Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PERSONALITIES OF GRADE 12
ABM STUDENTS TO THEIR ACA
DEMIC STANDING IN POLYTEC
HNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHI
LIPPINES
GROUP 1
FLOW OF THE PRESENTATION
CONCEPTUAL
01 INTRODUCTION 05
FRAMEWORK
BACKGROUND OF
02 THE STUDY 06 METHODOLOGY
Introduction
Background of the Stud
y
Personality has always been affiliated with one’s
academic standing. If you are an introvert, most
likely, you are expected to have low grades due
to minimal interaction with people. An extrovert
will be much expected to be on top because they
get toEasyjoin every curricular activity, participate
to change colors, photos and is
in class and study well.
beautiful
Theoretical Framework
Conceptual Framework
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
PROCESS OUTPUT
INPUT
Personality traits: Academic
Stay and taking part
Introvert achievements
in school activities
Extrovert Good academic
Ambivert
standing
METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
Easy to change colors, photos
Slovin’s Formula: and is beautiful
n=N1+Ne2
Solution:
N=total population
e=margin of error
n=sample size
Get a modern PowerPoint
Presentation that is
beautifully designed.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents by Age
Age
Frequency Percentage
15-16 years old 6 2.4
29%
71%
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents by
General Average
Verbal
Description Weighted Mean
Interpretation
Q1 4.12 Agree
Q2 4.04 Agree
Q3 3.81 Agree
Q4 3.94 Agree
Verbal
Description Weighted Mean
Interpretation
Q8 3.70 Agree
Q9 3.67 Agree
Verbal
Description Weighted Mean
Interpretation
Personal Weighted P–
Sex t-computed Decision Remarks
Traits Mean value
Male 3.73 Reject
3.94 -2.021 .044 Significant
Introvert Female H0
Test for Significance on Extrovert Personality Traits
According to their Sex
Personality Weighted P–
Traits Sex Mean t-computed Decision Remarks
value
Male 3.42 Accept Not
3.42 .012 .991 Significan
Extrovert Female Ho t
Test for Significance on Ambivert Personality Traits
According to their Sex
Personality Weighted P–
Traits Sex Mean t-computed Decision Remarks
value
Male 3.61 Not
Accept
Ambivert 3.76 -1. 579 .116 Significan
Female Ho t
Test for Significance on the Students’ Personality Traits
According to their Age
Personality Traits F-computed P-value
Decision Remarks
Accept
Introvert .825 .439 Not Significant
Ho
Extrovert Accept
.077 .926 Not Significant
Ho
Accept
Ambivert .675 .510 Not Significant
Ho
Relationship between the Academic Standing and
Personality Traits
Correlation P-
Coefficient Decision Remarks
value
Academic Standing
Reject
vs .190 .003 Significant
Ho
Personality
Conclusion
Almost all of the personalities don’t have a
01 significant relationship when grouped according to
sex and age.