Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marketing Research CH 5
Marketing Research CH 5
5-1
© 2007 Prentice Hall
A Classification of
Marketing
Research Data
Marketing Research Data
Descriptive Causal
1. I think that the purchase of the brand would lead to a risk for me.
Strongly Agree 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Strongly Disagree
5-3
© 2007 Prentice Hall
A Classification of Qualitative
Research Procedures
Qualitative Research
Procedures
Projective
Depth Interviews Techniques
Focus Groups
5-5
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Application of Focus Group
• Understanding consumers' perceptions, preferences, and behavior
concerning a product category
5-6
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Characteristics of Focus Groups
5-7
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Procedure for Planning and Conducting
Focus Groups
Determine the Objectives and Define the Problem
5-9
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Before The Focus Group
Define the purpose, i.e. objectives of the
focus group
This has to be clear and specific. The more
defined the objective the easier the rest of the
process.
5-10
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Before The Focus Group
5-11
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Before The Focus Group
5-12
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Before The Focus Group
Select a facilitator
-The facilitator should be knowledgeable about the
project.
5-13
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Conduct The Focus Group
The facilitator should arrive before the participants, set
out the refreshments, and arrange the room so all
participants can view one another.
Make sure you record the session!
Carry out the focus group as per the plan.
5-14
© 2007 Prentice Hall
After The Focus Group
5-15
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Depth Interview Techniques
Depth interviews are conducted on a one-on-one
basis.
Laddering
In laddering, the line of questioning proceeds from
product characteristics to user characteristics. This
technique allows the researcher to tap into the
consumer's network of meanings.
5-16
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Definition of Projective Techniques
An unstructured, indirect form of questioning that
encourages respondents to project their underlying
motivations, beliefs, attitudes or feelings regarding
the issues of concern.
In interpreting the behavior of others, respondents
indirectly project their own motivations, beliefs,
attitudes, or feelings into the situation.
5-17
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Word Association
In word association, respondents are presented with a
list of words, one at a time, and asked to respond to each
with the first word that comes to mind. The words of
interest are called test words. For example,
5-18
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Completion Techniques
5-19
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Construction Techniques
With a picture response, the respondents are asked
to describe a series of pictures of ordinary as well as
unusual events. For example,
5-20
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Expressive Techniques
Third-person technique The respondent is presented
with a verbal or visual situation and the respondent is
asked to relate the beliefs and attitudes of a third person
rather than directly expressing personal beliefs and
attitudes. This third person may be a friend, neighbor,
colleague, or a “typical” person. For example,
Instead of –
5-21
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Analysis of Qualitative data
1. Data Reduction : The researcher chooses which
aspects of the data are emphasized.
5-22
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Qualitative data Analysis
Focus group : university students
5-23
© 2007 Prentice Hall
Qualitative data Analysis
Res : Communications most Effective Why
5-24
© 2007 Prentice Hall