Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter
Determining Externally
Competitive Pay Levels and Structures
External
Merge Competitive
competitiveness: Draw policy
Select Design internal & pay levels,
Pay relationships Set Policy lines
market survey external mix, and
among
pressures structures
organizations
Total Cash Tells how competitors are All employees may not receive incentives, so it
(base + bonus) valuing work; also tells the may overstate the competitors’ pay; plus, it
cash pay for performance does not include long-term incentives.
opportunity in the job.
Total Tells the total value All employees may not receive all the forms.
Compensation competitors place on this work Be careful; don’t set base equal to competitors’
(base + bonus + total compensation. Risks high fixed costs.
stock options +
benefits)
External pressures
Differences in quality among individuals in
external market
Differences in productivity or value of quality
variations
Differences in mix of pay forms of competitors
Internal pressures
Recognize individual performance differences
with pay
Meet employees’ expectations that their pay will
increase over time
Encourage employees to remain with
organization
Develop Grades
Grades
Alljobs considered substantially equal for pay
purposes placed in same grade
Each pay grade has its own pay range and all
jobs in a single grade have same pay range
Enhances ability to move people among jobs
within a grade with no change in pay
How many pay grades?
Number of jobs
Organization hierarchy
Reporting relationships
Broad Banding
Alternative to traditional salary structures
Involves collapsing salary grades into a few
broad bands, each with a sizable range
One minimum and one maximum
Range midpoint often not used
Purposes
Exhibit 8.18
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-14
Contrasts Between
Ranges and Bands
Ranges support . . . Bands support . . .
Some flexibility within Emphasis on flexibility
controls within guidelines
Relatively stable Global organizations
organization design Cross-functional
Recognition via titles or experience and lateral
career progression progression
Midpoint controls, Reference market rates,
comparatives shadow ranges
Controls designed into Controls in budget, few
system in system
Give managers “freedom Give managers “freedom
with guidelines” to manage” pay
Up to 150 percent range-
100 – 400 % spreads
spread
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-15
Market Pricing
Approach
Sets pay structures almost exclusively by relying
on external market rates
Emphasizes external competitiveness (market-
based factors) and de-emphasizes internal
alignment
Issues
Validity of market data
Use of competitors’ pay decisions as primary
determinant of pay structure
Lack of value added via internal alignment
Difficult-to-imitate aspects of pay structure are
deemphasized
Fairness
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-17
Conclusion
Students must review this lecture using
a lens that allows them the privilege of
focusing on both the local environment
and the global environment.