Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE CONTENTS;
SUGGESTIVE READINGS;
1-Production system; planning, Analysis & Control by Riggs, LJ (4th Edition ) John Wiley &
sons
2. Modern Production/ Operation Managemnet;Buffa, ES & Sarin (8 th Edition), John Wiley
& Sons
3- Production & Operation management; By Panneer Saivem, R (21 st edition)PHI
4-Production & Operation management; By Chary, S.N (TMH)
MODULE ASSESSMENT;
Nature of assessment; Theory
• All three decisions are ongoing and may occur simultaneously. In the following
sections, we will take a closer look at the decisions and considerations firms
face in each stage of production and operations management.
• An important part of operations management is production planning.
Production planning allows the firm to consider the competitive environment
and its own strategic goals to find the best production methods. Good
production planning has to balance goals that may conflict, such as providing
high-quality service while keeping operating costs low, or keeping profits high
while maintaining adequate inventories of finished products. Sometimes
accomplishing all these goals is difficult.
• What are the three types of decisions that must be made in production
planning?
• What are the three phases of production planning?
• Why is production and operations management important in both
manufacturing and service firms?
1. Need to be Focused
2. Production Control
It is the duty of the production manager to use the resources at his disposal in
the best possible manner as well as to regulate the operation in such a way
that the desired delivery schedule is maintained. It is been done by routing,
scheduling, and inspection during the production process.
3. Quality Control
Inventory implies all the materials, parts, supplies, tools, and in-process or finished products
kept in stocks for some time. The procurement policy of these items requires careful
consideration and analysis. The purchases should be planned in economic lot sizes and the
time of purchase should be so scheduled that the investment in the inventory is at the lowest
possible level. This implies the determination of economic lot sizes and re-order level.
7. Work-Study
Work measurement & method study and techniques are applied to find the relationship
between the output of goods and services and the input of human and material resources.
The production manager should try to find the most appropriate method of performing
various operations involved in a particular production process so as to obtain the optimum
use of the resource as well as increasing productivity.
8. Motivation
Production manager should be able to generate the interest of the workers to increase their
efforts by providing them wage incentives. This will result, an increase in labor productivity.
(iv) Recent Trends in Operations Management
Day by day latest trends keeps changing the entire world. I would like to share few those
latest trends in Supply Chain Management, Operations Management and Research.
The trends in Operations Management are never fads. They have very good reasons to be
in existence. They incorporate a lot of lessons from the past and can affect the future in
several ways. From the Industrial Revolution in 1769 up to the recent Internet Revolution,
Operations Management has seen trends, which designed and redesigned the processes in
order to make them more efficient, and businesses more profitable.
This paper will focus on a very few of such recent trends which have come up as the need
of the hour and will dictate the future of the businesses. In the course of discussion, the
paper discovers how Lean Operations influences all other trends popular in the field of
Operations Management at the moment. Different aspects of Lean philosophy go on to
define all the various trends as inseparable parts of lean operations. This makes an
interesting study as to how the Operations.
Management has evolved in the face of changing businesses and the recent trends give a
very clear idea about what to expect in the near future, with respect to Operations
Management.
• Recent Trends
From Division of Labour to Scientific Management and Mass Production,
Operations has always tried to adjust to the need of the businesses by
improvising and innovating with several trends. Similarly, the following discussion
illustrates how Operations are strategized these days and what are the recent
trends, which are affecting Operations Management.
1. Computer-aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM):
After the trend of Scientific Management and automation, the next big step was
CAD/CAM. These computer-aided operations meant that all the designing and
manufacturing of the product would be done with the help of computers making
the operations way more efficient (Groover, 1997).These systems immensely
helped in new product development and redesigning the processes.
General Motors had its first brush with computer-aided systems in 1996 and
ended up saving time and money by using these systems. It helped the company
launch new vehicles faster and more efficiently by making the process much
smoother (ICMR, 2002).
2.Supply-Chain Management:
• Supply Chain partners are required to be more in tune with the needs of the
end users as a result of shorter product life cycles, demanding customers, fast
changes in technology, material and processes (Davis, 1993). And because
suppliers can contribute unique expertise, operations managers are
outsourcing and building long-term partnerships with critical players in the
supply chain (Christopher, 1998).
