properties-of-mg-based-thin-films-1st-edition-
gongbiao-xin-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/design-of-electrical-
transmission-lines-structures-and-foundations-volume-i-1st-
edition-kalaga/
HYDROGEN: ITS TECHNOLOGY AND
IMPLICATIONS
E d ito rs
SERIES OUTLINE
Volume I
Hydrogen Production Technology
Volume II
Transmission and Storage of Hydrogen
Volume III
Hydrogen Properties
Volume IV
Utilization of Hydrogen
Volume V
Implications of Hydrogen Energy
Hydrogen: Its
Technology
and
Implications
Volume II
Transmission and Storage
Editors:
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have
been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for
the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace
the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if
permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged
please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or
utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written
permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www. copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive,
Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organiza-tion that provides licenses and registration
for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system
of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Publisher's Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections
in the original copies may be apparent.
Disclaimer
The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they
have been unable to contact.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com and the
CRC Press Web site at http://www.crcpress.com
PREFACE TO HYDROGEN: ITS TECHNOLOGY AND IMPLICATIONS
The United States, Western Europe, Japan, and several other countries are presently
faced with an energy shortage due largely to an imbalance of energy consumption over
fossil energy production. This problem was dramatized in October 1973 during the Arab
embargo on the shipment of oil to the United States and the resultant large increases in
the price of crude oil. This shortage in energy supply was then termed the “energy crisis.”
It was a clear demonstration of the nation’s dependence on imported petroleum and its
vulnerability on both political and economic grounds. It is clear that the above problems
would worsen in the future unless more attention and effort are directed toward
increasing domestic energy production from both depletable and nondepletable sources
and reducing energy consumption.
In the short-term, until the year 2000, coal and nuclear energy are expected to play
dominant roles in meeting the energy shortage despite the environmental restrictions that
hamper the production and consumption of high-sulfur coal and similar difficulties (siting
and radioactive waste disposal) that have slowed the development of nuclear energy. In
the long-term, beyond the year 2000, it is imperative that all forms of renewable energy
be developed. These include solar energy, in such forms as wind, ocean thermal gradients,
and biomass; geothermal energy; and fusion.
A major problem with several of the renewable energy sources is that they are
intermittent and their energy density is low; thus, there is a need for an energy carrier
that can act as both a storage and transportation medium to connect the energy source to
the energy consumer. Many of the renewable energy forms, together with coal and fission
exhibit their energy in the form of heat release. It is necessary to develop an energy
carrier, other than electricity, to supply the transportation sector as well as overcome the
problems of electrical storage.
Hydrogen, the lightest element, has been suggested as the energy carrier of the future.
In itself, it is not a primary energy source but rather serves as a medium through which a
primary energy source (such as nuclear or solar energy) can be stored, transmitted, and
utilized to fulfill our energy needs. There are several distinct advantages to the use of
hydrogen as an energy medium. It can be made from water, an inexhaustible resource. On
combustion, water is the main product; thus, hydrogen can be regarded as a clean,
nonpolluting fuel. Indications from current research efforts suggest that hydrogen may be
produced from high-temperature heat sources at an efficiency greater than that of
electrical generation, thereby making hydrogen a more economical energy source than
electricity. Technology has already been developed for storing hydrogen as a pressurized
gas, a cryogenic liquid, or in the form of a metal hydride. Systems for transporting
hydrogen as a gas or a liquid have been developed with liquid hydrogen playing a major
part in NASA’s putting a man on the moon. Finally, hydrogen is of value as a chemical
intermediate, being used in fertilizer manufacture, methanol synthesis, and petroleum
treatment. This area of hydrogen utilization represents 3% of today’s energy consumption
and is expected to grow by a factor of five by the year 2000. The above concept of using
hydrogen is termed the “hydrogen energy economy” and has been receiving an increasing
amount of attention from energy scientists and engineers in the United States and abroad.
This series in five volumes represents a serious attempt at providing information on all
aspects of hydrogen at the postgraduate and professional level. It discusses recent
developments in the science and technology of hydrogen production; hydrogen
transmission and storage; hydrogen utilization; and the social, legal, political, environ
mental, and economic implications of hydrogen’s adoption as an energy medium.
Although there are several reports of selected studies on hydrogen as a fuel, this is the
first comprehensive reference book that covers a wide range of topics of notable interest
and timely importance.
Volume I of the series discusses such topics as hydrogen production from fossil fuels,
nuclear energy, and solar energy. Hydrogen production technology from water by
traditional methods such as water electrolysis and newer attempts to split water
thermochemically are included with details of current research efforts and future
directions.
