You are on page 1of 9

TASK 1:

SCENARIO-BASED/PROBLEM SOLVING
SCENARIO 1:
Would you recommend revisions? Why?
- Yes, because administrations of test about sculptures of 21 st century is not valid even if it is
connected to the topic. Instead of discussing about sculptures, the first thing that you can do trust
expose your discuss first the different Aspects of Arts in order them to rely on what you're discussion
is all about.
SCENARIO 2:
I suggest the content of the portfolio must not be writings; it is more efficient if compilations of
problem solving with solutions about computations of Areas, Perimeters, and other Geometrical shapes.
SCENARIO 3
I would not choose between test A & B. I suggest test must contains both validity and reliability for
its efficiency, because they are tandem for purpose.

TASK 2: CRITIQUING
ANSWER:
1. No, the number of hours is not proportionate, because the/it is not reasonable
for its objective. Specifically the Learning Objectives.
2. The Learning Objectives #1.
3. No, they are not appropriate & interconnected to each other.
4. Objective valid item, because the question and the choices are related to one another.
Objectives 2; also valid
Objectives 3; not valid, there is no choices or rubrics stated.
Objective 4; valid, related to one another.
5. Validity and Reliability is important to be always focus of the teacher in Evaluating
“Learning Outcome”.
CRITIQUING:
SOURCE OF
VALIDITY QUESTION RESPONSE
EVIDENCE
CONTENT What content domain is -Personal
covered by the test?
Experience
-Vocabulary
Words cognitive,
-Rhyming Words affective,
-Sound of psycho-
Letter motor
-Upper & Lower domains
Case Letters
-Characters
-Naming of Words
-Noun & Spoken
Words
-Sequence of Letters

ALIGNMENT Is the test (question or task) - Test items, contents and tasks match the
content draw exclusively from intended domain & content standards
the intended domain? Do the accordingly. There is parallelism among and
tasks match the content between it.
standards?
ITEM/TASK Are the test question or tasks - Test questions or Elaborated by means of
CONSTRUCTION that the students ask to clear instructions & directions. These are
perform clear? Are directions arranged & organized well, with proper
clear? correlation to contents.
- If I will scale 1-100, I will rate 98%, if it is
Learner-centered approach considering
grade1 pupils the conclusiveness.
SCORING Was the test scored - Yes given points and the rubrics is
appropriately? reasonable with validity.

OPPORTUNITY TO Do all students had sufficient - It may vary the depends or upon the
LEARN opportunities to learn the teaching process, techniques and strategies
of the teacher.
K & S being tested.

ACTIVITY 3:

SOURCE PROS & CONS

STABILITY PROS; Only one test is prepared.


(TEST-RETEST) CONS; students may remembered how they responded
to items on the first administrations of the test and
simply answer correspondingly, thus overestimating the
reliability.
EQUIVALENCE PROS; Parallel test concept & contents are interrelated.
(PARALLEL FORMS) CONS; students construct idea easily by means of
parallelism of construct the reliability is being infirm.
INTERNAL CONSISTENCY PROS; mastery level is being enhanced.
( SPLIT-HALF) CONS; students may master the specific topics and they
will respond (immediately to specific assessment
process)
SCORER CONSISTENCY PROS; measurement errors will be avoided through
consistent scoring practices burdened and area.
(INTER-RATER AGREEMENT)
CONS; student will threatened in scoring consistency.
DECISION CONSISTENCY PROS; organization of assessment is well and
presentable.
CONS; students progress is being anchor to the teachers
decision and will be expose on that part.

ACTIVITY 1:

ASSESSMENT SCENARIOS
SCENARIO 1:
Text constructions in a secondary school designed a measurement procedure to measure intellectual
ability. Compared to well established measures of intellectual ability test on students. To determine its
effectiveness, A of students accomplished two-test (a standardized intelligence test and the new test with
only a few days interval).
ANSWER:
-The situation used an instructional validity to fully design and a measure intellectual
ability of the learners.
-The type of validity used considered valid, why? Because it asserts the sense of being
efficient of using proper instructional materials. The aim of validity is to provide proper
mode of instruction to attain the desired learning outcome.
SCENARIO 2:
After the review sessions, a simulated examination was given to graduating students a
few months before the LET. When the results of LET came out the reviewer coordinator
found that the scores in the simulated (mock) examination are not significantly correlated
with LET scores.
ANSWER:
-The situation used an concurrent validity to fully defined significant of the scenario.
-The type of validity used is not suit in the situation given, why? Because it just a
measure the students current performance. Since the type of test given was mock is not
related to the future performance of what we call month’s interval.
SCENARIO 3:
ANSWER:
-The situation used a predictive validity that suit the scenario.
- The type of validity used is not appropriate in the scenario, why? It because social
study and biology is a combination of two non-interrelated subject areas. So, the test score
may vary. There should be one specific assessment in every subject to determine validity,
effectiveness and sense of compatibility.
SCENARIO 4:
ANSWER:
Divergent Validity is being used. It is not valid, because the topic is not correlated to
text items. Truly learning outcome will not be assessed accordingly.
SCENARIO 5:
ANSWER: - External Validity is used.
- The type of validity used is valid in the situation because it really related to the
Appropriate and generalizes the topics and contents of the assessments. The validity used is
suited to the scenario.