3. Mass Customization:
• In the past, there used to be large-scale standardized mass production to gain
economies of scale. Now with increased flexibility and competition, companies
are forced to respond with creative product designs and flexible production
processes that cater to the individual whims of consumers (Stevenson, 2005).
The trend has now been changing towards customised production of goods,
whenever and wherever needed. This has led to change in the way operations
were designed earlier leading to better and more efficient processes (Beaty,
1996).
4.Employee Involvement:
• In the past, employees were treated as just another input to the production
process where they were treated more or less like machines and worker
concerns were generally ignored.
• The knowledge explosion and more technical workplace have combined to
require more competence in the workplace (Hanna, 2000).
• Operations managers now respond by moving more decision making to
individual workers (Hutchins, 1998). With the development of HRM alongside,
firms tend to focus more on employee empowerment, treating employees as
resources that bring competitive edge to the firm. Quality management training
based on lean philosophy has been very popular recently, making employee
involvement an essential part of the improvement process (Clegg et al, 2010).
• In the past, the focus of the production was aimed on obtaining resources at
lowest possible cost ignoring the damage made to the environment.
Operations’ managers now are increasingly getting concerned with design of
products and processes that are ecologically sustainable (Johnson, 2006). That
means designing and packaging products that minimize resource use, are
biodegradable, can be recycled and generally environment friendly (Heizer and
Render, 2010). In other words, Green production has been seen as a recent
trend in operations management concerning ecological sustainability.
6.Operations Turning Lean:
• Interestingly, all the trends discussed above can boil down to the “Lean”
philosophy. Be it Sustainability or Mass Customization, both the trends are
two different aspects of lean operations. Businesses can lead to successful
Sustainable Management, only by following a part of lean philosophy:
continuous improvement or Kaizan (Johnson, 2006). In fact, Mass
Customization has been possible just because JIT, since it helps customize the
products according to the customers’ needs or preferences without increasing
costs or manufacturing time (Beaty, 1996).
• Same is the case of Employee Involvement. Lean philosophy considers
employees to be the most important asset of the organization and successful
implementation of this philosophy depends on
• the people to a very large extent (Hutchins, 1998). Inevitably, involving them
at every step of the process, helps make the system leaner (Hanna, 2000).
• Even Computer-aided systems and Supply-chain Management fall under the
Lean philosophy since the main aim of these concepts is to make the process
faster, reduce costs and avoid any waste (Groover, 1997). Continuous
improvements, as an aspect of lean, help face the challenge of shrinking
product life cycle by making the system more efficient and reducing waste at
every step (Nersesian, 2000).
Following, the paper will discuss the lean philosophy in general touching upon all
the major aspects of Lean Operations and concepts related to it, with Toyota
being the case in point.
Lean Operations – Just In Time
7. Principles of Lean and JIT
• JIT is a method of planning and control and an operations philosophy that aims to meet
demand instantaneously with perfect quality and no waste (Slack et al, 2007). Lean
Operations philosophy replaces the past methods of mass production where there were
batches of produced goods sold at mass, generating economies of scale. The recent trend in
operations management era has shifted this to Just in Time production where goods and
services are produced upon the receipt of order with customizations, resultant being a
drastic reduction of inventory cost (Hutchins, 1998).
• Lean philosophy is based on the principle of moving towards the elimination of all the waste
in order to develop an operation that is faster, more dependable, produces higher-quality
products and services and above all, operates at low cost. An understanding of lean
operations can be developed through the phrase that is often used interchangeably with
‘lean’ – just in time or sometimes lean synchronization. This is because apparently the
means to achieve the lean state are less easily explained and sometimes counterintuitive
(Slack et al, 2007).
• Just-in-Time and Lean Operations are often used interchangeably. However, if there is any
distinction between JIT and Lean Operations, it is that JIT emphasizes forced problem solving
where as Lean operations emphasize on customer understanding (Brian J. Carroll, 2009).
8. Lean Operations and the Toyota Production System
•Research suggests that the more JIT is comprehensive in its breadth and depth, greater the
overall returns will be (Fullerton and Watters, 2001)
•Toyota Motor Corporation is amongst the largest vehicle manufacturers in the world with
annual sales of over 9 million cars and trucks. Post WWII, Just-in-Time (JIT) and the Toyota
Production System (TPS) have served as techniques instrumental in the growth of this company.