Volume II provides detailed design information on systems necessary for the storage,
transfer, and transmission of gaseous and liquid hydrogen. Cost factors, technical aspects,
and models of hydrogen pipeline systems are included together with a discussion of
materials for hydrogen service. Metallic hydride gaseous storage systems for the utility
and transportation industry are covered in detail, and the design Dewars and liquid
hydrogen transfer systems are examined.
Volume III focuses on hydrogen’s properties and provides in one location all of the
hydrogen data measured and compiled by the National Bureau of Standards, Cryogenic
Division. The properties are individually discussed, and tables of data are provided. The
properties of slush hydrogen are also included.
Volume IV covers the present and future uses of hydrogen. Hydrogen has been
suggested as a prime candidate for both air and surface transportation. In the utility
industry, hydrogen systems for peak shaving promise to play an important future role.
Both present and future domestic and industrial applications of hydrogen are surveyed.
These include present uses in ammonia and methanol synthesis and future uses in the
direct hydrogasification of coal to synthetic natural gas. Important to all of these
applications are the safety considerations in the use of hydrogen to allow for public
acceptance of hydrogen’s role as an energy medium.
Volume V is primarily concerned with the nontechnical aspects of hydrogen.
Economics of hydrogen energy systems will play a major part in determining the time
frame for hydrogen’s adoption. Cost analyses of such systems with return on investment
considerations are surveyed from the point of view of production, transmission, and
storage of hydrogen. The environmental, political, social, and legal implications of new
secondary energy forms such as hydrogen are discussed with reference to governmental
energy policy, the social costs of energy production and use, and the public’s acceptance
of a hydrogen energy medium.
The unusually broad nature of hydrogen demands the expertise that could only be
provided by a wide authorship; thus, some of the authors are the original authorities in
their respective fields. Although the subject matter treated in each chapter is, in general,
the author’s research work and his critical review of the state-of-the-art, the authors have
had complete freedom in choosing the particular important areas to be emphasized. As a
result, some chapters treat the subject matter in more detail than others with a greater
emphasis on the engineering or design aspects of a particular system. Therefore, each
chapter possesses its own special feature and appealing points. Due to the limited space in
the series, the editors have encouraged each author to supply an extensive list of
references at the end of his chapter for the benefit of interested readers. Detailed author
and subject indexes have been provided at the end of each volume.
The editors, while striving to avoid duplication, have allowed some degree of overlap in
certain of the chapters for the sake of continuity and allowing the reader to view a
particular topic from two or more points of view. Further volumes on the topic of
hydrogen are planned, and we wish to hear from our readers as to areas that might have
been neglected or deserve a special chapter on their own.
We would like to express our sincere thanks to these authors and the staff of CRC
Press, Inc. in particular Mrs. Gayle Tavens and Miss Sandy Pearlman, for their efforts in
making these volumes possible. Lastly, we would like to thank our wives, Patricia R. Cox
and Ruth S. Williamson, for their encouragement and help during the time it took to edit
these five volumes.
K. E. Cox
Albuquerque, New Mexico
K. D. Williamson, Jr.
Los Alamos, New Mexico
March 1975
PREFACE TO VOLUME II:
TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE OF HYDROGEN
This volume of Hydrogen: Its Technology and Implications deals with transmission
and storage technology. In Chapter 1, Mr. G. Garth Leeth discusses the transmission of
gaseous hydrogen. Equations used by the industry are given and discussed for use in
calculation of power requirements and costs. It is concluded that costs for transmitting
gaseous hydrogen are on the order of 50% greater than for natural gas on an equal energy
basis. The chapter concludes with a discussion of pipeline safety and operating
experience.
Mr. James Reilly covers the subject of metal hydride storage media in Chapter 2. Metal
hydride chemistry lays the foundation for a discussion of specific metal hydride systems.
This is followed by an informative section on hydride applications, pointing up the
versatility of such systems as energy storage media. More on this subject is, of course,
given in Volume IV.
Chapter 3 covers the subject of liquid hydrogen storage and transmission and is written
by Dr. F. J. Edeskuty and myself. Most of the technology presented here was developed
from 1957 to the early 1970s as part of our space and nuclear rocket programs. It is a
technology which is well developed and readily applicable to today’s energy problems.
The final chapter in the volume is by Dr. Anthony Thompson and is on the subject of
materials for hydrogen service. In this chapter the subject of hydrogen embrittlement is
covered, along with all other aspects related to the proper choice of materials for use in
hydrogen systems.
