Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This unit:
1. discusses the antecedents of
nanotechnology and discusses both its
positive and adverse impacts on environment
and society.
2. illustrates how nanotechnology affected our
lives individually and as society.
Intended Learning Outcomes:
Instruction:
Name______________________________ Section______________________
Instructions:
Select a manufacturing product you use in your daily life that involves
nanotechnology.
Prepare a flashcard (A4 size) with the picture of the product on the front side and the
description of the product why it is classified utilizing nanotechnology at the back.
Prepare for a 2 minute discussion of your flash card in front of the class.
Activity 2
*Note: Exercise 2. Shall be a Group activity
Instructions:
• The class will be divided into 6 groups composed of 5 members per group.
• Three fields (any of these topics ICT and Semiconductor, Energy, Food and
Agroculture, Environment, and Health and Medicine) where nanotechnology is
used in the Philippines will be drawn by each group.
• Two groups will be given the same field. One of these groups needs to give and
defend the potential benefits of nanotechnology on this field while the other
group needs to be defending the issues and concerns on human health and the
environment.
• Prepare for a debate using the Rubric for Debate below.
Rubric for Debate Levels of Performance
Criteria 1 2 3 4
Few or no Many
3. Use of Examples and Facts
relevant Some relevant examples/facts Most relevant supporting
(Examples and facts are given to
supporting examples/facts given given: fairly examples and facts given
support reasons, with references)
examples/facts relevant
Instructions:
Research on the existing Professional, Legal/Policy, and Ethical issues on
Nanotechnology.
Instructions:
• Form a group of 5 members.
• Identify an existing Nanotechnology Issue and Concern that you think
needs a policy to be implemented.
• Use the Rubric for Policy Paper as your guide.
Category Rubric for Policy Paper
Exceeds Standards 9-10 pts Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard
7-8 pts
Does Not meet
Standard 4-7 pts
No evidence
0 Points
8-9 pts
Title Your name, date, and a catchy/clever title Title is not quite as catchy all else is there Missing one element Missing more than one element Absent
Thesis Clearly and concisely states the paper's Clearly states the paper's purpose and policy States the purpose/policy proposal of Incomplete and/or unfocused Absent and/or unfocused
Statement purpose and policy proposal in 2-3 engaging proposal the paper but is somewhat unclear or and/or has purpose but no policy and/or missing purpose
appears much too late in the paper proposal and/or policy proposal
sentences that are identifiable in the first 3-4
pages
Introduction Engaging, draws the reader in; includes the States the main purpose and thesis, but is not Alludes to the topic, but is not engaging No clear and delineated intro, Absent
thesis; sets out the reasoning about why topic creative and dances around the reason that and does not include an identifiable thesis is missing
the policy topic is problematic thesis
is a "problem" that needs fixed
Body Is well-organized; Includes thorough history of Is mostly well-organized; includes decent Organization is troubling; treatment of Organization is so sloppy that If you don't have a body,
topic, thorough discussion of current policies historical discussion; discussion of current history is cursory; policy proposal is paper is hard to follow; one or you don't have a paper!
policies may be a bit superficial; scholarly neither plausible nor defended; more elements of policy proposal
and scholarly debates about the topic, clear
debates present but not necessarily linked to scholarly debate is missing history, or scholarly debate are
articulation of feasible and defensible policy
sources; policy proposal not defended but missing
proposal feasible
Development Policy solution is obviously well-developed and Policy solution is tentatively asserted and is Policy solution is very basic and not Policy solution is not possible No evidence of attempt
of based in an excellent understanding of mostly supported by research and based in a based in a thorough understanding of and/or is not grounded in any to articulate policy
decent understanding of current government current government structure and understanding of current solution
Idea/Support government structure and power; policy
structure and power; development of argument power; policy solution is tentatively government structure/power;
for Ideas solution is obviously supported by research;
is sound but sometimes difficult to follow; based in research; transitions are transitions are weak
development of argument is logical and transitions solid but not seamless convoluted and interfere with
transitions enhance clarity development of idea
Conclusion The conclusion is engaging and encourages The conclusion is clear and present The conclusion doesn’t' seem to wrap The conclusion is not conclusive No conclusion present
reader to "think some more" up the paper and/or is hard to identify
Mechanics/ Few if any errors in sentence structure, Several errors in the categories mentioned in Significant errors in punctuation, Mechanics are so rough as to Writing is illegible.
organization, spelling, capitalization, column 1. Writing is terse and not overly organization, spelling interferes with thoroughly distract from the
Usage poetic, but appropriate and clear. clarity of the ideas. Word/verb choice is articulation of the ideas
punctuation. Beautiful language and
elementary and repetitive.
sophisticated word/verb choice
Citations/ Has all 10 sources; at least 3 book sources; all Has 8-10 sources; may only have 2 books Has 7-9 sources; not enough book Sources are 7 or fewer; book No footnotes and no
Internet sources are reliable sources; citation sources; 1-2 Internet sources seem suspect; sources and too much reliance on sources are not present; bibliography
Sources citation format followed with perhaps a couple unreliable Internet sources; citation footnotes are in incorrect format
format follows Chicago Manual of Style
of errors; footnotes are present but may be format rough and incomplete; some and/or are not adequate
perfectly; footnotes are informative and support
rather terse; all direct quotations are cited; quotes are not cited directly; difficult to
assertions of ideas; all direct quotes are cited; bibliography present and in correct format understand which sources ideas are
bibliography present and in correct format emanating from; bibliography present
but some formatting trouble
Bibliography Present and in correct format Present and in correct format Present with formatting inconsistencies Incomplete No Bibliography
Policy Paper Template Proposal
1. Greer, Julia (October 27, 2014). “The surprising strengths of materials in the nanoworld”,
TEDx Talks, Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjHYHY_IkUk.