TPS has always laid emphasis on continuous improvement, respect for people and standard
work practices. It accentuates employee learning and empowerment in an assembly-line
environment. JIT, TPS and Lean systems, when implemented as a comprehensive manufacturing
strategy, sustain competitive advantage and result in increased overall returns (Heizer and
Render, 2010).
•The term “Lean” in the manufacturing environment in itself refers to the Toyota Production
System, established by the Toyota Corporation. Taiichi Ohno, the Father of the Kanban System
and one of the former vice president of Toyota, created the basic framework for JIT and TPS:
one of the world’s most discussed systems for improving productivity (Ronald M. Becker, 1998).
•JIT is based on the philosophy of continued problem solving via a focus on throughput and
reduced inventory. In practice, JIT means to make only what is needed, whenever needed. It
provides an excellent way for finding and eliminating problems because it is easier to find
problems in a system with no slack. Quality, layout, scheduling, supplier issues and excess
production become immediately evident when excess inventory is eliminated.
• The continuing effort to create and produce products under ideal conditions is a
concept central to TPS. Generally ideal conditions would exist only if facilities,
machines and people are brought together to add value without waste.
• Toyota’s latest implementation of TPS and JIT are present at its new San Antonio
plant, which is the largest Toyota land site for an automobile assembly plant in
the US. The building itself is one of the smallest in the industry despite its
annual production of 200,000 Tundra pick-up trucks. Generally modern
automobiles have around 30,000 parts, but at Toyota, many of these parts are
combined into sub-assemblies by independent suppliers. Twenty-one of these
suppliers are on site at the San Antonio facility and transfer components to the
assembly line on a Just-in-Time basis (Heizer & Render, 2010). It is because of
these operations that take place in the new San Antonio plant that Toyota still
continues to perform near the top in quality and maintain the lowest labour-
hour assembly time in the industry.
• This is how JIT, TPS, and Lean operations work and provide a competitive
advantage at Toyota Motor Corporation.
9. Elimination of Waste:
• This is the most significant part of the lean philosophy. Waste is defined as any activity that
does not add value. Toyota has identified seven categories of waste, which have become
popular in lean organisations and cover many of the ways organisations waste or lose
money. Ohno’s seven wastes are: Overproduction, Waiting Time (Queues), Transportation,
Inventory, Motion, Over- processing, Defectives.
• To eliminate the above mentioned categories of waste, the Japanese developed the initial
5S’s as a checklist for lean operations where they provide an easy vehicle with which to
assist the culture change that is often necessary to bring about lean operations. The 5S’s
are: Segregate/Sort(Seiri),
Simplify/Straighten(Seiton),Sweep/Shine(Seiso),Standardize(Seiketsu) & Self-
Discipline/Sustain (Shitsuke) (Slack et al, 2007).
• The 5S’s can be thought of as a simple housekeeping methodology to organise work areas
that focus on visual order, organisation, cleanliness and standardization. It helps to
eliminate all types of waste related to uncertainty, waiting, searching for relevant
information, creating variation and so on. The 5S’s provide a vehicle for continuous
improvement (Heizer & Render, 2010). Offices, retail stores, manufacturers etc have
successfully implemented the 5S’s in their respective efforts to eliminate waste and adapt
the lean philosophy.
10. Involvement of Everyone:
• Lean philosophy is often put forward as a ‘total’ system. Its aim is to provide
guidelines which embrace everyone and every process in the organisation. The
lean approach to people management is sometimes also called as respect-for-
humans system. It encourages and often requires team-based problem solving,
job enrichment, job rotation and multi-skilling. The intention is to encourage a
high degree of personal responsibility, engagement and ownership of the job
(Slack et al, 2007).
• According to this model, a strategy consist of five essential parts that together
should form a unified whole: Arenas, Vehicles, Differentiators, Staging and
Economic Logic. For each element concrete and deliberate choices have to be
made on what to do and more importantly what NOT to do. In addition,
choices made within one element should reinforce and match choices made in
the other four elements.
• Only that way companies can achieve a sound and sustainable strategy. More
information and examples on using the Strategy Diamond can be found
Figure 2: Strategy Diamond
3. Treacy and Wiersema’s Value Disciplines
• The Value Disciplines framework builds upon the key message of Porter’s
Generic Strategies (i.e. companies should have a clear focus in what they want
to be known for and what they want to excel in).
