Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CATALYTIC STUDIES
B. Viswanathan
National Centre for Catalysis Research
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
NCCR 1
A pictorial representation of generating the possible techniques in terms of
input and out put probes
29th October 2008 NCCR 2
Representation of the techniques based on Electrons in – electron, ion, neutral and
photon out LEED: Low Energy Electron Diffraction; HEED: High Energy Electron
diffraction; RHHED: Reflected High Energy Electron Diffraction; ILEED: Ineleastic
Low Energy Electron Diffraction; AES: Auger Electron Spectroscopy; EELS:
Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy; EIID: Electron Induced Ion Desorption;
SEPSMS: Electron Probe Surface Mass Spectrometry; EID: Electron Induced
Desorption; SDMM: Surface Desorption Molecular Microscope; CIS: Characteristic
Isochromat Spectroscopy; APS: Appearance Potential Spectroscopy.
29th October 2008 NCCR 3
Schematic representation of the techniques that can be generated from Photon- in
photon, neutral, electron or ion-out methodology. XPS: X ray Photoelectron
Spectrroscopy; ESCA: Electrons Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis
29th October 2008 NCCR 4
Schematic representation of the techniques that can be generated from Ions-in ion-,
neutral-, electron- or photon-out methodology. ISS: Ion Scattering Spectroscopy,
SIMS: Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry, INS: Ion Neutralization Spectroscopy, PIX:
Proton Induced X ray emission
29th October 2008 NCCR 5
Partial listing of the surface Analytic Techniques with the appropriate acronym.
Acronym Technique
AEAPS Auger Electron Appearance Potential Spectroscopy
AES Auger Electron Spectroscopy
AFM Atomic Force Microscopy
APECS Auger Photoelectron Coincidence Spectroscopy
APFIM Atom Probe Field Ion Microscopy
APS Appearance Potential Spectroscopy
ARPES Angle Resolved Photoelectron Spectroscopy
ARUPS Angle Resolved Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy
ATR Attenuated Total Reflection
BEEM Ballistic Electron Emission Microscopy
BIS Bremsstrahlung Isochromat Spectroscopy
CFM Chemical Force Microscopy
CHA Concentric Hemispherical Analyzer
CMA Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer
CPD Contact Potential Difference
CVD Chemical Vapour Deposition
DAFS
29th October 2008Diffraction Anomalous Fine Structure
NCCR 6
DAPS Disappearance Potential Spectroscopy
EDX Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis
EELS Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy
Electron induced luminescence
Ellipsometry
Cost effectiveness
is also one
consideration to use
simultaneous Fig1.3a
thermal
measurement.
3. Structural changes
Solid-solid transitions where a change in crystal structure occurs, it could be exo-or
endothermic.
4. Thermal stability
One can monitor the thermal stability of an oxide, particularly stability of a porous
material.
6. Characterization of materials.
Determination of glass transition temperature.
Analysis of Portland cement versus high alumina
cement.
29th October 2008 NCCR 21
Applications of thermal methods contd
Quantitative analysis (TGA)
Plaster contains gypsum (CaSO42H2O), lime Ca(OH)2 and chalk
CaCO3.
Fig 1.4m
Balance
Balance: :1g,5g;1µ,0.1µg
1g,5g;1µ,0.1µg
GAS FLOW
Gas
Vacuum and
outlet
purge gas tubing
stopcock
Deflection balance:
When balance arm is deflected by a change in weight, the relative
illumination of photocells from light source changes due to the
movement of shutter attached to the balance beam, resulting in flow
of compensating current through one of the pair of photocells.
Step-II
CaC2O4 CaCo3 + CO
MW 128 100 28
Step-III
CaCo3 CaO + CO2
MW 100 56 44
113 oC peak-
Rhombic to monoclinic
124 OC peak-
Melting point
179 OC peak-
Transition among three
forms of liquid ’S’.
446 OC peak-
Boiling point of sulphur
-0.02
-0.04
CeAlO3 CA-prec
CeAlO3 CP-prec
CeAlO3 HD-prec
-0.06
100 (b) CeAlO3 CA-prec
98
CeAlO3 CP-prec
-0.08 DTG 96
CeAlO3 HD-prec
94
-0.10 92
90
Weight %
-0.12
88 TGA
86
200 400 600 800 1000
84
o
Temperature ( C) 82
80
(a) CeAlO3 CA-prec
Heat Flow (mW),Endo down/Exo up
10
78
CeAlO3 CP-prec
76
0 CeAlO3 HD-prec
74
72
-10
200 400 600 800 1000
o
-20 Temperature ( C)
-30
-40 DTA
-50
-60
TGA-FT IR
Transfer
TG Analyzer Purge Gas Analyzer
Purge Line
gas +
gas Gas
Balance Furnace products Heater Interferometer
Cell
High TCD
sensitivity.
Volume between
reactor outlet and
TCD should be
low.
Using MFC is
better.
Lower H2
concentration in
gas for achieving
differential
conditions.
29th October 2008 NCCR 59
Temperature Programmed Reduction
Described first by Robertson et al ( J. Catal 1975, 37, 424)
MO (s) + H2 (g) M (s) + H2O
Theoretical H2 consumption
is 96.7 cc at STP.