DETERMINE THE SOURCE OF REALIBILTY, EVIDENCE and


ACTIVITY 2:
TYPE OF REALIBILITY COEFFICIENT
1. STABILITY- it is being used, because there is a combination and compassion of the test score.
2. EQUIVALENCE - is being used because there is an assessment of student’s performance and it is
related through equivalent ratings.
3. EQUIVALENCE - is being used, because it administered 2 several of an assessment tool. There is
also parallel from of reliability and two sets of scores.
4. EQUIVALENCE - is being used because there is parallel form of reliability. There is a comparison of
two correlated test results.
5. INTERNAL CONSISTENCY- is being used because the type OF assessment is being measured by
means of portfolio. Wherein the main objective of portfolio assessment is to measure student learning and
mastery level.
ACTIVITY:
METHOD SELECTION
FACTOR ASSESSMENT METHOD REASON
Familiarity Selected Constructed Teacher Self- In order the
with the Response Response Observation Assessment discussion to be
Method specific and direct
to the point of
Assessment
Familiarity Brief Essay Performance Oral Through oral the
with the constructed Assessment Questioning factor will be
Method Assess in order the
Response
objective attain
easily.
Time Selected Constructed Teacher Self- As the teacher, you
Required Response Observation Assessment will be the first one
Response
to be assessed by
the time required.
Time Brief Essay Performance Oral Through this
Required method it will really
Constructed Assessment Questioning
emphasize the
Response important ideas to
be learned.
Ease in Selected Constructed Teacher Self- Through this
Assessment method it will
Administrati Response Response Observation
inform the teacher
on
if he/she teach well
the lesson.
Ease of Selected Constructed Teacher Self- Through this
method it will
Scoring Response Response Observation Assessment
assessed if your
teaching process is
effective.

Ease of Selected Constructed Teacher Self- Through this


Response method the
Interpreta- Response Observation Assessment
interpretation is will
tion be specific.

Cost Selected Constructed Teacher Self- This method will


Response Observation not required
Response Assessment
expensive money
but critical thinking.

QUESTION:
From your answers, which among the assessment methods are most practical and efficient?
- Constructed response, I think it is appropriate in practicality and efficiently. Because in a certain
instances constructed response will be effective. It will make the Assessment, do able and authentic. Also
it will make your process of Assessment unique and can be attain by your students easily and understand
it well.

ASSESSMENTS SCENARIOS:
For each scenario, describe the assessment method in view of Factors, of practicing and Efficiency.
SCENARIO 1  MMs Rivera would like her students to create a video about proper waste
management. She looked into the strengths and limitations of giving a
performance task. She is used to giving projects to students, but she has
limited knowledge about educational technology. Except for the concept,
she does not know how to grade the technical aspects of the video.
Familiarity with  In this method the required strength is the teacher must be the first
the Method Resources for the Learning of the Learners. The student will be the
second-step for the learning's to be applied in real life situation. In this
scenario the teacher must have brief knowledge to be taught in his/her
class.
Time Required  In that scenario the teacher commands to make a video. Time required is
very important in certain activities and allocated must be followed by the
students to practice “on how to follow directions and time management”.
Complexity of  In this method, COMPLEXITY of administration. In making the video as
Administration the teacher.

Ease of Scoring  In this method the teacher is required to summarize his/her scoring. In
and that case, the teacher will give first the criteria to be guided in the grading
Interpretation of the activity. The ease of Interpretation must learned by your students.
Cost  The scenario doesn't require any expensive materials to be finished or
done. But it takes much effort to attain the bets performance. Cost, is very
important in order to balance practically and Efficiency.
Scenario 2:  MMs. De Luna, a social teacher is preparing an ass. For her grade 6 Class
on the topic “Mga Hamon sa Kasarinlan” For this topic, student should be
able to examine problems and challenges on independence after the
Second World War. The teacher decides that colonial mentality and parity
rights. She has almost 50 students and plans to return the paper within
three days.