• Choosing each one of the disciplines has tremendous consequences on how the
company should be operating in terms of structure, processes and culture.
More information on the Value Disciplines can be found
Figure 3: Value Disciplines
4. Ansoff Matrix
• There are different ways of growing a business. Igor Ansoff identified four
strategies for growth and summarized them in the so called Ansoff Matrix. The
Ansoff Matrix (also known as the Product/Market Expansion Grid) allows
managers to quickly summarize these potential growth strategies and compare
them to the risk associated with each one.
• The four growth strategies are Market Penetration (offering more of the existing
products to existing markets), Market Development (offering the existing
products to new markets), Product Development (offering new products to
existing markets) and Diversification (launching new products in new markets).
• The idea is that each time you move into a new quadrant (horizontally or
vertically), risk increases. More information on the Ansoff Matrix can be found
Figure 4: Ansoff Matrix
5.BCG Growth-Share Matrix
• The Boston Consulting Group’s product portfolio matrix (also known as BCG Growth-
Share Matrix) is designed to help companies consider growth opportunities by
reviewing its portfolio of products or business units in order to decide where to
invest and where to divest. The matrix is divided into four quadrants based on two
factors: market growth and relative market share. The four types of business units
(or products) are Dogs, Question Marks, Cash Cows and Stars. Most business units
start off as Question Marks with a relatively small market share in a high growth
market. Depending on how well the unit and the industry is doing, it might end up
as a Star or Dog. Eventually when industry growth is flattening, the unit becomes a
Cash Cow that can be ‘milked’ in order to invest in more promising businesses.
• The BCG Matrix is therefore a great tool for portfolio analysis and corporate strategy
purposes. More information and examples on using the BCG Matrix can be found.
In economics, goods and services are often pronounced in the same breath. These are
offered by the companies to the customers to provide utility and satisfy their wants. At
present, the success of the business lies in the combination of best quality of goods and
customer oriented services. ‘Goods’ are the physical objects while ‘Services’ is an activity
of performing work for others.
Goods implies the tangible commodity or product, which can be delivered to the
customer. It involves the transfer of ownership and possession from seller to the buyer.
On the other hand, services alludes to the intangible activities which are separately
identifiable and provides satisfaction of wants.
One of the main difference between goods and services is that the former is produced
and the latter is performed. To know more differences on the two, take a read of the
article presented to you.
Content: Goods Vs Services
1. Comparison Chart
2. Definition
3. Key Differences
4. Conclusion
Comparison Chart
BASIS FOR
GOODS SERVICES
COMPARISON
Transfer of Yes No
ownership
Goods are the products which are traded on the market. There is a time gap in the
production, distribution, and consumption of goods. When the buyer purchases
goods and pays the price, the ownership is passed from seller to buyer.
Products are manufactured in batches, which produces identical units. In this way,
a particular product offered by the company will have the same specifications and
characteristics all over the market.
Example: Books, pen, bottles, bags, etc.
Definition of Services
Services are the intangible economic product that is provided by a person on the
other person’s demand. It is an activity carried out for someone else.
They can only be delivered at a particular moment, and hence they are perishable
in nature. They lack physical identity. Services cannot be distinguished from the
service provider. The point of sale is the basis for consumption of services. Services
cannot be owned but can only be utilized. You can understand this by an example:
If you buy a ticket for watching a movie at the multiplex, it doesn’t mean that you
purchased the multiplex, but you have paid the price of availing services.
Service receiver should fully participate when the service is provided. Evaluation of
services is a relatively tough task because different service providers offer the same
services but charges a different amount. It may be due to the method they provide
services is different or the parameters they consider in valuing their services vary.
2.Goods are tangible items i.e. they can be seen or touched whereas services are intangible
items.
3.When the buyer purchases the goods by paying the consideration, the ownership of
goods moves from the seller to the buyer. Conversely, the ownership of services is non-
transferable.
4.The evaluation of services is difficult because every service provider has a different
approach of carrying out services, so it is hard to judge whose services are better than the
other as compared to goods.
5.Goods can be returned to or exchanged with the seller, but it is not possible to return or
exchange services, once they are provided.
6.Goods can be distinguished from the seller. On the other hand, services and service
provider are inseparable.
7.A particular product will remain same regarding physical characteristics and
specifications, but services can never remain same.
8.Goods can be stored for future use, but services are time bound, i.e. if not
availed in the given time, then it cannot be stored.