It is our feeling that this volume covers its subject completely and authoritatively. The
editors would appreciate comments to make future editions more valuable to the reader.
It has been a pleasure working with all of the authors in this volume. Both they and we
hope and believe that hydrogen will find a major place in our future energy systems and
that these volumes will make getting there a bit easier.
K. D. Williamson, Jr.
Los Alamos, New Mexico
August 1976
THE EDITORS
Kenneth E. Cox, Ph.D., is a Staff Member in the High-Temperature Chemistry
Group at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico. He is
currently performing research in developing practical thermochemical cycles that pro
duce hydrogen by water-splitting. In his previous position as Professor of Chemical
Engineering at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, he pioneered the devel
opment of photovoltaic-electrolytic methods to produce hydrogen from solar energy
and water.
Dr. Cox graduated in 1956 from the Imperial College of Science and Technology of
the University of London with B.Sc. and A.C.G.I. degrees in chemical engineering.
He received his M.A.Sc. from the University of British Columbia in 1959 and his
Ph.D. from Montana State University in 1962, also in chemical engineering.
Dr. Cox is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, the American
Chemical Society, and Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society. He is also a member
of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy and has contributed both as an
author and reviewer to the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
Dr. Cox has published numerous research papers and has given over 100 presenta
tions. His current research interests include: thermochemical generation of hydrogen
from water, use of solar energy for hydrogen generation, techno-economic energy eval
uations as well as traditional chemical engineering, e.g., thermodynamics of separation
processes, process design, and dispersion phenomena in fluids.
K. D. Williamson Jr., Ph.D. is Assistant Division Leader of the Systems Analysis
and Assessment Division, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mex
ico.
Dr. Williamson received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in chemical engineering
from Pennsylvania State University in 1957, 1959, and 1961, respectively.
Dr. Williamson is a member and lecturer for the New Mexico Academy of Sciences
and has served as an invited lecturer at the University of Tennessee and New Mexico
Highlands University.
Dr. Williamson has published more than 35 research papers. His current interests
include technology assessments and systems analyses of energy-related topics in sup
port of research and development decision makers at Los Alamos and the State and
National government levels.
CONTRIBUTORS
F. J. Edeskuty J. J. Reilly
Associate Group Leader Chemist
Cryogenics Group Department of Applied Science
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Brookhaven National Laboratory
Los Alamos, New Mexico Upton, New York
Anthony W. Thompson
G. Garth Leeth Professor, Department of Metallurgy
Member of Professional Staff and Material Sciences
General Electric Tempo Carnegie Mellon Institute
Santa Barbara, California Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
K. D. Williamson, Jr.
Assistant Division Leader
Systems Analysis and Assessment
Division
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory
Los Alamos, New Mexico
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1
Transmission of Gaseous Hydrogen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
G. G. Leeth
Chapter 2
Metal Hydrides as Hydrogen Storage Media and Their Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
J. J. Reilly
Chapter 3
Liquid Hydrogen Storage and Transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
F. J. Edeskuty and K. D. Williamson, Jr.
Chapter 4
Materials for Hydrogen Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
A. W. Thompson
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Chapter 1
Transmission o f Gaseous Hydrogen
Chapter 1
TRANSMISSION OF GASEOUS HYDROGEN
G. G. Leeth
TABLE OF CONTENTS
R e fe re n c e s ........................................................................................................................................................ 10
3
cally in terms of pipe size and pumping power
requirements. A pipeline design and the cost ( 1. 2)
for a specified energy flow must be calculated.
By iteration, a minimum cost design can be
determined.
The most difficult relationships to obtain and (1.3)
validate are the costing algorithms. There are two
major reasons for this difficulty. First, actual
pipeline system costs depend strongly on terrain
(1.4)
difficulty and other factors associated with geo
graphy. Second, all real pipelines are not opti
mized for a specific flow, but are designed to
permit capacity increases by addition of more (1.5)
and/or larger compressors.
In general, calculations based on an optimum
(minimum cost) pipeline system appear to be ( 1.6)
satisfactory for comparison between gases under
varying conditions. The gas flow relationships are
correct, but the costing algorithms are true only
where Q = energy flow (MMBTU [million British
for some nominal conditions. Consequently, re
thermal units] /hr); m = mass flow rate (slugs/sec);
lative comparisons are meaningful, but absolute
g = gravitational acceleration (32.2 ft/sec2); LHV
costs should be carefully evaluated.