K = no/(F x co)
Nucleation model
Oxygen is removed,
rearrangement takes
place in the lattice of
oxide sphere, after
which reduction.
progresses rapidly
Critical time
Important parameters
Heating rate
H2 concentration
Flow rate
Content of reducible
species
A. Heating rate
B. H2 concentration
C. Flow rate
D. Content of
reducible species
67 : 33
480K
62 K
85 K
TPO of Pd(NH3)42+-NaY
29th October 2008 NCCR 79
Summary of TPR and TPO
TPR is a useful technique to determine the reducibility of sample
and to find the amount of H2 consumed.
NH2
+ NH3
H-Beta
6
4
Desorption
0
100 200 300 400 500 600
Temperature(o C)
29th October 2008 NCCR 85
Acidity distribution in H-beta and dealuminated samples
NH3 TPD of various zeolite structures NH3 TPD of HY zeolites with various
SiO2/Al2O3
Al-MFI
Acidity
Catalyst Tmax (K) (mmoles of NH3)
weak strong
HZ-40 473, 594 0.43 0.34
HZ-100 471, 621 0.34 0.31
HZ-250 459, 601 0.18 0.29
HZ250 CLD 446, 582 0.12 0.19
HZ250 CLD-LE 455, 577 0.14 0.11
NH2
+ NH3
Decomposition
oxidation
reduction
solid state reactions and so on for
Materials of quality
Thermal stability and
Chemical processes /transformations.
• The reactions are not normally not simple stoichiometric like dehydration
decomposition – a single set of kinetic triplet can describe a simple reaction at the
most or if the mechanism is independent of temperature and the progress of the
reaction.
Various options
(i) Model based
(ii) parameter based
(iii) geometry based
(iv) experimental variables based
and so on………..
29th October 2008 NCCR 118
Why do we question the kinetic analysis of thermal
methods?
K = A exp ( - Ea/RT)
Ln k = ln A - Ea/RT
The data obtained from such an experiment consists of the intensity variation of
each recorded mass fragment as a function of time / temperature. In the case of a
simple reversible adsorption process it may only be necessary to record one
signal - that attributable to the molecular ion of the adsorbate concerned.
Rationale
desorption and will
therefore undergo
desorption at a lower
temperature.
The two peaks correspond
to the presence of both
molecularly and atomically
(i.e. dissociatively)
adsorbed oxygen on the
surface.
The molecular species is
the more weakly adsorbed.
[3]
This problem may also be considered in a rather simplistic graphical way -the key to
this is to recognise that the expression for the desorption signal given in the above
equation is basically a product of a coverage term ( N x - where N depends on T ) and
an exponential term (involving both Ea and T ).
Initially, at low temperatures Ea >> RT and the exponential term is vanishingly small.
However, as the temperature is increased this term begins to increase very rapidly
when the value of RT approaches that of the activation energy, Ea .
29th October 2008 NCCR
176
By contrast, the pre-exponential term is dependent upon the
coverage, N(T), at the temperature concerned - this term will remain
at the initial value until the desorption rate becomes of significance
as a result of the increasing exponential term. Thereafter, it will
decrease ever more rapidly until the coverage is reduced to zero.
The shaded area is an approximate representation of the product of
these two functions, and hence also an approximate representation
for the desorption signal itself - whilst this illustration may be
overly simplistic it does clearly show why the desorption process
gives rise to a well-defined desorption peak.
If you wish to see exactly how the various factors such as the
kinetic order and initial coverage influence the desorption profile
then try out the
Interactive Demonstration of Temperature Programmed Desorption
; we will however continue to look at one particular case in a little
more detail.
29th October 2008 NCCR 177
CASE I (Molecular adsorption) - in this case the desorption kinetics will
usually be first order (i.e. x = 1 )
The maximum desorption signal in the I(T) trace will occur when ( dI / dT ) =
0,
i.e. when
Hence , remembering that the surface coverage changes with temperature
i.e. N = N(T),
The solution is given by setting the expression in square brackets to be equal to
zero , i.e.
where we have now defined the temperature at which the desorption maximum
occurs to be T = Tp (the peak temperature ).
H(ads) + H(ads) H2 (g)
leaves only the formate
species on the surface.
The formate species is
stable to relatively high
temperatures but
eventually decomposes
yielding the observed
coincident desorption of
hydrogen and carbon
dioxide.
The hydrogen trace thus contains examples of both a desorption limited peak (at
ca. 280 K) and a decomposition limited peak (at ca. 440-470 K)
29th October 2008 NCCR 183
TEMPERATURE-
PROGRAMMED TECHNIQUES
RECENT TRENDS AND
FURTURE PROSPECTS
Temperature
29th October 2008 NCCR 185
VACUUM VS CARRIER GAS
• NH3 ON HSZM-5 : DIFFERENCE COULD
BE150 K
• METHANOL AND ACETONE FROM
HZSM-5:
– BOTH DESORB LARGELY INTACT IN
VACUUM
– BUT REACT TO GIVE A RANGE OF
HYDROCARBON PRODUCTS USING A
CARRIER GAS
29th October 2008 NCCR 186
DESIGN EXPERIMENTS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE
OF THE OPTIONS AVAILABLE
29th October
S. C.2008
FUNG NCCR
AND C. A. QUERINI, J. Catal., 138 (1992) 240 206
Temperature Programmed Oxidation of Coke
Deposits