Professional Documents
Culture Documents
hou2015
hou2015
DETC2015-46671
C2 18.92 mm
67.10°
Abramowicz and Jones [4, 5]. Research on thin-walled h1
12.76
mm
h2
12.76
mm
11.74 mm
11.74 mm
E1
1
28.39
mm
in a way similar to circular tubes, while those with deeper A1A2 H1 C1C2
corrugations exhibited a lower initial peak force and a more
D1D2 B2 F1F2
uniform crushing process. However, the total energy
absorption of corrugated tubes was lower than that of G1G2 E2 I1 I2
2
conventional ones. Song et al. [16] applied a kind of origami 23.23
mm
116.54°
F1 l2
46.73°
D1 D2 F2
21.36 mm
21.36 mm
1 1
21.36 mm
21.36 mm
2 2 conventional square tube, SQU, are side length b = 60 mm,
136.42°
136.42°
123.37°
123.37°
E1 E2
total axial height L=120 mm and thickness t = 1 mm. The
origami tubes have L and t identical to those in SQU. Other
G1 I1 A2 C2
parameters in the unfolded state are as follows: b1=60mm,
H1 B2 b2=50mm, and ψ1 = 90°. Parameters M and θ1 vary from one
(a)
tube to another. The configurations of all tubes are
(b)
summarized in Table 1. The notation K-M-θ1 is adopted, in
Figure. 2 (a) A FOLDED SHAPE OF BASIC ELEMENT P1; (b) A which K is short for kite-shape, M is the number of layers, and
FOLDED SHAPE OF BASIC ELEMENT P2. θ1 is the pre-folded angle in the unfolded state.
Commercial FEA software package Abaqus/Explicit was
The equations relating these angles (α1 ψ1 θ1) are obtained [21] applied to simulate the quasi-static axial crushing process of
as kite-shape patterned tubes. The tube was mainly meshed with
1 1
cot (1) tan 1 cos quadrilateral shell elements S4R, with only a few triangular
2 2 elements being used to avoid excessive distortion. In the
Addition useful relationships are simulation, the tube was put on a stationary rigid panel. A
moving rigid panel initially just contacting the top edge of the
2h1 sin 1 l1 (2)
2 tube, moved axially to crush the tube. No extra clamping or
l holding apparatus was used to constrain tube ends. All the
a1 sin 1 1 (3) DOFs of the stationary rigid panel were fixed, whereas only
2
a1 sin1 h1 (4) the translational one of the moving rigid panel in the axial
direction of the tube was free of constraint. Prescribed
Figure 2(b) shows the geometry of basic element P2. Similar downward displacement of kL [16] was applied to the free
to the analysis of P1, the equations relating parameters of P2 translational DOF of the moving rigid panel to control the
are given by
crushing distance,in which k = 0.73 is a numerical factor
2 2
cot tan 2 cos (5) defining the effective crushing. Self-contact was employed to
2 2 model the contact among different parts of the tube and
2 surface to surface contact was defined between the tube and
2h2 sin l2 (6)
2 each rigid panel. Friction was taken into consideration and the
l2 friction coefficient was taken as 0.3. The material adopted was
a2 sin 2
(7) mild steel, and the mechanical properties are as follows:
2
density ρ = 7800 kg/m3, Young’s modulus E = 210GPa,
a2 sin 2 h2 (8)
Poisson’s Ratio ν = 0.3, yield stress σy = 200.2 MPa, tensile
A module of an origami tube with a kite-shape pattern strength σu = 480 MPa. The strain hardening effect was
constructed by joining the basic elements P1 and P2 can be approximated by using power law hardening model with the
deployed and collapsed following the condition of rigid strain hardening exponent being 0.2.
