After the two world wars, world leaders sought to create a
global economic system that would ensure a longer-lasting global peace. They believed that one of the ways to achieve this goal was to set up a network of global financial institutions that would promote economic interdependence and prosperity. The Bretton Woods System
The Bretton Woods System was inaugurated in 1944 during
United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference to prevent the catastrophes of the early decades of the century from reoccurring and affecting international ties. The Bretton Woods System was largely influenced by the ideas of British economist John Maynard Keynes. The Bretton Woods System
John Maynard Keynes believed that economic crises occur
not when a country does not have enough money, but when money is not being spent and, thereby, not moving. When economies slow down according to Keynes, governments have to reinvigorate markets with infusions of capital. The Bretton Woods System
Delegates at Bretton Woods agreed to create two financial
institutions: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development International Monetary Fund The Bretton Woods System
Shortly after Bretton woods, various countries committed
themselves to further global economic integration through General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947. GATT’s main purpose is to reduce tariffs and hindrances to free trade. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
The high point of global Keynesianism came in the mid
1940s to the early 1970s. During this period, government poured money into their economies , allowing people to purchase more goods and, in the process, increase demands for these products. As the demand increased, so did the prices of these goods Neoliberalism and Its Discontents Westerns and some Asian economies like Japan accepted the rise in prices because it was accompanied by general economic growth and reduced unemployment. The theory went that, as prices increased, companies would earn more, and would have more money to hire workers. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
In the early 1970s, however, the prices of oil rose sharply as
a result of the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries’ imposition of an embargo in response to the decision of the United States and other countries to resupply the Israeli military with the needed arms during the Yom Kippur War. Arab countries also used the embargo to stabilize their economies and growth. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
The “oil embargo” affected the Western economies that
were reliant to oil. To make matters worse, the stock markets crashed in 1973- 1974 and it effectively ended the Bretton woods System. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
The result was a phenomenon that Keynesian economics
could not have predicted- a phenomenon called stagflation, in which a decline in economic growth and employment (stagnation) takes place alongside a sharp increase in prices (inflation). Neoliberalism and Its Discontents Around this time, a new form of economic thinking was beginning to challenge the Keynesian orthodoxy. Economists such as Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman argued that the governments’ practice of pouring money into their economies had caused inflation by increasing demand of goods without necessarily increasing supply. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
Economists like Friedman used the economic turmoil to
challenge the consensus around Keynes’s ideas. What emerged was a new form of economic thinking that critics labeled neoliberalism. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
From the 1980s onward, neoliberalism became the codified
strategy of the United States Treasury Department, the World Bank, the IMF, and eventually the Word Trade Organization (WTO)- a new organization founded in 1995 to continue the tariff reduction under the GATT. The policies they forwarded came to be called the Washington Consensus. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents The Washington Consensus dominated global economic policies from the 1980s until the early 2000s. It advocates pushed for minimal government spending to reduce government debt. They also called for the privatization of government-controlled services, believing that free market can produce the best results. They pressured governments, particularly in the developing world, to reduce tariffs and open up their economies, arguing that is the quickest way to progress. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
The appeal of neoliberalism was in its simplicity. Its advocates
like US President Ronald Reagan and British Minister Margaret Thatcher justified their reduction in government spending by comparing national economies to households. Thatcher, in particular, promoted an image of herself as a mother, who reined in overspending to reduce the national debt. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
The problem with household analogy is that governments are
not households. For one, government can print money, while households cannot. The constant taxation systems of governments provide them a steady flow of income that allows them to pay and refinance debts steadily. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
Despite the initial success of neoliberal politicians like
Thatcher and Reagan, the defects of Washington Consensus became immediately palpable. After communism had collapsed in Russia in 1990s, the IMF called for the immediate privatization of all government industries. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents The government assumed that such a move would free these industries from corrupt bureaucrats and pass them on to the more dynamic and independent private investors. What happened, however, was that only individuals and groups who had accumulated wealth under the previous communist order had the money to purchase these industries. Neoliberalism and Its Discontents
In some cases, the economic elites relied on easy access to
government funds to take over the industries. This practice has entrenched an oligarchy that still dominates the Russian economy to this very day.