You are on page 1of 58

MAJOR HAZARDS

CONTROL
Direktorat Pengawasan Norma K3
Kemenakertrans
MAJOR HAZARD
Danger of large accidents, with consequences not only on the
plant site, but also in the surroundings :
 Many dead or wounded
 Heavy damage to buildings
 Wide and unfavorable publicity: press, radio,TV
 Emotional public reactions
 Serious consequences for the company involved :
 Production loss
 Investigation
 Insurance procedures
 Additional safety requirements
 Shutdown, perhaps : PERMANENT
MAJOR ACCIDENT
A major accident is defined in the regulation as :
“A sudden occurrence at facility causing
serious danger or harm to :
- a relevant person or
- an at risk community or
- property or
- the environment
whether the danger or harm occurs immediately
or at a later time”.
(Australian Government – Comcare)
HARMFUL EFFECT ARISING FROM
MAJOR CHEMICAL HAZARDS

1) DEATHS – immediate and delayed


2) PHYSICAL INJURIES – disabling and non disabling
3) MENTAL INJURIES – short term or long term
4) SOCIAL TRAUMA – short term or long term
5) DISRUPTION OF PEOPLE’S WAY OF LIFE – short
term or long term
6) ENVIRONMENT DAMAGE – short term or long term
7) FINANCIAL LOSS; property damage; consequential
loss
INCIDENT BHOPAL,INDIA (3/12/84)
 Nature of occurrence : runaway reaction in
storage tank released ca. 30 tons of MIC
 Fatalities : Immediate : > 2000; delayed : ??
 Physical injuries : + 200.000; disabled : ??
 Mental injuries : extreme shock & panic,
prolonged & extreme anxiety
 Disruption of people’s way of live : ??
 Environmental damage : ??
 Financial loss : property damage £ 100 millions
INCIDENT MEXICO CITY (19/11/84)
 Nature of occurrence : 18 hours conflagration of
ca.6000 tons of LPG
 Fatalities : Immediate : > 500; delayed : ??
 Physical injuries : 7097; disabled : 100
 Mental injuries : severe shock & panic
 Disruption of people’s way of live : 39.000
homeless or evacuated; hundreds of houses up
to 300 meters destroyed
 Environmental damage : ??
 Financial loss : property damage >£ 13 millions
INCIDENT PIPER ALPHA OIL PLATFORM,
NORTH SEA (6/7/88)

 Nature of occurrence : explosion destroyed oil


production platform
 Fatalities : Immediate : 167; delayed : nil
 Physical injuries : 20; disabled : 7
 Mental injuries : loss of public confidence; loss of
morale in workforce
 Disruption of people’s way of live : relief fund £
millions
 Environmental damage : 5 km oil slick formed
 Financial loss : property damage + £ 500
millions
SPECIFIC FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO
MAJOR ACCIDENT (1)

 Poor management practices; e.g : inadequate


supervision
 Pressure to meet production target
 Inadequate Safety Management System
 Failure to learn lessons from previous accident
 Communication issues; e.g : between shifts, between
personnel and management
 Inadequate reporting system
 Complacency
 Violation / non compliance behavior
SPECIFIC FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO
MAJOR ACCIDENT (2)
 Inadequate training, e.g : emergency response, fire
and safety
 Lack of competency
 Excessive working hours resulting in mental fatigue
 Inadequate procedures
 Modification /up date to equipment without operator
knowledge and/ or revised risk assessment
 Inadequate /insufficient maintenance
 Maintenance error
MAJOR HAZARD CONTROL
is
Prevention of Major Accidents
Factors Influencing Major Incidents
MAJOR ACCIDENTS OCCUR ALWAYS
UNEXPECTED

 At night
 During the weekend
 When the factory is stopped
 During a power failure
 In very bad weather
CONTROL MEASURES

Avoidance of Risks
 Prevention of Accidents

 Mitigation of Consequences

Sitting of the plant Operation


Lay out Maintenance
Design Repair
Construction Modification
Start up Decommissioning
AVOIDANCE OF RISKS