= lower heating value of gas (Btu/lb); L = pipe
length between compressor stations (ft); D = inside
1.3. GAS PIPELINE DYNAMICS
diameter of pipe (ft); f = pipe friction factor; Pi =
initial gas pressure (lb/in.2); P2 = gas pressure at
Isothermal flow of a compressible fluid is used
length, L (lb/in.2); Mi = initial Mach number; k =
as a basis for practically all pipeline analyses by
ratio of gas specific heats; hp = compressor
the gas industry. Various formulations have been
horsepower; 17x = compressor efficiency; R = gas
devised to simplify calculations or answer specific
constant, T = temperature of gas (°R); Z = gas
questions. The parameters of interest usually
compressibility factor; p = gas density (slugs/
include energy flow, pipe diameter, distance be
ft3); Re = - (Reynold’s number); e = pipe
tween compressor stations, pressure ratio, and
roughness parameter (typical value = 0.00015); t =
compressor horsepower. 0.7 P, • 12 *D _ .
Two recent analyses of hydrogen pipelines1’2 • = pipe thickness (in.).
6 0 ,0 0 0
use somewhat different formulations of the gas
It is assumed that the equations listed above
flow equations. Reference 2 also uses European
would be solved with a computer, and therefore,
cost data. The general conclusions of both refer
simplicity is not a critical issue. If desired, several
ences are the same, although detailed comparisons
simplifications are possible. For example, temper
are difficult. Results of the two methods of
ature, pressure, and Reynold’s number are nearly
calculation are shown in Section 1.5. A brief
constant for typical pipelines. Thus, the friction
description of the procedure followed in Refer
factor becomes only a function of the roughness
ence 1 is given in the following pages as it is
parameter, and the rather complex definition given
probably more useful to American readers.
in Equation 1.6 is not needed.
Equations 1.1 to 1.3 describe the gas flow
relationships in terms of the parameters previously Equations 1.1 to 1.6 can be used in a variety of
mentioned. Equations 1.4 to 1.6 provide the ways. One method is to specify energy flow rate
additional relationships needed to solve the set of (Q), temperature (T), initial pressure (P j), pressure
Equations 1.1 to 1.3. All of the information in drop between compressors (Px - P2), and pipe dia
these equations is fairly standard fluid dynamics. meter (D). Using these as inputs, the pipe length
For further details, see References 3 and 4. (L) and associated compressor power (hp) can be
calculated. Thus, a pipeline design can be defined
in terms of size and power requirements as a func
( 1. 1)
tion of energy flow rate for various gas conditions.
Numerical Constants
Gas pipeline system costs are calculated using
Equations 1.7 to 1.11. Capital costs are calculated P, 1000 psi
from Equations 1.7 to 1.9 and fuel costs from 17, 0.85
Equation 1.10. The inflation factors in Equations A, $200/ton
B, $1300/in.-mi
1.7 and 1.9 are used to adjust cost data from
CR $6000/mi
different years, when necessary. The total cost of E, $200/hp
transporting gas per MMBTU per 100 mi is F, $15,000/in. of pipe diameter
calculated from Equation 1.11. G, $0.40/106 Btu
0.40
Cp = C1(A 1Wp + B112D + CR) (1.7) FCR 0.15
CF 0.90
Wp = 28.2 t (12D - t) (1.8)
lent agreement with a proposed 36-in. Texas to
Cc = C2(E ,-h p + F , 1 2 D ) ^ ^ (1.9) California natural gas pipeline.6 Accordingly, the
tabulated data are believed to be sufficiently
where Cp = pipe capital cost ($/mi); Q and C2 = accurate for comparative analyses. .
inflation factors; Wp = weight of pipe (tons/mi); The curves in Figures 1.1 to 1.4 are all
Ai = specific cost of pipe ($/ton); Bi = instal minimum cost systems. Operation and mainte
lation cost ($/in.-mi); CR = right of way cost nance costs are not included, but would have an
($/mi); Cc = pumping station capital cost ($); Ei = almost insignificant effect on comparisons. Figure
specific pumping cost ($/hp), compressor and 1.1 shows that for the same energy flow, hydrogen
prime mover; Fi = pumping station cost ($/in. of costs approximately 1.4 times as much to
pipe diameter). transport as natural gas. As noted previously, the
absolute costs are reasonably correct for transport
( 1. 1 0)
in the early 1970s in the southwestern U.S. With
current fuel prices and fabrication costs, gas
transportation costs in mid 1976 would be approx
where CF = transport fuel cost ($/10 6 Btu-100
imately 50% higher than indicated in Figure 1.1.