TASK- SCENARIO BASED/PROBLEM SOLVING LEARNING


As an assessment expert, you were asked for advice on the following matters. Provide your
recommendations.
SCENARIO 1:
Ms. Loreto handles six Grade 5 classes in English. She would like to test their skills in spelling. She has
two options.
A. Oral Spelling Test
- The teacher pronounces each word out loud and the students write down each word.
B. Spelling Bee-Type Test
- Each student is asked individually one-at-a-time to spell specific words out loud.
In terms of practicality and Efficiency, which one would you suggest? Why?
- I suggest to use the (b) Spelling Bee-Type Test, in times of practicality and efficiency. It will be
necessary for the students to ask them individually to spell specific words to test their skills in spelling
through that way you will identify their strengths and weaknesses in spelling. Also by that if they didn’t
know certain words like Extravagant, next time you will know what you will spell to them or what stages
will you start for the students to easily cope it up. Next, 21 st century is considered as students cantered
that will be a great example to emphasize the skills, knowledge, and attitudes of your students.
SCENARIO 2:
Mr. Chua is preparing a final examination for his third year college students in Philippines Government
and Constitution scheduled two weeks from now. He is handling six classes. He has no teaching assistant
he realized that after the final examination, he has three days to calculate the grades of his students. He is
thinking of giving response essays.
What advice would you give him? Which aspects practicality and efficiency should he prioritized? What
type of Assessment should he consider?
- I prefer to suggest it will be effective if he will Familiarity with the method. For the finalization of the
topics in Philippines Government and Constitution.
SCENARIO 3:
Ms Rodriguez will give an end of the year listening comprehension and speaking test in English for her
Grade 3 pupils in Pampanga. She handles three
Sections with 45 students. She meets them daily for 40-50 minutes. She has only one teaching assistant.
A. Should the test be individually- administered or group administered?
B. Should the directions examples and prompts be in the mother tongue or in English? Spoken or
Written?
Should student’s answers and responses be in mother tongue or in English? Spoken or Written?
C. Should the method of scoring be based on counting the number of correct answers and/or follow a
holistic approach (one overall score) or analytic approach (separate scores for each performance once
criterion)?
Give your recommendations in view of the principle of practicality and efficiency.

ACTIVITY 1:

ASSESSMENT SCENARIOS
Write down your recommendations citing specific aspects of Ethics or Fairness discussed in this chapter.
SCENARIO 1:
Eight grade students complained that their music teacher uses only written tests as the sole method of
Assessments. They were not assessed on their skills in singing or creating musical melodies.
Answer:
-Opportunity to learn
- The students are capable of learning the knowledge of the discussion in the three domain. It must be
balance (cognitive domain, Psychomotor, Affective Domain)
SCENARIO 2:
Grade 7 students complained that there were questions in their/ not informed that there is a summative
test in Algebra.
Answer:
- Students knowledge of Learning Targets and Assessments.
- The students must know the coverage of the exam.
SCENARIO 3:
Grade 7 students complained that there were not told what to study for mastery test. They were simply
told to study and prepare for the test.
Answer:
- Students knowledge of Learning Targets and Assessment.
SCENARIO 4:
Grade 9 students studied for a long test conversations/covering the following topics; Motion in two
dimensions; Mechanical Energy; Heat, Work and Efficiency, and Electricity and Magnetism. The teacher
prepared several questions on the first topic. Hence, students complained the most of what they studied
did not turn up in the test.
Answer:
-Avoiding bias in Assessment Task and Procedures.
SCENARIO 6:Students complained that they had difficulty with the test because they prepared by
memorizing the content.
Answer:
-Students’ knowledge of Learning Targets and Assessments
-The students must be informed on what you will put in the test or the coverage of the Assessment. In
order those to attain the knowledge that you preferred to teach to them.
SCENARIO 7:
-Students were tested on an article they read about Filipino Ethnic groups. The article depicted Ilocanos
as stingy. Students who hail from Ilocos were not comfortable answering the test.
Answer:
-Avoiding Stereotyping
- The teacher must be sensitive in giving certain situation. Be sure and efficient to/in making an
Assessment Test.
- As a teacher you must consider the emotions, if they will be affected or not.

Case Analysis.
For each of the following explain why the teacher’s action is deemed unethical .more the section
of the code of that was violated to support your answer.

1. A social studies teacher gave an essay asking students to suggest ways to improve the quality of
education in the country. The teacher simply students answer and many of the students received
the same score.
 Unethical action: The teacher simply students answer and many of the students received the same
answer.

- According to sec.1 of the article VIII: of the code of ethics for the teachers ( resolution
no.435,s.1997 ) A teacher has a right of duty to determine the academic marks of the
promotions of learners in the subject or grades he handles , provided that such determination
shall be in accordance with generally accepted procedures of evaluation and measurement.
In a case of any complaint, teacher concerned shall immediately take appropriate actions,
observing due process.

Libo n Community College


Libon, Albay

Libon, Albay

Portfolio in
Professional Education 8
(Assessment of Student
Learning)

Ivy Shainne Repala Domo


BEED III-A
Dr. Salvacion Raquid
Instructor

You might also like