Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by:
D. Sai Chaitra – 2019PGPH018
This is a shortlisting technique that can be used for initial screening. It involves comparing
William
candidates based on the essential criteria that are identified from the job requirements. Here, the Wendel
criteria chosen could be:
● Educational Qualifications Fred Fallon
● Previous Experience
● Relevant Technical skills
The candidates are scored on whether he/she meets the criteria by looking at their resumes. An Chris Cowan
important step here is deciding the scoring system. For instance, we could use a scoring system
that uses these scores: Mitchell
0=fails to meet the criteria, 1=partially meets the criteria, 2=meets the criteria, 3=exceeds criteria. Madison
The candidates are ranked according to their total scores and the ones with the least scores
could be eliminated An example of a Shortlisting Scorecard
This method involves searching for relevant Telephonic interviews before the actual Psychometric tests helps to identify the
keywords in the candidate’s resume using a interviews act as an efficient and cost effective personality styles of the candidates and can
suitable Applicant Tracking System (ATS). The screening method. It helps the recruiters act as a reliable indicator of the candidate’s
keywords could be words that highlight the understand if the candidate is fit for the job and capabilities.
candidate’s previous job role, domain knowledge, the organisation. Here phone interviews would We could use a leadership psychometric test
experience and other prospects. be a suitable method to screen the candidates in our case that is designed such that it can
In our case, keywords could be related to PC based on their behavioural skills like identify the candidates who have leadership
Networks, leadership roles and VARs channels. Communication skills styles required for the role.
Structured Interview
Ways of getting the
information Focus: Gathering factual info. about
past behaviour
● In-tray exercise: a work simulation
assessment where candidate is
presented with a workplace scenario BEI Philosophy: Past behaviour predict
future behaviours
● Reference check: helps to ensure
the accuracy of information provided
by the candidate Investigative not reflective
Competency Based
Competencies to be tested
Curiosity
0 no opportunity to observe the factor Adaptability
Additional information 1 very little of the factor shown
Decision Making
Risk taking
required
● Subjective aspects of the candidate 2 not much of the factor shown
Work Oriented-Motivation
Determination
● How the candidate will react to a given
Insight
situation 3 moderate amount of the factor shown Collaboration and Influence
● Differentiating competencies that a Strategic Orientation
person possesses . eg- decision 4 quite a lot of the factor shown
making with sensitivity to people issues
● Behavioral competencies 5 a great deal of the factor shown
● How do you invite others on your team to Jim is really interested in finding what makes the employee tick. So,
share their inputs? here the competency in concern in Work Motivation. So an ideal answer
● What do you do to broaden your knowledge will be on the following lines-
and enrich your experience? How often do What motivates you at work?
you do that? Why is it important for you? ● Clearly explains what motivates him ( eg- I am motivated by the
● How do you tackle the unknown? What is constant challenges my work presents and my quest to
your general strategy in dealing with overcome and ultimately mastering them)
unknown territories, techniques, products ● Gives example from past behaviour (eg- In my previous
etc? organisation I was constantly exploring innovative sales
● How do you encourage learning in your channels. VARs was a new territory for me and I was engaged
team? in making sure I am able to understand the ground realities of
this and deliver my best which I did by getting 100M revenue.
Curiosity
Thank you