mi); hp = horsepower calculated from flow equa
Figures 1.2 and 1.3 summarize pipe size and
tions; Gi = fuel cost ($ / 106 Btu);r?2 = conversion compressor power requirements for a range of
efficiency fuel to shaft power; Q = energy flow
energy flows. Pipeline capital costs for two kinds
rate of pipe (MMBTU/hr); L = distance between
of terrain are shown in Figure 1.4. The lower
compressor stations calculated from flow equa
curves are typical of the southwestern U.S. and the
tions.
upper curve of more difficult terrain, such as
Alaska. Pipeline capital costs for most future
( 1. 11) installations in the conterminous U.S. are likely to
fall between these two curves, closer to the upper
where CT = total cost of gas transport ($/10 6 one.
Btu-100 mi); FCR = fixed charge rate; CF = In addition to the General Electric (GE) calcu
capacity factor of pipeline system. lations summarized in Figures 1.1 to 1.4, two
other analyses of hydrogen pipelines have been
1.5. HYDROGEN PIPELINE ANALYSES reported .2’7 Table 1.2 summarizes the conclusions
from three studies: GE ,1 EURATOM,2 and the
Some numerical calculations were performed Institute of Gas Technology (IGT).7
using Equations 1.1 to 1.11 and empirical The IGT computations assume that electrolytic
constants as listed in Table 1.1. The results of hydrogen is used to drive the pipeline compressors.
these computer analyses are summarized in Figures This results in a fuel cost five to ten times higher
1.1 to 1.4. The main source of the cost data than assumed by the GE and EURATOM studies,
itemized in Table 1.1 was written in 1965.5 and which explains the higher transmission cost
However, the use of these data resulted in excel- calculated by IGT. The slight differences in hy-
5
FIGURE 1.1. Total pipeline transportation cost vs. energy flow.
account for about 90% of total transmission costs. hydrogen is more likely to leak than any other gas.
At current fuel costs (on the order of Flammability limits are unusually large (4 to 75%
S2.00/MMBTU), it is estimated that the systems by volume with air) at normal temperature and
would optimize at a capital cost equal to about pressure. The ignition temperature (1075°F) is
80% of total cost. The relative transmission costs higher than that of most hydrocarbons (400° to
of hydrogen and natural gas are not significantly 700°F), but its ignition energy is an order of
affected by higher pumping energy costs, as long magnitude lower. Once ignited, flame speeds are of
as the same costs apply to both fluids. the order of tens of feet per second.
In general, hydrogen transmission costs about Hydrogen flames are nearly invisible and char
1.5 times as much as natural gas, where the acterized by a low level of radiation to sur
pumping energy costs are the same. Hydrogen also rounding regions. Thus, a hydrogen fire is less
requires about 1.5 times the pumping power of likely than a hydrocarbon fire to ignite other
natural gas. For a minimum cost hydrogen pipeline combustible materials by radiation. However, since
at 10 10 Btu/hr, about 0.5% of the energy flow is a hydrogen flame is nearly invisible, it is difficult
required for pumping, compared to approximately to detect, making it more of a personnel hazard
0.35% for natural gas. As the energy flow in the than are hydrocarbon flames.
pipe or the pumping cost increases, the fraction of An explosion of hydrogen-air mixtures is very
energy used for pumping decreases. unlikely to occur as a result of a pipeline leak.
Detonation limits of hydrogen-air mixtures range
1.6 HYDROGEN PIPELINE SAFETY from 18 to 59% by volume. Since the hydrogen
molecule has a very low mass, it would rise rapidly
The major hazard associated with pipeline in air. Unless the leak occurred in a confined
transmission of hydrogen gas is leakage, followed region, it is improbable that a concentration of
by combustion. Due to its small molecular size, 18% would be reached. Furthermore, the ignition
7
FIGURE 1.4. Pipeline capital cost vs. energy flow.
energy for detonation is very large compared to constructed hydrogen gas pipeline operating with
that required for combustion. trace amounts of impurities should have no
Hydrogen embrittlement is a potential concern embrittlement problems.
in a pipeline operation with hydrogen gas. Con The use of existing natural gas pipelines to
siderable controversy exists as to the exact transport hydrogen has often been suggested.
mechanisms involved in such embrittlement (see While this is probably feasible, the compatibility
Chapter 4). It is clear that the degree of embrittle of hydrogen with the specific pipeline would have
ment is dependent upon such parameters as the to be demonstrated. The problem is that welds,
type of alloy, operating stress level, impurities in valves, and pump components might suffer
the hydrogen, and probably others not yet recog hydrogen embrittlement and significant hydrogen
nized. leakage might occur.