 Small Inventories
 Safer Substances

 Lower Pressure REDUCE


 Lower Temperature POTENTIAL
 Etc
PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTS
 Ensure adequate control
 instrumentation
 Reduce Failures
 Improve Detection
 Improve Shutdown
 Improve Relief
 Site Layout REDUCE


Operator training
Operation Maintenance
PROBABILITY
 Work permit system
 Inspection, testing
 Accident - investigation
 Etc
MITIGATION OF CONSEQUENCES

 Detection systems
 Emergency action on site
 Choice of site
 Firefighting system
REDUCE
 First aid kit
IMPACT
 Personal service/ambulance
 Control development nearby
 Etc
ACCIDENT MODEL
HUMAN
FAILURE Unsafe acts

INCIDENT

Latent Unsafe Plant/


Errors Condition

PERFORMANCE
INFLUENCING FACTORS Fail to
recover situation

ORGANISATION

PERSON JOB
Failure of ACCIDENT
mitigation
ACCIDENT MODEL
PERSON :
• aptitude
• sifat
ORGANISATION • sistem nilai
• kharakteristik
• minat
• motivasi
PERSON JOB
• usia
• jenis kelamin
• pendidikan
• pengalaman dll
ORGANISATION :
• kharakteristik perusahaan JOB :
• sistem manajemen • mesin
• diklat • peralatan kerja
• pengawasan/supervisi • bahan
• pengupahan • lingkungan fisik
• lingkungan sosial • metode kerja
• dll • dll
HUMAN FACTOR

HUMAN
FACTOR
(Health & Safety Executive -1999)

JOB

 The JOB – what people are ask to do


(task/workload/procedures/environment/equipment)
 The INDIVUAL – who is doing it (competence/attitude/capability/risk
perception)
 ORGANIZATION – how is the work organized
(leadership/resources/culture/communication)
EXAMPLES OF MAJOR HAZARD
WORKS

 Petrochemical Works
 Chemical Works
 LPG Storage
 Fertilizer Works
 Explosives Manufacture
 Bulk Use of Chlorine
 Pesticide factories
 Etc
CONTOH
INDUSTRIAL MAJOR ACCIDENT
I. PELEDAKAN (Explosions)
 Cyxlohexane (Mati : 28; Cidera : 89) Flixborough –UK, 1974
 Propylene (Mati : 14; Cidera :107) Beek, Netherland, 1975
II. KEBAKARAN (Major Fires)
 LPG (Mati : 650; Cidera : 2500) Mexico City, 1985
III. TOKSIK (Toxic Release)
 Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) (Mati :2000;Cidera :20000 Bhopal,
India, 1984
MAJOR ACCIDENT

 BHOPAL – absence of system maintenance


 PIPER ALPHA – an error in work organization
and transmission of instruction
 CHERNOBYL – breach of safety regulation
 FLIXBOROUGH – a poorly designated
modification
DESIGNATION OF MAJOR
HAZARD PLANT

 List of Substances considered to be


dangerous

 Threshold Quantities for each of substances


on the list
PENETAPAN POTENSI BAHAYA
INSTALASI
 POTENSI BAHAYA BESAR :
Kuantitas Bahan yang Digunakan melebihi
Nilai Ambang Kuantitas (NAK)
Qs > TQ
 POTENSI BAHAYA MENENGAH : Kuantitas
Bahan yang Digunakan sama atau lebih kecil Nilai
Ambang Kuantitas (NAK)
Qs = TQ atau Qs < TQ
KEWAJIBAN PENGUSAHA ATAU PENGURUS
Persh. Potensi Bahaya Besar (I)

 Mempekerjakan Petugas K3 Kimia :


 Sistem Kerja Non Shift min. 2 orang
 Sistem Kerja Shift min. 5 orang
 Mempekerjakan Ahli K3 Kimia min. 1 orang
 Membuat Dokumen Pengendalian Potensi
Bahaya Besar
 Melaporkan Setiap Perubahan (bahan, kuantitas,
proses dan modifikasi instalasi)
KEWAJIBAN PENGUSAHA ATAU PENGURUS
Persh. Potensi Bahaya Besar (II)

