You are on page 1of 24

ANIMAL

RIGHTS
Conclusion
Animal Rights 

Freedom of
animals to do as
they wish to
survive
NEED TO
KNOW  
The following are the things we still need to know about;

• Republic Act No. 8485 known as The Animal Welfare Act of 1998.
• Since 1900, 543 vertebrate species have gone extinct
• Animals play a critical role in medicine
• Animals are nothing but dumb machines
• Ahiṃsā - means non-violence
• Henry Stephens Salt - the first reference to the concept of animal rights
• In 1635, the first animal cruelty regulation was established
• Martin’s Act aimed at preventing cruelty towards cattle in 1822.
• IUCN Red List has evaluated 35,765 species
• Animal exploitation is widespread and common in Asia
How is the status of Animal Rights at the moment?

Most rapidly expanding social movement in the world. 

In Asia, they’re struggling to fight for animal rights

In the Philippines, began to stop & reduce killings . 


Examples of Animal Rights

Animals should not be considered property 

Destroying animal habitats

Animals not allowed to be hunted

No use of animals for hard labor


Conclusion
•It is sad that those vulnerable vertebrate
species have gone extinct.

•No one is protected from cruelty.

•We have no right to harm others in


brutal ways.
Conclusion
Positive Views of Animal Rights
TO HUMANS • BOTH WILL BENEFIT TO
HARMONIOUS LIFE
TO ANIMALS • FAIR TREATMENT TO ANIMALS
• FREEDOM FROM PAIN
• ABILITY TO GROW TO THEIR
NATURAL HABITAT

TO ENVIRONMENT • CLEAN AND HEALTHY


ENVIRONMENT CAN BE ACHIEVED.
Positive Views of Animal Rights
TO HUMANS • BOTH WILL BENEFIT TO
HARMONIOUS LIFE
Positive Views of Animal Rights

TO ANIMALS
• FAIR TREATMENT TO
ANIMALS
Positive Views of Animal Rights

FREEDOM FROM PAIN


Positive Views of Animal Rights

• ABILITY TO GROW TO THEIR NATURAL HABITAT


Positive Views of Animal Rights

• ABILITY TO GROW TO THEIR NATURAL HABITAT


Positive Views of Animal Rights

TO ENVIRONMENT

• Clean and healthy


environment can be
achieved.
Conclusion
• It would affect medications testing
procedures.
• Human hazards are reduced when
animals do not have rights.

• There would be added enforcement costs.

• Animals are not humans.


Conclusion
•Ecologically,having an animal husbandry is
extremely helpful to avoid extinction of animals
that we eat.

•Animals deserve the same basic human rights

•A law can only be implemented for those people


who intentionally hurt animals.

•Replacing animal testing with human testing


doesn’t put human patients at risk.
Conclusion
Conclusions:
• We must enact animal rights and live a peaceful life.
• No humans excuse killing animals through conducting
scientific tests.
• Animals surely deserve to enjoy their lives. 
• Animals have the rights to treat with dignity and
respect. 
•  What we do to them reflects our intention to them
• Animals are living creatures that deserve to have rights
like humans.

You might also like