Almost all of the observed hydrogen embrittle
ment has involved very pure hydrogen. Failures 1.7 HYDROGEN PIPELINE
resulting from embrittlement have usually been OPERATING EXPERIENCE
associated with welds, rather than the base metal.
Small amounts of oxygen, carbon monoxide, and In the U.S., an 8-in. hydrogen pipeline has been
other gases are effective in inhibiting hydrogen operating for several years from Bayport to
embrittlement. Such impurities would be quite Baytown, Texas. Very little information about this
acceptable for almost all energy or industrial uses pipeline appears in the literature. Most of the
of hydrogen. It seems likely that a properly reported hydrogen pipeline operating experience is
from Germany.12 A hydrogen pipeline network construct, and operate an integrated hydrogen
208 km in length is in use in the Rhine-Rhur area. pipeline network.
The original segments of this network have been
operating since 1938. Pipe size varies, but much of 1.8 CONCLUSIONS
the system appears to be 300 mm in diameter.
Maximum pressure is 15-bar gauge; in 1973 the Transmission of hydrogen gas in a large pipeline
integrated network handled some 206 million network is technically and economically feasible.
standard cubic meters of hydrogen. For large energy flow rates, the transmisison cost
German operating experience, covering a period would be approximately 50% greater per energy
of 30 years, has been quite good. Some fires have unit than for natural gas. Sufficient experience is
occurred, but there have been no explosions or available to be confident that hydrogen pipelines
any problems with hydrogen embrittlement. can be designed, built, and safely operated on a
Chemische Werke Hiils AG, the German operating commercially profitable basis. Modification of
organization, has expressed a high degree of existing natural gas pipelines to transport hy
confidence in their technical ability to design, drogen is probably feasible.
9
REFERENCES
1. Reynolds, R. A. and Stager, W. L., Transportation and Storage o f Hydrogen for Eco-Energy, Report GE72TMP-54,
General Electric-TEMPO, Santa Barbara, Calif., 1972.
2. Beghi, G., Ciborra, M., Dejace, J., and Massaro, C., Hydrogen, Oxygen and Natural Gas by Pipelines: Comparative
Transport Costs, Report EUR-5103.e, EURATOM-C.C.R., Ispra, Italy, 1973.
3. Shapiro, A. H., The Dynamics and Thermodynamics o f Compressible Fluid Flow, Ronald Press, New York, 1953.
4. Schlichting, H., Boundary-Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.
5. Khan, A. R. and Panos, P. S., The Economics o f Natural Gas Production, Transportation, Storage, and Distribution,
Institute of Technology, Chicago, 1965.
6. O’Donnell, J. P., Pipe installation and equipment costs, Oil GasJ., 61(27), 105, 1963.
7. Gregory, D. P. and Gillis, J. C., Survey o f Hydrogen Production and Utilization Techniques, Institute o f Gas
Technology, Chicago, 1965.
8. Swisher, J. H., Keaton, S. C., West, A. J., and Jones, A. T., Survey o f Hydrogen Compatibility Problems in Energy
Storage and Energy Transmission Applications, Energy Report SAND74-8219, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque,
N. Mex. and Livermore, Calif., 1974.
9. Parrish, W. R., Voth, R. O., Hust, J. G., Flynn, T. M., Sindt, C. F., and OJien, N. A., in Selected Topics on Hydrogen
Fuel, Hord, J., Ed., Report NBSIR 75-803, Institute for Basic Standards-National Bureau of Standards, Boulder,
Colo., 1975.
10. Kelley, J. H., and Laumann, E. A., Hydrogen Tomorrow: Demands & Technology Requirements, Jet Propulsion
Laboratory Report JPL 5040-1, Report of the NASA Hydrogen Energy Systems Technology Study, Pasadena,
1975.
11. Bowen, T. L., Investigation o f Hazards Associated with Using Hydrogen as a Military Fuel, Report 4541, Naval Ship
Research and Development Center, Bethesda, Md. 1975.
12. Isting, C., Experience with a Hydrogen Pipline Network, Chemische Werke Hiils AG (CWH), Federal Republic of
Germany, 1974.
