Scribd
Upload
27 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation Performance Task Report

The document is a peer evaluation form for a group project, specifically for the SYCAMORE group dated April 4, 2025. It includes criteria for assessing group members on preparation, contribution to ideas, quality of work, timeliness, and engagement, with ratings from 4 to 12. The evaluation is completed by a member named Marj Dawn S. Sarabusing.

Uploaded by

marcdominicsarabusing559
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation Performance Task Report

The document is a peer evaluation form for a group project, specifically for the SYCAMORE group dated April 4, 2025. It includes criteria for assessing group members on preparation, contribution to ideas, quality of work, timeliness, and engagement, with ratings from 4 to 12. The evaluation is completed by a member named Marj Dawn S. Sarabusing.

Uploaded by

marcdominicsarabusing559
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PEER EVALUATION (PERFORMANCE TASK)

Group Number and Section: SYCAMORE​ ​ Date:/.4/2025

Rating:​ Excellent (12)​ Good (9)​ Fair (6)​ Poor (4)

Names of the Members


CRITERIA 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 10: 11: RATING
UNDAC DIMACALI SY ACASO

Preparation The student is fully 9 9 6 4


prepared, having clearly spent significant​ time and
effort on the task.
Contribution to Ideas 6 6 6 6
The student consistently contributes innovative and valuable
ideas to the
project.
Quality of Work 6 9 4 4
The​ student’s work is
of high quality and
enhances​ the overall
project.
Timeliness 6 6 6 6
The​ student always
meets deadlines and
is punctual with their
contributions.
Engagement in Group Activities 6 6 6 6
The student is highly
engaged in group activities and
discussions.
TOTAL:
33 36 28 26
Rated by:
SARABUSING, MARJ DAWN S.
Group Member’s Name and Signature
PEER EVALUATION (PERFORMANCE TASK)

Group Number and Section: SYCAMORE​ ​ Date:/.4/2025

Rating:​ Excellent (12)​ Good (9)​ Fair (6)​ Poor (4)

Names of the Members


CRITERIA 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 10: 11: RATING
UNDAC DIMACALI SY ACASO

Preparation The student is fully


prepared, having clearly spent significant​ time and
effort on the task.
Contribution to Ideas
The student consistently contributes innovative and valuable
ideas to the
project.
Quality of Work
The​ student’s work is
of high quality and
enhances​ the overall
project.
Timeliness
The​ student always
meets deadlines and
is punctual with their
contributions.
Engagement in Group Activities
The student is highly
engaged in group activities and
discussions.
TOTAL:
Rated by:
SARABUSING, MARJ DAWN S.
Group Member’s Name and Signature

You might also like