Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS
Saumya Srivastava
19M804
Indoor Air Pollution
• It refers to the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of air in the indoor
environment within a residential, institutional or commercial building.
• It is estimated that the urban population spends a majority of their time up to 90 % in
indoor environments and that a large proportion of the time awake is spent in the work
place.
• Indoor air pollution can begin within the building or be drawn in from outdoors.
• In urban areas, exposure to indoor air pollution has increased due to a variety of reasons,
including the construction of more tightly sealed buildings, reduced ventilation, the use
of synthetic materials for building and furnishing and the use of chemical products,
pesticides, and household care products.
• Other than nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and lead, there are a number of other
pollutants that affect the air quality in an enclosed space.
Causes of Indoor Air Pollution
• Inadequate ventilation - increases indoor pollutant levels by not bringing in enough outdoor
air to dilute emissions from indoor sources and by not carrying indoor air pollutants out of the
home.
• The construction of more tightly sealed buildings.
• High temperature and humidity levels - Temperatures which are too high sometimes make
it seem “stuffy”. If the humidity in the office is too low, it can result in allergy-like symptoms
such as dry, scratchy throat and eyes and general discomfort. Increases concentrations of some
pollutants.
• Inadequate Amount of Fresh Air: An inadequate amount of outdoor fresh air introduced
into the building can lead to a buildup of carbon dioxide.
• Modern offices usually have several sorts of electronic equipment and other dominant heat
sources indoors.
• The use of cleaning products and pesticides in housekeeping.
• Building materials and furnishings as diverse as deteriorated, asbestos-containing insulation,
wet or damp carpet, and cabinetry or furniture made of certain pressed wood products
• Cooling systems and humidification devices; and outdoor sources such as radon, pesticides,
and outdoor air pollution(nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and lead).
Sources of Indoor Air Pollution in a Typical Office Building
Volatile Organic Compounds
Sources of VOCs Health Effects
Household products, including: • Health effects may include:
• paints, paint strippers and other solvents • Eye, nose and throat irritation
• wood preservatives • Headaches, loss of coordination and nausea
• aerosol sprays • Damage to liver, kidney and central nervous
• cleansers and disinfectants system
• moth repellents and air fresheners • cause cancer in humans and animals.
• stored fuels and automotive products
• hobby supplies Key signs or symptoms associated with
• dry-cleaned clothing exposure to VOCs include:
• pesticide • conjunctival irritation
Other products, including: • nose and throat discomfort
• building materials and furnishings • headache
• office equipment such as copiers and • allergic skin reaction
printers, correction fluids and carbon copy • dyspnea
paper. • declines in serum cholinesterase levels
• graphics and craft materials including glues • nausea
and adhesives, permanent markers and • emesis
photographic solutions. • epistaxis
• fatigue
• dizziness
Benzene
• The aim of the present study is to characterize IAQ in different office and academic buildings
located in densely build-up area of New Delhi, India.
• PM2.5, CO2 and VOCs were
measured simultaneously in the
indoor environment of different
types of buildings during the pre-
monsoon season.
• The study was conducted in two
commercial/official buildings :
O1(located near busy road in
Central, New Delhi) and O2(inside a
commercial complex in East Delhi)
• 8 h (9:00–18:00 h) monitoring of
PM2.5, VOC and CO2 was
conducted every day in each
building during the study period
• Published studies investigating the efficacy of air cleaning interventions to improve both
IAQ of offices and the health of employees is limited to installation of free-standing
electrostatic air cleaners as an effective means of breathing zone particle filtration.
• Analysis shows that, the monetized health benefits of filter installations outweighed the
operation costs, the net benefits were greatest for the highest efficiency filters.
• Modeling has also suggested that implementing a high efficiency filter can mitigate negative
effects of ventilation whilst higher ventilation rates can increase the efficacy of filtration.
• Results indicate that increasing ventilation rates alone is ineffective at reducing chronic
disease burdens in these commercial buildings and that alternative strategies such as
pollutant source control and the use of particle filtration, should receive greater priority.
Air Cleaners
Mechanical Filtration
• Mechanical filtration is a simple and extensively utilized technique to
substantially capture and retain particulate air pollutants.
• Performance depends on the type of filter (flat, pleated, HEPA), filter
media material and coatings, airflow through the system, size of particle
contaminant and filter age.
• The most commonly used HEPA(High Efficiency Particulate Air) filters
are over 95% efficient in removing particles of all sizes.
