You are on page 1of 1

Enhancing Self-Regulation Through Mindful

Yoga Breathing in a Preschool-Aged Child


Biannca Guzman
PK-3 Program

Introduction Method Discussion


•Behavior Definitions: Experimental Conditions:
•Self-regulation is a critical aspect in a child’s learning experience – Self-regulation - “the process of •Baseline: Everyday, the teacher would use In this intervention it was seen that the selected child enjoyed
in that it is said to “predict how well children make the transition to modulating systems of emotion, attention verbal redirection when students were not participating in the exercise as once the research concluded she
school and how they fare in the early grades” (Copple & and behavior in response to a given self-regulating during whole group would ask to go do the exercise on the following days.
Bredekamp, 2009, p.7). Through the development of self regulation contextual situation, stimulus or demand instruction.
it is noted that children then have a better learning experience. (Razza, Bergen-Cico & Raymond, 2013 This research showed that through the Mindful Yoga Breathing
p.2) technique the child was indeed able to better self-regulate.
•Mindful Yoga Breathing Intervention: The
•Data Collection: Although this student still had some moments that she would not
•A mindful yoga breathing (MYB) exercise intervention was MYB intervention was implemented twice per
– Data were collected on a partial interval self-regulate, she had an overall increase in this area of
implemented to increase a selected child's ability to self-regulate in day by the researcher after the child ate
basis: If the child was self-regulating and development.
their preschool classroom. breakfast and before center time. The student
the teacher was giving +/- responses it was coached through a 30-second segment of
was recorded as partial interval. deep breathing exercises along with hand
•The guiding research question for this study was “Will the
implementation of mindful yoga breathing exercises periodically, – Reliability was calculated on 16% of the gestures justifying how the exercise aided in
observed sessions, interobserver remaining calm and focused. (Razza, Bergen-
increase self-regulation during whole group activities in a
agreement was 89% (range, 85-95%) Cico & Raymond, 2013).
preschool-aged child?”
based on both child self-regulation and
teacher responses.

Findings Conclusion
• Results of the present study are similar to finding from the study
Child Self Regulation: 100
Enhancing Preschoolers’ Self-regulation Via Mindful Yoga
Baseline Mindful Yoga Breathing Intervention
Percentage of Observed Intervals

During baseline, child self-regulation averaged 44% (range, • This intervention can be incorporated within classrooms by setting
with child self-regulation and

90
teacher positive responses

35- 55%); when the MYB Intervention was implemented, child Childs inability to self aside time during students daily routine and allowing them breathing
80
Childs ability to self-regulate
self-regulation averaged 60%% (range, 55- 70%). This exercises.
70
represents an increase of 16% percentage points. No response from teacher
• Further research can be done to expand on the effects of this
intervention and answer the question of “How would MYB
60

Teacher Positive Responses 50


implementation alter self-regulation over a longer period of time?”
During baseline, teacher positive responses averaged 16% (range, 40
Positive teacher response • Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate
10- 25%); when the MYB Intervention was implemented, teacher 30
practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth t
positive responses averaged 26% (range, 20-30%). This represents 20
Negative teacher hrough age 8. Washington, D.C.: National Association for the
an increase of 10% percentage points. 10
response Education of Young Children
0
• Razza, R. A., Bergen-Cico, D., & Raymond, K. (2013). Enhancing
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Preschoolers’ Self-Regulation Via Mindful Yoga. Journal of Child


Sessions and Family Studies, 24(2), 372-385.doi:10.1007/s10826-013-
9847-6

You might also like