Professional Documents
Culture Documents
𝐺
𝐼/ 𝐼𝐼
𝛿 𝑚𝑎𝑥
Crack Opening
Comparing Element and Surface Based Cohesive Behaviour:
Cohesive Elements Cohesive Surface
Preprocessing • Gives you direct control over the cohesive element mesh density • Are easily defined using contact
and stiffness properties. interactions and cohesive interaction
• Constraints are enforced at the element integration points. properties.
• A pure master-slave in formulation is
used. Constraints are enforced at the
slave nodes.
Initial • Must be bonded at the start of the analysis • Can bond anytime contact is established
configuration: • Once the interface has failed, the surfaces do not re-bond. • You can control whether
debondedsurfaces will stick or not stick if
contact occurs again.
Constitutive Allow for several constitutive behavior types: Must use the traction-separation interface
behavior: • Traction-separation constitutive model behavior.
• Continuum-based constitutive model • Intended for bonded interfaces where the
• Uniaxial stress-based constitutive model interface thickness is negligibly small.
• Only one failure mechanism is allowed.
Mass: • The element material definitions include mass. • Do not add mass to the model.
• Indented for thin adhesive interfaces;
thus, neglecting adhesive mass is
appropriate for most applications.
Summary
0.02 mm 0.02 mm
A 0.5 mm B C
D Surface Cohesive
Damage Initiation
nominal stress in the pure normal mode nominal strain in the pure normal mode
𝜎 𝑠 : nominal stress in the first shear direction 𝜀 𝑠 : nominal strain in the first shear direction
: nominal stress in the first shear direction nominal strain in the first shear direction
:
Damage Evolution
𝑛𝑛 = 𝐸
𝐸
𝐴𝑑h𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑇h𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
Adhesive Thickness =0.2
1800 500
𝐸𝑛𝑛 = =9000 𝐸𝑠𝑠 = =2500
0.2 0.2
Damage evolution
• Post damage-initiation response defined by:
𝜎 =(1 − 𝑑 ) 𝜎
´
• d is the scalar damage variable
d = 0: undamaged
d = 1: fully damaged
d monotonically increases