• Owing to particle saturation and associated pressure loss, filters must be
replaced to maintain removal efficiency, guard against sensory pollution
and new sources of contamination in the form of harmful microorganisms.
Electronic Air Filtration
• Electrostatic precipitators (ESP) are medium cost devices, generating ions
that attach to and electrically charge particulate pollutants as they pass
through the device. Once charged, the particles are deflected by an electric
field onto on a series of positive and negative charged cleanable plates.
• Advantages: 1. It is efficient at removing 90% particles 2. Results in slower
pressure loss than mechanical filters.
• Disadvantages: A high relative humidity can negatively affect removal
efficiency, plus they can generate hazardous charged particles and
unwanted oxidation byproducts.
Adsorption
• Adsorption is a high performance technique (> 90% removal efficiency) that removes
gaseous pollutants (VOCs, O3, NO2, SO2 and hydrogen sulphide) using an appropriate
adsorbent, such as activated carbon and hydrophobic zeolites.
• Disadvantages include a compromised efficiency at a high relative humidity, the need to
regularly replace the adsorbents to prevent waste pollutants re-entering the atmosphere and
the potential of airborne bacteria to thrive on carbon sorbents.
• There are three established strategies to reduce indoor air pollution, namely source control,
ventilation and mechanical air cleaners.
• The key element of the self-cleaning ecosystem is bioremediation, which is the use of living
(micro)organisms for the cleaning up of contaminated soil, water, sediment or air.
• Instead of applying conventional cleaning products in indoor spaces, microorganisms namely
Bacillus species are nebulized on surfaces, objects and in the indoor air.
• A crossover pilot study was carried out in an urban region in Flanders, Belgium and lasted 3
weeks
• The microorganisms were nebulized in one office building. One office of a neighbouring
office building was included as control.
• The indoor air quality was assessed by tracking particulate matter, carbon dioxide, aldehydes,
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, temperature, relative humidity
and ventilation rate.
• The percentage decreases of acetaldehyde and particulate matter concentrations were
respectively up to 1.5 and 4 times larger in the offices equipped with a self-cleaning
ecosystem than in the control office.
Phytoremediation of VOCs from indoor air by ornamental potted plants: A pilot
study using a palm species under the controlled environment
Hakimeh Teiri, Hamidreza Pourzamani, Yaghoub Hajizadeh*
• Botanical bio-filtration of indoor formaldehyde was tested in this study.
• The potted Chamaedorea elegans plant–soil system examined in this study
showed high potential of removing formaldehyde from polluted air in a long
time exposure.
• Although, the areal part of the plant had substantial contribution in the
removal of formaldehyde, the influence of potted soil and roots was
considerable which can be attributed to the pollutant absorption and Chamaedorea elegans
metabolism by the microorganisms in the soils.
• The entire plant showed more removal in day time rather than night time and darkness.
• Examination of the plant morphology and physiology showed that Chamaedorea elegans can
perfectly tolerate to the formaldehyde exposure with a concentration less than 14.6 mg m-3,
whereas, long term exposure could not stop the plant's growth.
• Thus, it is evident from our results that, phytoremediation can be one of the most effective,
economically and environmental friendly indoor air purification methods.
Schematic dia of the experimental setup: (1)
air pump, (2) activated carbon column, (3)
formaldehyde solution (37%) vessel, (4)
humidifier vessel, (5) mixing vessel, (6) flow
meter, (7) gas sampling port, (8) test
chamber, (9) air mixing fan, (10) temperature
& humidity sensor, (11) sampling impingers,
(12) extraction
Phytoremediation of benzene vapors from indoor air by Schefflera arboricola and
Spathiphyllum wallisii plants
Iman Parseha , Hakimeh Teirib , Yaghoub Hajizadehc,∗ , Karim Ebrahimpourc
• An abundant research indicates that photocatalytic technology is able to convert toxic air
pollutants, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), into nontoxic carbon dioxide under
UV light irradiation.
• Among photocatalytic materials, nano titanium dioxides (nano-TiO2) is considered as the
most appropriate photocatalyst because of low cost and high oxidation power.
• Applying nano-TiO2 thin film to the decorative glass has potential applications in self-
cleaning, antifogging and reducing VOCs.
• Furthermore, high durability performance and transmittance were beneficial for the novel
glass in the purification of indoor air pollutants.
References
• https://iaq.ashrae.org
• https://www.epa.gov/environmental-topics/health-topics
• https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/ciaq-webinar-muller.pdf
• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.06.1064
• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.058
• https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.coac.2016.02.003