 Melakukan Pemeriksaan dan Pengujian


Faktor Kimia min. 6 bulan sekali
 Melakukan Pemeriksaan dan Pengujian
Instalasi min. 2 tahun sekali
 Melakukan Pemeriksaan Kesehatan Tenaga
Kerja min. 1 tahun sekali
KEWAJIBAN PENGUSAHA ATAU PENGURUS
Persh. Potensi Bahaya Menengah (I)

 Mempekerjakan Petugas K3 Kimia :


 Sistem Kerja Non Shift min. 1 orang
 Sistem Kerja Shift min. 3 orang
 Membuat Dokumen Pengendalian Potensi
Bahaya Menengah
 Melaporkan Setiap Perubahan (bahan,
kuantitas, proses dan modifikasi instalasi)
KEWAJIBAN PENGUSAHA ATAU PENGURUS
Persh. Potensi Bahaya Menengah (II)

 Melakukan Pemeriksaan dan Pengujian


Faktor Kimia min. 1 tahun sekali
 Melakukan Pemeriksaan dan Pengujian
Instalasi min. 3 tahun sekali
 Melakukan Pemeriksaan Kesehatan Tenaga
Kerja min. 1 tahun sekali
DOKUMEN PENGENDALIAN POTENSI BAHAYA BESAR
Berisikan :
 Identifikasi Bahaya, Penilaian dan
Pengendalian Risiko
 Kegiatan Tehnis, Rancang Bangun,
Konstruksi, Pemilihan Bahan Kimia,
Pengoperasian dan Pemeliharaan Instalasi
 Kegiatan Pembinaan Tenaga Kerja
 Rencana dan Prosedur Penanggulangan
Keadaan Darurat
 Prosedur Kerja Aman
DOKUMEN PENGENDALIAN POTENSI BAHAYA
MENENGAH
Berisikan :

 Identifikasi Bahaya, Penilaian dan


Pengendalian Risiko
 Kegiatan Tehnis, Rancang Bangun,
Konstruksi, Pemilihan Bahan Kimia,
Pengoperasian dan Pemeliharaan Instalasi
 Kegiatan Pembinaan Tenaga Kerja
 Prosedur Kerja Aman
Faktor2 yg dipertimbangkan dlm
memilih lokasi MH Instalasi :
1. Proximity to populated areas;
2. Proximity to public ways;
3. Risk from adjacent facilities;
4. Storage quantities;
5. Present and predicted development of
adjacent properties;
6. Topography of the site, including elevation
and slope;
Faktor2 yg dipertimbangkan dlm
memilih lokasi MH Instalasi :

7. Access for emergency response;


8. Availability of needed utility;
9. Requirement for the receipt and shipment
of products;
10. Local codes and regulation;
11. Prevailing wind condition;
IDENTIFICATION AND PRIOTISATION OF MAJOR
HAZARD CONTROL

1. Factories
2. Installation
3. Plant Unit
PRIORITISATION OF MAJOR HAZARD
FACTORIES IDENTIFIED
FACTORY RANKING FACTOR (FRF) :
Consist of 5 rating factors :
1) Hazard Rating (HR)
2) Capacity Rating (CR)
3) Population Rating (PR)
4) Domino Effect Rating (DER)
5) Special Object Rating (SOR)

FRF = HR + CR +PR + DER + SOR


HAZARD RATING (HR)
 The chemical & physical properties
 The hazardous substances

No. Group of Hazardous Substances Penalty


Point
1. Extremely Toxic and Toxic Substances – gases (Cl2, NH3, 25
Phosgene)

