Presentation

on
Regression analysis

Presented By :
Surendra Kumar Jha
Roll - 22
 Finding frequency in SPSS

frequency table for geographical region

 Particulars Frequency Percent

Percent
South 56 28.0 35.0

Northeast 30 15.0 30.0

Midwest 60 30.0 25.0

Southwest 3 1.5 20.0

Percent
Rocky Mountain 20 10.0 15.0
28.0
30.0

10.0
15.0
California 19 9.5 5.0 10.0 9.5
6.0
Northwest 12 6.0 0.0 1.5
South Northeast Midwest Southwest Rocky California Northwest
Total 200 100.0 Mountain
 Finding descriptive statistics
Descriptive Statistics                        

  N Range Minimum Maximum Mean   Std. Deviation Variance Skewness   Kurtosis  

  Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error
Payroll expenditures in thousands 200 187812 1053 188865 30500.89 2313.359 32715.837 1070326021.861 2.231 0.172 6.075 0.342

Number of outpatients 200 813369 0 813369 98224.75 8405.008 118864.762 14128831686.905 3.071 0.172 13.438 0.342

Number of admissions 200 37264 111 37375 6831.84 469.953 6646.138 44171146.350 1.611 0.172 3.096 0.342

Valid N (listwise) 200                      

Simple Regression model
Model Summary        
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .965 a
0.931 0.930 18580.774
a. Predictors: (Constant), Number of        
personnel

ANOVAa            
Model   Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 917537470637.845 1 917537470637.845 2657.640 .000b
  Residual 68358541871.549 198 345245160.967   
  Total 985896012509.395 199     
a. Dependent Variable:            
Total Expediture in
thousands
b. Predictors: (Constant),            
Number of personnel
Coefficientsa            
Unstandardized Standardized
Model   Coefficients   Coefficients t Sig.
    B Std. Error Beta    
1 (Constant) -4060.492 1906.237  -2.130 0.034
  Number of personnel 82.647 1.603 0.965 51.552 0.000
a. Dependent Variable: Total            
Expediture in thousands
 Simple regression Analysis

Total Expenditure (Y) Number of personnel (X)

Dependent Variable Independent Variable

Figure : Research Model

Simple Regression Model

Null hypothesis (H0): p = 0 (there is no significant correlation between the total expenditure and no of
personnel)

Alternative hypothesis (H1): p #0 (there is a significant correlation between the total expenditure and no of
personnel)

 hypothesis or relationship is significant

 Alpha = 0.05
 P- value (sig) =0.034
 I.e 0.034< 0.05 so we accept alternative
 Interpreting the regression coefficient

 Y^= -4060.492+ 82.647x1

 b0= -4060.492, this means total expenditure (y) is decreased by 4060.492 when x1= 0

 b1= 82.647 this means total expenditure(y) is increased by 82.647 when the value of number of perssonal (x 1) is
increased by 1 unit

 (se) = which indicate the average variation of total expenditure lies in the regression line 18580.774
Correlation coefficient / coefficient of determination

 Correlation coefficient ( r )

R= 0.965 , this means there is positive correlation between total expenditure and no of personnel

 coefficient of determination (r2)

if r2 = 0.93 than we can interpret it as total variation of expenditure 93% is explain by no of personnel and remaining 7% explain by others

factors which are not in the model.

 Test of significant for correlation coefficient

 Null hypothesis (H0): p = 0 (there is no significant correlation between the total expenditure and no of
personnel)

 Alternative hypothesis (H1): p = (there is a significant correlation between the total expenditure and no of
personnel)
Leve of significance = 0.01
 Correlation coefficient

Correlations        
Number of
    Number of beds personnel  
Number of beds Pearson 1 .753**
Correlation  
  Sig. (2-tailed)   0.000
 
  N 200 200  
Number of personnel Pearson .753** 1
Correlation  
  Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 
 
  N 200 200  
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01      
level (2-tailed).  
 Correlation matrix: This matrices of correlation coefficient between
different pair of variable
  Correlations
Total Payroll
Number of Number of Number of Number of Expediture expenditures Number of
  beds admissions outpatients Births in thousands in thousands personnel  
Hospital Pearson Correlation -0.011 -0.096 0.084 -0.104 -0.002 0.028 0.020  
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.879 0.178 0.239 0.142 0.974 0.689 0.780  
N 200 200 200 200 200 200 200  
Number of beds Pearson Correlation 1 .625** .340** .429** .711** .737** .753**  
Sig. (2-tailed)   0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000  
N   200 200 200 200 200 200  
Number of admissions Pearson Correlation   1 .602 **
.856 **
.902 **
.848 **
.879**  
Sig. (2-tailed)    0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000  
N     200 200 200 200 200  
Number of outpatients Pearson Correlation     1 .567 **
.629 **
.626 **
.644**  
Sig. (2-tailed)      0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000  
N       200 200 200 200  
Number of Births Pearson Correlation       1 .713 **
.660 **
.697**  
Sig. (2-tailed)        0.000 0.000 0.000  
N         200 200 200  
Total Expediture in thousands Pearson Correlation         1 .983 **
.965**  
Sig. (2-tailed)          0.000 0.000  
N           200 200  
Payroll expenditures in Pearson Correlation           1 .952**  
thousands Sig. (2-tailed)            0.000  
N             200