13. Nelson, G. A., When to use low alloy steel for hydrogen service, Hydrogen Process., p. 45, 1966.
J. J. Reilly
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A ck n o w led g m en t............................................................................................................................................. 46
R e fe re n c e s......................................................................................................................................................... 47
13
TABLE 2.1 review of this subject should refer to the works of
Libowitz,2’3 Mueller et al.,4 Fast,5 and Mackay.6
Properties of Representative Binary Metal Hydrides
Metal hydride compounds may be divided into
Hydride Wt % H Heat of formation (kcal) three general categories: saline or ionic, metallic,
%
and covalent. The classification is based on the
LiH 12.7 5.9 -21.7 predominant character of the hydrogen bond and
A1H3 10.1 - -2.7 is somewhat equivocal since no one compound
CaH2 4.2 5.1 -41.7
exhibits purely one type of bonding.
MgH2 7.6 6.6 -18
NaH 4.8 5.1 -13.6 In the ionic hydrides, the crystal lattice consists
TiH2 4.0 9.1 -3 0 of metal cations and hydrogen anions. Such
ZrH2 2.2 7.3 -39.7 hydrides are formed by the direct reaction of
LaH2 2.1 6.8 -49.7 hydrogen with the alkali and alkaline earth metals
uh3 1.3 8.4 -30.8
and magnesium, although the bonding of the latter
H2 Liquid 100 4.2 —
hydride exhibits an appreciable amount of co
valent character. Hydrides of these metals are
Note: N h X 1022 = number of H atoms per cubic quite similar to their halide analogues both in
centimeter. structure and properties; the alkali metal hydrides
have the sodium chloride structure, while those of
account, it would require the expenditure of about the alkaline earths have a structure similar to that
1 lb of hydrogen fuel for every pound of liquid of barium chloride. With the exception of mag
hydrogen produced. In view of this, any novel nesium, the ionic hydrides are too stable to be
hydrogen storage method that would make its use considered attractive hydrogen storage media.
as a common fuel feasible should be fully ex The metallic hydrides exhibit typical metallic
plored. properties having a metallic appearance and high
One potentially attractive alternative to conven thermal and electrical conductivities. They are
tional storage methods is storage as a metal formed by the reaction (usually direct) of hydro
hydride. Such compounds are of interest because gen with most of the transition metals (periodic
of their high hydrogen density per unit volume, table Groups IIIA to VIIIA), including the
which (as noted in Table 2.1) may be substantially lanthanide and actinide series. Some metals (such
greater than that of liquid hydrogen. Unfortu as Zr or the monohydrides of V, Nb, and Ta) can
nately, when the same comparison is made on a be almost completely hydrided and still retain
weight basis, the hydrides are at a considerable their original shape and form; in others, such as U,
disadvantage because of the weight of the associ the hydride product is a very fine powder. Certain
ated metal. Therefore, the present use of such transition metal hydrides are prime examples of
materials has focused on stationary applications. the tendency of this type of compound to deviate
Nevertheless, hydrides cannot be discounted as from stoichiometry by very large amounts. There
mobile fuel sources, as has been recently demon is considerable uncertainty at present surrounding
strated.43,4 4 the state of the hydrogen atom and the nature of
The purpose of this chapter is several fold: to the bonding in metallic hydrides. Currently, there
acquaint the reader with the more salient and are three models (none of which is completely
pertinent aspects of metal hydride chemistry and satisfactory) which attempt to account for their
to delineate the properties of several individual observed properties. They are the proton model, in
metal-hydrogen systems of interest and discuss which the hydrogen is assumed to donate its single
their applications, particularly as energy storage electron to the d-band of the metal, thus existing
media. in the metal lattice as a proton; the covalent
model, where it is suggested that the bonding is
2.2. METAL HYDRIDE CHEMISTRY predominantly the electron sharing type; and the
anionic model, which is essentially the inverse of
In order to appreciate the potential of metal the proton model. In the latter case, the metal
hydrides as energy (hydrogen) storage media, a donates electrons to the hydrogen atom, which
general knowledge of their chemistry is required. consequently exists in the lattice as an anion. For
Those who are interested in a detailed account and14 a detailed discussion of these models (which is
15
16
___V
1 H He
I A MB 1M B 3CB 3ZEB 3 M B
2 L iH B eH B C N 0 F Ne
VH C rH
4 KH C qH2 ScH 2 T iH 2 Mn Fe Co NiH CuH ZnH 2 6a Ge As Se Br Kr
vh 2 C rH 2
6 C sH B aH 2 LoH , H fH 2 ToH W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn
Fr Ra A c H2
7
? ?
