Division (SY 2020-2021) Rating and Validation Flow of the OPCRF
Self-Rating Collegial Rating and Analyses
Discussion and signing of and Approval of with the rater preparation for the OPCR VALIDATION the OPCR of MoVs adjustments STEP 1: Self-rating and preparation of MoVs
* The ratee peruses the pre-reviewed OPCRF and performs self-
rating based on the artifacts he/she can present; * Means of Verifications will be compiled per Key Result Area (KRA); * Ratee then prepares a presentation per KRA and reflects on his/he strengths and weaknesses; * Self-rating on the IPCF follows; * Compilation of artifacts finishes this step. STEP 2: Collegial discussion with the rater for adjustments • Ratee presents the self-rated OPCRF with the portfolio of artifacts; • Rater peruses the documents using the QET rubrics as guide; • Collegial discussion follows (which includes other school heads); • If adjustments will be made (based on the raters observations and anecdotal records), ratee revisits the OPCRF • If the rater agrees on the presented rating, ratee can then proceed to Step 3. STEP 3: Rating and signing of the OPCRF
• Ratee presents the prepared PowerPoint presentation using the
official template; • Rater approves the OPCRF; • Finalization of OPCRF for validation STEP 4: Analyses and validation
• Ratee presents the OPCRF to the validator using the official
template provided by the division office; • Implications and Ways Forward are important parts of the validation process • Ratee walks through his/her performance with the assistance of the rater (PSDS/DIC); • Validator clarifies issues and peruses the portfolio and OPCRF • Deliberation happens STEP 5: Approval of the OPCRF
• If there will be no issues and after the validator is convinced
with both the performance and the plans presented on the Ways Forward, approval of the OPCRF is done.