Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bala, A. R. (2010). The Philippine experience in social assistance., in S.W. Handayani & C.
Burkley (Eds.)., Social Assistance and Conditional Cash Transfers. Mandaluyong: ADB.
As per EO 43 (2011), the DSWD Secretary is the chair of the Cabinet Cluster
on Human Development and Poverty Reduction.
IMPLEMENTATION HISTORY
November 2006 DSWD and World Bank begin
work on 4Ps
March 2007 Pilot implementation– 4,459
households in three regions
February 2008 320,000 households in 27
provinces, 160 cities
December 2009 665,542 households in 63
provinces, 446 cities
December 2010 1 million households in 79
provinces, 729 cities
June 2011 2 million households reached
December 2011 2.3 million households
Fernandez, L. & Olfindo, R. (2011). Overview of the Philippines’ conditional cash transfer program: the
Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (Pantawid Pamilya). Philippine Social Protection Note No. 2. World
Bank and Australian Government Aid Program.
Fernandez, L. & Olfindo, R. (2011)
PROGRAM CYCLE
IMPLEMENTATION
1. Targeting and enumeration
Development of National Household Targeting System
Poorest provinces identified (Family Income and Expenditure survey)
Poorest cities and municipalities identified within poorest provinces
Outside poorest cities, poor communities identified via data from
Presidential Commission on Urban Poor and local social indicators
In poorest cities, communities are selected based on local gov’t data
DSWD deploys enumerators to gather socioeconomic information via
house-to-house interviews (questionnaire about household assets)
Households’ incomes estimated using interview response data
Lists of potential eligible households posted in communities for
verification*
*On demand applications in communities also accepted
4.7 million households identified poor as of Jan. 2011
IMPLEMENTATION
2.Verification and disbursement
Eligible households sign agreement and are organized into community
assemblies (with elected leaders) for monitoring
Actual cash disbursements made every two months, to coincide with
compliance checks by DSWD program management offices
Payroll process: NPMO DSWD Cash Division check DSWD Project
Director and Manager approval Land Bank
3. Updating (Management Information System)
Individual households responsible for updating information
Updates flow from community upward to NPMO, for encoding
Updates presented at monthly community assemblies, verified by links
Third non-compliance offense/change in household eligibility results in
termination of payments
IMPLEMENTATION
Compliance Verification System
NPMO (compliance forms) RPMO (compliance forms) City schools
& health centers RPMO (via municipal links) NPMO updates MIS and
issues compliance forms for next period
Grievance Redress System
Grievance application and process via MIS being tested
Complaint reporting mechanisms (text hotline, e-mail, social networking)
4. Program monitoring
Aside from internal monitoring by DSWD and World Bank, biannual spot
checks done by a third party (Social Weather Stations in 2010)
President has mandated Senate and House Oversight Committees on
Public Expenditures to monitor 4Ps implementation
IMPACT
Compliance with conditions
Condition Compliance
Day care attendance 95.71%
Primary and secondary school 97.50%
attendance
Check-ups for children and 96.99%
pregnant women
Deworming for school-age 97.29%
children
Family development sessions 97.30%