FIGURE 2.1. Periodic chart showing occurrence of binary hydrides which exist as solids at room temperature. All, except underlined compounds, can
be prepared by the direct reaction of hydrogen. In cases where two distinct hydride phases are formed, both are noted. In order to prepare CrH and NiH
directly, very high pressures are required (>5000 atm).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
272
Samar 5,040
13,054
Saranguani 36
93
Semerara 23
60
Siargao 134
347
Sibuyan 131
339
Siquijor 83
215
Sulu, or Jolo 241
624
Tablas 250
648
Ticao 94
243
Ybayat, or Ibayat 22
57
Ylin 24
62
GROUPS.
Alabat 76
197
Jomalig
Banton 44
114
Simara
Romblon
Daram 41
106
Buad
Camotes group: 74
192
Ponson
Poro
Pasijan
Calaguas group:
Tinagua 19
49
Guintinua
Cuyos group: 28
73
Cuyos
Cugo
Agutaya
Hamipo
Bisukei
Laguan 23
60
Batag
Limbancauyan 184
477
Mesa, or Talajit
Maripipi
Balupiri
Biliran
Lubang 53 163
Ambil
Golo
Others of the
Tawi Tawi group. 54 140
Estimated area of
unmeasured islands 1,000 2,500
{368}
Name. Miles
Kilometers
Bohol 161
259
Cebu 310
499
Jolo Archipelago 858
1,381
Kalamines 126
203
Leite 363
584
Luzon 2,144
3,450
Masbate 244
393
Mindanao 1,592
2,562
Mindoro 322
518
Negros 386
621
Palawan 644
1,036
Panay 377
607
Samar 412
663
Minor islands 3,505
5,641
Total 11,444
18,417
"The following [as to population] is a quotation from an
article by W. F. Wilcox, of the United States Census Bureau.
It is well to notice that the last official census was in 1887
and that the figures of that census, though probably
underestimating the population of the islands, are the ones
which, in default of better, we are obliged to take as final.
It is probable that these are an understatement of the true
population of the Philippines for several reasons, among which
is one not observed by Mr. Wilcox, and which is therefore
mentioned. It is, of course, only supposition, but is at least
suggestive. For every adult counted in the census the
officials were obliged to return a poll tax. Thus, for
instance, if 100,000 persons were counted 100,000 pesetas
would have to be returned to the treasury. It has therefore
been supposed that the officials counted, say, 150,000 and
returned only 100,000 pesetas and 100,000 names. Mr. Wilcox
says (American Statistical Association Publ., September,
1899): 'The population of the islands in 1872 was stated in a
letter to Nature (6:162), from Manila, by Dr. A. B. Meyer, who
gives the latest not yet published statistics as his
authority. The letter gives the population of nine islands, as
follows:
Luzon 4,467,111
Panay 1,052,586
Cebu 427,356
Leite 285,495
Bohol 283,515
Negros 255,873
Samar 250,062
Mindanao 191,802
Mindoro 70,926
1. Tribute-paying natives.
5,501,356
2. Army
14,545
3. Navy
2,924
4. Religious officers (Geistlichkeit)
1,962
5. Civil officers
5,552
6. Other Spaniards
13,265
Total Spaniards
38,248
1876-77.
1879.
Total Catholics 5,539,604
5,777,522
Heathen and Mohammedan natives 602,853
632,640
Foreigners (In 1876 there were:
British, 176; German, 109;
Americans, 42; French, 30) 378
592
Chinese 30,797
39,054
Total 6,173,632
6,449,813
"The third enumeration reported 5,567,685 as the
tribute-paying population. To this number should be added the
estimated number of the independent tribes, 'Indios no
sometidos'; this according to the missionaries' count was
about 600,000, making a total of 6,167,685. Most experts agree
that this official report is untrustworthy and involves
serious omissions, but believe that the facts are so
imperfectly known that they are unable to correct it. One
author, del Pac, writing in 1882, started from the
missionaries' census of 1876-77, viz, 6,173,632, assumed that
this omitted as many as 600,000 members of independent tribes
and that the increase of 1876-1882 would be 740,000. In this
way he got 7,513,632. A second writer, Sanciano, estimated the
population in 1881 as 10,260,249. The missionaries made an
estimate of their own in 1885 which showed 9,529,841.
Seat of War in the Island of Luzon.
{369}
Spanish
Estimated number
census.
not counted.
Total 5,985,000
1,000,000
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS:
The native inhabitants.
Philippine Commission,
Report, January 31, 1900, volume 1, pages 11-15.
J. Foreman,
The Philippine Islands,
chapter 26 (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons).
F. V. Greene,
Memorandum concerning the Situation in the Philippines,
August 30, 1898 (Treaty of Peace and Accompanying Papers:
55th Congress, 3d Session,
Senate Document Number 62, part 1, page 421.