9.First of all the goods are produced, then they are traded and finally consumed,
whereas services are produced and consumed at the same time.
Conclusion
Generally, companies keep a stock of goods with itself to fulfill an urgent
requirement of goods. It also keeps track of the quantity of goods at the beginning
and the end. In contrast to services are delivered as per the request of the
customer itself. In short, the production of services depends on the customer’s
demand. Both are subject to tax like Value Added Tax (VAT) is levied on goods
while service tax on services provided.
Sometimes products offered by the companies in such a way that it ‘s hard to
segregate goods and services like in the case of a restaurant, you pay for the food
you eat as well as for the add-on services of the waiters, chef, watchman and so
on.
Similarities Between Goods and Services
Goods are tangible things while services are intangible. In light of this, a service
refers to an act of doing something for another person. Different companies offer
either goods or services to satisfy customer’s needs. The success of every business
lies in the combination of the best value for goods and customer oriented services.
Human beings depend on both of them for survival.
Definition of Goods
Goods;
Goods are the tangible expendable products, articles, and commodities offered by
companies in exchange for cash. Goods have physical characteristics, for instance,
shape, appearance, size, weight, and other visible characters. Goods satisfy human
wants thereby providing utility.
Goods are different in that some re disposable after using for once. Other goods
are usable for more than once. Goods have a time gap between production,
distribution, and consumption. The ownership of goods is transferable meaning
once a person buys, the ownership moves from the seller to the buyer.
Characteristics of Goods
Goods are tangible. They have physical properties which allow for marketability in a physical
sense. Companies also produce goods either in identical or non-identical units. When identical,
the specific goods offered by a production company will have many unchangeable
characteristics.
These characteristics stay the same, and they do not change even when the product reaches
the marketplace. Example of goods includes books, bags, pen, and bottles. On the other hand,
companies or businesses offer their services at a go and they do not last for future use since
you cannot consume them. For goods, ownership changes from the producer to the consumer
once they you buy them.
Definition of Services
Services refer to the intangible economic products offered to a consumer by a producer, on
demand. Services are perishable, they do not have a physical identity and the ownership of
Services is not transferable. The point of sale for a service is the base for consumption.
Services are only consumable or usable by a buyer, but they are not sellable for ownership.
An example of a service is when you buy a ticket to watch a movie at the cinema hall, it does
not mean the cinema hall becomes yours, it means you paid for the available service. The
evaluation of services is tough since there are so many service providers offering the same task
at a different amount.
The difference in amount is because different firms use different methods or
parameters to value their services. Examples include banking services,
communication, postal services, and many more.
In the production of both goods and services, the producer decides on the location
and the production facilities. They both require technology. The main aim of both
goods and services is to create productivity amongst the users. In addition, both
goods and services aim at fulfilling human needs. Human beings cannot live
without either goods or services and therefore they are both crucial. In both goods
and services, customers cannot influence the capacity choice.
(vii) Historical Evolution of Operation Management-Changes
For over two centuries operations and production management has been recognized as an
important factor in a country’s economic growth. The traditional view of manufacturing
management began in eighteenth century when Adam Smith recognized the economic
benefits of specialization of labor. He recommended breaking of jobs down into sub tasks
and recognizes workers to specialized tasks in which they would become highly skilled and
efficient. In the early twentieth century, F.W. Taylor implemented Smith’s theories and
developed scientific management. From then till 1930, many techniques were developed
prevailing the traditional view.
Production management becomes the acceptable term from 1930s to 1950s. As F.W.
Taylor’s works become more widely known, managers developed techniques that focused
on economic efficiency in manufacturing. Workers were studied in great detail to eliminate
wasteful efforts and achieve greater efficiency. At the same time, psychologists, socialists
and other social scientists began to study people and human behavior in the working
environment. In addition, economists, mathematicians, and computer socialists
contributed newer, more sophisticated analytical approaches.
With the 1970s emerges two distinct changes in our views. The most obvious of these,
reflected in the new name operations management was a shift in the service and
manufacturing sectors of the economy. As service sector became more prominent, the
change from ‘production’ to ‘operations’ emphasized the broadening of our field to
service organizations. The second, more suitable change was the beginning of an emphasis
on synthesis, rather than just analysis, in management practices.
UNIT-02 Capacity Planning