Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Population Dynamics: Zoo 511 Ecology of Fishes 2009
Population Dynamics: Zoo 511 Ecology of Fishes 2009
Bluegill Rusty
250 1400
1200
200
1000
Bluegill catch
Rusty catch
150 800
100 600
400
50
200
0 0
Major role of ecology: understand change
Stocking
B = births
D = deaths
Births Deaths
I = immigration Population
E = emigration
Angling
Emigration
Density Dependence
Rate of
Change
(per capita)
Population Density
Rate of population increase
per capita annual increase
Density independent
Density dependent
N
Small group exercise
Population starts at low density.
What happens to density over time under
density-dependent rate of increase?
What happens if rate of increase is density-
independent?
Density-dependent Density-independent
Population
Population
density
density
Time Time
Logistic population growth
dN/dt=r0N(1-N/K)
N K
R-selected vs. K-selected
r-selected K-selected
Environment variable and/or constant and/or
unpredictable predictable
Lifespan short long
Growth rate fast slow
Fecundity high low
Natural mortality high low
Population dynamics unstable stable
How do populations change?
Nt+1 = Nt + B – D + I – E Immigration
Stocking
B = births
D = deaths
Births Deaths
I = immigration Population
E = emigration
Angling
Emigration
Survival
Predation
Disease “Natural Mortality”
Prey availability
Competition for food
Harvest Age 1 Age 2 Age 3
Year 1 N1,1 N1,2 N1,3
S
Year 2 N2,1 N2,2 N2,3
Year 3 N3,1 N3,2 N3,3
Survival
Eggs and larvae suffer the largest losses
Other
Ricker
What determines recruitment?
Beverton-Holt
Ricker
What determines recruitment?
Beverton-Holt
Ricker
What determines recruitment?
Beverton-Holt
CPUE=4/48=0.083
Effort= 4 nets for
12 hours each=
48 net hours
2
Catch=8 fish
CPUE=8/48=0.167
Effort= 4 nets for
12 hours each= We conclude population 2 is
48 net hours
2X larger than population 1
Population abundance
Density estimates (#/area)
Eggs estimated with quadrats
Pelagic larvae sampled with modified plankton nets
Juvenile and adult fish with nets, traps, hook and line, or
electrofishing
Density is then used as index of abundance, or
multiplied by habitat area to get abundance
estimate
Depletion methods
Closed population
Vulnerability constant for each pass
Collection efficiency constant
Often not simple linear regression
N *
N=population size=????
Modified Petersen method
Assumptions:
Closed population
Equal catchability in first sample
Sex
Geographic regions
How many to mark/recapture?
Requires some knowledge of population size!
Trade-off between precision and sample size
Population
of 10,000: Mark 400 and examine 600 for
+/- 50% OR mark 1,000 and examine 1,500 for +/-
10%
Trade-off between marked and recapture sample
size
Population
of 10,000: Mark 1,000 and examine1,500
OR Mark 4,500 and examine 500
Schnabel method
Closed population
Equal catchabilty in first sample
Marking does NOT influence catchability
Multiple recaptures
Easier to pick up on violation of assumptions
Jolly Seber method
Open populations
Allows estimation of births and deaths
Three or more sampling periods needed
Equal catchability of all individuals in all samples
Equal probability of survival
Marks are not lost
Sampling time is negligible compared to intervals
between samples
Importance of variability
Confidence intervals
Long-term frequency, not probablity!
95% confidence intervals if you repeated
procedure an infinite number of times, 95% of the time
the interval you create would contain the “true” value
Precision vs. accuracy
Accurate, not precise Not accurate, precise Accurate, precise
x x
x x
x x xxxx
x
x xxxxx
x
Lets count some beans!