2. Flammable Substances (LPG, Butane, Propane, Propylene, 20


Hydrogen)
3. Highly Reactive and Explosive Substances (NH4NO3,TNT) 15

4. Extremely Toxic and Toxic Substances – powder/solid 10


(Parathion Methyl)
5. Liquid Flammable Substances – solvent (Toluen, naphta) 5
CAPACITY RATING (CR)
 Max. quantity
 Threshold quantity

No. Capacity ratio Penalty Points


1. CR < 10 4
2. 10 < CR < 50 8
3. 50 < CR < 100 12
4. CR > 100 16

CR = Max. Capacity
ILO Threshold Quantity
POPULATION RATING (PR)
 Population in within a circle of 1 km

No. Number of People Penalty Points


1. PR < 1000 3
2. 1000 < PR < 5000 6
3. PR > 5000 9
DOMINO EFFECT RATING (DER)
 Major Hazard Installation

No. Domino Effect Rating Penalty Points


1. 1 MH Installation 0
2. 2 MH Installation 2
3. > 3 MH Installation 4
SPECIAL OBJECTS RATING
(SOR)
 Object such as : schools, hospitals, cinemas, markets,
supermarkets etc
 Within a circle of 1 km

No. Categories SOR points


1. No special objects 0
2. 1 Special objects 1
3. > 2 Special objects 2
FACTORY RANKING FACTOR
(FRF)

No. Factories Categories FRF


I. Important MH Factories 12 < FRF < 27
II. More Important MH Factories 27 < FRF < 41
III. Most Important MH Factories 41 < FRF < 56
CONTOH 1
PT. X Jakarta, Informasi :
LPG : 37.000 tons
Penduduk lebih dari 10.000 orang, tidak
terdapat MH instalasi lainnya dan tidak ada
spesial objek
Jawaban : HR = 20; CR = 37.000 : 25 = 1480 =>
CR > 100, CRp = 16; PR = 9; DER = 0 dan
SOR = 0
Jadi FRF = 20+16+9+0+0 = 45 (Category III)
CONTOH 2
PT. X Cikampek, Informasi :
Chlorine : 113 tons
Penduduk lebih dari 1000 orang, tidak
terdapat MH instalasi lainnya dan spesial objek
sekolah dan rumah sakit
Jawaban : HR = 25; CR = 113 : 10 = 11
=> CRp = 8; PR = 6; DER = 0 dan SOR = 2
Jadi FRF = 25+8+6+0+2 = 41 (Category II)
IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITISATION OF
MAJOR HAZARD INSTALATION

Calculation of Designation Factor (DF) of a


Major Hazard Installation :

DF = Q x CF/DQ
DF = Designation Factor of Major
Hazard Installation.
Q = Max. Quantity of Major Hazard
Substance in kg
CF = Condition Factor
DQ = Designation Quantity of Major Hazard
Substance in kg
CONDTIONS FACTOR (CF)
 A measure for the conditions under which a Major Hazard Substances
is present in the installation
 Condition deviations and corrections
No. Condition Correction
Factor
a Installation for Processing 1
Installation for storage 0.1
b Installation out of doors 1
Installation in enclosure 2
c Substance is in the gaseous phase 10
Substance is in the liquid phase (see table 1) 0.1 -10
Substance is in the solid phase (respirable powder only)
0.1
d If the process temperature is equal or higher than ambient 0
If the process temperature is lower than ambient (see table 2)
0-3
CONDITIONS FACTOR
(CF)

CF = a x b x (c + d)
DESIGNATION QUANTITY (DQ)
 Quantity of hazardous substance when released suddenly,
can result in extreme danger for a worker within a radius of
100 m from the point of emission

 The designation Quantity :


a. Flammable Substances :10.000 kg
b. Extremely Toxic Substances : 1 kg (based on LC < 20
mg/kg)
c. Toxic Substances; reference = 300 kg Chlorine
d. Explosive Substances; reference = 1000 kg TNT

