COMPARING THE

EFFECTIVENESS OF MODULAR
LEARNING AND TRADITIONAL
LEARNING IN GRADE-10 STE
STUDENTS OF ALANGALANG
NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY:

 The outbreak of COVID-19 in the Philippines have

affected over a billion of students around the world.
Filipino students across all academic levels are among
those who must remain at home and adhere the
Philippine Government’s Quarantine Regulations
(UNESCO). The shift to modified forms of modular
learning might be seen as a move by the government to
solidify its commitment to learning despite the
pandemic, due to the pandemic, students are missing out
on traditional schooling.
OBJECTIVES:
 Focused on comparing the effectiveness of modular
learning and traditional learning, and to determine which
mode of learning is effective to the students.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY:
 This study benefits to the following:

 Learners- serve as a basis of knowledge on the effectiveness od modular

learning and traditional learning on their own perspective.
 Teacher- it will provide insight on how different the effects o modular
learning and traditional learning to the performance of the students.
 Parents- it is helpful to them to encourage and support their child on their
academic performance without pressure.
 Future Researcher- this study can be used to guide future researcher in this
topic
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:
 Schools were forced to shut down, forcing students to
attend modular classes instead of regular classroom
learning.

 Classroom instruction has a reputation for being

teacher- centered and requiring passive learning from
students, whereas modular learning is frequently
student-centered and involves active learning. The
instructor frequently controls classroom dynamics in
teacher-centered, or passive learning. As the teacher speaks
and remarks, the students listen, take notes, and ask
questions. In student-centered, or active learning, students
frequently control classroom dynamics.
SCOPE AND DELIMITATIONS:
 This study aims to discuss the effectiveness of Modular
learning and Traditional learning and how they adjust
with this new learning system especially to the GRADE-
10 STE students of ANHS.
REVIEW RELATED LITERARURE:
 According to Bransford, J., et al. (2007), is a social activity in which
people interact with the learning environment. Classroom learning
occurs in a school setting, where a calendar or timetable, as well as
rules and regulations, govern how teaching and learning should be
conducted. Learning in the classroom necessitates students'
participation in the learning environment. For teaching and learning
to take place, both students and teachers must be physically present
in the classroom.
 Modular learning is the most popular type of Distance Learning. When
education institutions were closed, learners, as well as teachers, miss the
opportunity to socially interact which is essential to learning and
development.
 Interactions serve a variety of functions in the
educational transaction (Sims, 1999). These functions
allow learner control, facilitating program adaptation
based on learner input, allowing various forms of
participations and communication, and acting as an aid
to meaningful learning.
METHODOLOGY:
 RESEARCH DESIGN:
Quantitative method would be used in order to obtain more
comprehensive and appropriate data to answer the various
questions asked in the study. The quantitative approach is
shown by the use of questionnaire made by the researcher of
the study whose data was analyzed by using numbers.
RESPONDENTS OF THE STUDY

 Approximately 6,000 pupils attend the Alangalang

national High School. Only GRADE-10 STE was chosen
as the subject of the investigation. In a class of 85
people, all of the participants are my classmates
SAMPLING METHOD

 This study instrument was broken down into three

pieces. Part I addresses the number of pupils in
determining whether form of learning is most successful.
Part II discusses how challenging modular learning was
for students. Part III discusses if classroom teaching
setting aided in improved learning .
 
DATA ANALYSIS

 Quantitative Data Analysis is concerned with taking

measurements and gathering numerical data in order to
generalized it across groups of people or explain in a
phenomenon.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
  The survey that I obtained is voluntary participation, which means that those
answered questions voluntary agreed to participate in the data collection. Due to the fact
that the majority of my classmates are busy doing their assessments, only 24 respondents
in GRADE-10 STE responded to my survey.

Table I. Showing which they prefer mode of learning

WHICH DO YOU PREFER MODE OF LEARNING?

TRADITIONAL LEARNING MODULAR LEARNING

4%

96%
Table II. Showing how difficult for learning was the Modular learning

HOW DIFFICULT WAS THE MODULAR

LEARNING

Very Easy

Easy

Neutral

Difficult

Very Difficult

0 10 20 30 40 50 60
 Table III. Is teaching environment at class helped in better learning ?

IS TEACHING ENVIRONMENT AT CLASS

HELPED IN BETTER LEARNING?
IS TEACHING ENVIRONMENT AT CLASS HELPED IN BETTER LEARNING?

Strongly Agree 20.8

Somewhat Agree 41.7

Neutral 8.3

Somewhat Disagree 8.3

Strongly Disagree 20.8

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
 Based on the summary of findings, the following
conclusion were derived. Traditional learning is an
excellent style of learning, according to the various
consultations and evaluation, because it aids in better
learning for students and allow real-time face-to-face
engagement with the contents.
 Modular learning, on the other hand is ineffective for
those students who find it difficult to complete
evaluations without the assistance of teachers. Due to the
large amount of activities, self-studying and a lack of
time to complete all the modules.
 As the recommendations, the respondents should stay
organized, stay connected to the instructor, classmates
and group mates for better learning setting and it
suggested that each of us recognize the significance of
education in our general lives.
THANK YOUU!!