origami with only one degree of freedom (DOF). Taking P1 as Convergence tests in terms of mesh density and analysis
a reference configuration, the following geometrical time, were also conducted. Two principles [22] were followed,
relationships should be satisfied. i.e., that the ratio of the artificial energy to the internal energy
a2 a1 (9) was below 5% to make sure that hourglassing effect would not
1 2 (10) significantly affect the results, and that the ratio of the kinetic
energy to the internal energy was below 5% during most of
b2 sin 2 b1 sin 1 (11) the crushing process so as to ensure that the dynamic effect
2 2 could be considered as insignificant. It was found that an
In summary, there are five independent geometric
element size of 1 mm and a crushing time of 0.075s satisfied
3 Copyright © 2015 by ASME
the two principles and were therefore adopted in the analysis. 3.2 CONVENTIONAL SQUARE TUBE
Two key parameters were applied to evaluate the energy The conventional square tube SQU is studied to set a
absorption performance: the specific energy absorption (SEA), benchmark to evaluate the energy absorption enhancement of
defined as the energy absorption per unit mass, and the load the origami patterned tubes. Numerical simulation shows that
uniformity, defined as the ratio of the initial peak force to the SQU collapses into the symmetric mode as presented in Fig. 3,
mean crushing force. The initial peak force, Pmax , and mean which is typical of thin-walled square tubes with b/t = 60. The
crushing force in numerical simulation, Pms , of each tube were initial peak force Pmax and mean crushing force Pms of SQU was
generated from the results of numerical simulation. found to be 46.38 kN and 10.92 kN as listed in Table 1.
The mean crushing force in numerical simulation for
each tube was calculated by formula (12), in which δ is the
final crushing distance.
p s
0
p(x)
(12)
m
(b) K-4-140
(b) K-3-120
(c) K-4-150
(c) K-4-120
(d) K-4-160
(d) K-5-120
Figure 6. AXIAL CRUSHING PROCESSES OF (a) K-4-130 (b) K-4-140
Figure 4. AXIAL CRUSHING PROCESSES OF (a) K-2-120 (b) K-3-120
(c) K-4-150 (d) K-4-160
(c) K-4-120 (d) K-5-120
25
K-4-170 K-4-160 K-4-150
K-4-140 K-4-130 K-4-120
20 20
K-5-120 K-4-120
Force (kN)
15 15
Force (kN)
K-3-120 K-2-120
10 10
5 5
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm)
Figure. 5 FORCE VS DISPLACEMENT CURVES OF K-2-120 TO Figure. 7 FORCE VS DISPLACEMENT CURVES OF K-4-120 TO
K-5-120. K-4-170.
3.3 ORIGAMI TUBES WITH KITE-SHAPE PATTERN displacement curves of these samples are plotted in Fig. 5.
The crushing processes of representative patterned tubes Three observations can be made from the results. First, the
are shown in Fig.4 and Fig. 6. The Mises stress contour is patterns are well followed and the origami tubes collapse
shown in the first one of each figure, which clearly show that according to the crease lines. At the onset of the crushing
the stress level is among the highest in the vicinity of the process, every module of the origami tubes shown in Fig. 4,
plastic hinges. It can be seen that all the tubes collapse buckles simultaneously. As the tube is compressed further,
following the pre-folded origami pattern in a progressive and plastic hinge lines are formed along the crease lines. Second,
stable manner. the area below the curve indicates the energy absorption
Figure 4 shows the axial crushing processes of samples capability. Fig.5 clearly shows that increasing M can
with identical θ1 = 120° but different M. The force vs. significantly enhance the capacity of energy absorption.
50
45
40 SQU K-5-156
(e) K-5-160
35
Force (kN)
30
25
20
15
10
(f) K-6-156
5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Displacement (mm)
D1 F1
21.36 mm
1,I 1
p
hinges occur. The last is that the pattern is not followed at all. p
136.42°
123.36°
2
p
p
H1 E1 1
Percent difference
p Simulation Theoretical
1
1,III 2 Sample
46.89°
s
P (kN )
m Pmt (kN ) Pms Pmt / Pms
A1
1 K-2-120 2.1210 2.1446 1.1%
1
p
2
p
B2 K-3-120 3.3365 2.9262 12.3%
51.98°