 See list of Dangerous substances and Threshold Quantities


CORRECTION FACTOR c FOR LIQUIDS (I)
Table 1 :
No Process Temperature (Tp – Tbp) Correction
Factors
1. Tp>90˚c below the boiling point 0.1
80-90 below the boiling point 0.2
70-80 below the boiling point 0.3
60-70 below the boiling point 0.4
50-60 below the boiling point 0.5
40-50 below the boiling point 0.6
30-40 below the boiling point 0.7
20-30 below the boiling point 0.8
10-20 below the boiling point 0.9
<10 below or above boiling point 1
CORRECTION FACTOR c FOR LIQUIDS (II)
No Process Temperature (Tp – Tbp) Correction
Factors

10 - 20˚c above the boiling point 2


20 - 30 above the boiling point 3
30 - 40 above the boiling point 4
40 - 50 above the boiling point 5
50 - 60 above the boiling point 6
60 - 70 above the boiling point 7
70 - 80 above the boiling point 8
80 - 90 above the boiling point 9
Tp> 90 above the boiling point 10
CORRECTION FACTOR d
Tabel 2 :
- 25˚C < boiling point < ambient ˚C : 0
- 75˚C < boiling point < - 25˚C :1
- 125˚C < boiling point < - 75 ˚C :2
boiling point < -125 ˚C :3
MH INSTALLATION CATEGORIES
Designation Factor ( DF)

No. MH Installation Categories DF


I. Important MH Installation 0 < DF < 100
II. More Important MH Installation 100 < DF < 500
III. Most Important MH Installation DF > 500
CONTOH 1
Instalasi produksi yang tertutup, berisikan 2.100
kg bahan kimia beracun Chlorine dalam bentuk
cair pada temperatur proses 35˚C
Boiling Point Cl2 : - 34˚C
Threshold Quantity Cl2 : 300 kg. DF = ?
DF= (Q x CF)/DQ
CF = 1 (processing)x2(enclosed)x7(69˚C above
atm bp) = 14
DF = (2100 x 14)/300 kg = 98 (Category I.
Important MH Instalation )
CONTOH 2
PT.X Jawa Barat – LPG Instalasi penyimpanan yang di
lapangan terbuka, berisikan 37000 ton;
DQ = 10 ton
LPG mixture : 80% butane; 20% propane
Tbp butane : - 2˚C; Tbp propane : - 45˚C
Storage & ambient temp. (max. 35˚C)
T proses antara 30 – 40˚C diatas utk Tbp butane dan 70
- 80˚C utk propane. DF = ?
DF= (Q x CF)/DQ
DF = 80%x37000x0.1(4+0) + 20%x37000x0.1(8+0)/10
DF = 1776 (Category III. Most Important MH Instalation )
CLASSIFICATION OF PLANT
ELEMENT

 DOW INDEX
 FIRE, EXPLOSION & TOXICITY INDEX
(FE&T INDEX)
CLASSIFICATION OF PLANT
ELEMENT
Category Fire and Explosion Toxicity Index
Index

Category I F < 65 T<6

Category II 65 < F < 95 6 < T < 10

Category III F > 95 T > 10


SURVEY SAFETY STUDIES
Category I II III

Checklist 1 x x

Checklist 2 x

Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOPS) x

Accident Data x x x

Emission of Safety Devices x x x


CHECKLIST 1
Causes (internal and external) that may lead to loss of
containment of a hazardous material in the installation

 Failure in  Explosion and/or fire in


 The supply/discharge of the area
process substances  Extreme high open air
 The electric power temperature
supply
 The cooling water supply  Extreme low open air
 The process water or
temperature
common water supply  Flood
 Air supply  Soil subsidence
 Steam supply  Stroke of lightning
 Inert gas supply
 Mechanical impact
 Fuel supply
CHECKLIST 2
Causes that may lead to loss of containment of
the hazardous substances from the installation

 Exceeding safe limits  Thermal expansion


 Corrosion (internal)  Contraction
 Corrosion (external)  Decomposition
 Erosion  Incorrect sampling
 Mechanical stress,  Stratification
fatigue  Control errors
 Fouling and clogging  Fire in the observed
 Failure of seals plant element
SEKIAN

You might also like